Can linezolid be validly measured in endotracheal aspiration in critically ill patients? A proof-of-concept trial.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of anti-infectives such as linezolid is routinely performed in blood of intensive care unit (ICU) patients to optimize target attainment. However, the concentration at the site of infection is considered more important for a successful therapy. Until now, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is the gold standard to measure intrapulmonary concentrations of anti-infective agents. However, it is an invasive method and unsuitable for regular TDM. The aim of this proof-of-concept study was to investigate whether it is possible to reliably determine the intrapulmonary concentration of linezolid from endotracheal aspiration (ENTA). METHODS: Intubated ICU patients receiving 600 mg intravenous linezolid twice daily were examined in steady state. First, preliminary experiments were performed in six patients to investigate which patients are suitable for linezolid measurement in ENTA. In a second step, trough and peak linezolid concentrations of plasma and ENTA were determined in nine suitable patients. RESULTS: Linezolid can validly be detected in ENTA with viscous texture and > 0.5 mL volume. The mean (SD) linezolid trough concentration was 2.02 (1.27) mg/L in plasma and 1.60 (1.36) mg/L in ENTA, resulting in a median lung penetration rate of 104%. The mean (SD) peak concentration in plasma and ENTA was 10.77 (5.93) and 4.74 (2.66) mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: Linezolid can validly be determined in ENTA with an adequate texture and volume. The penetration rate is comparable to already published BAL concentrations. This method might offer a simple and non-invasive method for TDM at the site of infection "lung". Due to promising results of the feasibility study, comparison of ENTA and BAL in the same patient should be investigated in a further trial.

Extracorporeal adsorption of protective and toxic bile acids and bilirubin in patients with cholestatic liver dysfunction: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The release of toxic bile acids (BAs) in the blood of critically ill patients with cholestatic liver dysfunction might lead to the damage of various organs. Their extracorporeal elimination using the cytokine adsorber Cytosorb® (CS) (adsorption of especially hydrophobic molecules < 60 kDa) might be promising, but data proving a potential adsorption are missing so far. METHODS: The prospective Cyto-SOVLE study (NCT04913298) included 20 intensive care patients with cholestatic liver dysfunction, continuous kidney replacement therapy, total bilirubin concentration > 10 mg/dl and the application of CS into the dialysis circuit. Bilirubin and different BAs were measured pre- and post-CS at defined timepoints (10 min, 1, 3, 6, and 12 h after initiation). Relative reduction (RR, %) was calculated with: [Formula: see text]. RESULTS: The median RR for total and conjugated bilirubin after initiation was - 31.8% and - 30.3%, respectively, and decreased to - 4.5% and - 4.8% after 6 h. A high initial RR was observed for the toxic BAs GCA (- 97.4%), TCA (- 94.9%), GCDCA (- 82.5%), and TCDCA (- 86.0%), decreasing after 6 h to - 32.9%, - 32.7%, - 12.8%, and - 14.3%, respectively. The protective hydrophilic BAs showed a comparable RR after initiation (UDCA: - 77.7%, GUDCA: - 83.0%, TUDCA: - 91.3%) dropping after 6 h to - 7.4%, - 8.5%, and - 12.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cytosorb® can adsorb bilirubin and toxic as well as protective BAs. However, a fast saturation of the adsorber resulting in a rapid decrease of the RR was observed. Furthermore, no relevant difference between hydrophobic toxic and hydrophilic protective BAs was detected regarding the adsorption amount. The clinical benefit or harm of the BA adsorption needs to be evaluated in the future.

Correlation between Bilirubin Elimination with the Cytokine Adsorber CytoSorb® and Mortality in Critically Ill Patients with Hyperbilirubinemia.

INTRODUCTION: Hyperbilirubinemia is often the first evidence for any kind of liver disorder and over one-third of all patients in intensive care units (ICU) show elevated bilirubin concentrations. In critically ill patients, high concentrations of serum bilirubin are correlated with a poor outcome. Therapies to lower bilirubin concentrations are often just symptomatically and their effect on the patients' outcome is hardly evaluated. Therefore, this study investigates whether the extracorporeal elimination of bilirubin with the cytokine adsorber CytoSorb® (CS) reduces mortality in patients with hyperbilirubinemia. METHODS: Patients with bilirubin concentrations >10 mg/dL at the ICU were screened for evaluation from 2018 to 2020. Patients with kidney replacement therapy and older than 18 years were included. Patients with continuously decreasing bilirubin concentrations after liver transplantation or other liver support systems (i.e., Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System [MARS®], Advanced Organ Support [ADVOS]) were excluded. CS therapy was used in clinical routine and was indicated by the treating physicians. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS statistics utilizing a multivariate model. Primary outcome measure was the effect of CS on the 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Data from 82 patients (mean Simplified Acute Physiology Score [SAPS] II: 74 points, mean bilirubin: 18 mg/dL, mean lactate: 3.7 mmol/L) were analyzed. There were no significant differences in patients with and without CS treatment. The multivariate model showed no significant effect of CS therapy (p = 0.402) on the 30-day mortality. In addition, a significant effect of bilirubin concentration (p = 0.274) or Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score (p = 0.928) on the 30-day mortality could not be shown. In contrast, lactate concentration (p = 0.001, b = 0.044) and SAPS II (p = 0.025, b = 0.008) had significant impact on 30-day mortality. CONCLUSION: The use of CS in patients with hyperbilirubinemia did not result in a significant reduction in 30-day mortality. Randomized and controlled studies with mortality as primary outcome measure are needed in the future to justify their use.

