Goldenhar syndrome associated with increased risk of respiratory failure and reoperations following spinal deformity surgery.

BACKGROUND: Goldenhar syndrome is a rare congenital disease that presents with a spectrum of clinical sequelae related to the vertebrae and other organs. The spinal manifestations of the syndrome are associated with scoliosis for which fusion may be considered. The current study aimed to evaluate the risks of adverse events and reoperations following posterior spinal fusion for those with Goldenhar syndrome relative to those with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). METHODS: Patients with Goldenhar syndrome and AIS between the ages of 10 and 17 who underwent posterior spinal fusion were abstracted from the 2010 to 2022 PearlDiver Database. The Goldenhar syndrome patients were matched 1:4 to patients with AIS based on age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. All 90 day postoperative adverse events, readmissions, and 5 year reoperations were identified using administrative coding. Incidence of adverse events between the cohorts were compared using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 11,742 patients with AIS and 72 (0.61%) Goldenhar syndrome undergoing deformity surgery were identified. On matched comparison, patients with Goldenhar syndromes had higher odds ratio (OR) of respiratory failure (OR: 2.99, p = 0.009), severe adverse events (p = 2.29, p = 0.01), and readmissions (p = 2.26, p = 0.02). Over 5 years, they had a significantly higher incidence of reoperation compared to those with AIS (18.1% versus 5.5%, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: In this national sample of patients with Goldenhar syndrome undergoing posterior spinal fusion, patients with Goldenhar had increased odds of respiratory failure, readmissions, and reoperations. Targeted risk mitigation strategies may be appropriately considered for those with Goldenhar syndrome undergoing such surgeries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III; Case-control study or retrospective cohort study.

Risk Factors for Perioperative Nerve Injury Related to Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Background: Nerve injury following total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a rare but serious adverse event. While prior studies have reported risk factors for nerve injury related to THA, they are limited to institutional data or small sample sizes. The current study aimed to leverage a large, national database to assess independent risk factors for sustaining nerve injury with THA. Methods: The 2010-2021 PearlDiver M157 database was queried for adult THA cases. Those with nerve injury within 90 days of THA were identified. Patient age, sex, body mass index (BMI), Elixhauser comorbidity index (ECI), fracture indication, and surgery type (index vs revision) were assessed for correlation with nerve injury by multivariate analyses. Results: Out of 750,695 THAs, 2659 (0.35%) had nerve injuries. Multivariate analysis revealed independent predictors of nerve injury in decreasing odds ratio (OR) order to include: revision procedure (OR: 2.13), female sex (OR 1.35), ECI (ECI 1-2 [OR 1.27], ECI 3-4 [OR 1.43], and ECI ≥5 [OR 1.59]) and age (OR 1.02 per decade decrease) (P < .05 for each). Pertinent negatives by multivariate analysis included underweight BMI (<20), and fracture indication. Individuals with morbidly obese BMI status (≥35) had a decreased risk of nerve injury (OR 0.84, P = .019). Conclusions: THA-related nerve injury was found to be low at 0.35%. Factors independently associated with this adverse outcome were defined, of which the greatest risk was seen in revision procedures. These risk factors, derived from the largest cohort to date, may be helpful for risk stratification and patient counseling.

Outcomes following two-level Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Relative to two-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate postoperative adverse events, readmissions, and five-year survival to reoperation for two-level cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) relative to two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). BACKGROUND: CDA and ACDF are both treatment options for degenerative cervical spine pathology. Relative to ACDF, CDA is a relatively novel treatment option, and limited research exists comparing outcomes between two-level CDA and two-level ACDF. METHODS: Patients undergoing two-level CDA or two-level ACDF were isolated from the PearlDiver M165Ortho database. These two cohorts were matched 1:1 based on patient age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) scores. The odds of 90-day postoperative adverse events were compared between the two groups by multivariable analysis. Overall cost-of-care for the first 90-days postoperatively, and five-year survival to cervical spine reoperation were then assessed. RESULTS: Of the two-level cases identified, only 3.9% had CDA and the rest had ACDF. After matching, there were 4,224 patients in each of the study groups. With controlling for patient age, sex, and ECI on multivariable analysis, two-level CDA patients had significantly lower odds of experiencing 90-day dysphagia (OR 0.60, P<0.0001 driving aggregated any adverse event [OR 0.65, P<0.0001]) and readmission (OR 0.69, P=0.0002). Median 90-day cost of care was greater for two-level ACDF patients ($4,776.00 vs. $3,191.00, P<0.0001). No significant difference in five-year survival to cervical spine reoperation was identified (P=0.7). CONCLUSIONS: Relative to two-level ACDF patients, two-level CDA patients were found to have significantly lower odds of 90-day readmissions and minor adverse events (dysphagia), while rates of major adverse events (pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, sepsis, etc.) were comparable between the groups. Further CDA patients had lower cost of overall care, but no difference in five-year survival to cervical spine reoperation. Thus, it may be appropriate to further consider CDA when two-level surgery is pursued.

