Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 56
Filtrar
1.
Encephale ; 48 Suppl 1: S34-S38, 2022 Sep.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36064757

RESUMEN

Child abuse is a major health problem that can lead to physical and psychological issues. Its diagnosis can be difficult and sensitive. Physicians are submitted by law to inform the parents when they report to child welfare services or judicial authorities, unless otherwise in the minor's interest. This exercise is destabilizing for both patients and physicians. The physician must be trained to detect and announce a possible diagnosis of child abuse. To facilitate and increase those reports, we have developed guidelines for the physicians to help the exercise of announcement. These guidelines were based on pre-existing recommendations about how to announce bad news. We have also planned to put into practice these guidelines with a communication skills training program based on standardized patients. We propose the acronym PROTECT; P for plural: never stay alone in such situations, R for remaining a caregiver and not becoming an investigator or judge, O for obligation to protect minors, T for time, to take enough time to inform the parents and the child but in a limited time frame, E for explaining to the parents what preoccupy the professionals; C for centring ourselves on the child, his or her symptoms, needs and pain; T for total care of the child that should integrate physical, psychological, and social child health, through a global and interdisciplinary approach in collaboration with child welfare services, and should involve also the child in the process. This tool will be applied by simulation in child welfare training with standardized patients. The evaluation of this tool and its application would need further study.


Asunto(s)
Maltrato a los Niños , Médicos , Niño , Maltrato a los Niños/diagnóstico , Maltrato a los Niños/prevención & control , Protección a la Infancia , Familia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Padres
2.
Encephale ; 48 Suppl 1: S39-S43, 2022 Sep.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36055827

RESUMEN

Minor offenders are at risk for medico-psycho-social vulnerability, that impacts global health, schooling, professional future, and socio-familial environment; moreover, minors who are victims of violence and neglect are at greater risk of becoming offenders and minor offenders are at greater risk of suffering violence. Few data are currently available regarding global health and vulnerability factors for minors (i.e. those aged under 18) who have been placed in police custody. This study aimed to describe the judicial and social characteristics of these minors, their medical and psychological health status, with the hypothesis that most minors placed in police custody can be considered as abused or neglected, by presenting factors of vulnerability. We carried out a prospective study, including consecutive minors aged of 13 to 18 years old, who had been detained in custody at the Central Police Station of Nantes (France), from October 2012 to May 2013. The sociodemographic characteristics, scores for global health and the data collected from the welfare and judiciary services were analyzed, to identify abused or neglected minors. Ninety-nine teenagers were included: 78 males and 11 females (mean age±standard deviation: 16.5 years±1.01), who had been placed in custody for robbery, with a remarkable proportion of recidivist minors. Our study has highlighted several worrying characteristics of minors in police custody reflecting their vulnerability, as living conditions (no schooling, no fixed address) and irregular or absent medical follow-up; however their scores for global health were not different from the general population. While 49 minors (49.5 %) had already been identified by the welfare services, our study find that 35 added minors of this population should nonetheless be considered as being abused and/or neglected, based on a very high rate of minors already followed by child protection services and/or already penalized. Systematic health screening in custody could help to detect abused and/or neglected minors, in order to provide them access to appropriate medical and social cares. They could be referring to psychiatric or rehabilitation cares, and to the relevant welfare and judiciary services in order to assess if a specific protection measure is needed.


Asunto(s)
Salud Global , Prisioneros , Adolescente , Anciano , Niño , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Policia , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
3.
Arch Pediatr ; 28(5): 398-404, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33903000

