Validity of the multidimensional assessment profile of disruptive behavior in autistic toddlers.

Objective: Early measurement of atypical disruptive behavior within autistic children is critical for later referrals to behavioral screenings, diagnoses, and services. Disruptive behavior in autistic toddlers is often measured using a categorical approach and identifies the presence or absence of behavior. In contrast, dimensional approaches evaluate behavior on a spectrum of typical to atypical by measuring the clinical salience of disruptive behavior. We sought to assess the validity of the Infant/Toddler version of the multidimensional assessment profile of disruptive behavior (MAP-DB-IT), a dimensional approach measurement tool, in a sample of autistic toddlers. Methods: Autistic toddlers (n = 82, M age = 33.2 months, SD = 6.28 months) and their mothers received 8 weeks of caregiver-mediated social communication intervention. Mothers completed the MAP-DB-IT and the Infant Toddler Social Emotional Assessment (ITSEA) across three timepoints: before intervention, immediately after intervention, and at 3 months post-intervention follow-up. The MAP-DB-IT provided scores for three subdomains: temper loss, noncompliance, and aggression (generically or specifically with siblings). Ratings on the MAP-DB-IT were compared to the ITSEA using several analytic strategies such as evaluating (a) the internal consistency of the MAP-DB-IT domain scores; (b) the convergent validity between the two measures; and (c) its convergent change due to intervention and if this varied by child characteristics. Results: The MAP-DB-IT demonstrated excellent internal consistency across all four subdomains. We evaluated convergent validity and found positive correlations between the (a) ITSEA externalizing and MAP-DB-IT aggression domain, (b) ITSEA externalizing and MAP-DB-IT aggression with siblings domain, and (c) ITSEA dysregulation and MAP-DB-IT temper loss domain. Conclusion: The MAP-DB-IT is a valid measurement tool for disruptive behavior in autistic toddlers. Clinicians should consider the use of the MAP-DB-IT for young autistic clients presenting with disruptive behavior to (a) discriminate between early developmentally appropriate tantrums from clinically salient dysregulation, and (b) refer to additional behavioral evaluations and services.

Autistic Children's Irritability During Social Communication Assessments.

PURPOSE: Accurate measurement of autistic children's social communication is critical for assessing skills, setting intervention goals, evaluating change over time, determining service eligibility, and determining classroom placement. There are various types of assessments, some of which use specific tasks to elicit social communication. Structured tasks may frustrate children, inadvertently elicit irritability, and have a cascading effect on their ability to communicate. To date, no studies have evaluated how differing types of social communication assessments may exacerbate children's irritability and impact assessment scores. We examined the extent to which (a) social communication assessment type (structured vs. naturalistic) impacts autistic children's irritability and (b) child irritability is associated with social communication scores. METHOD: Autistic toddlers (n = 114, Mage = 33.09 months, SD = 6.15) completed the Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales (CSBS; structured) and a 10-min play-based mother-child interaction (MCX; naturalistic). Child irritability was scored on both assessments using a global rating scale of 0-15. RESULTS: Child irritability during the CSBS was significantly higher than during the MCX (V = 4892, p < .001, r = .68). Higher irritability was associated with lower CSBS social communication scores (B = -0.05, p = .03), but not MCX scores (B = 0.04, p = .13; Theil's F = 6.92, p = .009). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the CSBS may pose unique challenges for autistic children, as it led to higher rates of irritability and negatively affected children's social communication scores. Evaluating the association between assessment type and irritability supports the complete characterization of autistic children's experience during assessments and clinicians in obtaining a more representative measure of social communication.

Characterizing mechanisms of caregiver-mediated naturalistic developmental behavioral interventions for autistic toddlers: A randomized clinical trial.

LAY ABSTRACT: Caregiver-mediated early interventions support caregivers' use of strategies to improve their young autistic child's communication. In the current clinical trial, we sought to isolate the most effective strategies to improve short-term and long-term child communication outcomes. Results demonstrated how children may benefit from caregiver prompts to facilitate long-term language outcomes. In conclusion, the current study improves our understanding of how early intervention facilitates child communication outcomes.