One- versus Three-- Level Fusion in Patients Undergoing Multilevel Lumbar Decompression: Relative Perioperative Risks and Five-year Revisions.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To assess relative odds of perioperative complications, readmissions, and five-year survival to reoperation for three-level lumbar decompression patients who undergo three-level fusion relative to one-level fusion. BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing multilevel lumbar decompression may be indicated for fusion at one or more levels. The question of fusing only one level with indications such as spondylolisthesis or fusing all levels decompressed is of clinical interest in both the short and longer term. METHODS: Patients undergoing three-level lumbar decompression were extracted from the PearlDiver M165Orto database. The subset of these patients undergoing concomitant three-level and one-level lumbar fusion were identified and matched 1:1 based on patient age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) scores. The incidence and odds of 90-day postoperative adverse events were compared between the two groups by multivariable analysis, and comparative five-year survival to lumbar spinal reoperation was determined. RESULTS: After matching, 28,276 patients were identified as undergoing three-level lumbar decompression with three-level fusion and the same for those undergoing three-level decompression with one-level fusion. Controlling for patient age, sex, and ECI, three-level fusion patients had significantly greater odds ratio (OR) of many 90-day adverse events and aggregated any (OR 1.42), serious (OR 1.44), and minor (OR 1.42) adverse events, as well as readmissions (OR 1.51) (P<0.0001 for all). Five-year survival to reoperation was significantly lower for those undergoing three-level decompression with three-level fusion (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Three-level lumbar decompression patients who underwent three-level fusion were found to be at significantly greater odds of 90-day postoperative adverse events, readmissions, and five-year reoperations relative to those undergoing one-level fusion. The current data support the concept of limiting fusion to the levels with specific indications in the setting of multi-level lumbar decompressions and not needing to match the decompression and fusion levels.

Emergency department utilization after elbow arthroscopy.

Background: Elbow arthroscopy has defined indications for which technical pearls and outcomes have been described. However, other aspects of the postoperative course, such as postprocedural emergency department (ED) visits, have received less attention. The current study defined the incidence and factors associated with ED visits in the 90 days following elbow arthroscopy by leveraging a large, national, multiinsurance, administrative database. Methods: Adult patients who underwent elective elbow arthroscopy were identified in the 2010 to Q1 2022 PearlDiver Mariner161 national administrative database. Those who visited the ED in the 90 days following surgery were identified and compared to those who did not based on age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, geographic region of the United States, and insurance type by multivariate analyses. The timing (weeks following surgery), reasons for ED visit (elbow-related or not), and ED-to-hospital admission (presence or absence) were also assessed. Finally, the rate of those who were admitted during an ED visit was described. Results: A total of 16,310 elbow arthroscopy patients were identified, of which ED visits in the 90 days following surgery were noted for 1086 (6.7%). ED visits were independently associated with younger age (odds ratio [OR, 95% confidence interval (CI)]: 1.23 [1.17, 1.29] per decade decrease), higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (OR [95% CI]: 1.21 [1.19, 1.23] per 1-point increase), different geographic region (OR [95% CI]: 1.42 [1.19, 1.71] for Midwest relative to West), and insurance (OR [95% CI]: 1.88 [1.48, 2.39] for Medicaid relative to Commercial) (P < .001 for each). The incidence of all-cause ED visits was highest during the first two postoperative weeks and gradually decreased over the following weeks. The reason for ED visits related to the elbow decreased from 65% in month one, to 37.7% in month two, to 26.6% in month three. Of those visiting the ED, 12.4% went on to be admitted (for any reason). Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients from a large cohort of elbow arthroscopy patients visited the ED at least once in the 90 days following surgery. The defined associated factors and timing of these ED visits can help optimize postoperative care pathways.

