Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
PLoS One ; 9(9): e107924, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25247991

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Exercise capacity is a strong predictor of survival in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Exercise capacity improves after cardiac rehabilitation exercise training, but previous studies have demonstrated a decline in peak oxygen uptake after ending a formal rehabilitation program. There is a lack of knowledge on how long-term exercise adherence can be achieved in CAD patients. We therefore assessed if a 12-month maintenance program following cardiac rehabilitation would lead to increased adherence to exercise and increased exercise capacity compared to usual care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two-centre, open, parallel randomized controlled trial with 12 months follow-up comparing usual care to a maintenance program. The maintenance program consisted of one monthly supervised high intensity interval training session, a written exercise program and exercise diary, and a maximum exercise test every third month during follow-up. Forty-nine patients (15 women) on optimal medical treatment were included following discharge from cardiac rehabilitation. The primary endpoint was change in peak oxygen uptake at follow-up; secondary endpoints were physical activity level, quality of life and blood markers of cardiovascular risk. RESULTS: There was no change in peak oxygen uptake from baseline to follow-up in either group (intervention group 27.9 (±4.7) to 28.8 (±5.6) mL·kg (-1) min (-1), control group 32.0 (±6.2) to 32.8 (±5.8) mL·kg (-1) min (-1), with no between-group difference, p = 0.22). Quality of life and blood biomarkers remained essentially unchanged, and both self-reported and measured physical activity levels were similar between groups after 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: A maintenance exercise program for 12 months did not improve adherence to exercise or peak oxygen uptake in CAD patients after discharge from cardiac rehabilitation compared to usual care. This suggests that infrequent supervised high intensity interval training sessions are inadequate to improve peak oxygen uptake in this patient group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01246570.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/fisiopatología , Prueba de Esfuerzo/métodos , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Consumo de Oxígeno , Anciano , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/rehabilitación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Clin Rehabil ; 26(1): 33-44, 2012 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21937520

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Exercise capacity strongly predicts survival and aerobic interval training (AIT) increases peak oxygen uptake effectively in cardiac patients. Usual care in Norway provides exercise training at the hospitals following myocardial infarction (MI), but the effect and actual intensity of these rehabilitation programmes are unknown. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Hospital cardiac rehabilitation. SUBJECTS: One hundred and seven patients, recruited two to 12 weeks after MI, were randomized to usual care rehabilitation or treadmill AIT. INTERVENTIONS: Usual care aerobic group exercise training or treadmill AIT as 4 × 4 minutes intervals at 85-95% of peak heart rate. Twice weekly exercise training for 12 weeks. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was peak oxygen uptake. Secondary outcome measures were endothelial function, blood markers of cardiovascular disease, quality of life, resting heart rate, and heart rate recovery. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients (74 men, 15 women, 57.4 ± 9.5 years) completed the programme. Peak oxygen uptake increased more (P = 0.002) after AIT (from 31.6 ± 5.8 to 36.2 ± 8.6 mL·kg(-1)·min(-1), P < 0.001) than after usual care rehabilitation (from 32.2 ± 6.7 to 34.7 ± 7.9 mL·kg(-1)·min(-1), P < 0.001). The AIT group exercised with significantly higher intensity in the intervals compared to the highest intensity in the usual care group (87.3 ± 3.9% versus 78.7 ± 7.2% of peak heart rate, respectively, P < 0.001). Both programmes increased endothelial function, serum adiponectin, and quality of life, and reduced serum ferritin and resting heart rate. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased only after AIT. CONCLUSIONS: AIT increased peak oxygen uptake more than the usual care rehabilitation provided to MI patients by Norwegian hospitals.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Infarto del Miocardio/rehabilitación , Consumo de Oxígeno/fisiología , Análisis de Varianza , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital , Calidad de Vida
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA