Efficacy of Nasal Testosterone Gel (Natesto®) Stratified by Baseline Endogenous Testosterone Levels.

OBJECTIVE: Pharmacokinetic and efficacy data from a phase 3 testosterone nasal gel (TNG) study were stratified by baseline endogenous testosterone level in patients with testosterone deficiency. Total testosterone (TT), LH, and FSH levels, as well as erectile function, mood, and lean body mass for each group were compared. In a subset of patients with very low baseline endogenous testosterone levels (<100 ng/dL), we investigated whether TNG is a suitable treatment option. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with testosterone deficiency (serum TT <300 ng/dL) were treated with TNG for 3 months, followed by safety extension periods of 90 and/or 180 days. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated from serum hormone levels on days 30 and 90, along with efficacy measurements, which were analyzed by comparison with baseline values. Baseline and/or predose TT values were used for patient stratification. RESULTS: Prestudy and predose endogenous testosterone concentrations correlated. The maximal concentration of TT was nearly identical across all cohorts at days 30 and 90, whereas the average concentration over 24 hours had a slight positive dependence relative to predose levels. LH levels remained in the normal range but were decreased more in patients with higher starting baseline levels. These findings indicate that TNG works with an active hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis that responds to each dose of TNG throughout the treatment period. Patients with the lowest endogenous testosterone levels received maximum exposure impact from each TNG dose. Patients with severe testosterone deficiency had similar efficacy improvements as the remainder of the study population. CONCLUSION: All testosterone-deficient cohorts were successfully treated with TNG.

A practical approach and algorithm for intensifying beyond basal insulin in type 2 diabetes.

Despite the availability of long-term data demonstrating the benefits of timely and aggressive intensification of antihyperglycaemic regimens among individuals with type 2 diabetes, intensification beyond basal insulin continues to be suboptimal and a global challenge. This review summarizes the evidence surrounding the various options of advancing glucose-lowering management beyond basal insulin and provides a practical algorithm to assist in optimizing patient care and enhancing glycaemic target achievements.