Robotic Versus Navigation Assisted Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A National Database Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Compare perioperative adverse events and reoperations between navigation-assisted and robotic-assisted posterior lumbar fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Navigation has become increasingly utilized for posterior lumbar fusion (PLF). More recently, robotic assistance systems have been gaining traction. However, the incremental advantage of these systems has been unclear in the literature. METHODS: Patients undergoing one to three level PLF (with or without anterior or posterior interbody fusion) were identified from the 2015-2022 M161Ortho PearlDiver Database using CPT codes. Navigation assistance was identified based on CPT coding and robotic assistance was based on ICD-10 procedural coding. Navigation-assisted cases were matched 4:1 to robotic assisted patients based on age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, number of levels fuse, and concomitant anterior fusion. Incidence of 90-day adverse outcomes were assessed and compared with multivariable logistical regression. Bonferroni correction was applied for multiple testing. Rate of reoperation was assessed using a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: From 2015 to 2022, there has been a significant increase in both navigation and robotic assisted lumbar fusions, with navigation-assisted surgery being significantly more common. After matching, there were 2,401 navigation-assisted cases and 651 robotic-assisted cases. On multivariate analysis, there no significant differences in 90-day any, severe, or minor adverse events. There was a significant increase odd of readmissions in the robotic cohort (OR: 1.77, P<0.001). There were no differences in three-year reoperation rates between the navigation-assisted and robotic-assisted cohorts (95.8% versus 94.0%, P=0.30). CONCLUSIONS: As spinal navigation has been gaining popularity and robotic assistance is starting to be further utilized, the incremental advantage of different techniques may be questioned. While further study and technique evolution are ongoing, the current study was not able to demonstrate 90-day or 3-year incremental advantages for robotics relative to navigation based on the metrics evaluated.

International Classification of Diseases Coding for Inflammatory Arthritides.

This quality improvement study investigates usage patterns of codes for inflammatory arthritides under International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision vs International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision.

A 10-year perspective on the question of whether surgeries for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis are "one and done"?

PURPOSE: Posterior scoliosis fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is considered a highly successful surgery with excellent outcomes. However, especially as many patients "graduate" from their pediatric surgeons, there is the need to quantify the long-term outcomes of such surgeries. METHODS: The 2010-2022 Pearldiver M161 dataset was queried for those who were 10 to 18 years old with AIS undergoing PSF with at least 10 years follow-up. Patient characteristics were abstracted. Reoperations were identified based on coding for any subsequent thoracic/lumbar surgery/revision. The 10-year reoperation rate and reasons for reoperation were determined, and multivariate regression was performed to determine risk factors. RESULTS: In total, 3,373 AIS PSF patients were identified. Of the study cohort, 324 (9.6%) underwent reoperation within 10-years with an interquartile range for timing of surgery of 81-658 days, of which 29.6% were done for infection. Reoperations were done within the first three months for 152 (46.9% of reoperations), three months to 2 years for 97 (29.9%), and 2 years to 10 years for 74 (22.8%). Based on multivariate regression, need for reoperation was associated with male sex (OR: 1.70), asthma (OR: 1.36) and greater than thirteen segments of instrumentation (OR: 1.48) (p < 0.05 for each) but not age, other comorbidities, or insurance. CONCLUSIONS: The current study of a large national AIS PSF population found 9.6% to undergo reoperation in the 10 years following their index operation. Although specifics about the curve pattern could not be determined, the reoperation incidence and correlation with specific risk factors are notable and important for patient counselling.

Physical Therapy Utilization After Single-level Posterior Lumbar Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Characterize physical therapy (PT) utilization following single-level posterior lumbar fusion (PLF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: PLF is a common procedure that is increasing in frequency. After such surgeries, PT may be considered to facilitate mobilization and return to activities. However, the usage of such therapy has not been well-characterized in the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing single-level PLF were identified from the 2010 to 2021 PearlDiver administrative database. These patients were stratified based on usage of therapy, home versus outpatient therapy, and timing of therapy within the year after surgery. To determine predictors of therapy, patient characteristics were determined and multivariable regressions were performed. RESULTS: A total of 213,240 patients undergoing single-level PLF were identified, of which therapy was done in the year after surgery for 63,231 (29.0%, of which home therapy accounted for 16.5% of therapy visits). Of those who utilized PT, the average number of visits was 10.6±10.6. Home therapy peaked within the first month after surgery and outpatient therapy peaked at month two. Factors associated with any PT following PLF in decreasing odds ratio (OR) were having commercial insurance (OR: 1.68), being from the Northeast (OR: 1.41), age (OR: 1.13 for 70+ of age) female sex (OR: 1.09), and ECI (OR: 1.04 per point) ( P <0.001 for all). Of those who received therapy, factors associated with home PT utilization were being from the Northeast (OR: 2.55), age (OR: 1.91 for 70+ of age), Medicaid insurance (OR: 1.48), female sex (OR: 1.39), and interbody fusion (OR:1.07) ( P <0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: After single-level PLF, the minority of patients received home or outpatient PT. Of those who did, there was significant variation in the number of visits, with nonmedical factors such as insurance plan and geographic region being strongly associated suggesting room for more consistent practice patterns. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Low Back Pain: Utilization of Urgent Cares Relative to Emergency Departments.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To understand why patients utilize emergency departments (EDs) versus urgent care centers for low back pain (LBP). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: LBP is a common reason for ED visits. In the setting of trauma or recent surgery, the resources of EDs may be needed. However, urgent care centers may be appropriate for other cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients below 65 years of age presenting to the ED or urgent care on the day of diagnosis of LBP were identified from the 2019 PearlDiver M151 administrative database. Exclusion criteria included history of radiculopathy or sciatica, spinal surgery, spinal cord injury, other traumatic, neoplastic, or infectious diagnoses in the 90 days prior, or Medicare insurance. Patient age, sex, Elixhauser comorbidity index, geographic region, insurance, and management strategies were extracted. Factors associated with urgent care relative to ED utilization were assessed using multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Of 356,284 LBP patients, ED visits were identified for 345,390 (96.9%) and urgent care visits for 10,894 (3.1%). Factors associated with urgent care use relative to the ED were: geographic region [relative to Midwest; Northeast odds ratio (OR): 5.49, South OR: 1.54, West OR: 1.32], insurance (relative to Medicaid; commercial OR: 4.06), lower Elixhauser comorbidity index (OR: 1.28 per two-point decrease), and higher age (OR: 1.10 per decade), female sex (OR: 1.09), and use of advanced imaging (OR: 0.08) within 1 week ( P <0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients presenting for a first diagnosis of isolated LBP went to the ED relative to urgent care. The greatest drivers of urgent care versus ED utilization for LBP were insurance type and geographic region. Utilization of advanced imaging was higher among ED patients, but rates of surgical intervention were similar between those seen in the ED and urgent care.

Lumbar Laminotomy: Variables Affecting 90-day Overall Reimbursement.

INTRODUCTION: Lumbar laminotomy/diskectomy is a common procedure performed to address radiculopathy that persists despite conservative treatment. Understanding cost/reimbursement variability and its drivers has the potential to help optimize related healthcare delivery. The goal of this study was to assess variability and factors associated with reimbursement through 90 days after single-level lumbar laminotomy/diskectomy. METHODS: Lumbar laminotomies/diskectomies were isolated from the 2010 to 2021 PearlDiver M151 data set. Exclusion criteria included patients younger than 18 years; other concomitant spinal procedures; and indications of trauma, oncologic, or infectious diagnoses. Patient, surgical, and perioperative data were abstracted. These variables were examined using a multivariable linear regression model with Bonferroni correction to determine factors independently correlated with reimbursement. RESULTS: A total of 28,621 laminotomies/diskectomies were identified. The average ± standard deviation 90-day postoperative reimbursement was $9,453.83 ± 19,343.99 and, with a non-normal distribution, the median (inner quartile range) was $3,314 ($5,460). By multivariable linear regression, variables associated with greatest increase in 90-day postoperative reimbursement were associated with admission (with the index procedure [+$11,757.31] or readmission [+$31,248.80]), followed by insurance type (relative to Medicare, commercial +$4,183.79), postoperative adverse events (+$2,006.60), and postoperative emergency department visits (+$1,686.89) ( P < 0.0001 for each). Lesser associations were with Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (+$286.67 for each point increase) and age (-$24.65 with each year increase) ( P < 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively). DISCUSSION: This study assessed a large cohort of lumbar laminotomies/diskectomies and found substantial variations in reimbursement/cost to the healthcare system. The largest increase in reimbursement was associated with admission (with the index procedure or readmission), followed by insurance type, postoperative adverse events, and postoperative emergency department visits. These results highlight the need to balance inpatient versus outpatient surgeries while limiting postoperative readmissions to minimize the costs associated with healthcare delivery.

