Efficacy and biomarker analysis of second-line nab-paclitaxel plus sintilimab in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a highly aggressive malignancy with limited second-line therapy. We conducted this phase 2 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of second-line nab-paclitaxel plus sintilimab in advanced BTC. Histologically confirmed advanced BTC patients with documented disease progression after first-line chemotherapy were enrolled. Subjects received nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus sintilimab 200 mg on day 1, administered every 3 weeks. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse reactions. Simultaneously, next-generation sequencing, programmed cell death ligand 1 immunohistochemistry and multiplex immunofluorescence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were applied to explore potential biomarkers. Twenty-six subjects were consecutively enrolled. The ORR was 26.9% (7/26), including two complete responses and five partial responses, which met the primary end point. The disease control rate was 61.5% (16/26). The median PFS was 169 days (about 5.6 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] 60-278 days). The median OS was 442 days (about 14.7 months, 95% CI 298-586 days). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were mainly anemia (27%), leukopenia (23%), neutropenia (19%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (8%). No grade 4 or 5 TRAEs occurred. Biomarker analysis suggested that positive PD-L1 and high proportions of CD8+ T-cell infiltration were correlated with improved clinical outcome. Nab-paclitaxel plus sintilimab is a potentially effective and tolerable second-line regimen for advanced BTC that deserves to be studied in large-scale trials. PD-L1 status and CD8+ T cell infiltration might be promising biomarkers for efficacy prediction.

68Ga-FAPI-04 positron emission tomography/CT and laparoscopy for the diagnosis of occult peritoneal metastasis in newly diagnosed locally advanced gastric cancer: study protocol of a single-centre prospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Accurate baseline clinical staging is critical to inform treatment decision-making for patients with gastric cancers. Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is the most common form of metastasis in gastric cancer and mainly diagnosed by diagnostic laparoscopy and peritoneal lavage evaluation. However, diagnostic laparoscopy is invasive and less cost-effective. It is urgent to develop a safe, fast and non-invasive functional imaging method to verify the peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer. The aim of our study was to evaluate the proportion of patients in whom 68Ga-FAPI-04 positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT) led to a change in treatment strategy and to assess the diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT for the detection of occult peritoneal metastasis compared with laparoscopic exploration. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this single-centre, prospective diagnostic test accuracy study, a total of 48 patients with locally advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (cT4a-b, N0-3, M0, based on CT images) who are considering radical tumour surgery will be recruited. All participants will undergo 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT before the initiation of laparoscopic exploration. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients with occult peritoneal metastatic lesions detected by 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT, leading to a change in therapy strategy. The secondary outcomes include the diagnostic performance of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT for occult peritoneal metastasis, including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University (2022-1484). Study results will be presented at public and scientific conferences and in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2300067591.

Fisetin nanoparticles based on cells cycle and apoptosis intervention for the treatment of lymphoma and leukemia.

Lymphoma and leukemia are both hematological system tumors with complex etiology, and mainly treated with chemotherapeutic drugs. However, therapeutic drugs can interrupt curative effect due to different side effects. Therefore, it is worthwhile to develop a novel therapeutic for providing insights for clinical tumor treatment. In this study, we developed a fisetin nanoparticles (Fisetin NPs) through a self-assembled method, and investigated the activity and potential mechanism of Fisetin NPs against lymphoma and leukemia. The spherical and uniformly distributed Fisetin NPs effectively inhibited both tumor cells proliferation, arrested EL4 cells G0/G1 phase and K562 cells G2/M phase, and induced apoptosis in vitro. In vivo, Fisetin NPs exhibited excellent tumor growth inhibition, effective inhibition of cell proliferation and angiogenesis, significant induction of apoptosis and ideal safety. Mechanically, fisetin upregulated genes (Fas, Pidd, Puma, Apaf1, and p21) in the p53 signaling pathway and bound to N-acetyltransferase 10 (NAT10), ribosomal protein L34 (RPL34) and GTP binding protein 4 (GTPBP4). Collectively, Fisetin NPs have promising therapeutic effects on lymphoma and leukemia, which are of great significant for clinical implications.

