Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Surg Oncol ; 120(6): 911-918, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31376162

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A new technique named "Selected Lymph Node" ("SeLyN") was evaluated, aiming to identify the most functional groin lymph nodes (LNs) for an effective LN transplantation. METHODS: Bilateral lower-limb SPECT-CT was performed in the upper-limb lymphedema patients, to select the most radioactive inguinal LN. Recorded data included demographics, stage, etiology of lymphedema, flap consistency in accordance to preoperative findings, flap size, number of LN, and harvesting time. Infection episodes per year and volume changes of the upper limbs were documented. Donor-site complications were recorded and lower-limb evaluation was performed through clinical examination, volume analysis, and lymphoscintigraphy. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients underwent a "SeLyN" transfer technique. The mean flap size was 28.34 cm2 containing a mean of 3.4 LNs. The mean time spent on flap harvest was 39 minutes. A mean 56.5% volume reduction (P < .001) and a mean 1.41 to 0.29 infection episodes per patient per year (P < .001) were recorded. Clinical evaluation and lymphography of the donor site advocated no major complications for a mean follow-up period of 42.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: "SeLyN" is a safe and effective technique in selecting the most suitable LNs, minimizing the donor-site morbidity, and decreasing the overall operating time.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Ingle/cirugía , Ganglios Linfáticos/trasplante , Vasos Linfáticos/cirugía , Linfedema/cirugía , Linfocintigrafia/métodos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Ganglios Linfáticos/diagnóstico por imagen , Linfedema/diagnóstico por imagen , Linfedema/etiología , Masculino , Mastectomía/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada de Emisión de Fotón Único/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos
2.
Aesthetic Plast Surg ; 42(3): 692-701, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29372268

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although free abdominal flaps constitute the gold standard in post-radiation delayed breast reconstruction, latissimus dorsi-based methods offer alternative reconstructive options. This retrospective study aims to compare outcomes of delayed breast reconstruction using the fat-augmented latissimus dorsi (FALD) autologous reconstruction and the latissimus dorsi-plus-implant reconstruction in irradiated women. METHODS: We reviewed the files of 47 post-mastectomy irradiated patients (aged 29-73 years), who underwent delayed latissimus dorsi-based breast reconstruction between 2010 and 2016. Twenty-three patients (Group A) had an extended FALD flap and twenty-four patients (Group B) an implant-based latissimus dorsi reconstruction. Patients' age, BMI, pregnancies, volume of injected fat, implant size, postoperative complications, and secondary surgical procedures were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Age, BMI, pregnancies, and donor-site complications were similar in both groups (p > 0.05). Mean fat volume injected initially was 254 cc (ranged 130-380 cc/session); mean implant volume was 323 cc (ranged 225-420 cc). Breast complications were significantly fewer in Group A (one wound dehiscence, two oily cysts) compared to Group B (three cases with wound dehiscence, two extrusions, thirteen severe capsular contractions). Non-statistically significant difference was documented for secondary procedures between groups; although the mean number of additional surgeries/patient was higher in Group A, they referred to secondary lipofilling, whereas in Group B they were revision surgeries for complications. CONCLUSIONS: The FALD flap constitutes an alternative method for delayed autologous reconstruction after post-mastectomy irradiation, avoiding implant-related complications. Although additional fat graft sessions might be required, it provides an ideal autogenous reconstructive option for thin nulliparous women, with a small opposite breast and adequate fat donor sites. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Colgajos Tisulares Libres/trasplante , Mamoplastia/métodos , Músculos Superficiales de la Espalda/trasplante , Tejido Adiposo/trasplante , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Estudios de Cohortes , Bases de Datos Factuales , Estética , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Mastectomía/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/fisiopatología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Trasplante Autólogo/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA