RESUMEN
Background: First described by Michal et al in 1972, penile revascularization for vasculogenic impotence and its outcomes has been scarcely reported in plastic surgery literature. Such injuries are often secondary to atherosclerosis of the distal internal pudendal, common penile or proximal cavernosal artery, or locoregional trauma. Various techniques have been described to restore blood flow to the cavernosal body. Methods: In this report, we review 2 cases of penile revascularization for arteriogenic erectile dysfunction at our level 1 trauma center in 2021-2022 completed by the senior author in conjunction with urology. Results: Both patients sustained pelvic crush injuries with resultant arteriogenic impotence minimally responsive to medical management with phosphodiesterase inhibitors and/or injection therapy. After thorough urologic and vascular workup, they underwent microsurgical revascularization of the penis utilizing the deep inferior epigastric arteries with anastomosis to the deep dorsal penile veins. Both patients demonstrated improvement in erectile dysfunction and were able to achieve sustained erection with adequate glans tumescence on minimal pharmacotherapy postoperatively. One patient noted ability to achieve penetration. Patient 1 experienced postoperative retention requiring Foley placement, and both patients experienced glans edema requiring additional urologic procedures (patient 1: dorsal slit, patient 2: completion circumcision). Conclusions: Overall, we have demonstrated improvement of sexual function with the most common complication being prolonged penile edema requiring release of constriction by our urology colleagues. Additional research in the plastic surgery field is warranted to further refine the technique and improve outcomes.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The goal of treating periprosthetic infection, besides its eradication, is to avoid recurrence. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of increasing Infection Severity (IS) score (based on the 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Orthopedic Infections statement), single-stage revision, and pathogenicity of the infective organism on the risk of infection recurrence. METHODS: A database of 790 revisions performed by a single surgeon from 2004-2020 was reviewed for patients with minimum 2-year follow-up and ≥1 positive culture finding and/or pathology result from the revision surgical procedure. In total, 157 cases performed in 144 patients met the inclusion criteria. These cases were then categorized by infection probability (IS score) according to the 2018 consensus statement. Of 157 cases, 46 (29%) were classified as definitely or probably infected; 25 (16%), possibly infected; and 86 (55%), unlikely to be infected. Additionally, patients were grouped by single-stage surgery and pathogenicity of the infective organism. RESULTS: A recurrence in this study was classified as the growth of the same organism in any patient requiring revision surgery. The 86 cases in the group with unlikely infection showed a recurrence rate of 2.3%. The 25 cases in the group with possible infection showed a recurrence rate of 12%. The 46 cases in the group with definite or probable infection showed a recurrence rate of 17.4%. Patients in the definite/probable infection group had a higher rate of recurrence than those in the groups with possible infection and unlikely infection (P = .009). The IS score was higher in the recurrence group than the non-recurrence group (7.5 ± 4.3 vs. 3.9 ± 3.4, P < .001). Overall, patients who underwent 1-stage revision had a 5.0% recurrence rate, but among the 34 patients with an infection classification of definite or probable who underwent 1-stage revision, the recurrence rate was 5.9%. Cases of highly virulent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus also showed a recurrence rate of 30.8% compared with 4.0% and 5.9% for Cutibacterium acnes and coagulase-negative staphylococci, respectively (P = .005). CONCLUSION: Recurrent infection after treatment of a periprosthetic infection is associated with increasing severity scores, as defined in the 2018 consensus statement, and more aggressive microorganisms. However, a single-stage surgical procedure, even in patients with higher IS scores, did not impart a significantly increased risk of recurrence.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Recurrencia , Reoperación , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Prótesis de Hombro/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Despite advances in management, open fractures are at an elevated risk for deep fracture-related infection (FRI). Time to systemic antibiotic (ABX) administration and intraoperative topical administration of ABX powder have been used to decrease FRI risk. The purpose of this study was to determine whether topical application of antibiotic powder to type III open lower extremity fractures immediately on presentation to the emergency department (ED) reduces the rate of FRI. DESIGN: Prospective cohort compared with retrospective historical control. SETTING: Level I trauma center. INTERVENTION: Application of 1 g of vancomycin and 1.2 g of tobramycin powder directly to open fracture wounds on presentation to the ED. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Patients with type III open lower extremity fractures treated from July 1, 2019, to September 17, 2022, who received topical ABX powder in the ED were compared with patients from a 4-year historical cohort from July 1, 2015, to June 30, 2019, who were treated without topical ABX powder. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Development of a FRI within 6 months of follow-up. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, and postoperative data were analyzed as risk factors for FRI. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients received topical ABX powder in the ED and were compared with 129 patients who were treated without topical ABX powder. The rate of FRI in the trial group was 6/66 (9.09%) versus 22/129 (17.05%) in the control cohort ( P = 0.133). Multivariate analysis demonstrated higher body mass index as a risk factor for development of FRI ( P = 0.036). CONCLUSION: No statistically significant difference in rates of FRI in open lower extremity fractures treated with immediate topical ABX administration in the ED versus standard-of-care treatment without topical ABX was found. These findings may have been limited by insufficient power. Further large-scale study is warranted to determine the significance of topical antibiotic powder application in the ED. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Abiertas , Traumatismos de la Pierna , Humanos , Antibacterianos , Fracturas Abiertas/complicaciones , Fracturas Abiertas/tratamiento farmacológico , Fracturas Abiertas/cirugía , Traumatismos de la Pierna/complicaciones , Traumatismos de la Pierna/diagnóstico , Extremidad Inferior , Polvos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Centros Traumatológicos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Lipoproteins (LPs) are circulating heterogeneous nanoparticles produced by the liver and intestines. LPs play a major role in the transport of dietary and endogenous lipids to target cells through cell membrane receptors or cell surface-bound lipoprotein lipase. The stability, biocompatibility, and selective transport of LPs make them promising delivery vehicles for various therapeutic and imaging agents. This review discusses isolation, manufacturing, and drug loading techniques used for LP-based drug delivery, as well as recent applications for diagnosis and treatment of cancer, atherosclerosis, and other life-threatening diseases.