Dynamic ctDNA-based analysis of drug-resistant gene alterations at RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer patients after cetuximab plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to explore the dynamic changes of genomic mutations and their correlations with the efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with cetuximab plus mFOLFOX as the first-line treatment. METHODS: We included mCRC patients from January 2018 to October 2020 as a studied cohort which were treated with cetuximab plus mFOLFOX as first line therapy. Blood samples were collected for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) test at three timepoints: before the first-line therapy(baseline), at the time of first-line progression and at the time of second-line progression. Progression-free survival was considered as the primary endpoint while objective response rate and overall survival were determined as the secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Totally 39 patients received first-line treatment, of which 25 patients entered the second-line treatment, while 10 patients entered the third-line treatment. The median follow-up time was 16.4 months (95 %CI, 14.8-19.3). Along the treatment from first-line progress disease (PD) to second-line PD, proportions of TP53 (12/18, 67 %), APC (10/18, 56 %), FBXW7 (3/18, 17 %), and AMER1 (2/18, 11 %) were gradually increased according to results of single nucleotide variation (SNV). CONCLUSIONS: Resistant gene mutations caused by anti-EGFR drugs in RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC patients can be observed by dynamic ctDNA analysis. TP53 and AMER1 mutations, tumor mutational burden (TMB) levels, and TP53/AMER1 co-mutation may predict the efficacy of the first-line cetuximab-contained treatment. Situations of genetic mutations were differentiated from first-line PD to second-line PD, which indicated that mutation detection may contribute to predict prognosis of mCRC patients.

A Single-Arm Phase II Study of Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer.

PURPOSE: Patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) have a poor survival. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine and cisplatin regimen in Chinese advanced BTC patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic BTC administrated intravenous 100 mg/m2 nab-paclitaxel, 800 mg/m2 gemcitabine, and 25 mg/m2 cisplatin every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and adverse events, while exploratory endpoint was the association of biomarkers with efficacy. RESULTS: After the median follow-up of 25.0 months, the median PFS and OS of 34 enrolled patients were 7.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.4 to 13.7) and 16.4 months (95% CI, 10.9 to 23.6), respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse events at ≥ 3 grade were neutropenia (26.5%) and leukopenia (26.5%). Survival analyses demonstrated that carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels could monitor patients' survival outcomes. A significant increase in the number of infiltrating CD4+ cells (p=0.008) and a decrease in programmed death-1-positive (PD-1+) cells (p=0.032) were observed in the response patients. CONCLUSION: In advanced BTC patients, nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine and cisplatin regimen showed therapeutic potential. Potential prognostic factors of CEA levels, number of CD4+ cells and PD-1+ cells may help us maximize the efficacy benefit.

Efficacy and safety of fruquintinib dose-escalation strategy for elderly patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: A single-arm, multicenter, phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Fruquintinib has demonstrated significant improvement in overall survival (OS) among previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. However, the utilization of fruquintinib has been constrained by various toxicities, such as hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) and hypertension, particularly in elderly patients with reduced tolerance to the standard dosage. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib dose-escalation strategy for elderly refractory mCRC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This open-label, single-arm, phase II trial included patients aged 65 years or over with mCRC who had progressed after two or more lines of chemotherapy. Fruquintinib was administered for 21 consecutive days of a 28-day treatment cycle. The starting dose of fruquintinib was 3 mg/day and escalated to 4 mg/day in Week 2 and 5 mg/day in Week 3 if no significant drug-related toxicity was observed. The highest tolerated dose from Cycle 1 would be administered in Cycle 2 and all subsequent cycles. Before commencing treatment, all enrolled patients underwent a G8 questionnaire and comprehensive geriatric assessments. The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: A total of 29 patients were enrolled and all started fruquintinib at 3 mg/day. Fifteen patients (51.7%) were subsequently escalated to 4 mg/day and 4 (13.8%) to 5 mg/day. Only four (13.8%) patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events (AEs). The median PFS was 3.8 months (95% CI, 2.7-4.9), and the median OS was 7.6 months (95% CI, 6.5-8.7). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were observed in all 29 patients (100%). The most frequently occurring (>10%) TRAEs greater than Grade 3 were HFSR (20.7%), hypertension (20.7%), and diarrhea (10.3%). CONCLUSION: Our study indicated that a dose of 4 mg/day was well tolerated by most elderly patients, suggesting that fruquintinib dose-escalation strategy during the first cycle could serve as a viable alternative to the standard 5 mg/day dosing.

Clinicopathological features of a rare cancer: Intrahepatic lymphoepithelioma-like cholangiocarcinoma with Epstein-Barr virus infection.

PURPOSE: Epstein-Barr virus-related lymphoepithelioma-like cholangiocarcinoma (EBV-LELCC), a subtype of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC), is an extremely rare cancer. To date, only few cases have been reported. Therefore, more studies are needed to provide new insights into its clinicopathological characteristics and treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from 16 EBV-LELCC patients admitted to our hospital between January 2013 and February 2022. We summarized their clinical characteristics and analyzed the genomic features of 5 patients by whole-exon sequencing. In addition, the Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess the prognostic differences between EBV-LELCC and EBV-negative IHCC. RESULTS: A total of 16 EBV-LELCC patients aged between 35 and 70 were included in this study and were characterized by female predominance. Eight genetic mutations including KMT2C, ARID1B, BAZ1A, NPM1, POLE, PER3, TOPBP1, USP1 were identified from 5 patients. There were 11 stage I, 2 stage III and 3 stage IV patients in this study. The overall survival of stage I and stage III EBV-LELCC patients after radical surgery was significantly better than that of EBV-negative IHCC patients with matched stage (p = 0.0119). Notably, a stage IV patient treated with a variety of antitumor modalities including surgery, interventional therapy, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy achieved long-term survival of more than seven years. CONCLUSION: Altogether, EBV-LELCC presents a more favorable prognosis than IHCC. This study suggests that patients with early EBV-LELCC have a good prognosis after radical surgery, and even patients with advanced EBV-LELCC are expected to have a longer survival under appropriate and timely treatment. For such a rare cancer with unique clinicopathological features and molecular patterns, more research is needed to facilitate its diagnosis and treatment.

Case report: Remarkable response to sintilimab, lenvatinib, and nab-paclitaxel in postoperative metastatic chemotherapy-resistant combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma.

Background: Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is a highly aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. However, there are no consensus treatment guidelines, and decisions are usually extrapolated from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Given that cHCC-CCA owns the unequivocal presence of both hepatocytic and cholangiocytic differentiation, a combination regimen of anti-PD1 antibody, multikinase inhibitor, and chemotherapy targeting against both components might be an optimal choice. Case presentation: We present the case of a patient with postoperative metastatic chemotherapy-resistant cHCC-CCA who exhibited a durable response and reasonable tolerability to a combination therapy consisting of the anti-PD1 antibody sintilimab, multikinase inhibitor lenvatinib, and nab-paclitaxel, despite having a low tumor mutational burden (TMB-L), microsatellite stability (MSS), and negative programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1). Conclusion: The combination regimen of immune checkpoint inhibitor sintilimab, multikinase inhibitor lenvatinib, and chemotherapy with nab-paclitaxel, which targets both the HCC and ICC components, may represent a promising treatment option for patients with cHCC-CCA. Further research is warranted to validate these findings in larger patient cohorts.

Sintilimab plus nab-paclitaxel as second-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer: study protocol for an investigator-initiated phase 2 trial (NapaSinti trial).

BACKGROUND: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a relatively rare but highly aggressive malignancy. However, there is currently no satisfactory second-line regimen for patients without specific genetic mutations. Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel, also known as nab-paclitaxel (Abraxane, Bristol Myers Squibb), has shown activity in patients with BTC. Studies investigating the immunogenic features of BTC suggested that checkpoint inhibition may lead to antitumor immune responses. In recent years, improved survival has been observed in patients treated with chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy across multiple cancer types, including BTC. This clinical trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of second-line sintilimab in combination with nab-paclitaxel in advanced BTC patients. METHODS: The NapaSinti trial is a prospective, nonrandomized, open-label, phase 2 study conducted at a tertiary hospital in Chengdu, China. Eligible patients are those with histologically or cytologically confirmed locally advanced non-resectable or metastatic adenocarcinoma in the biliary tract (including intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and gallbladder cancer), aged between 18 and 75 years, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, who have experienced disease progression after prior gemcitabine- or fluorouracil-based chemotherapy and have not received taxane or immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Enrolled patients will receive intravenous administration of sintilimab 200 mg on day 1 and nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, every three weeks. The primary endpoint is the objective response rate (ORR), while the secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. Exploratory objectives aim to identify biomarkers and molecular signatures for predicting response or prognosis. Using Simon's two-stage design, a total of 63 participants will be enrolled in the study. This trial was initiated in March 2022 in China. DISCUSSION: The NapaSinti trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of second-line sintilimab plus nab-paclitaxel for advanced biliary tract cancer. Additionally, the trial provides an opportunity for translational research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100052118. Registered October 19, 2021.

