Benefits of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Elderly Myeloma Patients in the Last Quarter of Life.

Although survival outcomes have improved dramatically over the last few decades in newly diagnosed myeloma patients, elderly patients have not yielded the same magnitude of benefit as evidenced by higher rates of reported myeloma-related deaths in patients over the age of 75. This is of particular importance given this cohort comprises a large proportion of myeloma patients with the median age of diagnosis being 70 years. One contributor to this discrepancy is reduced use of high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT) in this population because of concerns for increased toxicity and safety. The objective of this retrospective analysis is to evaluate survival and safety outcomes in 53 newly diagnosed patients ≥74 years of age who underwent HDT/ASCT at our institution in comparison to 122 control patients in the same age bracket who did not undergo stem cell transplantation during this same time period. Patients treated at our institution were identified in our institutional myeloma database by age. They were all treated between November 2006 and October 2016 at the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University. Fifty-three patients were identified who had undergone HDT/ASCT, and, to assess the relative benefit of ASCT, 122 control patients in the same age range were also identified who did not undergo HDT/ASCT during the same time period. The median age for the entire cohort was 77 years (74 years in the ASCT group versus 78 in the non-ASCT group). Median time to ASCT was 6 months (range 2-57 months). There were no gender or race differences between the 2 groups, although a higher proportion of high-risk patients underwent HDT/ASCT. Ninety-three percent of ASCT patients received triplet induction therapy with a proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory agent backbone in comparison to only 55% of patients the non-ASCT group. The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the ASCT group was 50 months versus 30 months in the non-ASCT group. The median overall survival (OS) was 80 months versus 40 months, respectively. In high-risk patients, the median PFS was 60.8 months, and the median OS was 77.8 months in the ASCT group compared to 26 months and 38 months in the non-ASCT group, respectively. There were no transplant-related deaths within the first 100 days in the ASCT group. This study offers real-world perspective and data on the safety and survival benefit of ASCT in the elderly population with a near doubling of OS when compared to those treated with similar regimens and modern agents without ASCT. These data provide a rationale for offering ASCT in elderly patients pending a thorough pretransplantation evaluation.

Safety and survival outcomes for bloodless transplantation in patients with myeloma.

High-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) are established components in the treatment of multiple myeloma; however, undergoing transplantation usually requires hematopoietic support, which poses a challenge among patients who are unwilling to receive blood products. Most transplant centers decline HDT/ASCT to these patients because of safety concerns. Here, the authors' institutional data on safety, engraftment parameters, and survival outcomes after bloodless ASCT (BL-ASCT) are examined among patients with myeloma. This retrospective case-control study included patients who underwent BL-ASCT and Transfusion-supported ASCT (TS-ASCT) at Emory University Hospital between August 2006 and August 2016. In total, 24 patients who underwent BL-ASCT and 70 who underwent TS-ASCT were included. The median time for neutrophil engraftment, platelet engraftment and the median length of hospital stay all were equivalent for both groups. There were no transplant-related cardiovascular complications or mortality in either the BL-ASCT group or the TS-ASCT group. The median progression-free survival was 36 months and 44 months in the BL-ASCT and TS-ASCT groups, respectively (P = .277), and the median OS was not reached in either group at a median follow-up of 59 months after ASCT (P = .627). There was no transplant-related mortality at the 100-day or 1-year mark in either group. BL-ASCT is safe and feasible; transplant-related mortality, cardiovascular and hematologic complications are similar to those associated with TS-ASCT. Furthermore, BL-ASCT can yield similar engraftment and survival parameters comparable to those observed with TS-ASCT.

Peritransplantation Red Blood Cell Transfusion Is Associated with Increased Risk of Graft-versus-Host Disease after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

