Fatigue in gynecological cancer patients during and after anticancer treatment.

CONTEXT: Research has indicated that individuals with gynecological cancer experience severe fatigue. OBJECTIVES: This longitudinal survey aimed to analyze the fatigue experienced over the course of one year by a gynecological cancer population, to determine if the fatigue was more severe than that reported by females without cancer, and to identify variables associated with cancer-related fatigue (CRF). METHODS: Data were collected over a 12-month period before, during, and after anticancer treatment. Fatigue was assessed using the Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form. Participants with cancer also completed the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist. RESULTS: Sixty-five cancer patients (mean age = 57.4 years, standard deviation [SD] = 13.9) and 60 control subjects (mean age = 55.4 years, SD = 13.6) participated. Descriptive analysis and repeated measurements modeling indicated that the cancer participants reported worse fatigue than the noncancer individuals before, during, and after anticancer treatment (P < 0.001) and that the level of fatigue in persons with cancer changed with time (P = 0.02). A forward stepwise regression demonstrated that psychological distress level was the only independent predictor of CRF during anticancer treatment (P < 0.00), explaining 44% of the variance in fatigue. After treatment, both psychological distress level (P < 0.00) and physical symptom distress (P = 0.03) were independent predictors of fatigue, accounting for 81% of the variance. CONCLUSION: Psychological distress level is an important indicator of CRF in gynecological cancer. Interventions focused on the reduction of psychological distress may help alleviate CRF.

Physiotherapy management of cancer-related fatigue: a survey of UK current practice.

PURPOSE: To establish physiotherapy management of cancer-related fatigue (CRF), in particular, to determine physiotherapy exercise management of CRF. METHODS: All physiotherapist members of the UK Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Oncology and Palliative Care (ACPOPC) received a questionnaire. RESULTS: The response rate was 65% (223/341). Therapists had a mean of 6.8 years (+/-5.6) experience in oncology and/or palliative care. Seventy-eight percent of therapists recommend and/or use exercise as part of the management of CRF; 74% teach other strategies, most commonly energy-conservation techniques (79%). Therapists recommend and/or use exercise in similar frequencies with a range of cancer types, before (32%), during (53%) and following treatment (59%) and during advanced stages of the disease (68%). The most common barrier encountered by therapists in recommending and/or using exercise was related to the lack-of-exercise guidelines for patients with CRF (71%). CONCLUSION: Physiotherapists' management of CRF includes recommending and using exercise and teaching energy-conservation techniques. Therapists recommend and/or use exercise with a variety of cancer populations, across all stages of the disease trajectory, in particular during advanced stages of the disease. Findings show therapists feel their practice is affected by the lack of exercise guidance for the cancer population. CRF management and physiotherapy practice would benefit from further research testing the efficacy of exercise in understudied patient groups, in all stages of the disease trajectory.

Physiotherapists' use of advice and exercise for the management of chronic low back pain: a national survey.

The objective of the study was to establish the specific use of advice and exercise by physiotherapists, for the management of chronic low back pain (LBP). A questionnaire was mailed to a random sample of 600 members of the Irish Society of Chartered Physiotherapists. Open and closed questions were used to obtain information on treatments provided to chronic LBP patients. Respondents' treatment goals were also investigated, along with the typical methods used to assess treatment outcome. Four hundred and nineteen of the sample returned the questionnaire; 280/419 (67%) indicated that they currently treated LBP of which 76% (n=214) were senior grade therapists. Advice and exercise, respectively, were the treatments most frequently used for chronic LBP: advice was most commonly delivered as part of an exercise programme, with strengthening (including core stability) the most frequently used exercise type. Supervision of exercise and follow-up advice were underutilised with respect to the recommendations of relevant clinical guidelines. Pain relief was an important treatment goal. Emphasis on exercise programme supervision, incorporating reassurance that its safe to stay active and 'hurt does not mean harm', must be more effectively disseminated and promoted in practice. The influence of follow-up advice on exercise adherence warrants further investigation.

The effectiveness of motorised lumbar traction in the management of LBP with lumbo sacral nerve root involvement: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Traction is commonly used for the treatment of low back pain (LBP), predominately with nerve root involvement; however its benefits remain to be established. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial to compare the difference between two treatment protocols (manual therapy, exercise and advice, with or without traction) in the management of acute/sub acute LBP with 'nerve root' involvement. METHODS: 30 LBP patients with nerve root pain were recruited and randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. Primary outcome measures were the: McGill pain questionnaire, Roland Morris disability questionnaire, and the SF36 Questionnaire; recorded at baseline, discharge, 3 and 6 months post-discharge. RESULTS: 27 patients completed treatment with a loss of another four patients at follow up. Intention to treat analysis demonstrated an improvement in all outcomes at follow up points but there appeared to be little difference between the groups. CONCLUSION: This study has shown that a trial recruiting patients with 'nerve root' problems is feasible. Further research based upon a fully powered trial is required to ascertain if the addition of traction has any benefit in the management of these patients. REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN78417198.