[Hemoperfusion in anesthesia and intensive care medicine: benefits, risks, and evidence for different systems]. / Hämoperfusion in Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin: Chancen, Risiken und Evidenz verschiedener Systeme.

BACKGROUND: Hemoperfusion is a technique for the extracorporeal elimination of endogenous and exogenous toxins and harmful mediators by adsorption. It can be used as a stand-alone device, as part of a heart-lung machine or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or, as is currently the case, integrated into a kidney replacement procedure. In the meantime, various suppliers offer devices with different technologies. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to evaluate the benefits, risks and evidence of the different systems, how they work and for which indications they are approved in Germany. METHOD: To achieve this goal, a narrative assessment of the existing literature and guidelines for different indications was performed. The focus was on in vivo studies. RESULTS: In principle, a distinction must be made in adsorption techniques between pure adsorption and the combination as adsorption and kidney replacement therapy. The adsorbers available in Germany include Cytosorb®, HA-330, Seraph®-100 and Toraymyxin. Combined procedures (adsorption and kidney replacement) are offered with coupled plasma filtration and adsorption (CPFA) and oXiris®. Most adsorbers have been developed for cytokine and endotoxin removal in patients with sepsis; however, to date, no randomized controlled trial (RCT) has demonstrated a survival benefit when using hemoperfusion. Therefore, the S3 guidelines for treatment of sepsis and the surviving sepsis campaign guidelines advise against its routine use. When the corona pandemic began, hemoperfusion was considered as a promising therapeutic approach. Cytosorb®, Seraph®-100, and oXiris® received emergency approval by the FDA to be used in critically ill patients with COVID-19, so questions arose about the appropriateness and importance of its use; however, the data generated did not show positive results, so its use cannot be recommended routinely either. In addition, they are not mentioned as a treatment option in the current guidelines. The use of adsorption procedures in patients with liver failure and rhabdomyolysis has only been rudimentarily studied, so any evidence is currently lacking. The only adsorber that has CE approval in Germany for both applications is Cytosorb®. In the next few years, studies will have to follow that investigate the efficacy and thus either justify or refute the use in clinical routine. Hemoperfusion procedures are used in the heart-lung machine as part of cardiac surgery for either cytokine or anticoagulant adsorption. No congruent data are available to support the use for the elimination of cytokines. If emergency cardiac surgery is required in a patient with pre-existing anticoagulation, hemoperfusion procedures can be used to prevent bleeding complications. Cytosorb® has CE approval for this indication. All available techniques are nonselective adsorption processes, so that adsorption of known and unknown substances can occur. Unintentional adsorption of drugs, such as various anti-infective agents is a relevant risk, especially when used in patients with sepsis. DISCUSSION: Various adsorption systems can eliminate different known and unknown substances. Currently, there is a lack of evidence for all indications and systems to justify their routine use except in clinical trials. Future clinical trials should evaluate the potential benefits but also dangers, so that in the meantime the routine use can be justified or a recommendation against the use can be given.

The effect of cytosorb® application on kidney recovery in critically ill patients with severe rhabdomyolysis: a propensity score matching analysis.

Severe rhabdomyolysis frequently results in acute kidney injury (AKI) due to myoglobin accumulation with the need of kidney replacement therapy (KRT). The present study investigated whether the application of Cytosorb® (CS) led to an increased rate of kidney recovery in patients with KRT due to severe rhabdomyolysis. Adult patients with a myoglobin-concentration >10,000 ng/ml and KRT were included from 2014 to 2021. Exclusion criteria were chronic kidney disease and CS-treatment before study inclusion. Groups 1 and 2 were defined as KRT with and without CS, respectively. The primary outcome parameter was independence from KRT after 30 days. Propensity score (PS) matching was performed (predictors: myoglobin, SAPS-II, and age), and the chi2-test was used. 35 pairings could be matched (mean age: 57 vs. 56 years; mean myoglobin: 27,218 vs. 26,872 ng/ml; mean SAPS-II: 77 vs. 76). The probability of kidney recovery was significantly (p = .04) higher in group 1 (31.4 vs. 11.4%, mean difference: 20.0%, odds ratio (OR): 3.6). Considering patients who survived 30 days, kidney recovery was also significantly (p = .03) higher in patients treated with CS (61.1 vs. 23.5%, mean difference: 37.6%, OR: 5.1). In conclusion, the use of CS might positively affect renal recovery in patients with severe rhabdomyolysis. A prospective randomized controlled trial is needed to confirm this hypothesis.