More than 90% of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients receive red blood cell (RBC) or platelet transfusions in the peritransplantation period. We tested the hypothesis that transfusions are associated with the development of severe (grade III-IV) acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) or mortality after allo-HSCT in a retrospective study of 322 consecutive patients receiving an allogeneic bone marrow or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized blood stem cell graft for a hematologic malignancy. Counting transfused RBC and platelet units between day -7 pretransplantation and day +27 post-transplantation, but excluding transfusions administered after a diagnosis of aGVHD, yielded medians of 5 RBC units and 2 platelet units transfused. Sixty-three patients (20%) developed a maximal grade III-IV aGVHD with onset up to day +150 post-transplantation (median aGVHD onset of 28 days). HLA mismatch (hazard ratio [HR], 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 4.7; P = .01), and transfusion of more than the median number of RBC units (HR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1 to 3.7; P = .02) were independently associated with greater risk of grade III-IV aGVHD in a multivariable analysis model. Disease risk strata (HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.4 for high risk versus low risk; P = .005) and transfusion of more than the median number of RBC units (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0 to 2.0; P = .054) were independently associated with inferior overall survival. These data support our hypothesis that peritransplantation RBC transfusions are associated with the risk of developing severe aGVHD and worse overall survival following allo-HSCT, and suggest that strategies to reduce routine RBC transfusion may favorably reduce the incidence and severity of GVHD.

Myeloablative busulfan/cytoxan conditioning versus reduced-intensity fludarabine/melphalan conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia.

Fludarabine and melphalan (Flu/Mel) has emerged as a more tolerable chemotherapy-based conditioning regimen compared with busulfan and cyclophosphamide (Bu/Cy) for allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT)) patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). We conducted a retrospective review of a single-institution database including patients with AML who received allo-HSCT following conditioning with Mel/Flu or Bu/Cy-based regimens. We performed descriptive statistical analysis to examine patient demographics and clinical outcomes. We identified 156 patients meeting criteria between 2005 and 2014. Overall, patients conditioned with Bu/Cy were significantly younger, but more likely to be treated in an earlier era than those receiving Flu/Mel. Regimen choice was not associated with relapse rates (RR), relapse-free survival (RFS), or overall survival (OS) on both univariate and multivariable analyses. Bu/Cy was associated with increased non-relapse mortality (NRM) on multivariable analysis. These findings demonstrate that Flu/Mel provides non-inferior disease control and could be an appropriate regimen for selected patients.

Similar survival for patients undergoing reduced-intensity total body irradiation (TBI) versus myeloablative TBI as conditioning for allogeneic transplant in acute leukemia.

PURPOSE: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the mainstay of treatment for adults with acute leukemia. Total body irradiation (TBI) remains an important part of the conditioning regimen for HCST. For those patients unable to tolerate myeloablative TBI (mTBI), reduced intensity TBI (riTBI) is commonly used. In this study we compared outcomes of patients undergoing mTBI with those of patients undergoing riTBI in our institution. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients with acute leukemia who underwent TBI-based conditioning, using a prospectively acquired database of HSCT patients treated at our institution. Patient data including details of the transplantation procedure, disease status, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), response rates, toxicity, survival time, and time to progression were extracted. Patient outcomes for various radiation therapy regimens were examined. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: Between June 1985 and July 2012, 226 patients with acute leukemia underwent TBI as conditioning for HSCT. Of those patients, 180 had full radiation therapy data available; 83 had acute lymphoblastic leukemia and 94 had acute myelogenous leukemia; 45 patients received riTBI, and 135 received mTBI. Median overall survival (OS) was 13.7 months. Median relapse-free survival (RFS) for all patients was 10.2 months. Controlling for age, sex, KPS, disease status, and diagnosis, there were no significant differences in OS or RFS between patients who underwent riTBI and those who underwent mTBI (P=.402, P=.499, respectively). Median length of hospital stay was shorter for patients who received riTBI than for those who received mTBI (16 days vs 23 days, respectively; P<.001), and intensive care unit admissions were less frequent following riTBI than mTBI (2.22% vs 12.69%, respectively, P=.043). Nonrelapse survival rates were also similar (P=.186). CONCLUSIONS: No differences in OS or RFS were seen between all patients undergoing riTBI and those undergoing mTBI, despite older age and potential increased comorbidity of riTBI patients. riTBI regimens were associated with shorter length of hospital stay, fewer intensive care unit admissions, and similar rates of nonrelapse survival, which may reflect reduced toxicity. Prospective trials comparing riTBI and mTBI are warranted.

Pharmacoeconomic analysis of palifermin to prevent mucositis among patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Trials have shown benefits of palifermin in reducing the incidence and severity of oral mucositis in patients with hematological malignancies undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with total body irradiation (TBI)-based conditioning regimens. Similar outcome data are lacking for patients receiving non-TBI-based regimens. We performed a retrospective evaluation on the pharmacoeconomic benefit of palifermin in the setting of non-TBI-based conditioning and autologous HSCT. Between January 2002 and December 2010, 524 patients undergoing autologous HSCT for myeloma (melphalan 200 mg/m²) and lymphoma (high-dose busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide) as preparative regimen were analyzed. Use of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was significantly lower in the palifermin-treated groups (myeloma: 13% versus 53%, P < .001; lymphoma: 46% versus 68%, P < .001). Median total transplant charges were significantly higher in the palifermin-treated group, after controlling for inflation (myeloma: $167,820 versus $143,200, P < .001; lymphoma: $168,570 versus $148,590, P < .001). Palifermin treatment was not associated with a difference in days to neutrophil engraftment, length of stay, and overall survival and was associated with an additional cost of $5.5K (myeloma) and $14K (lymphoma) per day of PCA avoided. Future studies are suggested to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of palifermin compared with other symptomatic treatments to reduce transplant toxicity using validated measures for pain and quality of life.

Pharmacokinetic-directed high-dose busulfan combined with cyclophosphamide and etoposide results in predictable drug levels and durable long-term survival in lymphoma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation.

The clinical advantage of pharmacokinetic (PK)-directed-based dosing on intravenous (i.v.) versus oral busulfan-related toxicity and survival remains unclear. We performed a retrospective cohort study of sequential cohorts of patients comparing PK-directed oral and i.v. busulfan-based conditioning regimens in lymphoma patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (ASCT). Patients received oral (n = 95), every 6 hours i.v. (IV16, n = 113), or once-daily i.v. (IV4, n = 86) busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide. PK-directed dosing was performed to achieve a predefined target area under the curve (AUC) of 20,000 µM-min (range: 18,400-21,600 µM-min). PK-directed dose adjustments markedly reduced the number of patients in the oral group with total AUC higher than the targeted AUC range, and reduced the variations of total AUC values in all patient groups. One hundred-day mortality was 2.1%, 3.6%, and 3.5% for oral, IV16, and IV4 cohorts, respectively. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 57% (95% confidence interval [CI] 45%-66%) and 64% (95% CI 53%-73%) for patients who received oral and i.v. busulfan, respectively. Both multivariable and instrumental variable analyses indicated the route of delivery had no significant impact on OS, whereas refractory disease and age ≥55 were significantly associated with poorer OS. In lymphoma patients undergoing ASCT, PK-directed i.v. or oral busulfan-based conditioning regimens have comparable toxicity and OS.

Effectiveness and cost analysis of "just-in-time" salvage plerixafor administration in autologous transplant patients with poor stem cell mobilization kinetics.

BACKGROUND: Plerixafor is a recently Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved CXCR4 antagonist, which is combined with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to facilitate stem cell mobilization of lymphoma and myeloma patients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: To evaluate the effectiveness and the related costs of a "just-in-time" strategy of plerixafor administration, we performed a retrospective cohort study comparing 148 consecutive lymphoma and myeloma patients in whom mobilization was attempted during 2008 before the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of plerixafor with 188 consecutive patients mobilized during 2009 after FDA approval. RESULTS: Plerixafor was administered to 64 of 188 patients considered to be at risk for mobilization failure due to either their medical history ("high risk," n = 23) or the occurrence of peripheral blood CD34+ count of fewer than 15 × 10(6) cells/L with a white blood cell count of greater than 10 × 10(9) cells/L after at least 5 days of G-CSF administration (just-in-time, n = 41). The success rates of collecting a minimum transplant CD34+ cell dose (≥2 × 10(6) cells/kg) or target cell dose (≥5 × 10(6) lymphoma or ≥10 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg myeloma) in the just-in-time patients compared favorably with the 36 poor mobilizers collected with G-CSF alone: 93% versus 72% and 42% versus 22%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of plerixafor in selected high-risk patients and poor mobilizers did not increase the total charges associated with stem cell collection when compared with poor mobilizers treated with G-CSF alone. The targeted use of plerixafor increased the overall success rate of mobilizing a minimum number of CD34+ cells from 93% to 98% in patients with hematologic malignancies scheduled for autotransplant and increased the overall charges associated with stem cell collection in all patients by an average of 17%.

