Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
ASAIO J ; 69(9): e421-e422, 2023 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37651098
2.
Pharmacotherapy ; 43(12): 1339-1363, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37519116

RESUMEN

Since its first success in 1975, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used with increasing frequency for pulmonary and cardiopulmonary bypass. Use in adults has increased exponentially since the early 2000s, but despite thousands of international cannulations using both veno-arterial (VA) and veno-venous (VV) ECMO, there are still significant hemocompatibility-related adverse events. Current management of anticoagulation has been based on the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization guidance published in 2014 with recent updates published in 2022. Despite this guidance, there is still limited international consensus on how to manage anticoagulation in ECMO. For this review, we completed a comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases to identify studies pertaining to anticoagulation of adult patients on VV or VA-ECMO. The highest priority was given to sources that were prospective, randomized, controlled studies, but in the absence of such resources, observational studies, retrospective uncontrolled studies, and case series/reports were considered for inclusion. This document serves to provide a comprehensive review of the current understanding of management pertaining to anticoagulation relating to ECMO.


Asunto(s)
Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Adulto , Humanos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Coagulación Sanguínea , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos
3.
ASAIO J ; 69(1): 96-100, 2023 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36583775

RESUMEN

The prophylactic use of amiodarone to reduce the incidence of postoperative arrhythmias is effective for patients undergoing general cardiac surgeries; however, no data exists for the use of prophylactic amiodarone to prevent postoperative arrhythmias after CF-LVAD. This single-center, retrospective analysis compared patients with CF-LVADs placed between April 2014 and June 2020 who received prophylactic postoperative amiodarone to those who did not. Based on institution practice at the respective times, patients with a CF-LVAD placed between April 2014 and June 2018 were included in the group receiving postoperative amiodarone arrhythmia prophylaxis and patients with a CF-LVAD placed July 2018 to June 2020 were included in the group not receiving arrhythmia prophylaxis. The primary outcome was the incidence of first occurring atrial or ventricular arrhythmia from CF-LVAD placement to 21 days or hospital discharge. Sixty patients received amiodarone for arrhythmia prophylaxis and 27 patients did not receive prophylaxis. The primary outcome occurred in 40% of the prophylaxis group and 66.7% in the no prophylaxis group (RR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.40-0.90; p = 0.038). In patients receiving CF-LVADs, the use of prophylactic amiodarone was associated with a reduction in the incidence of postoperative arrhythmias, which was driven primarily by a reduction in postoperative atrial arrhythmias, without significantly increasing the rate of amiodarone-related adverse events.


Asunto(s)
Amiodarona , Fibrilación Atrial , Corazón Auxiliar , Humanos , Amiodarona/efectos adversos , Antiarrítmicos/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...