Chronic low back pain: patients' experiences, opinions and expectations for clinical management.

PURPOSE: To explore the experiences, opinions and treatment expectations of chronic low back pain (LBP) patients in order to identify what components of treatment they consider as being of most value. METHOD: Three stand-alone focus groups were convened. All participants were experiencing chronic non-specific LBP (>3 months). Each group was facilitated by an independent moderator, and guided by a series of pre-determined questions. Participants were encouraged to freely air their personal opinions during the discussion. Transcribed data were organized into a series of 'categories' using the Qualitative Solutions for Researchers Nudist 6 package from which five common themes emerged. RESULTS: Each participant had typically experienced a variety of failed treatment approaches. Whilst the value of advice and exercise was recognized, participants typically questioned the appropriateness of such treatment given the fact that a precise diagnosis was rarely given, and symptoms often recurred. As a result, poor adherence with advice and exercise appeared to be a key factor limiting the potential effectiveness of long-term self-management strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Participants considered appropriate exercise (despite pain) and activity modification as important components for effective long-term self-management of symptoms. To enhance treatment effectiveness, participants welcomed the introduction of individually tailored advice and exercise programmes, with supervision and follow-up support, along with a better understanding of the physical and emotional impact of chronic LBP by practitioners.

Advice for the management of low back pain: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

To synthesise the evidence relating to the effectiveness of advice, the relevance of its content and frequency, and to compare the advice being offered to acute, subacute and chronic low back pain (LBP) patients. A systematic review of Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) using advice, either alone or with another intervention. The QUOROM guidelines and the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group Guidelines for Systematic Reviews were followed throughout: methodological assessment identified RCTs of 'high' or 'medium' methodological quality, based on their inclusion of at least 50% of the specified internal validity criteria. Outcome measures were analysed based on five recommended core outcome domains; pain, work disability, back-specific function, generic health status and satisfaction with care. Relevant RCTs (n=56) were scored for methodological quality; 39 RCTs involving 7347 patients qualified for inclusion, based upon their methodological quality. Advice as an adjunct to exercise was most effective for improving pain, back-specific function and work disability in chronic LBP but, for acute LBP, was no more effective for improving these outcomes than simple advice to stay active. Advice as part of a back school was most effective for improving back-specific function in subacute LBP; these trials generally demonstrated long-term positive results. Advice as an adjunct to exercise was the most common form of treatment for acute and chronic LBP; advice as part of a back school was most commonly used for subacute LBP. Fifteen percent of acute LBP trials had a positive outcome, compared to 86% and 74% of subacute and chronic LBP trials respectively. A wide variety of outcome measures were used, making valid comparisons between treatment outcomes difficult. The advice provided to patients with LBP within RCTs varied considerably depending on symptom duration. The findings of this review have important implications for clinical practice, and for the design of further clinical trials in this area. Advice to stay active is sufficient for acute LBP; however, it appears that RCTs do not commonly reflect these recommendations. No conclusions could be drawn as to the content and frequency of advice that is most effective for subacute LBP, due to the limited number and poor quality of RCTs in this area: this review provides preliminary support for advice as part of a back school approach. Given that the effectiveness of treatment for subacute symptoms will directly influence the development of chronicity, these results would suggest that education and awareness of the causes and consequences of back pain may be a valuable treatment component for this patient subgroup. For chronic LBP there is strong evidence to support the use of advice to remain active in addition to specific advice relating to the most appropriate exercise, and/or functional activities to promote active self-management. More investigation is needed into the role of follow-up advice for chronic LBP patients.

Reflective practice in physiotherapy curricula: a survey of UK university based professional practice coordinators.

There has been recent increasing interest in reflective practice within physiotherapy education as a method for reducing the 'theory-practice gap' and as a means of articulating, exposing and developing knowledge embedded in practice. Several contrasting theories have been developed to explain the role, place, purpose and definition of reflection in learning and teaching; however, much of the research to date has relied on theoretical debate rather than high quality empirical evidence. The aim of this paper was therefore, to report how a group of United Kingdom (UK) based physiotherapy Professional Practice Coordinators (n = 33) with their unique insight into the concept from both the academic and clinical perspective viewed and interpreted the use of reflective practice within their physiotherapy curriculum. Consent for the study was obtained via the professional body (The Chartered Society of Physiotherapists) (CSP) and data was collected via postal questionnaire. Results indicated a diversity of experience in respondents both in terms of their role as Coordinator and their training in reflective practice. There was also no clear consensus regarding facilitative models or assessment methods even though the majority of coordinators believed that reflective practice should be considered to be a central component of physiotherapy teaching strategies. The results of this survey provide a focus for further empirical research into reflective practice as part of the physiotherapy curricula, while advancing the understanding of reflective practice from a broader perspective and clarifying the benefits to students, teachers, patients and practitioners.

