A multidimensional selective landscape drives adaptive divergence between and within closely related Phlox species.

Selection causes local adaptation across populations within species and simultaneously divergence between species. However, it is unclear if either the force of or the response to selection is similar across these scales. We show that natural selection drives divergence between closely related species in a pattern that is distinct from local adaptation within species. We use reciprocal transplant experiments across three species of Phlox wildflowers to characterize widespread adaptive divergence. Using provenance trials, we also find strong local adaptation between populations within a species. Comparing divergence and selection between these two scales of diversity we discover that one suite of traits predicts fitness differences between species and that an independent suite of traits predicts fitness variation within species. Selection drives divergence between species, contributing to speciation, while simultaneously favoring extensive diversity that is maintained across populations within a species. Our work demonstrates how the selection landscape is complex and multidimensional.

Phylogenomic analyses re-examine the evolution of reinforcement and hypothesized hybrid speciation in Phlox wildflowers.

The tree of life is riddled with reticulate evolutionary histories, and some clades, such as the eastern standing Phlox, appear to be hotspots of hybridization. In this group, there are two cases of reinforcement and nine hypothesized hybrid species. Given their historical importance in our understanding of plant speciation, the relationships between these taxa and the role of hybridization in their diversification require genomic validation. Using phylogenomic analyses, we resolve the evolutionary relationships of the eastern standing Phlox and evaluate hypotheses about whether and how hybridization and gene flow played a role in their diversification. Our results provide novel resolution of the phylogenetic relationships in this group, including paraphyly across some taxa. We identify gene flow during one case of reinforcement and find genomic support for a hybrid lineage underlying one of the five hypothesized homoploid hybrid speciation events. Additionally, we estimate the ancestries of four allotetraploid hybrid species. Our results are consistent with hybridization contributing to diverse evolutionary outcomes within this group; although, not as extensively as previously hypothesized. This study demonstrates the importance of phylogenomics in evaluating hypothesized evolutionary histories of non-model systems and adds to the growing support of interspecific genetic exchange in the generation of biodiversity.

Genomic analyses overturn two long-standing homoploid hybrid speciation hypotheses.

The importance of hybridization in generating biological diversity has been historically controversial. Previously, inference about hybridization was limited by dependence on morphological data; with the advent of the next-generation sequencing tools for nonmodel organisms, the evolutionary significance of hybridization is more evident. Here, we test classic hypotheses of hybrid origins of two species in the Phlox pilosa complex. Morphological intermediacy motivated the hypotheses that Phlox amoena lighthipei and Phlox pilosa deamii were independent homoploid hybrid lineages derived from P. amoena amoena and P. pilosa pilosa. We use double-digest restriction site-associated DNA sequencing of individuals from throughout the range of these taxa to conduct the most thorough analysis of evolutionary history in this system to date. Surprisingly, we find no support for the hybrid origin of P. pilosa deamii or P. amoena lighthipei. Our data do identify a history of admixture in individuals collected at a contemporary hybrid zone between the putative parent lineages. We show that three very different evolutionary histories, only one of which involves hybrid origin, have produced intermediate or recombinant morphological traits between P. amoena amoena and P. pilosa pilosa. Although morphological data are still an efficient means of generating hypotheses about past gene flow, genomic data are now the standard of evidence for elucidating evolutionary history.