Development of the Lymphoma Enterprise Architecture Database: a caBIG Silver level compliant system.

Lymphomas are the fifth most common cancer in United States with numerous histological subtypes. Integrating existing clinical information on lymphoma patients provides a platform for understanding biological variability in presentation and treatment response and aids development of novel therapies. We developed a cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid (caBIG) Silver level compliant lymphoma database, called the Lymphoma Enterprise Architecture Data-system (LEAD), which integrates the pathology, pharmacy, laboratory, cancer registry, clinical trials, and clinical data from institutional databases. We utilized the Cancer Common Ontological Representation Environment Software Development Kit (caCORE SDK) provided by National Cancer Institute's Center for Bioinformatics to establish the LEAD platform for data management. The caCORE SDK generated system utilizes an n-tier architecture with open Application Programming Interfaces, controlled vocabularies, and registered metadata to achieve semantic integration across multiple cancer databases. We demonstrated that the data elements and structures within LEAD could be used to manage clinical research data from phase 1 clinical trials, cohort studies, and registry data from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database. This work provides a clear example of how semantic technologies from caBIG can be applied to support a wide range of clinical and research tasks, and integrate data from disparate systems into a single architecture. This illustrates the central importance of caBIG to the management of clinical and biological data.

Changing management and outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation of 501 patients treated at a single comprehensive center.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated changes in therapy and outcome for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) over time in a large cohort of Western patients managed at one U.S. medical center. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients with HCC treated at one U.S. medical center was performed. Analyses were stratified by time intervals 1990-1996 (pre-Milan) and 1997-2004 (post-Milan) to examine impact of UNOS criteria adapted from the post-Milan experience with OLT on treatment and survival. RESULTS: From 1990 to 2004, 501 patients were identified, 170 (34%) pre-Milan and 331 (66%) post-Milan. Seventy-four (15%) underwent OLT, 99 (20%) had partial hepatectomy (PH), 51 (10%) had ablative therapy (Ablate), 84 (16%) had embolic treatment (Embo), and 194 (39%) had chemotherapy or supportive care (C/SC). Median survival for all patients was 11 months. By time interval, median overall survival (OS) was better for post-Milan patients as compared with the pre-Milan group (13 months vs. 7 months, P = 0.02). On multivariate analysis OLT had the strongest association with improved survival of all factors examined (Odds ratio 12.4, 95% CI 7.7-20.5). CONCLUSIONS: In this series, treatment post-1996 is associated with improved survival, likely due to improvements in selection criteria and outcomes for liver transplantation.

Development of query strategies to identify a histologic lymphoma subtype in a large linked database system.

BACKGROUND: Large linked databases (LLDB) represent a novel resource for cancer outcomes research. However, accurate means of identifying a patient population of interest within these LLDBs can be challenging. Our research group developed a fully integrated platform that provides a means of combining independent legacy databases into a single cancer-focused LLDB system. We compared the sensitivity and specificity of several SQL-based query strategies for identifying a histologic lymphoma subtype in this LLDB to determine the most accurate legacy data source for identifying a specific cancer patient population. METHODS: Query strategies were developed to identify patients with follicular lymphoma from a LLDB of cancer registry data, electronic medical records (EMR), laboratory, administrative, pharmacy, and other clinical data. Queries were performed using common diagnostic codes (ICD-9), cancer registry histology codes (ICD-O), and text searches of EMRs. We reviewed medical records and pathology reports to confirm each diagnosis and calculated the sensitivity and specificity for each query strategy. RESULTS: Together the queries identified 1538 potential cases of follicular lymphoma. Review of pathology and other medical reports confirmed 415 cases of follicular lymphoma, 300 pathology-verified and 115 verified from other medical reports. The query using ICD-O codes was highly specific (96%). Queries using text strings varied in sensitivity (range 7-92%) and specificity (range 86-99%). Queries using ICD-9 codes were both less sensitive (34-44%) and specific (35-87%). CONCLUSIONS: Queries of linked-cancer databases that include cancer registry data should utilize ICD-O codes or employ structured free-text searches to identify patient populations with a precise histologic diagnosis.