Current use of lumbar traction in the management of low back pain: results of a survey of physiotherapists in the United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the current use of traction and the types of patients, treatment parameters, and treatment modalities used in conjunction with traction. DESIGN: Postal survey, with 4 sections: professional characteristics of respondent, current use of traction, patient selection, and treatment parameters. SETTING: Musculoskeletal outpatient departments (private and nonprivate practitioners). PARTICIPANTS: Random sample (N=1491) of chartered physiotherapists in the UK who work in the management of low back pain (LBP). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Descriptive analysis of information on current use and practice in applying traction. RESULTS: A response rate of 83% (n=1239) was achieved; 41% (n=507) use lumbar traction, which is most commonly used in the management of subacute LBP patients presenting with nerve root symptoms. Treatment parameters were established for weights (5-60 kg), frequency (2-3 times weekly), and length of treatment (4 wk). In addition, traction is commonly used with other modalities (87%): mobilizations, advice, and exercise. CONCLUSIONS: Survey results show the continued use of lumbar traction despite the recommendations of numerous guidelines. Results also clarify the types of patients and the parameters used in the application of traction.

Exercise and chronic low back pain: what works?

The aim of this review was to investigate current evidence for the type and quality of exercise being offered to chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients, within randomised controlled trials (RCTs), and to assess how treatment outcomes are being measured. A two-fold methodological approach was adopted: a methodological assessment identified RCTs of 'medium' or 'high' methodological quality. Exercise quality was subsequently assessed according to the predominant exercise used. Outcome measures were analysed based on current recommendations. Fifty-four relevant RCTs were identified, of which 51 were scored for methodological quality. Sixteen RCTs involving 1730 patients qualified for inclusion in this review based upon their methodological quality, and chronicity of symptoms; exercise had a positive effect in all 16 trials. Twelve out of 16 programmes incorporated strengthening exercise, of which 10 maintained their positive results at follow-up. Supervision and adequate compliance were common aspects of trials. A wide variety of outcome measures were used. Outcome measures did not adequately represent the guidelines for impairment, activity and participation, and impairment measures were over-represented at the expense of others. Despite the variety offered, exercise has a positive effect on CLBP patients, and results are largely maintained at follow-up. Strengthening is a common component of exercise programmes, however, the role of exercise co-interventions must not be overlooked. More high quality trials are needed to accurately assess the role of supervision and follow-up, together with the use of more appropriate outcome measures.

The efficacy of traction for back pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of traction for patients with low back pain (LBP) with or without radiating pain, taking into account the clinical technique or parameters used. DATA SOURCES: A computer-aided search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, AMED, and the Cochrane Collaboration was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the English language, from 1966 to December 2001. STUDY SELECTION: RCTs were included if: participants were over the age of 18 years, with LBP with or without radiating pain; the intervention group received traction as the main or sole treatment; the comparison group received sham traction or another conservative treatment; and the study used 1 of 4 primary outcome measures. DATA EXTRACTION: The study was conducted in 2 strands. Strand 1 assessed methodologic quality using a specific criteria list recommended by the Cochrane Back Review Group. The strength of the evidence was then rated using the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research system. Strand 2 applied further inclusion criteria based on recommended clinical parameters. One reviewer conducted the selection and data extraction. DATA SYNTHESIS: Strand 1: 1 study scored 9 points (maximum score, 10 points); the other 12 scored between 0 and 3 points, indicating that most were of poor quality. Nine studies reported negative findings, but only 1 study was of a high quality. Three studies reported positive findings and 1 study was inconclusive. Strand 2: only 4 trials having low methodologic quality were included, 2 of which reported negative findings, and 2 positive findings. CONCLUSION: The evidence for the use of traction in LBP remains inconclusive because of the continued lack of methodologic rigor and the limited application of clinical parameters as used in clinical practice. Further trials, which give attention to these areas, are needed before any firm conclusions and recommendations may be made.

Physiotherapy management of low back pain: a survey of current practice in northern Ireland.

STUDY DESIGN: A questionnaire survey of physiotherapists treating low back pain. OBJECTIVE: To investigate current clinical practice in the physiotherapeutic management of low back pain in Northern Ireland. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND: Physiotherapists play an important role in the management of low back pain. However, there is relatively limited evidence about physiotherapy or about current physiotherapeutic management of low back pain. This survey aimed to establish current practice in this area. METHODS: Two sets of questionnaires were completed by physiotherapists during the period 1996-1997: one in relation to their professional profile, and subsequently a questionnaire for each patient referred by physicians to physiotherapy departments in the (government-funded) National Health Service in Northern Ireland. RESULTS: Physiotherapists (n = 157) recorded data for 1062 patients treated for low back pain in 35 outpatient centers across Northern Ireland. Of the patients treated, 70% had a duration of current episode more than 6 weeks; 26% of patients had previously received physiotherapy for low back pain. Physiotherapy treatment most commonly involved advice (89% of patients), McKenzie treatment (70%), Maitland mobilizations (42%), and interferential therapy (30.3%). CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: Physiotherapists typically treated subacute and chronic patients, principally using some types of manual techniques and advice, in keeping with current guidelines. However, high levels of the use of electrotherapy, and only limited use of manipulation, indicates the importance of further research to establish optimum management for this group of patients.