Identification of Immune Subtypes and Candidate mRNA Vaccine Antigens in Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated promising outcomes in small cell lung cancer (SCLC), but not all patients benefit from it. Thus, developing precise treatments for SCLC is a particularly urgent need. In our study, we constructed a novel phenotype for SCLC based on immune signatures. METHODS: We clustered patients with SCLC hierarchically in 3 publicly available datasets according to the immune signatures. ESTIMATE and CIBERSORT algorithm were used to evaluate the components of the tumor microenvironment. Moreover, we identified potential mRNA vaccine antigens for patients with SCLC, and qRT-PCR were performed to detect the gene expression. RESULTS: We identified 2 SCLC subtypes and named Immunity High (Immunity_H) and Immunity Low (Immunity_L). Meanwhile, we obtained generally consistent results by analyzing different datasets, suggesting that this classification was reliable. Immunity_H contained the higher number of immune cells and a better prognosis compared to Immunity_L. Gene-set enrichment analysis revealed that several immune-related pathways such as cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, programmed cell death-Ligand 1 expression and programmed cell death-1 checkpoint pathway in cancer were hyperactivated in the Immunity_H. However, most of the pathways enriched in the Immunity_L were not associated with immunity. Furthermore, we identified 5 potential mRNA vaccine antigens of SCLC (NEK2, NOL4, RALYL, SH3GL2, and ZIC2), and they were expressed higher in Immunity_L, it indicated that Immunity_L maybe more suitable for tumor vaccine development. CONCLUSIONS: SCLC can be divided into Immunity_H and Immunity_L subtypes. Immunity_H may be more suitable for treatment with ICIs. NEK2, NOL4, RALYL, SH3GL2, and ZIC2 may be act as potential antigens for SCLC.

Optimum duration of extended adjuvant endocrine therapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: protocol for a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

INTRODUCTION: The type of extended adjuvant endocrine therapy is not clear, nor is the optimum duration of extended adjuvant endocrine therapy for patients with early breast cancer. Our study aims to satisfy the requirements for systematically identifying and synthesising the available evidence on the clinical safety and efficacy of extended adjuvant endocrine therapy for patients with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A comprehensive electronic literature database search will be performed using three electronic databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase (Ovid interface). Our main outcomes of interest were overall survival, disease-free survival, relapse-free survival, invasive contralateral breast cancer, acceptability and grades 3 and 4 non-haematological toxicities in this study. We will assess the risk of bias and overall quality of evidence using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool and Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation, respectively. We will perform subgroup and sensitivity analyses in the selected trials. We will assess the three key assumptions of network meta-analysis: transitivity, consistency and homogeneity. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was preregistered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database. Ethics approval and patient consent are not required for the network meta-analysis. The final results of this network meta-analysis will be disseminated through national and international conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021278271.

Pathological complete response to neoadjuvant tislelizumab plus chemotherapy in stage IIIB small cell lung cancer: A case report and literature review.

Immunotherapy plus chemotherapy has been approved for the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC, stage IV). Recently, the 2023 version of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines recommended immunotherapy plus chemotherapy as the neoadjuvant regimen in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, it is still unclear whether the combination regimen of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy is also beneficial for SCLC in the neoadjuvant context. Here, we report the case of a patient with stage IIIB SCLC who showed long-term survival and good tolerance to the neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy consisting of tislelizumab (an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody) plus etoposide-carboplatin. The patient achieved pathological complete response after receiving two cycles of neoadjuvant tislelizumab and chemotherapy followed by surgery. Two courses of post-operative tislelizumab and etoposide-carboplatin treatment were performed. The patient has survived for more than 23 months with no recurrence or metastases after neoadjuvant therapy. Multiplexed immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry staining showed that the post-treatment specimens had remarkable immune cells infiltration, including CD3+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells, which contrasted with very low levels of these cells in the pre-treatment samples. This study is, to the best of our knowledge, the first attempt to present the neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy of tislelizumab in combination with etoposide-carboplatin in SCLC. Our study suggested that neoadjuvant tislelizumab plus chemotherapy may facilitate radical resection and benefit patients with locally advanced (stage IIB-IIIC) SCLC.

