High-dose dexamethasone treatment for COVID-19 severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective study.

Low-dose dexamethasone reduces mortality in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of high-dose dexamethasone in patients with COVID-19-related ARDS and evaluated factors affecting the composite outcome (death or invasive mechanical ventilation). From March 4th to April 1st 2020, 98 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were included. Those who after at least 7 days from symptom onset presented a worsening of the respiratory function or of inflammatory biomarkers were started on intravenous high-dose dexamethasone (20 mg daily for 5 days, followed by 10 mg daily for 5 days). Most patients were males (62%) with a mean age of 69 years. Hypertension and cardiovascular disease (CVD) were prevalent. Following dexamethasone treatment, a significant improvement in PaO2/FiO2 (277.41 [178.5-374.8] mmHg vs. 146.75 [93.62-231.16] mmHg, p < 0.001), PaO2 (88.15 [76.62-112.0] mmHg vs. 65.65 [57.07-81.22] mmHg, p < 0.001), and SpO2 (96 [95-98]% vs. 94 [90-96]%, p < 0.001) was observed. A concomitant decrease in C-reactive protein and ferritin levels was found (132.25 [82.27-186.5] mg/L vs. 7.3 [3.3-24.2] mg/L and 1169 [665-2056] ng/mL vs. 874.0 [569.5-1434] ng/mL, respectively; p < 0.001 for both vs. baseline). CVD was found to increase the risk of the composite outcome (RR 7.64, 95% CI 1.24-47.06, p = 0.028). In hospitalized patients with COVID-19-related ARDS, high-dose dexamethasone rapidly improves the clinical status and decreases inflammatory biomarkers. CVD was found to increase the risk of the composite outcome. These data support the importance of randomized clinical trials with high-dose dexamethasone in COVID-19 patients.

Epidemiology and secondary prevention of ischemic stroke in patients on antiplatelet drug: a retrospective cohort study.

One-third to one-half of ischemic strokes occurred in patients taking antiplatelet drugs. The optimal therapeutic strategy for antithrombotic drugs remains uncertain and guidelines provide scarse recommendation. Therefore, aims of our study were to: (i) estimate the prevalence of patients who develop an ischemic stroke while on antiplatelet drugs, (ii) investigate potential factors associated with this phenomenon, (iii) describe management strategies in daily clinical practice. Consecutive adult patients admitted for acute ischemic stroke at the academic hospital of Varese, Italy, from January 2010 till December 2011 were included. Patients were retrospectively identified by searching the administrative database of the hospital. Odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for identifying factors associated with dependent variable were estimated using univariate logistic regression. Any variable with a p value < 0.2 at univariate analysis was included in a multivariate model. A total of 419 patients were included. Patients with ischemic stroke while on antiplatelet drugs were 49.6%. The following baseline characteristics were associated with the occurrence of ischemic stroke in patients taking antiplatelet drugs: diabetes mellitus (DM), history of ischemic heart disease (IHD), age > 65 years and previous stroke or transient ischemic stroke (TIA). The following variables were significantly associated with a change of antithrombotic therapy at discharge: DM, history of IHD and previous stroke or TIA. Our study confirms that the occurrence of ischemic stroke during antiplatelet treatment is common and management of antithrombotic therapy is heterogeneous. Factors that may explain therapeutic failure include undetected cardioembolic sources, drug resistance, poor compliance, or the presence of diabetes, atherothrombotic disease, and advanced age. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to assess the optimal antithrombotic strategy for ischemic stroke occurred in patients taking antiplatelet drugs.

Cancer-associated ischemic stroke: A retrospective multicentre cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The association between stroke and cancer is well-known but insufficiently investigated. Aim of this multicentre retrospective cohort study was to estimate the prevalence of cancer-associated ischemic stroke, describe clinical outcomes in patients with cancer-associated ischemic stroke and investigate independent factors associated with active cancer. METHODS: Consecutive adult patients admitted for acute ischemic stroke were included. Included patients were admitted in the Stroke Unit of the Hospital of Perugia, Italy, from March 2005 to March 2015, and in a medical unit of the Hospital of Varese, Italy, from January 2010 till December 2011. Clinical and laboratory data of patients with and without active cancer were collected. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent factors associated with active cancer. RESULTS: A total of 2209 patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke were included with a median hospital stay of 9 days (interquartile range 5.75-14). Mean age was 72.7 years (standard deviation +/- 13); 55% patients were male and 4.4% had active cancer. Factors significantly associated with the presence of active cancer were age > 65 years (odds ratio [OR] 3.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.64-6.81), occurrence of venous thromboembolism [VTE] (OR 2.84; 95% CI 1.12-7.19), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level < 70 mg/dL (OR 1.92; 95% CI 1.06-3.47), cryptogenic stroke subtype (OR 1.93; 95% CI 1.22-3.04). Overall mortality rate during hospital stay was greater in patients with active cancer (21.5% vs. 10% P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Older age, occurrence of VTE, low LDL level, and cryptogenic stroke subtype, are independently associated with active cancer. Overall, our findings suggest a possible prevalent role of hypercoagulability in the pathogenesis of cancer-associated ischemic stroke.