Low-Dose Aspirin Use Does Not Increase Disease Activity in Pregnant Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: The adverse effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) drugs on the gastrointestinal system are well recognized, but the effect of NSAID use on disease activity patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains unresolved. Low-dose aspirin (LDA) is recommended for all pregnant patients with risk factors for developing preeclampsia, including autoimmune conditions. As recognition of risk factors for preeclampsia improves, the preventative use of LDA is likely to increase. AIMS: To investigate if LDA use for prevention of preeclampsia increases the risk of disease activity in pregnant women with IBD. METHODS: Single-center retrospective cohort study of pregnant patients with IBD who delivered from 2012 to 2020, comparing those with and without LDA use. Primary outcome was odds of clinical IBD activity in patients in remission at time of conception. Secondary outcomes were rate of elevated inflammatory biomarkers, defined as C-reactive protein > 5 ug/mL or fecal calprotectin > 250 ug/g, and rate of preeclampsia. Univariate analyses tested for associations. RESULTS: Patients taking LDA were older (p = 0.003) and more likely to have chronic hypertension (p = 0.002), to have undergone in vitro fertilization (p < 0.001), and to be on biologics (p = 0.03). Among patients in remission at conception, there was no difference in clinical disease activity or biomarker elevation during pregnancy based on LDA use (OR 1.27, 95% CI [0.55-2.94], p = 0.6). Rates of preeclampsia were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: LDA use for preeclampsia prevention did not increase the incidence of disease activity in pregnant patients with IBD.

Personalised Medicine with IL-23 Blockers: Myth or Reality?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The medical management of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] has become increasingly targeted, through the identification of specific immune mediators involved in its pathogenesis. IL-23 is an inflammatory cytokine involved in both innate and adaptive immunity, which has been identified as a therapeutic target in Crohn's disease [CD] and ulcerative colitis [UC] through its upstream inhibition of the T helper 17 [Th17] pathway. We sought to review available data on the efficacy of IL-23 inhibitors in the treatment of IBD and the potential for clinical and molecular predictors of response to facilitate a personalised medicine approach with these agents. METHODS: We reviewed and summarised available clinical trial data on the use of the IL-23 inhibitors risankizumab, brazikumab, mirikizumab, and guselkumab in the treatment of IBD, as well as the evidence from studies of these agents in IBD and other immune-mediated conditions which might inform prediction of response to IL-23 inhibition. RESULTS: Early clinical trials have demonstrated promising results following both induction and maintenance therapy with IL-23 inhibitors in CD and UC. Pre- and post-treatment levels of IL-22 and post-treatment levels of IL-17 have been identified as potential molecular predictors of response to therapy, in several studies. No significant clinical predictors of response have been identified thus far. CONCLUSIONS: IL-23 antagonism is a promising therapeutic approach in IBD. Further exploration of molecular and clinical predictors of response may identify patients most likely to benefit from these medications.

Peripartum Exposure to Biologic Therapy Does Not Impact Postpartum Wound Healing in Women With IBD.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) commonly affects women during childbearing years and often requires antepartum therapy. Data regarding effects of biologic exposure on delivery outcomes are limited. We explored whether peripartum biologic exposure impacts wound healing following cesarean section (C-section) and vaginal delivery (VD) in IBD patients. METHODS: Pregnancy and IBD data from the IBD Preconception and Pregnancy Planning (I-PrePP) Clinic database were collected and analyzed. Primary outcome was frequency of postpartum wound infection in women receiving peripartum biologics, defined as exposure in the third trimester and up to 2 weeks postdelivery relative to nonexposed patients. Secondary outcomes included effect of peripartum biologic timing and IBD phenotype on wound healing. Descriptive statistics summarized data using frequency for categorical variables and median for continuous variables. Univariate analyses tested associations when appropriate. RESULTS: Of 100 deliveries (interquartile range, 30-35; median, 33 years old), 58 were C-sections and 42 VDs. Peripartum biologic exposure occurred in 72% (42 of 58) and 57% (24 of 42), respectively. Median time from last dose to delivery was 6 (interquartile range, 4-8) weeks; 21 (32%) received biologics within 72 hours following delivery. Seven infections occurred following C-section among 5 unique CD patients. Peripartum biologic exposure was not associated with infection (4 of 66 [6%] exposed vs 3 of 34 [8.8%] nonexposed; P = .68), nor was disease activity (P = 1.0). Crohn's disease (P = 0.02), internal penetrating phenotype (P < .001), prior IBD surgery (P = .03), and prior postpartum infection (P = .04) were associated with infection. CONCLUSIONS: Peripartum biologic exposure does not impair postpartum wound healing; however, patients with more complicated disease phenotypes require close monitoring.

No prior studies have explored risk of postpartum wound infection in women receiving biologics in the peripartum period. We found no significant increase in risk of postpartum wound infection; however, internal penetrating Crohn's phenotype may be an important risk factor.