Single-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Results in Lower Five-year Revisions than Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy in a Large National Cohort.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study using the 2010-2020 MSpine PearlDiver administrative data set. OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative adverse events and five-year revisions for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical disk disease can often be treated surgically using single-level ACDF or PCF. Prior studies have suggested that posterior approaches provide similar short-term outcomes as ACDF; however, posterior procedures may have an increased risk of revision surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The database was queried for patients undergoing elective single-level ACDF or PCF (excluding cases performed for myelopathy, trauma, neoplasm, and/or infection). Outcomes, including specific complications, readmission, and reoperations, were assessed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to ascertain odds ratios (OR) of 90-day adverse events controlling for age, sex, and comorbidities. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to determine five-year rates of cervical reoperation in the ACDF and PCF cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 31,953 patients treated by ACDF (29,958, 93.76%) or PCF (1995, 6.24%) were identified. Multivariable analysis, controlling for age, sex, and comorbidities, demonstrated that PCF was associated with significantly greater odds of aggregated serious adverse events (OR 2.17, P <0.001), wound dehiscence (OR 5.89, P <0.001), surgical site infection (OR 3.66, P <0.001), and pulmonary embolism (OR 1.72, P =0.04). However, PCF was associated with significantly lower odds of readmission (OR 0.32, P <0.001), dysphagia (OR 0.44, P <0.001), and pneumonia (OR 0.50, P =0.004). At five years, PCF cases had a significantly higher cumulative revision rate compared with ACDF cases (19.0% vs. 14.8%, P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The current study is the largest to date to compare short-term adverse events and five-year revision rates between single-level ACDF and PCF for nonmyelopathy elective cases. Perioperative adverse events differed by procedure, and it was notable that the incidence of cumulative revisions was higher for PCF. These findings can be used in decision-making when there is clinical equipoise between ACDF and PCF.

Urgent Care Versus Emergency Department Utilization for Foot and Ankle Fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Foot and ankle fractures are common injuries for which patients may need urgent evaluation and care. Many such injuries are managed in emergency departments (EDs), but urgent care facilities may sometimes be an appropriate setting. Understanding which foot and ankle fractures are managed at which facility might help define care algorithms, improve patient experience, and suggest directions for containing costs. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the 2010 to 2020 M151 PearlDiver administrative database. Adult patients less than 65 years old presenting to EDs and urgent care facilities for foot and ankle fractures were identified using ICD-9 and ICD-10 diagnosis codes, excluding polytrauma, and Medicare patients. Patient/injury variables associated with urgent care utilization relative to ED utilization and utilization trends of urgent care relative to ED were assessed with univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2020, 1,120,422 patients with isolated foot and ankle fractures presented to EDs and urgent care facilities. Urgent care visits evolved from 2.2% in 2010 to 4.4% in 2020 (P , 0.0001). Independent predictors of urgent care relative to ED utilization were defined. In decreasing odds ratios (ORs), these were insurance (relative to Medicaid, commercial OR 8.03), geographic region (relative to Midwest, Northeast OR 3.55, South OR 1.74, West OR 1.06), anatomic location of fracture (relative to ankle, forefoot OR 3.45, midfoot 2.20, hindfoot 1.63), closed fracture (OR 2.20), female sex (OR 1.29), lower ECI (OR 1.11 per unit decrease), and younger age (OR 1.08 per decade decrease) (P , 0.0001 for all). DISCUSSION: A small but increasing minority of patients with foot and ankle fractures are managed in urgent care facilities relative to EDs. While patients with certain injury types were associated with increased odds of urgent care relative to ED utilization, the greatest predictors were nonclinical, such as geographic regions and insurance type, suggesting areas for optimizing access to certain care pathways. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Urgent Care Visits Sought After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Potentially Overlooked Resource.