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Infectious diseases are still an important cause of morbidity and mortality in high-income countries and may preferentially affect predisposed children, especially immunocompromised children. We aimed to evaluate the frequency of recommended immunological tests in children with community-onset severe bacterial infection (COSBI) admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit. We also assessed the frequency and described the typology of diagnosed primary immune deficiency (PID). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational epidemiological study in six university hospitals in western France. All children from 1 month to 16 years of age admitted to hospital for bacterial meningitis, purpura fulminans, or meningococcal disease between August 2009 and January 2014 were included. We analyzed the frequency, type, and results of the immunological tests performed on children with meningitis, purpura fulminans, or a meningococcemia episode. RESULTS: Among the 143 children included (144 episodes), 84 (59%) and 60 (41%) had bacterial meningitis and purpura fulminans or meningococcemia, respectively: 72 (50%) had immunological tests and 8% had a complete immunological investigation as recommended. Among the 72 children examined for PID, 11 (15%) had at least one anomaly in the immunological test results. Two children had a diagnosis of PID (one with C2 deficit and the other with C8 deficit) and seven other children had possible PID. Thus, the prevalence of a definite or possible diagnosis of PID was 12% among the children examined. CONCLUSION: PID is rarely investigated after COSBI. We raise awareness of the need for immunological investigations after a severe infection requiring PICU admission.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/complicaciones , Enfermedades de Inmunodeficiencia Primaria/etiología , Adolescente , Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Pediatría/métodos , Prevalencia , Enfermedades de Inmunodeficiencia Primaria/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
Arch Pediatr ; 28(4): 291-295, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33773893

RESUMEN

While enteroviruses (EV) are a well-recognized cause of aseptic meningitis in children, human parechoviruses (HPeV), especially genotype 3, have been increasingly reported as a frequent cause of sepsis-like illness and meningitis among young infants. The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of HPeV infections in infants and to compare them with those of well-known EV infections. This monocentric retrospective study was carried out at the pediatric unit of Nantes University Hospital from January 2015 to August 2018. All patients under 18 years of age with diagnosis codes referring to fever, for whom viral infection was suspected and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) specimens were collected, were included. All CSF specimens were screened by duplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay that allows for the simultaneous detection of EV and HPeV in clinical samples. During the study period, 1373 CSF specimens from patients under 18 were included. A total of 312 CSF samples were positive for HPeV (n=34) or EV (n=278). Among the 34 HPeV-positive patients, 97% (33/34) were under 3 months of age, whereas the rate was 54% (149/278) for EV-positive patients (P<0.001); thus, patients under 3 months of age were defined as the study population for the rest of this work. A review of the medical records was carried out for the positive cases. In this population, the HPeV detection rate was 5.6% versus 25.3% (P<0.001) for EV. All but one of the HPeV samples available for genotyping were HPeV-3. No seasonality was observed for HPeV infections. Length of hospital stay tended to be longer for children infected with HPeV compared with those infected by EV (3 days vs. 2 days, P=0.05). Clinicians reported more severe illness presentations among HPeV-infected infants, with more frequent administration of fluid bolus (P<0.02). Regarding laboratory characteristics, a significant lack of cellular reaction in the CSF (P=0.004) as well as lower C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (P=0.006) and neutrophil counts (P<0.001) were noted for HPeV infections compared with EV infections. Our results confirm the early onset of HPeV infections (more than 95% of patients aged under 3 months). The clinical presentation and laboratory characteristics of the two infections was similar. However, some higher clinical severity criteria and a lack of CSF pleocytosis were regularly observed in patients with HPeV infections. Considering the significant proportion (5.6%; 95% CI, 3.7-7.5) of all CSF samples in our series, HPeV detection should be systematically included in the microbiological diagnosis of febrile children under 3 months of age.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Enterovirus/diagnóstico , Enterovirus/aislamiento & purificación , Parechovirus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Picornaviridae/diagnóstico , Enterovirus/genética , Infecciones por Enterovirus/epidemiología , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Parechovirus/genética , Infecciones por Picornaviridae/epidemiología , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sepsis/diagnóstico
5.
Arch Pediatr ; 28(3): 178-185, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33618971