Study of SOX combined with intraperitoneal high-dose paclitaxel in gastric cancer with synchronous peritoneal metastasis: A phase II single-arm clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Intraperitoneal paclitaxel is proved to be efficient for peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer. It remains uncertain the efficacy and safety of the triplets regimen which combined intraperitoneal high-dose paclitaxel with systemic SOX in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal administration of high-dose paclitaxel, intravenous oxaliplatin and S-1 in patients with peritoneal metastatic gastric cancer. METHODS: This single-center, prospective, single-arm phase II study was conducted between January 2017 and May 2019 in West China Hospital, Sichuan University. Patients diagnosed with primary gastric cancer by histopathology and confirmed synchronous peritoneal metastasis were enrolled. This study aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal administration of high-dose paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 , d1), intravenous oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2 , d1), and S-1 (80 mg/m2 , d1-14) of patients. The primary endpoint was 1-year overall survival rate, and the second endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and adverse events. RESULTS: In this single-arm phase II clinical trial, 49 patients received SOX combined intraperitoneal high-dose paclitaxel treatment. One-year survival rate was 81.6% (95% CI, 68.6-90.0%). Median PFS and OS were 6.50 months (95% CI, 2.89-10.11) and 16.9 months (95% CI, 13.58 to 20.22), respectively; ORR was 55.3% (95% CI, 41.3-68.6) and DCR was 76.6% (95% CI, 62.8-86.4). Thirteen patients underwent second laparoscopic detection, but only nine ultimately underwent radical gastrectomy. Subgroup analysis showed that sPCI ≤12 was a good index for a favorable prognosis. The most frequent grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (40.8%), anemia (22.4%), leukopenia (18.4%), nausea (14.3%), and vomiting (12.2%). None of the patients had any intraperitoneal catheter-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: Intraperitoneal high-dose paclitaxel with systemic SOX is an effective and tolerable first-line treatment for patients with peritoneal metastatic gastric cancer and patients with sPCI≤12 scores might be recommended crowd for this regimen as conversion therapy.

PD-1 inhibitors plus nab-paclitaxel-containing chemotherapy for advanced gallbladder cancer in a second-line setting: A retrospective analysis of a case series.

Background: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a fatal cancer, and the efficacy of the current standard second-line chemotherapy for GBC is limited. Novel therapies need to be explored. This retrospective analysis was aimed to investigate the outcomes of patients treated at West China Hospital with PD-1 inhibitors combined with nab-paclitaxel-based chemotherapy (nab-paclitaxel monotherapy or nab-paclitaxel plus other cytotoxic agents) in a second-line setting. Methods: Between April 2020 and May 2022, the patients with advanced GBC receiving PD-1 inhibitors combined with nab-paclitaxel-based chemotherapy after resistance to first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy at West China Hospital were retrospectively screened. Results: Eleven patients were included, and all received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy. Eight patients underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS), and all had microsatellite stability (MSS) and a low tumor mutation burden (TMB). Six patients were negative for PD-L1 expression and one patient was positive for PD-L1. Therapeutically relevant genetic alterations were not found. All patients received PD-1 inhibitors in combination with nab-paclitaxel-based chemotherapy as second-line therapy. Pembrolizumab was administered in 3 patients, and sintilimab was administered in eight patients. One patient had no measurable target lesion. Complete response (CR) was observed in one (10.0%) patient, partial response (PR) in four (40%) patients, and stable disease (SD) in four (40%) patients. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.5 (95% CI: 2.5-12.5) months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 12.7 (95% CI: 5.5-19.9) months. The adverse events (AEs) were manageable. Conclusion: Our results suggest that PD-1 inhibitors combined with nab-paclitaxel-based chemotherapy as second-line therapy for advanced GBC might be a potential treatment and deserves further evaluation.

Durable response to the combination of pembrolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in a metastatic extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A case report and literature review.

Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a highly aggressive malignant tumor with poor overall survival. Although the first-line standard chemotherapy (gemcitabine plus cisplatin) combined with immunotherapy has yielded positive results with survival prolongation, the efficacy remains unsatisfactory, and new treatment modalities need to be explored. Case presentation: We report the case of a patient with metastatic extrahepatic CCA who achieved a durable response and good tolerance to the combination treatment of pembrolizumab and nab-paclitaxel following progression on gemcitabine plus capecitabine chemotherapy. The tumor samples of the patient revealed low TMB, MSS, negative PD-L1 expression, and negative CD8+ TIL expression. This patient was treated with 3 cycles of pembrolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin, followed by 5 cycles of pembrolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel. Finally, 10 cycles of pembrolizumab monotherapy were administered. The patient survived for over 27 months after the initiation of combined therapy and was still in continuous remission at the last follow-up. Conclusion: As far as we know, this is the first report that pembrolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel successfully treated a patient with advanced CCA. This combination therapy might be a potential treatment option for patients with cholangiocarcinoma, and further clinical trials are needed to explore the outcomes.

Enhanced anti-glioma efficacy of doxorubicin with BRD4 PROTAC degrader using targeted nanoparticles.

Current treatment of glioma is hampered due to the physical blood-brain barrier (BBB) and the resistance to traditional chemotherapeutic agents. Herein, we proposed a combined treatment strategy based on Cyclo (Arg-Gly-Asp-d-Phe-Lys) (cRGDfk) peptides-modified nanoparticle named cRGD-P in a self-assembly method for the co-delivery of doxorubicin (DOX) and BRD4 PROTAC degrader ARV-825 (ARV). Molecular dynamics simulations showed that cRGD-P could change its conformation to provide interaction sites for perfectly co-loading DOX and ARV. The cRGD-P/ARV-DOX exhibited an average size of 39.95 â€‹nm and a zeta potential of -0.25 â€‹mV. Increased expression of BRD4 in glioma cells was observed after being stimulated by cRGD-P/DOX, confirming one of the possible mechanisms of DOX resistance and the synergistic tumor inhibition effect of BRD4 degrading ARV combined with DOX. In the study, the combination of DOX and ARV in the cRGD-P nanoparticle system exhibited synergistic suppression of tumor growth in glioma cells on account of cell cycle arrest in the G2/M phase and the activation of tumor cells apoptosis-related pathways including triggering caspase cascade and downregulating Bcl-2 as well as upregulating Bax. The cRGD-P/ARV-DOX system could effectively suppress the heterotopic and orthotopic growth of glioma by increasing tumor apoptosis, inhibiting tumor proliferation, and decreasing tumor angiogenesis in vivo. Therefore, the cRGD-modified nanoparticle to co-deliver DOX and ARV provides a potential platform for exploiting a more effective and safer combination therapy for glioma.

Clinicopathologic features, treatment, survival, and prognostic factors of combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma: A nomogram development based on SEER database and validation in multicenter study.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to comprehensively understand the combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma (CHC) and develop a nomogram for prognostic prediction of CHC. METHODS: Data were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (year 2004-2014). Propensity-score matching (PSM) was used to match the demographic characteristic of the CHC versus hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). A nomogram model was established to predict the prognosis in terms of cancer specific survival (CSS). The established nomogram was externally validated by a multicenter cohort. RESULTS: A total of 71,756 patients enrolled in our study including 62,877 HCC patients, 566 CHC patients, and 8303 ICC patients. The CHC, HCC, and ICC are not exactly similar in clinical characteristic. After PSM, the CSS of CHC was better than HCC but comparable to ICC. Tumor size, M stage, surgery, chemotherapy, and surgery were independently prognostic factors of CHC and were included in the establishment of novel nomogram. The c-index of the novel nomogram in SEER training set and multicenter validation was 0.779 and 0.780, respectively, which indicated that the model was with better discrimination power. In addition, decision curve analyses proved the favorable potential clinical effect of the predictive model. Lastly, a risk classification based on nomogram also verified the reliability of the model. CONCLUSION: CHC had better survival than HCC but was comparable to ICC. The nomogram was established based on tumor size, M stage, chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy and well validated by external multicenter cohort.

Early response to upfront neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CAPOX) alone in low- and intermediate-risk rectal cancer: a single-arm phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: With local recurrence of rectal cancer continuing to decrease, distant recurrence is becoming a major concern, especially for patients with low- and intermediate-risk stage II/III rectal cancer. Therefore, a new treatment strategy is warranted for these patients. This single-arm phase II trial aimed to assess the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) in low- and intermediate-risk stage II/III rectal cancer and explore candidate radiological and clinical parameters for early prediction of tumour response after two cycles of CAPOX. METHODS: Patients with mid-low stage II/III rectal cancer with low and intermediate risk were examined. The primary outcome was defined as a clinicopathological response by integrating tumour longitudinal length reduction (TLLR) on MRI into pathological tumour regression grade (TRG). After completing NCT, patients with TRG0-2 and TRG3 with a TLLR rate greater than 30 per cent were considered to be responders. Secondary outcomes included pathological complete response (pCR), adverse events and local and distant recurrence. RESULTS: This study enrolled 61 eligible patients. No patient was converted to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy owing to tumour progression. The clinicopathological response and pCR rates were 78.7 and 21.3 per cent respectively. After two cycles of CAPOX, TLLR, TRG on MRI, and mucosal lesion regression grade on endoscopy had potential discriminative ability (area under the curve greater than 0.7) for predicting both clinicopathological and pathological response. CONCLUSION: NCT alone achieves good tumour response rates in patients with low- and intermediate-risk stage II/III rectal cancer, and predicting tumour response to NCT is feasible at an early treatment phase. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03666442 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Rare DNA Mismatch Repair-Related Protein Loss in Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma and Their Response to Immunotherapy.

PURPOSE: The patients with advanced mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) cancers can benefit from programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) pathway blockade, regardless of the tumor type. Little is known about the prevalence of dMMR in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC). This study aimed to assess the mismatch repair (MMR)-related protein expression in patients with ICC and cHCC-CC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor specimens were obtained from patients undergoing surgery at the West china Hospital between 2009 and 2017. The immunoreactions for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 were investigated to determine the MMR status. RESULTS: A total of 97 patients were evaluated, including 73 ICC patients and 24 cHCC-CC patients. The prevalence of dMMR was only found in two cases of 97 patients (2.06%). Both patients are ICC. In 24 cHCC-CC patients, no dMMR was observed. They did not receive an adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. At the end of the follow-up, one patient was in a tumor-free state, and the other patient had local recurrence and metastasis. After receiving sintilimumab (an immune checkpoint inhibitor [ICI] for PD- 1), the patient had a partial response. CONCLUSION: DMMR was detected in few patients with ICC and cHCC-CC. Thus, it is not recommended to routinely evaluate the MMR status of patients with ICC or cHCC-CC after surgery, but that of patients with advanced ICC or cHCC-CC should be assessed.

First-line therapy of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus cetuximab plus chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer patients with mucinous adenocarcinoma or mucinous component.

BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy of first-line bevacizumab plus chemotherapy with cetuximab plus chemotherapy based on the stratification of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with mucinous adenocarcinoma (MA) or mucinous component (MC). METHODS: A retrospective study involving all mCRC patients receiving first-line bevacizumab-based or cetuximab-based chemotherapy at our hospital from September 2013 to January 2020 was conducted. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) were compared between the cetuximab-chemotherapy group and the bevacizumab-chemotherapy group on the basis of the conventional pathological classification of MA or MC. RESULTS: A total of 620 patients with mCRC were included in our study, consisting of 141 (22.7%) patients with MA/MC and 479 (77.3%) patients with non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (NMA). In the MA/MC cohort, patients who were treated with bevacizumab-based chemotherapy were associated with significantly better OS than those treated with cetuximab-base chemotherapy (30.0 vs. 26.3 months, p = 0.002), irrespective of tumor sites. The efficacy of bevacizumab-based chemotherapy was higher in nearly all subgroups as shown in the subgroup analysis. In the NMA cohort, median OS was better in the cetuximab plus chemotherapy group than that in the bevacizumab plus chemotherapy group (32.2 vs. 27.0 months, p = 0.005) for left-side mCRC patients, whereas OS was significantly longer in the bevacizumab plus chemotherapy group for right-side mCRC patients (26.0 vs. 20.9 months, p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Conventional pathological classification (e.g. MA/MC) should be considered when tailoring the individualized optimal treatment for mCRC. Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy may be the optimal option for patients with MA/MC.