BACKGROUND: Following total hip arthroplasty (THA), readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits have been studied. Urgent care utilization is not well-characterized and may represent an overlooked avenue to facilitate lesser acuity patient needs. METHODS: Primary THAs performed for osteoarthritis indications were identified from 2010 to April of 2021 from a large national database. The incidence and timing of 90-day postoperative ED and urgent care visits were determined. Univariable and multivariable analyses assessed factors associated with urgent care relative to ED utilization. Reasons and acuity of diagnoses for these visits were determined. For 213,189 THA patients, 90-day ED visits were identified for 37,692 (17.7%) and urgent care visits for 2,083 (1.0%). The greatest incidence of both ED and urgent care visits were in the first two postoperative weeks. RESULTS: Independent predictors of urgent care utilization relative to ED utilization were: procedures being performed in the Northeast or South, insurance plan being Commercial, women, and lesser comorbidity burden (P < .0001). Reason for visits to the ED was directly related to the surgical site for 25.6% but for urgent care were just 4.8% (P < .0001). Reasons for visits to the ED were classified as low-acuity for 57.4% and for urgent care 96.9% (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Following THA, patients may need urgent evaluation. While many issues can be addressed through the office, urgent care visits may represent a viable and underused resource relative to the ED for a large percentage of patients who have lower acuity diagnoses.

Rheumatoid arthritis patients are at increased risk for adverse events following lumbar discectomy.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lumbar discectomy is a common procedure for which patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may be considered. RA is an autoinflammatory disease that may predispose patients to postoperative adverse outcomes. PURPOSE: To assess the relative odds of adverse events after lumbar discectomy for those with versus without RA in a large, national, administrative dataset. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study using the 2010 to 2020 MSpine PearlDiver dataset. PATIENT SAMPLE: After exclusion of patients under 18 years old, those with any trauma, neoplasm, or infection diagnosis within the month before lumbar discectomy, and any patients who had any alternative lumbar spinal surgery performed on the same day as lumbar discectomy, we identified 36,479 lumbar discectomy patients. 2,937 (8.1%) of these patients had a prior diagnosis of RA. After matching 4:1 by patient age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI, a longitudinal measure of patient comorbidity burden generated via ICD-9 and 10 diagnosis codes), 8,485 lumbar discectomy patients without RA and 2,149 with RA were included. OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of severe and minor adverse events in the 90-days following lumbar discectomy, predictive factors for adverse events within 90-days of lumbar discectomy, risk of adverse events within 90-days of lumbar discectomy stratified by patient medication regimen, 5-year survival to reoperation following lumbar discectomy. METHODS: Patients undergoing lumbar discectomy were identified from the PearlDiver MSpine dataset. The subset of those with versus without RA were identified and matched 1:4 based on patient age, sex, and ECI scores. The incidence of 90-day adverse events in the two groups was determined and compared by univariate and multivariate analyses. Subgroup analysis was performed based on RA medications being taken. RESULTS: Matched lumbar discectomy patients with RA (n=2,149) and without RA (n=8,485) were identified. Controlling for patient age, sex, and ECI, those with RA were at significantly higher odds of any (odds ratio [OR] 3.30), severe (OR 2.78), and minor (OR 3.30) adverse events (p<.0001 for all). Stratifying by medications being taken (and relative to those without RA), there was increasing odds of all adverse events (AAE) based on potency of medications (no biologic or disease modifying antirheumatic drugs [DMARDs] OR 2.33, DMARDs only OR 3.86, biologic±DMARDs OR 5.69 (p<.0001 for all). Despite this, no statistically significant difference in 5-year survival from subsequent lumbar surgery was found between those with versus without RA (p=.1000). CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar discectomy patients with RA were found to be at significantly higher risk for 90-day adverse events following lumbar discectomy, and this was incrementally greater for those on increasingly suppressive medications. Lumbar discectomy patients with RA bear specific consideration and perioperative monitoring when considered for lumbar discectomy.

Incidental Durotomy After Posterior Lumbar Decompression Surgery Associated With Increased Risk for Venous Thromboembolism.

INTRODUCTION: Incidental durotomies can occur during posterior lumbar decompression surgery. Not only can this slow patient recovery but many surgeons recommend a period of bed rest in these situations, which can further slow mobilization. This immobility might be associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after spinal surgery. This study aims to determine whether incidental durotomies are associated with increased risk of VTE in patients undergoing lumbar decompression surgery. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing laminectomy or laminotomy (excluding any with concomitant fusion procedures) for degenerative etiologies and with a minimum of 90-day follow-up were identified from the MSpine Pearldiver dataset. Incidental durotomies were identified based on hospital administrative coding, and patient demographics, comorbidities, and the occurrence and timing of VTE (deep vein thrombosis [DVT] and/or pulmonary embolism) were defined. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of 156,488 lumbar decompression patients included in the study, incidental durotomies was noted for 2,036 (1.3%). Markedly more VTEs were observed in the first five days in the incidental durotomies group ( P < 0.001) but not incrementally any day after ( P > 0.05). On univariate analyses, a significant increased risk of VTE, DVT, and PE was observed ( P < 0.001 for each). On multivariate analyses controlling for age, sex, and comorbidities, odds were significantly increased for VTE (Odds ratios = 1.75, P < 0.001) and DVT (OR = 1.70, P < 0.001) but not independently significant for pulmonary embolism. DISCUSSION: Patients who have incidental durotomies during lumbar laminectomy or laminotomy surgery were found to have increased odds of VTE, primarily in the first five days. Although not all factors associated with this could be directly determined, slower mobilization would seem to be a likely contributing factor. Increasing mobilization and/or adjusting chemoprophylaxis in this group would seem appropriately considered.

Home and Outpatient Physical Therapy Utilization Following Total Ankle Replacement.

Background: Physical therapy (PT) following total ankle replacement (TAR) is often considered, but guidelines for its use are not standardized. Although patient factors may dictate recommendations, this retrospective cohort study aims to characterize baseline utilization practices to set the stage for establishing generalizable recommendations. Methods: TAR patients were identified from the 2010-2019 M91 Ortho PearlDiver data set based on administrative coding. Patient factors were extracted, including age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI), region of the country in which patients' surgery was performed (Midwest, Northeast, South, West), and insurance plan (commercial, Medicaid, Medicare). The incidence, timing, and frequency of home or outpatient PT utilization in the 90 days following TAR were identified. Inpatient PT was not captured. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses allowed identification of predictive factors for PT utilization. Results: Of 5412 TAR patients identified, postoperative PT services were used by 2453 (45.3%). Most PT was outpatient (38.3% of the study population) compared to home (4.1% of the study population). Weekly utilization of PT was greatest in the first week following surgery (17.7% of PT visits) and thereafter followed a roughly bell-shaped curve, with utilization greatest at 7 weeks following surgery (14.9% of PT visits).Independent predictors of PT utilization following TAR included having surgery performed in the Midwest (relative to the South, OR 1.37, P < .0001), Northeast (OR 1.20, P = .0217), or West (OR 1.26, P < .0021) and having commercial (relative to Medicare, OR 1.87, P < .0001) or Medicaid insurance (OR 1.46, P = .0239). Conclusion: Of 5412 TAR patients, 42.5% used PT within 90 days of surgery. PT utilization was highest in the first and seventh weeks following surgery, and demographic predictors of PT use were defined. Through identification of timing and predictors of PT utilization following TAR, PT care pathways may be better defined. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Emergency Department Visits Within 90 Days of Total Ankle Replacement.

Background: Total ankle replacement (TAR) utilization in the United States has steeply increased in recent decades. Emergency department (ED) visits following TAR impacts patient satisfaction and health care costs and warrant exploration. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized the 2010 to 2019 M91Ortho PearlDiver data set to identify TAR patients with at least 90 days of follow-up. PearlDiver contains billing claims data across all sites of care throughout the United States for all indications for care. Patient factors extracted included age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI), region of the country in which surgery was performed, insurance plan, and postoperative hospital length of stay. Ninety-day postoperative ED visit incidence, timing, frequency, and primary diagnoses were identified and compared to 1-year postoperative ED visit baseline data. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine risk factors for ED visits. Results: Of 5930 TAR patients identified, ED visits within 90 days were noted for 497 (8.4%) patients. Of all ED visits, 32.0% occurred within 2 weeks following surgery. Multivariate analysis revealed several predictors of ED utilization: younger age (odds ratio [OR] 1.35 per decade decrease), female sex (OR 1.20), higher ECI (OR 1.32 per 2-point increase), TAR performed in the western US (OR 1.34), and Medicaid coverage (OR 2.70; 1.71-4.22 relative to Medicare) (P < .05 each). Surgical site issues comprised 78.0% of ED visits, with surgical site pain (57.0%) as the most common problem. Conclusion: Of 5930 TAR patients, 8.4% returned to the ED within 90 days of surgery, with predisposing demographic factors identified. The highest incidence of ED visits was in the first 2 postoperative weeks, and surgical site pain was the most common reason. Pain management pathways following TAR should be able to be adjusted to minimize the occurrence of postoperative ED visits, thereby improving patient experiences and decreasing health care utilization/costs. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Risk factors for venous thromboembolism following fractures isolated to the foot and ankle fracture.