Understanding Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors in Autistic Toddlers.

PURPOSE: The majority of autistic toddlers present with clinically significant levels of internalizing or externalizing behaviors. Despite the prevalence of internalizing and externalizing behaviors in caseloads, the overwhelming majority of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) have not received specialized instruction in how to support children with these behaviors. The purpose of this study was to identify which child and caregiver characteristics are most associated with internalizing and externalizing behaviors in autistic toddlers in order to consider how SLPs may tailor their treatment to better support the individual needs of autistic children. METHOD: Participants included 109 mothers and their autistic children between 18 and 48 months of age. This study was a secondary analysis of data from a randomized clinical trial. Participants' baseline data included a variety of child (i.e., expressive language, receptive language, restricted and repetitive behavior [RRB], and nonverbal cognition) and caregiver (i.e., self-efficacy and responsiveness) characteristics. Seemingly unrelated regressions were conducted to determine which characteristics were associated with internalizing and externalizing behaviors in autistic toddlers. RESULTS: Higher RRB scores were associated with both higher internalizing and externalizing behavior scores. A lower nonverbal cognition score was also associated with higher internalizing behavior scores but to a lesser extent than RRB. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that SLPs may support internalizing and externalizing behaviors in autistic children by taking RRBs and nonverbal cognition into consideration.

A Comparison of Maternal and Clinician Perception of Communication in Autistic Toddlers.

PURPOSE: Parent instruction in communication facilitation strategies for autistic toddlers relies on assumptions that parents interpret child behaviors in alignment with clinician definitions of communication. The purpose of this study was to identify features of child behaviors that are predictive of alignment in identification of child communication between clinical researchers and mothers of young autistic children. METHOD: Participants were 33 mothers and their autistic children between 18 and 48 months of age. Mothers' and clinical researchers' perceptions of child communication were assessed using a procedure in which mothers and clinical researchers each independently identified child communication in the same ten 1-min video clips of each mother's child. Endorsed communicative acts were coded for the presence of conventional forms (e.g., vocalization) and potentially communicative forms (e.g., body movement). Multilevel binomial regressions, fit with Bayesian inference, were conducted to predict classification of maternal endorsements of child communication based on the presence of conventional and potentially communicative forms as either an aligned act (i.e., act endorsed by mother and clinical researcher as communicative) or a unique maternal endorsement (i.e., act endorsed by mother but not clinical researcher). RESULTS: The presence of vocalization, verbalization, and gesture each significantly predicted increased likelihood of alignment; the presence of eye contact did not. Although repetitive and sensory behaviors significantly increased the likelihood of unique maternal endorsement, affect shifts and body movements each significantly reduced the likelihood of unique maternal endorsement, and hand activity was not significantly predictive of unique maternal endorsement. CONCLUSIONS: Misalignment in mothers' and clinical researchers' identification of communication may be in part due to mothers' endorsement of behavioral forms that are not traditionally classified as part of a child's communication repertoire. Findings emphasize the need to work toward designing communication interventions that consider the ways in which clinicians and parents of autistic children each bring their own interpretive frameworks to the early intervention experience.

One size does not fit all for parent-mediated autism interventions: A randomized clinical trial.

LAY ABSTRACT: Parent-mediated interventions support parents' use of language facilitation strategies to improve their autistic child's communication and language development. To improve the effectiveness of parent-mediated interventions, it is important to individualize interventions. This article evaluates how different components of parent-mediated interventions and mothers' learning styles influence the effectiveness of the intervention. In a randomized clinical trial, mothers were taught to use one of two types of language facilitation strategies: responsive and directive. Mothers' learning styles were characterized by the Broad Autism Phenotype (BAP) and their natural tendency to use language facilitation strategies before intervention. Findings suggest that it was easier for all mothers (irrespective of learning style) to use responsive strategies compared to directive strategies. In addition, mothers with learning styles that were not consistent with the BAP were more likely to benefit from the intervention if they did not naturally use strategies before the intervention. In contrast, mothers with learning styles that were consistent with the BAP were more likely to benefit from the intervention if they did naturally use strategies before the intervention. Teaching mothers to use responsive strategies results in greater strategy use. Consideration of BAP and mothers' natural use of language facilitation strategies may inform intervention individualization.

Teaching Caregivers to Support Social Communication: Results From a Randomized Clinical Trial of Autistic Toddlers.

BACKGROUND: Studies of early caregiver-mediated interventions targeting social communication of young autistic children have yielded variable child outcomes. This study examined the effects of combining two caregiver-mediated interventions on caregiver strategy use and child social communication and language outcomes. METHOD: This was a multisite parallel randomized controlled trial. Participants included 120 caregivers and their autistic children between 24 and 36 months of age. Dyads were randomly assigned to receive a hybrid intervention that combined Enhanced Milieu Teaching (EMT) and Joint Attention, Symbolic Play, Engagement, and Regulation (JASPER) or to a behavior management control condition, each delivered over 6 months. Caregivers in the JASP-EMT group received twice-weekly, in-home, and hour-long sessions. Outcomes were measured at baseline, the end of intervention (T1), and 6 months later (T2) and included a naturalistic language sample procedure, standardized measures, and caregiver report measures. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02595697). RESULTS: Child outcomes did not differ between conditions at T1 or T2 for child primary (social communication) or secondary (language, play, and autism symptoms) outcomes. Relative to control group caregivers, intervention group caregivers demonstrated significantly higher use of JASP-EMT strategies at T1 and T2, with the exception of two strategies (Responsiveness and Matched Responsiveness), which were used significantly more by control group caregivers. Neither autism severity nor baseline caregiver responsiveness moderated outcomes. Post hoc analyses revealed significant correlations between specific strategies and all child outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Twice-weekly caregiver-mediated intervention that taught caregivers of autistic children to use social communication support strategies did not yield significant child outcomes. Future studies should examine possible sources for the lack of main effects including unexpected differences in linguistic features of caregiver input, changes in control group caregiver behavior, and insufficient intervention dosage. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.21714278.

Measuring Change During Intervention Using Norm-Referenced, Standardized Measures: A Comparison of Raw Scores, Standard Scores, Age Equivalents, and Growth Scale Values From the Preschool Language Scales-Fifth Edition.

PURPOSE: Norm-referenced, standardized measures are tools designed to characterize a child's abilities relative to their same-age peers, but they also have been used to measure changes in skills during intervention. This study compared the psychometric properties of four types of available scores from one commonly used standardized measure, the Preschool Language Scales-Fifth Edition (PLS-5), to detect changes in children's language skills during and after a language intervention. METHOD: This study included data from 110 autistic children aged 18-48 months whose mother participated in an 8-week parent-mediated language intervention. Children's language skills were measured at 3 time points using the PLS-5. Changes in children's expressive and receptive language skills were calculated using raw scores, standard scores, age equivalents, and growth scale values (GSVs). RESULTS: Analysis of raw scores, age equivalents, and GSVs indicated significant improvement in the scores of autistic children in both receptive and expressive language throughout the study (i.e., during the intervention period and in the 3-month period after the intervention). Standard scores suggested improvement only in the receptive language scale during the intervention period. Standard scores showed a floor effect for children who scored at -3 SD below the mean. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggested that GSVs were not only psychometrically sound but also the most sensitive measure of direct changes in skills compared to raw, standard, and age-equivalent scores. Floor effects may limit the sensitivity of standard scores to detect changes in children's skills. Strengths, limitations, and interpretations of each of the scoring approaches in measuring changes in skills during intervention were discussed. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.21498522.

Screening for Autism in 2-Year-Old Children: The Application of the Systematic Observation of Red Flags to the Screening Tool for Autism in Toddlers and Young Children.