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The role of schools in the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infections in the community is still controversial. The objective of our study was to describe the epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 infections in different pediatric age groups during the first 2 months of the fall back-to-school period, in the context of increasing viral transmission in France. METHODS: Weekly epidemiological data provided by Santé Publique France and the Ministry of National Education were analyzed according to the age groups defined by the different school levels. Weeks (W) 34-42 were considered for analysis. RESULTS: The PCR positivity rate and incidence rate increased in all age groups during the study period, in an age-dependent manner. At W42, with adults being considered as reference, the risk ratio for a positive PCR test was 0.46 [95% CI: 0.44-0.49] and 0.69 [0.68-0.70] for children aged 0-5 years and 6-17 years, respectively. Similarly, the incidence rate ratio was 0.09 [0.08-0.09], 0.31 [0.30-0.32], 0.64 [0.63-0.66], and 1.07 [1.05-1.10] for children aged 0-5 years, 6-10 years, 11-14 years, and 15-17 years, respectively. Children and adolescents accounted for 1.9% of the newly hospitalized patients between W34 and W42, and for 1.3% of new intensive care admissions. No death was observed. Among infected children and adolescents, the percentage of asymptomatic individuals was 57% at W34 and 48% at W42. The number of schools closed remained low, less than 1% throughout the study period. The number of confirmed cases among school staff was consistent with the data measured in the general population. CONCLUSION: In the context of increasing viral transmission in the population, the spread among children and adolescents remained lower than that observed among adults, despite keeping schools open. However, the impact was age-dependent, with data in high schools close to those observed in adults.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/transmisión , Política de Salud , Instituciones Académicas/organización & administración , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infecciones Asintomáticas/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Hospitalización/tendencias , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
6.
Arch Pediatr ; 27(7): 388-392, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32921531

RESUMEN

The educational and social benefits provided by school far outweigh the risks of a possible COVID-19 contamination of children in school environments or in daycare centers. Following summer break, the back-to-school period in France is taking place in the context of an increasing viral spread and requires strict adherence to health measures to limit the risk of outbreaks in communities. Based on a critical update of the role of children in the transmission of the infection, and of children's susceptibility to infection, the French Pediatric Society published practical guidelines for school re-entry and the management of COVID-19 infections in schools.


Asunto(s)
Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/normas , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Instituciones Académicas , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Niño , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Árboles de Decisión , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Cuarentena , SARS-CoV-2 , Sociedades Médicas
7.
Arch Pediatr ; 27(7): 356-361, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32896455

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In light of the pending update of the French guidelines for the management of neonatal infections, knowing the current epidemiology of early-onset neonatal infection (EONI) is essential. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the current epidemiology of a French administrative district population of proven EONI, including umbilical cord blood procalcitonin levels. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective population-based study in the Nantes metropolitan area. We included all infants treated for proven EONI in the maternity, neonatology, and intensive care wards between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2015 in the Nantes University Hospital. RESULTS: Among the 140,502 children born during the study period, 61 cases of EONI were documented. The overall incidence of confirmed EONI was 0.43/1000 live births, with 0.23/1000 GBS (group B streptococcus) infections and 0.08/1000 Escherichia coli infections. The majority of infected newborns were full-term or late-preterm infants (67% were≥34 weeks of gestation), 88% had symptoms of EONI in the first 24h of life, most of which were respiratory. The mortality rate was 8% (in premature infants). Available in 51% of the population, the cord blood PCT value could contribute to an earlier diagnostic screening in 10% of cases but with a very low sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of confirmed EONI is low in this French district. The diagnostic value of PCT umbilical blood cord should be assessed based on further studies before confirming its value. We suggest that a national registry of these rare but serious cases of EONI could contribute to monitoring the epidemiological progression as well as to optimizing our diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Escherichia coli/epidemiología , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/epidemiología , Streptococcus agalactiae , Biomarcadores/sangre , Diagnóstico Precoz , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/sangre , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/diagnóstico , Femenino , Sangre Fetal/metabolismo , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Polipéptido alfa Relacionado con Calcitonina/sangre , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/sangre , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/diagnóstico , Streptococcus agalactiae/aislamiento & purificación
9.
Arch Pediatr ; 27(2): 79-86, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31791827

