RESUMEN
A safety huddle is a meeting held among district nurses, allied health professionals, specialist nurses, administrative staff, community matrons and healthcare assistants, also known as the wider multidisciplinary team. This article aims to identify and discuss the importance of safety huddles within a community nursing team. The author, a Specialist Community Practitioner District Nurse (SCPDN), explores why safety huddles were introduced and the implications of staff and patient safety if a safety huddle is not performed. The article also discusses the role of the SCPDN, how patient harm is sustained when communication failures occur within a team, new technologies implemented into practice and the implementation of safety huddles electronically.
Asunto(s)
Enfermería en Salud Comunitaria/organización & administración , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Seguridad del Paciente , Comunicación , Conducta Cooperativa , HumanosRESUMEN
The records of the Transfusion Medicine Service of the Veterinary Teaching Hospital at The Ohio State University were searched for client-owned cats that received whole blood (WB), packed red blood cells (PRBCs), or fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusions between December 1, 1997, and April 1, 2000. Eighty-one cats received 112 units of blood products, consisting of 49 units of WB (administered to 35 cats), 44 units of PRBCs (administered to 34 cats), and 19 units of FFP (administered to 13 cats); 10 cats received more than 1 product each. Anemia was the most common reason for transfusing RBC-containing blood products, requiring 33 units of WB (75%) and 39 units of PRBCs (80%). The 2 most common causes of anemia were blood loss (27%) and renal disease (20%). Hypoalbuminemia (n = 9) and coagulopathies (n = 6), primarily due to liver disease (n = 7), were the 2 most common reasons for cats to receive transfusions of FFP. There were no differences in increase in PCV after administration of either 1 unit of WB or 1 unit of PRBCs (P = .22). Transfusion reactions occurred in 3 cats; 2 reactions were mild febrile events, but a fatal reaction occurred when a type B cat inadvertently received type A blood.
Asunto(s)
Anemia/veterinaria , Transfusión Sanguínea/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Gatos/epidemiología , Enfermedades de los Gatos/terapia , Anemia/epidemiología , Anemia/terapia , Animales , Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea/epidemiología , Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea/terapia , Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea/veterinaria , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Gatos , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/estadística & datos numéricos , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/veterinaria , Femenino , Masculino , Ohio/epidemiología , Plasma , Registros/veterinaria , Insuficiencia Renal/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal/terapia , Insuficiencia Renal/veterinaria , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Greyhounds frequently have laboratory values that are outside reference intervals established for dogs. Our recognition of increased serum creatinine concentrations in several Greyhounds posed a problem when evaluating a Greyhound with suspected renal disease. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare serum creatinine concentrations between Greyhound and non-Greyhound dogs. METHODS: Thirty retired racing Greyhounds and 30 age- and gender-matched control non-Greyhound dogs were evaluated. Serum creatinine concentrations in both groups were measured using a standard biochemical method and compared statistically using a Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: Creatinine concentration was significantly higher in the Greyhounds (P <.01) than in the control group. CONCLUSION: Greyhounds have a higher serum creatinine concentration than do non-Greyhound dogs. This idiosyncrasy should be taken into account when evaluating healthy Greyhounds and those with suspected renal disease.