Safety of continuous intrathecal midazolam infusion in the sheep model.

UNLABELLED: We investigated the safety of midazolam administered by continuous intrathecal infusion in relevant animal models. Preservative-free midazolam was delivered to sheep and pigs by using implanted infusion systems (SynchroMed pumps plus silicone catheters). Sheep received midazolam 5 mg/d (n = 4) or 15 mg/d (n = 7) or saline (n = 2) for 43 days at 125 micro L/h. One sheep received 10 mg/d. Infusion concentrations ranged from 1.7 to 2.5 mg/mL (5 mg/d) and from 2.5 to 5.0 mg/mL (15 mg/d). Pigs were evaluated for toxicity only and received 15 mg/d (n = 2) or saline (n = 1) for 43 days at 125 micro L/h. Behavior, neurologic function, and vital signs were documented. Serum and cerebrospinal fluid chemistry and cytology were evaluated, and histology was performed on spinal cord tissue. Behavior and neurologic function remained normal in all subjects. Gross and microscopic evaluation of spinal tissue revealed mild inflammation surrounding the catheter tract in both the midazolam-treated and the saline-treated groups. This inflammation was likely attributable to the mechanical presence of the catheter. These data demonstrate that continuous intrathecal infusion of preservative-free midazolam at doses up to 15 mg/d were well tolerated. IMPLICATIONS: We investigated the toxicity of preservative-free intrathecal midazolam delivered continuously via implanted infusion systems in sheep and pigs. Doses of 5-15 mg/d were well tolerated. The lack of neurotoxicity observed suggests that intrathecal midazolam may be an alternative for the treatment of intractable pain that is unresponsive to opioids.

Continuous intrathecal infusion of hydromorphone: safety in the sheep model and clinical implications.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety of hydromorphone delivered by continuous intrathecal infusion via implanted delivery systems in sheep. DESIGN: Sheep implanted with intrathecal infusion systems were randomly assigned to receive either 1.5, 3, or 6 mg/day hydromorphone HCl or saline control (3 sheep/dose level) at a fixed infusion rate of 1.92 mL/day for 28-31 days. Infusions were initiated approximately 5 days after surgical implantation of the delivery systems (pumps and intrathecal catheters), and investigators were blinded to doses administered. An additional group of sheep (N=3) received hydromorphone (open label) at a dose of 12 mg/day. All animals were examined daily during drug infusion for changes in behavior and neurologic function. Cerebrospinal fluid was analyzed for protein, cytology, and hydromorphone concentration in samples collected prior to and at the end of drug infusion. The spinal cord with the catheter in situ was removed en bloc and fixed in formalin for microscopic analysis. RESULTS: All sheep receiving intrathecal hydromorphone exhibited gaiting deficits and biting behavior over the caudal lumbar area above the infusion site. Animals treated with 12 mg/day were sedate and lethargic, and exhibited repeated biting behavior over the caudal lumbar area during the study. No lesions were noted in any animal upon gross evaluation of the spinal cord. Microscopic changes were comparable between hydromorphone- and saline-treated animals with one exception. Mild inflammation 5 cm cranial to the catheter tip was present in two of three sheep receiving 12 mg/day and in one of three sheep receiving 1.5 mg/day. Mild chronic inflammation hydromorphone in the vicinity of the catheter was also presented in saline-treated animals. CONCLUSIONS: Hydromorphone was not associated with inflammatory mass formation in the sheep model. Further studies are necessary to determine whether hydromorphone is a safer alternative to morphine for continuous intrathecal infusion for the treatment of chronic pain.

Safety of chronic intrathecal morphine infusion in a sheep model.

BACKGROUND: The safety of chronically administered intrathecal morphine has been questioned. Therefore, the authors examined the behavioral and neurologic effects and neurotoxicity of continuous intrathecal morphine administration in sheep. METHODS: Groups of three sheep were implanted with intrathecal infusion systems for the continuous administration of morphine (3, 6, 9, 12, or 18 mg/day) or saline at a fixed infusion rate of 1.92 ml/day beginning approximately 7 days after implantation. Sheep were examined daily for any changes in behavior or neurologic function. After 28-30 days, the animals were humanely killed. Cerebrospinal fluid samples were collected and analyzed for protein, erythrocytes and leukocytes, and morphine content. The spinal cord and meninges with the catheter in situ was removed en bloc and fixed in formalin for histologic analysis. RESULTS: Unilateral hind-leg gait deficits were observed in two of three animals in each of the 12- and 18-mg/day dose groups. Gross and microscopic evaluation of spinal cord tissue from these animals revealed intradural-extramedullary inflammatory masses that compressed the spinal cord at the catheter-tip and mid-catheter areas. This inflammation was ipsilateral to extremities that exhibited gait deficits and had acute and chronic cellular components. CONCLUSIONS: The toxicity of intrathecal morphine seems to be dependent on the amount of morphine infused, although the effects of dose versus concentration cannot be clearly distinguished in this study. Intrathecal morphine doses of 12- 18 mg/day produced inflammatory masses extending from the catheter tip down the length of the catheter within the subarachnoid space. Doses of 6-9 mg/day produced mild-to-moderate inflammation 5 cm cranial to the catheter tip. A dose of 3 mg/day produced no neurotoxicity and spinal histopathologic changes that were equivalent to those observed in the saline-treated animals.