OBJECTIVE: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an uncommon, but potentially morbid, complication following foot and ankle fractures. Current standard is to not administer thromboprophylaxis to patients with such injuries. Nonetheless, patient and fracture factors might affect this risk/benefit consideration. The goal of this study was to determine what patients are most at risk. METHODS: The M53Ortho Pearldiver database was used to identify patients with fractures isolated to the foot and ankle that were treated non-operatively or operatively. Patients with pilon, other appendicular fractures remote from the foot and ankle, and other traumatic injuries were excluded. The 90-day occurrence of VTE was identified based on codes for deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Characteristics of those patients who did and did not have VTEs were compared using chi-square analyses. Multivariate logistical regression was then performed to determined factors independently associated with VTE. Finally, timing of VTE relative to fracture was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 298,886 patients with isolated foot or ankle fractures were identified, of which 1,661 (0.56%) had VTE in the 90 days following fracture. In terms of timing, 27.3% occurred in the first week, and 49.8% occurred in the first three weeks. Independent risk factors for VTE included (in decreasing order):prior VTE (odd ratio [OR] = 25.44), factor V Leiden (OR = 24.34), active cancer (OR = 1.84), specific fracture relative to metatarsal fracture (multiple fractures [OR: 1.51], ankle fracture [OR = 1.51], and calcaneus fracture [OR = 1.24]), surgical treatment (OR = 1.41), male sex (OR = 1.19), greater Elixhauser index (OR = 1.05), and increasing age (OR:1.05 per decade) (p<0.05 for each). CONCLUSIONS: The present study found that, although only 0.56% of isolated foot and ankle fractures had a VTE within ninety days. Defined risk factors, such as Factor V Leiden, prior VTE, surgical treatment, active cancer, specific fracture patterns, and surgical treatment significantly affected the odds of their occurrence.

Changes in the Utilization of Lumbosacral Epidural Injections Between 2010 and 2019.

STUDY DESIGN: A descriptive epidemiologic study. OBJECTIVE: To analyze trends and patient characteristics for lumbosacral transforaminal and interlaminar/caudal epidural injection utilization over time. BACKGROUND: Lumbosacral transforaminal and interlaminar/caudal epidural injections are considered for varying lumbar pathologies. Reported studies, physician practices, insurance authorization, and other factors may influence utilization patterns over time. METHODS: Patients undergoing lumbosacral transforaminal and interlaminar/caudal epidural injections between 2010 and 2019 were identified in the M91Ortho PearlDiver database based on Current Procedural Terminology coding. Patient age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI), insurance plan (commercial, Medicaid, Medicare), and region of the country where the procedure was performed (Midwest, Northeast, South, West) were assessed and tracked over the years studied based on prevalence per 100,000 covered lives. RESULTS: Lumbosacral transforaminal and interlaminar/caudal epidural injections were identified for 426,039 and 501,228 patients, respectively. The number of injections performed per year decreased over the years studied: for transforaminal injections from 160.81 to 76.36 per 100,000 patients and for interlaminar/caudal injections from 200.53 to 77.56 per 100,000 patients. The decrease in overall injections was greatest for those with Commercial and Medicare coverage (53.40% and 66.50%, respectively), with a smaller drop amongst those with Medicaid coverage (32.39%).Over the years, the average patient undergoing injection was older and there was a relative shift toward transforaminal injections ( P <0.05 for both). In terms of specialty of those performing the injections, they were mostly performed by Anesthesiology specialists (who performed less transforaminal than interlaminar/caudal injections). CONCLUSION: Lumbosacral transforaminal and interlaminar/caudal spinal epidural injections were shown to decrease by 52.37% per 100,000 patients from 2010 to 2019. Changing demographics of those undergoing such injections and practice patterns are important to consider in the picture of overall spine service utilization. Variations in injection utilization trends by patient insurance raise questions regarding disparities in care.