PURPOSE: A multimeasure approach was developed to capitalize on the strengths of two screening measures: the Screening Tool for Autism in Toddlers and Young Children (STAT), an observational measure of social communication, and the Systematic Observation of Red Flags (SORF), a checklist including restricted and repetitive behavior (RRB) items. This approach offers a novel method of identifying autism in toddlers. METHOD: This was a retrospective study of data collected from a multidisciplinary diagnostic program for 24- to 36-month-olds with developmental delays. Raters with autism expertise but naïve to diagnoses applied the SORF to STAT videos. Psychometrics were derived for the SORF on STAT observations and a multiple-measure approach that used a Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator modeling framework to construct a STAT-SORF RRB Hybrid, retaining SORF RRB items based on individual predictive abilities. RESULTS: The SORF alone correctly classified 84% of the sample (84% sensitivity and 86% specificity). The STAT-SORF RRB Hybrid model, which retained four SORF RRB items, correctly classified 90% of a validation sample (95% sensitivity and 75% specificity). CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the potential utility of using multiple autism identification tools and regression-based scoring to establish presumptive eligibility and facilitate early access to autism interventions.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Illinois Early Intervention Services.

PURPOSE: We sought to understand the extent of the nationwide disruption to Part C Early Intervention services due to COVID-19 and the subsequent shift to telehealth, primarily through a focused examination of providers' perspectives on this disruption in a single state, which is Illinois. METHOD: To examine the impact of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) on Early Intervention service provision and implementation, 385 Early Intervention Illinois providers completed a web-based survey. Archival data were used to determine changes in number of Illinois Early Intervention referrals following the pandemic onset and to compare Illinois' telehealth and stay-at-home policies to those of other states. RESULTS: The majority (85%) of Illinois Early Intervention providers reported a disruption in service provision during COVID-19. The number of sessions delivered and the number of children per caseload decreased significantly. Provider confidence also decreased significantly. Only 28% of providers reported high confidence with telehealth. Identified benefits of telehealth included increased accessibility and caregiver involvement, whereas limitations included perceived lack of caregiver buy-in. New Illinois Early Intervention referrals and cases were lower during COVID-19 than in the previous year. Prior to 2020, 33 states did not have a permanent reimbursement policy for providing telehealth Early Intervention services. For states with a suspension of in-person Early Intervention services due to COVID-19, time to approval for telehealth reimbursement varied (0-22 days). CONCLUSIONS: The shift to telehealth in Illinois resulted in decreases in service provision and provider confidence across disciplines. However, providers identified some benefits to telehealth. Telehealth may represent a means to increase Early Intervention accessibility following the pandemic. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.19119539.

Beyond pass-fail: Examining the potential utility of two thresholds in the autism screening process.

Access to early intervention as early in development as possible is critical to maximizing long-term outcomes for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). However, despite the fact that ASD can be reliably diagnosed by 24 months, the average age of diagnosis is 2 years later. Waitlists for specialized developmental evaluations are one barrier to early diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to examine one potential approach to reducing wait time for an ASD diagnostic evaluation by examining the utility of using more than one threshold for an autism screening tool, the Screening Tool for Autism in Toddlers and Young Children (STAT). Participants included 171 children between 24 and 36 months of age who received a medical diagnostic evaluation through Illinois' Early Intervention Program. This study directly compared the performance of the STAT when scored: (a) using the original single threshold, (b) using seven equally weighted items using a single threshold, and (c) using all items differentially weighted based on how strongly that item predicts a later ASD diagnosis. In addition, this study explored the potential utility of using two thresholds rather than a single threshold for each scoring method. Results of this study suggest that using a two-threshold logistic regression method has potential psychometric advantages over a single threshold and categorical scoring. Using this approach may reduce the wait time for specialty ASD diagnostic evaluations by maximizing true negatives and true positives, such that specialty evaluations may be reserved for those cases that are more ambiguous or more complex. Autism Research 2019, 12: 112-122. © 2018 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc. LAY SUMMARY: This study examined the benefits of using two versus one cutoff score when screening for autism. Results indicate that having two scores and weighting test items based on predictive association with an autism diagnosis is better than using a single score and weighting each item equally. Using such an approach may reduce the wait time for specialty autism diagnostic evaluations, such that specialty evaluations may be reserved for those cases that are more ambiguous or more complex.