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Central venous catheters (CVCs) provide a great comfort for hospitalized children. However, CVCs increase the risk of severe infection. As there are few data regarding pediatric epidemiology of catheter-related infections (CRIs), the main objective of this study was to measure the incidence rate of CRIs in our pediatric university hospital. We also sought to characterize the CRIs and to identify risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted an epidemiological prospective monocentric study including all CVCs, except Port-a-Caths and arterial catheters, inserted in children from birth to 18 years of age between April 2015 and March 2016 in the pediatric University Hospital of Nantes. Our main focus was the incidence rate of CRIs, defined according to French guidelines, while distinguishing between bloodstream infections (CRBIs) and non-bloodstream infections (CRIWBs). The incidence rate was also described for each pediatric ward. We analyzed the association between infection and potential risk factors using univariate and multivariate analysis by Cox regression. RESULTS: We included 793 CVCs with 60 CRBIs and four CRIWBs. The incidence rate was 4.6/1000 catheter-days, with the highest incidence rate occurring in the neonatal intensive care unit (13.7/1000 catheter-days). Coagulase-negative staphylococci were responsible for 77.5% of the CRIs. Factors independently associated with a higher risk of infection in neonates were invasive ventilation and low gestational age. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of CRIs in children hospitalized in our institution appears to be higher than the typical rate of CRIs reported in the literature. This was particularly true for neonates. These results should lead us to reinforce preventive measures and antibiotic stewardship but they also raise the difficulty of diagnosing with certainty CRIs in neonates.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Edad Gestacional , Hospitales Pediátricos , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Respiración Artificial , Factores de Riesgo
10.
Arch Pediatr ; 25(6): 355-358, 2018 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30064711

RESUMEN

We present a prospective, observational study evaluating the incidence of medication errors (ME) in a university hospital pediatric emergency department and describe their characteristics and determinants. A systematic analysis of the handwritten prescriptions was conducted by a clinician and pharmacist. Of 11,573 consecutively studied prescriptions in children under 15 years of age, the ME incidence was 0.9% (n=102). The incidence of errors found was statistically significantly higher in children older than 5 years (OR=2.05; P=0.026). There was no significant difference regarding the time of admission (P=0.544), the day of the week (P=0.940), or the affluence of people in attendance at the emergency department. The errors observed were all prescription errors. Most errors were related to analgesic (51%) and antibiotic (30%) treatments. No serious errors were reported. CONCLUSION: We found a low incidence of medication errors in this study. The validation of prescriptions by a senior multidisciplinary staff could contribute to limited medication errors. Measures should be continued to further reduce the incidence of drug errors by calling the attention of prescribers to the most common situations at risk of ME.


Asunto(s)
Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Errores de Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Hospitales Universitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos
12.
Arch Pediatr ; 24(12): 1214-1219, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29153907

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Teenagers admitted to the emergency room for a violent attacks episode are increasingly numerous. The source of agitation is multifactorial for these teenagers, often with a complex course. They jeopardize hospital wards, which are often ill-suited for and overwhelmed during these outbursts. This study aims to identify and describe all the teenagers admitted to the hospital over 1 year for a violent outburst and discuss their management. METHODS AND EQUIPMENT: Retrospective and descriptive study of teenagers admitted to the pediatric emergency department of the Nantes University Hospital for a violent outburst in 2015. RESULTS: During this 1-year study, 99 teenagers out of a total of 182 consultations were admitted for a violent outburst. We noted that 85% of them had a previous history of a violent outburst, 70% of them were seeing a psychologist, and 56% were followed by the child welfare services. Most of the outbursts took place at home and were hetero-aggressive. Upon arrival at the pediatric emergency ward, 90% of the teenagers had calmed down. The mean time spent in the emergency ward was 3h42min. Finally, 31% of the teenagers were hospitalized in the general pediatric unit, 14% in the children's psychiatric department, and 8% in the adult psychiatry ward. CONCLUSION: We observed a high proportion of complex cases in the teenagers admitted to our emergency department for a violent outburst. These teenagers in distress, with a complex previous history, illustrated the relation between violence against themselves and their own violent behavior toward others. Developing short-stay units for a temporary isolation could be an advantageous multidisciplinary approach to allow somatic, psychological, and social evaluation of these vulnerable patients.


Asunto(s)
Violencia , Adolescente , Niño , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Admisión del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Violencia/estadística & datos numéricos
14.
Arch Pediatr ; 24(11): 1103-1110, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28965694

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to create a specific tool and evaluate its impact on the knowledge of primary care physicians (PCPs) in reporting child abuse to child protective services (CPS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective "before/after" study assessing the knowledge of general practitioners (GPs) registered at the medical board in a French administrative area through anonymous questionnaires. The tool was adapted from the guidelines published in 2014 by the French Health authorities. The main criterion was the median score (/100) calculated for each questionnaire before (Q1) and after (Q2) the dissemination of the tool. These median scores were compared and associations between scores and some PCPs' characteristics were tested through multiple linear regression. RESULTS: A total of 279 GPs answered the first questionnaire (Q1) and 172 answered the second (Q2). PCPs who answered were mainly women (68% and 74%), were between 30 and 50 years old (61% and 66%), practiced in association with other physicians (82% and 84), and had 15-30% children in their patient population. For Q1, the general median was 65 [IQR: 40-81] versus 82 [IQR: 71-91] for Q2 (P<0.001). The PCPs' characteristics leading to significant variations in the scores for Q1 were age older than 50 years, being female, and having been trained in diagnosis and management of child abuse, with the ß coefficient at -16.4 [95% CI: -31.1; -1.69], +8.93 [95% CI: 2.58; 15.27] and +12 [95% CI: 6.33; 17.73], respectively. DISCUSSION: This study confirms the significant impact of this new tool on PCPs' knowledge concerning reporting suspected child abuse to the CPS. CONCLUSION: Wider dissemination of this tool could increase PCPs' awareness and comprehension of when and how to make a report to the CPS.


Asunto(s)
Maltrato a los Niños , Servicios de Protección Infantil , Medicina General , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Notificación Obligatoria , Atención Primaria de Salud , Adulto , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Autoinforme
15.
Pediatr Cardiol ; 38(1): 176-183, 2017 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27844091

RESUMEN

Surgical site infections (SSI) increase length of stay, morbidity, mortality and cost of hospitalization. Staphylococcus aureus (SA) carriage is a known risk factor of SSI in adults, but its role in pediatrics remains uncertain. The main objective of this pilot prospective monocentric cohort study was to describe the prevalence of SA colonization in children under 1 year old before cardiac surgery. The secondary objectives were to compare the incidence of SSI and other nosocomial infections (NI) between preoperative carriers and non-carriers. From May 2012 to November 2013, all children <1 year old undergoing cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass underwent preoperative methicillin-resistant (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive SA (MSSA) screening using real-time PCR. The only exclusion criterion was invalid PCR. All patients were followed up to 1 year after the surgery regarding SSI and other nosocomial infections. Among the 68 studied patients, SA colonization prevalence was 26.5%, comprising 23.5% MSSA and 2.9% MRSA. There was no significant difference between colonized and non-colonized children regarding SSI rate (16.7 vs 20%; p = 0.53), but ventilator-associated pneumonia rate was significantly higher among the SA carriers (22.2 vs 2%; p < 0.05). The colonization rate was different depending on the age of the patients (p < 0.05). This pilot study highlights that colonization with MSSA is frequent whereas MRSA prevalence is low in our population. In this cohort, there was no association between SA colonization and SSI incidence but further studies are needed to analyze this association.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Portador Sano/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Portador Sano/microbiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Proyectos Piloto , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa , Factores de Riesgo , Staphylococcus aureus/genética
17.
Arch Pediatr ; 24 Suppl 3: S14-S17, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29433692

RESUMEN

In the era of intrapartum chemoprophylaxis to reduce GBS, rates of early onset bacterial infection have declined in term newborns. New guidelines have been written in order to adapt our current practices to this epidemiological evolution and limit excessive exams and antibiotic administrations. The main point of these new guidelines consists in a clinical systematic surveillance in maternity for well appearing newborns instead of the current empiric antibiotic treatment. Advised biological exams are also detailed.

18.
Arch Pediatr ; 24 Suppl 3: S9-S13, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29433696

RESUMEN

Rational use of antibiotic has become a national and international health priority to fight against the emergence of multiresistant bacteria. Neonates are particularly exposed to antibiotic treatments because of their high susceptibility to severe infection and the lack of specificity of sepsis signs that make diagnosis difficult. This population is also particularly susceptible to microbiota disruption due to antibiotic treatment. Implementation of antibiotic stewardship in neonate is then an urgent need. According to a literature review, principles of antibiotic stewardship implementation in neonate are based on: (i) a multidisciplinary team comprising infectious disease specialists and aware of neonatal specificities (diagnosis, bacterial epidemiology, pharmacology) ; (ii) clear and easy-to-evaluate goals discussed a priori with neonatologists ; (iii) short-term assessment of the impact on antibiotic consumption and antimicrobial resistance ; (iv) enablement of the healthcare professionals within the ward to enhance the sustainability and (v) support from the institution.

19.
Arch Pediatr ; 24(12S): S30-S35, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29290232

RESUMEN

Bacterial skin and soft tissues infections are common in children and frequently do not require systemic antibiotics, especially if lesions are superficial. Careful washing is always indicated in superficial lesions and is often sufficient. Careful evaluation of symptoms (which may be difficult despite the accessibility of the lesions) should be performed before prescription. Therefore, the need for drainage (spontaneous or surgical) should be assessed considering that antibiotics are mostly useless if purulent lesions are drained. Presence of toxinic symptoms (i.e., generalized cutaneous rash, diarrhea, hypotension) are strongly associated with enhanced severity. The bacterial targets for antibiotics are mainly Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and Streptococcus pyogenes. Considering the low incidence of methicillin-resistant SA in France, the French Pediatric Infectious Disease Group recommends the use of amoxicillin + clavulanate as the first-line antibiotic in most children suffering from severe skin infections requiring antibiotic treatment. In patients presenting toxinic symptoms and signs, the adjunction of an antibiotic with antitoxin properties such as clindamycin should be considered.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Cutáneas Infecciosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Niño , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto
20.
Arch Pediatr ; 24(12S): S36-S41, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29290233

RESUMEN

Acute hematogenous bone and joint infections (osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, osteoarthritis, and spondylodiscitis) affect more frequently children younger than 5 years of age. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment are needed to limit the risk of complications. Children with suspected bone and joint infections (BJI) should be hospitalized at the beginning of treatment. Surgical drainage is indicated in patients with septic arthritis and in those with periosteal abscess. Staphylococcus aureus is involved in BJIs in children at all ages; Kingella kingae is a very common causative pathogen in children under 4 years of age. The French Pediatric Infectious Disease Group recommends in children > 3 months of age empirical antibiotic therapy with appropriate coverage against methicillin-sensitive S. aureus with high doses (150mg/kg/day) of intravenous amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefuroxime or cefazoline. In most children with uncomplicated BJI, short intravenous antibiotic therapy for 3 days can be followed by oral therapy. The minimum total duration of antibiotic therapy should be 10 days for septic arthritis and 3 weeks for osteomyelitis.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Infecciosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Infecciosa/microbiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteomielitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteomielitis/microbiología , Niño , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA