Prevalence of missed nursing care and its association with work experience: A cross-sectional survey.

Background: Nurses faced with multiple demands in hospitals are often compelled to prioritize nursing care. Knowledge of missed nursing care provides insight into whether necessary nursing care is delivered, what is missed, and the reasons for missed nursing care. This insight is essential to support evidence-based policy and practice to improve patient care, enhance nursing practice, and optimize the work environment. Research on factors influencing missed nursing care is imperative to implement targeted strategies. However, studies investigating work experience as a predictor are inconclusive, and no identified studies have examined how nurses' work experience is associated with different elements of missed nursing care. Objectives: To investigate the prevalence and reasons for missed nursing care and whether nurses' work experience was associated with missed nursing care. Design: The design was cross-sectional, using the Danish version of the MISSCARE survey. Setting: The study was conducted at a public Danish university hospital with 1,150 beds and approximately 10,350 employees. Participants: Across 34 surgical, medical, and mixed bed wards for adults, 1,241 nurses were invited by email to respond anonymously to the Danish MISSCARE survey. Of these nurses, 50.3% responded, and 42.6% fully completed the questionnaire. Methods: A total score mean and a mean score were calculated and then compared between experience (≤5 years/>5 years) in a linear regression model adjusting for unequally distributed variables. Results: More than two thirds of the nurses reported that emotional support, patient bathing, ambulation, mouth care, interdisciplinary conferences, documentation, and assessing effectiveness of medication were frequently missed elements of nursing care. The most significant reasons for missed nursing care were an inadequate number of nurses, an unexpected rise in patient volume, urgent patient situations, heavy admission, and discharge activity. Nurses with work experience of less than 5 years reported more missed nursing care, especially within fundamental care. Conclusions: Nursing elements to avoid potentially critical situations and nursing related to treatment observations were rarely missed, while nursing care elements visible only to the patient and the nurse were most often missed. By increasing transparency and explicitness within nursing care, the results enable critical evaluation of prioritization of nursing care elements. The number of staff not balancing the number and acuity of patients was the main reason for missed nursing care. The perception of missed nursing care was most pronounced in less experienced nurses. The study contributes to the global research community to achieve a broader understanding of missed nursing care. Tweetable abstract: Nursing to avoid potentially critical situations and treatment observations are prioritized over fundamental care, perceived mainly by less experienced nurses.

Frontline nurses' experiences of managing visitor restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic in a Danish university hospital - Lessons learned.

BACKGROUND: Worldwide visitor restrictions forced nurses to separate patients from their relatives. However, the experience of implementing shifting restrictions from the frontline nurses' perspectives in a Danish context has yet to be assessed. AIM: The aim of this descriptive qualitative study was to explore frontline nurses' experiences of managing shifting visitor restrictions in a Danish somatic university hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: An online questionnaire, including open-ended questions, was developed. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis. FINDINGS: 116 nurses from 29 departments participated; they were informed about restrictions primarily by their charge nurses and hospital intranet. Shifting visitor restrictions compelled the nurses to constantly adjust and negotiate their practices. When deciding to suggest deviating from the restrictions, they shared their decision-making with colleagues. Visitor restrictions left the hospital environment quieter, but they also created a lack of overview and predictability, an emotional burden, and a negative impact on the quality of care. CONCLUSION: Restricting relatives' access challenged the nurses' professional values, and it seems to have affirmed their appreciation of relatives' role as important partners in contemporary hospital-based health care.

Computer habits and digital literacy in geriatric patients: A survey.

Objective: Among hospitalised geriatric patients, only half are computer users. However, many of them refrain from using telehealth solutions. This study aimed to investigate geriatric patients' computer and Internet habits and digital literacy and their associations with stress levels and frequency of Internet use. Methods: Inpatients and outpatients aged 65 years or older, all computer users, were consecutively surveyed. Besides information about computer and Internet habits, computer support, and computer stress, the survey also collected information about digital literacy using the electronic Health Literacy Assessment toolkit. Results: A total of 124 computer users with a mean age of 80.6 ± 7.4 years participated in the study from 1 October to 1 December 2019. Most patients received computer support from their children and grandchildren, whereas 6% did not seek support. They found themselves 'most familiar with using a keyboard' (79%), 59% 'were unfamiliar with the Copy Paste function', and only one-third 'were open to new ways of using computers'. Digital literacy was associated with the frequency of Internet use (P = 0.001), and higher digital literacy was associated with less computer stress (P = 0.01). Conclusions: Geriatric computer users are challenged by their basic computer skills, which may influence their choice of participation in telehealth solutions. If telehealth solutions are to succeed among geriatric patients, individualised computer support based on their basic computer skills and user-friendly computer devices are a prerequisite. For ongoing support, it is also necessary to introduce people close to the patient to telehealth solutions.

Geriatric assessment may prevent readmission in frail medical inpatients.

INTRODUCTION: Frailty is common in older adults. Many approaches exist to care of hospitalised older medical inpatients. The objectives of this study were to 1) describe frailty occurrence and 2) explore associations between frailty, type of care, 30-day readmission and 90-day mortality. METHODS: In a cohort of 75+-year-old medical inpatients with daily homecare or moderate comorbidity, frailty was graded as moderate or severe using the record-based Multidimensional Prognostic Index. The emergency department (ED), internal medicine (IM) and geriatric medicine (GM) were compared. Estimates of relative risk (RR) and hazard ratios were calculated in binary regression and Cox regression models. RESULTS: Analyses included 522 patients (61%) with moderate frailty and 333 (39%) with severe frailty. A total of 54% were females, and the median age was 84 years (interquartile range: 79-89). In GM, the distribution of frailty grade differed significantly from that of the ED (p less-than 0.001) and IM (p less-than 0.001). GM had the highest occurrence of severely frail patients and the lowest readmission rate. Compared with GM, the adjusted RR for readmission in ED was 1.58 (1.04-2.41), p = 0.032; and in IM: 1.42 (0.97-2.07), p = 0.069. Between the three specialities, no differences were seen in 90-day mortality hazard. CONCLUSION: In a regional hospital, frail older patients were discharged from all medical specialities. Admission to geriatric medicine was associated with a lower readmission risk and no increase in mortality. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment may explain the observed differences in readmission risk. FUNDING: None. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not relevant.

Prevalence of factors contributing to unplanned hospital readmission of older medical patients when assessed by patients, their significant others and healthcare professionals: a cross-sectional survey.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence of factors contributing to readmission of older medical patients perceived by patients, significant others and healthcare professionals and to examine the agreement of factors contributing to readmission. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey was conducted at Horsens Regional Hospital from September 2020 to June 2021. Patients aged ≥ 65 years and who were readmitted within 30 days were included. The questionnaire covered eight themes: disease; diagnosing, treatment and care; network; organisation; communication; skills and knowledge; resources; and practical arrangements. Response groups were patients, significant others, GPs, district nurses and hospital physicians. Outcomes were the prevalence of factors contributing to 30-day readmission and inter-rater agreement between respondents. RESULTS: In total, 165 patients, 147 significant others, 115 GPs, 75 district nurses and 165 hospital physicians were included. The patients' median age was 79 years (IQR 74-85), and 44% were women. The following were the most prevalent contributing factors: (1) relapse of the condition that caused the index admission, (2) the patient could not manage the symptoms or illness, (3) worsening of other illnesses or conditions, (4) the patient was not fully treated at the time of discharge and (5) the patient's situation was too complex for the medical practice to handle. Kappas ranged from 0.0142 to 0.2421 for patient-significant other dyads and 0.0032 to 0.2459 for GP-hospital physician dyads. CONCLUSION: From the perspectives of the included respondents, factors associated with the disease and its management were the most prevalent contributors to readmission for older medical patients. Agreement on the contributing factors was generally low. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial number NCT05116644. Registration date October 27, 2021.

Frailty level at discharge predicts mortality in older patients with Clostridioides difficile more accurately than age or disease severity.

PURPOSE: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) has a high mortality among older patients. Identification of older patients with CDI in increased mortality risk is important to target treatment and thereby reduce mortality. The aim of this study was to investigate mortality rates and compare frailty levels at discharge, measured by the record-based Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI), with age and severity of CDI as mortality predictors in patients with CDI diagnosed during hospitalisation. METHODS: This was a population-based cohort study from Central Denmark Region, Denmark, including all patients ≥ 60 years with a positive CD toxin test without prior infection and diagnosed from 1 January to 31 December 2018. Frailty level, estimated from the electronic medical record, was defined as low, moderate, or severe frailty. CDI severity was graded according to international guidelines. Primary outcome was 90-day mortality. RESULTS: We included 457 patients with median age 77 years (interquartile range 69-84) and females (49%). Overall, 90-day mortality was 28%, and this was associated with age (hazard ratio (HR): 2.71 (95% confidence interval 1.64-4.47)), CDI severity (HR 4.58 (3.04-6.88)) and frailty (HR 10.15 (4.06-25.36)). Frailty was a better predictor of 90-day mortality than both age (p < 0.001) and CDI severity (p = 0.04) with a receiver operating characteristic curve area of 77%. CONCLUSION: The 90-day mortality among older patients with CDI in a Danish region is 28%. Frailty measured by record-based MPI at discharge outperforms age and disease severity markers in predicting mortality in older patients with CDI.

A Danish version of the MISSCARE survey: Translation and validation.

BACKGROUND: Measuring missed nursing care in clinical settings may serve as an important indicator for improving patient safety and nursing staff retention. Internationally, several tools exist, with the MISSCARE Survey being the most frequently used and validated; however, no tools are available in the Danish language. AIM: This study aimed at translating the MISSCARE Survey from US English to Danish and evaluate its psychometric properties. METHODS: The translation followed the recommended method, that is forward-and-backward translation, involving clinical experts and a professional, native English-speaking translator. The final version was approved by the survey's original developer. Face validity was tested among 10 nurses and 1 practical nurse. Nursing staff from 34 selected departments at Aarhus University Hospital's (n = 1241) were invited to participate in a pilot test in November 2020. The survey consisted of a demographic section, a section of 'nursing elements' (Part A) and section of 'reasons' (Part B). Acceptability was assessed on Part A and B. Reliability was tested by Cronbach's alpha, and psychometric properties were investigated using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (Part B). RESULTS: The face-validity test resulted in minor contextual changes and the addition of a 'not applicable' response option in Part A. The pilot test had a 42.6% response rate (n = 529). Acceptability was good, with 1-10 missing responses per item in Part A and 0-20 missing responses in Part B. The numbers of 'not applicable' responses ranged from 0 to 81. The overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.81. Factor-loading ranges were 0.62-0.48 for 'communication', 0.79-0.39 for 'materials and resources', and 0.50-0.35 for 'labour', suggesting an acceptable fit with the theoretical model. CONCLUSION: The MISSCARE Survey was successfully translated into Danish. The psychometric properties confirmed the questionnaire as a valid and reliable tool for measuring missed nursing care in Danish hospital settings.

Effects of a transitional care intervention on readmission among older medical inpatients: a quasi-experimental study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of a transitional care intervention (TCI) on readmission among older medical inpatients. METHODS: This non-randomised quasi-experimental study was conducted at Horsens Regional Hospital in Denmark from 1 February 2017 to 31 December 2018. Inclusion criteria were patients ≥ 75 years old admitted for at least 48 h. First, patients were screened for eligibility. Then, the allocation to the intervention or control group was performed according to the municipality of residence. Patients living in three municipalities were offered the hospital-based intervention, and patients living in a fourth municipality were allocated to the control group. The intervention components were (1) discharge transportation with a home visit, (2) a post-discharge cross-sectorial video conference and (3) seven-day telephone consultation. The primary outcome was 30-day unplanned readmission. Secondary outcomes were 30- and 90-day mortality and days alive and out of hospital (DAOH). RESULTS: The study included 1205 patients (intervention: n = 615; usual care: n = 590). In the intervention group, the median age was 84.3 years and 53.7% were females. In the control group, the median age was 84.9 years and 57.5% were females. The 30-day readmission rates were 20.8% in the intervention group and 20.2% in the control group. Adjusted relative risk was 1.00 (95% confidence interval: 0.80, 1.26; p = 0.99). No significant difference was found between the groups for the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: The TCI did not impact readmission, mortality or DAOH. Future research should conduct a pilot test, address intervention fidelity and consider real-world challenges. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial number: NCT04796701. Registration date: 24 February 2021.

Absorbent incontinence pad use and the association with urinary tract infection and frailty: A retrospective cohort study.

Background: Up to 40% of adults over 65 years are full-time users of absorbent incontinence pads due to urinary incontinence. Simultaneously, urinary tract infection is amongst the most common hospital-acquired infection in older patients. Objectives: To explore the association between (1) full-time use of absorbent incontinence pads and urinary tract infection at acute hospital admission, (2) state of frailty and becoming a pad user during hospitalization, and (3) becoming a pad user and acquiring a urinary tract infection during hospitalization in older patients. Design: A retrospective cohort study. Setting: Admissions in an emergency department with transfers to geriatric, cardiac, infectious, or endocrinological wards from September 7th, 2017 to February 18th, 2019. Patients: 1,958 patients aged 65 years or more, having daily homecare or moderate comorbidity, hospitalized due to acute illness, and living in the municipality of Aarhus. Methods: The study was conducted by two researchers reviewing the patients' electronic health records combined with data on frailty status from a geriatric quality database. In the electronic health records, data on baseline characteristics, absorbent incontinence pad use at admission and during the hospital stay, and urinary tract infection were obtained. Results: Full-time users of absorbent incontinence pads had a higher probability of being admitted with urinary tract infection (Odds Ratio=2.00 (95% Confidence Interval: 1.61-2.49); p<.001). Patients identified as severely frail had a higher probability of becoming pad users during hospitalization (Odds Ratio=1.57 (95% Confidence Interval: 1.45-1.71); p<.001) compared to non/mild/moderate frail patients. Patients who became pad users during hospitalization had a higher risk of a hospital-acquired urinary tract infection (Odds Ratio=4.28 (95% Confidence Interval: 1.92-9.52); p<.001). Conclusions: There was an association between the use of absorbent incontinence pads and the development of urinary tract infections in older hospitalized patients, both in full-time users and those who were frail and became pad users during hospitalization. These findings emphasize the need for further research on preventing urinary tract infections and unnecessary pad use in older patients.

Preoperative dehydration identified by serum calculated osmolarity is associated with severe frailty in patients with hip fracture.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Preoperative dehydration is a well-known predictor of in-hospital complications and poor functional outcomes in older patients with hip fractures. In an orthopedic and geriatric cooperative setting, we aimed to investigate whether preoperative dehydration was associated with frailty, prolonged hospital stays and short-term mortality in older patients with hip fractures. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a Danish university hospital. The study population consisted of patients 65+ years surgically treated for hip fracture. Dehydration was defined as serum calculated osmolarity above 295 mmol/L. Outcomes were frailty at discharge measured by the Multidimensional Prognostic Index, hospital stay of 7 days or more and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: In total, 214 patients were consecutively included in the study from March 11, 2018, to August 31, 2020. The mean age was 81.2 (SD: 7.6) and 69% of the patients were women. The prevalence of preoperative dehydration was 40%. It was associated with severe frailty (Odds Ratio (OR): 2.08 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11-3.90]; p = 0.02) and prolonged hospital stay (OR: 2.28 [95% CI: 1.29-4.04]; p = 0.02). Seven percent died when dehydrated compared to 5% in the non-dehydrated (p = 0.91). CONCLUSION: Prevalence of preoperative dehydration is high among older patients with hip fractures and is associated with severe frailty and length of hospital stay. Systematic screening for dehydration on admission is advisable and may contribute to more adequate fluid management in the perioperative phase.

Tele-Rehabilitation in Community-Dwelling Older People with Reduced Functional Capacity: A 4-Patient Case Report.

Tele-rehabilitation (TR) can limit physical contact in older patients if long transportation times or physical attendance challenges their health. Digital literacy decreases with age, which might interfere with geriatric patients' ability to benefit from TR. The purpose was to describe the TR intervention, adherence to training sessions, and level of digital literacy. TR via videoconferencing was delivered both individually and in groups where more were challenged by joining training outside their homes. Improvements in functional capacity were found. Combining individual and group exercises, high adherence to the TR programme was achieved. Digital literacy was on par with younger adult computer users. Individual-and group TR sessions might secure high adherence to the exercise programme. Digital literacy at a certain level might be a prerequisite when supplied with both oral and written material Suggestions on how to raise older people's digital literacy to use telehealth solutions in the future are provided.

Prevalence of Computer Use among Geriatric In- and Outpatients.

Objective: Despite its many benefits, tele-rehabilitation is not widely used by the older generations. This study aimed to investigate the opportunity to offer tele-rehabilitation in a geriatric population by determining the prevalence of computer use and to examine whether the patients' characteristics affect computer use. Design: Cross-sectional study. Patients: Cognitive well-functioning in- and outpatients aged 65 years or older. Methods: Patients were consecutively included and surveyed. Results: A total of 249 patients participated in the survey. Among them, 124 were computer users. Four of these never went online. Compared to non-users, computer users were younger OR: 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87; 0.94) p = 0.001, less frail OR: 0.37 (95% CI: 0.25;0.55) p = 0.001, had a higher functional capacity OR: 1.02 (95% CI 1.01; 1.03) p = 0.001 and more often had an education at high school level or higher OR: 1.7 (95% CI: 1.41; 2.40). Conclusion: Only half of the geriatric patients are computer users. If tele-rehabilitation is to be adopted by a wider geriatric population challenged by reduced mobility, long transportation times, or frailty, computer training, user friendly devices and computer support should be considered beforehand.

Impact of involvement of relatives in early home visits by a hospital-led geriatric team.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether the involvement of relatives in home visits by a geriatric team post-discharge is associated with unplanned readmissions in severely frail patients living alone. METHODS: A quality improvement project evaluating outcomes from routine care of patients who were severely frail, 65+ years, living alone, and visited at home by a geriatric team after discharge from acute hospital admission. We compared patients who did and did not have relatives attending the visit. Data were analyzed by logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 437 patients with a mean age of 85.0 (±7.8) years 73% had severe comorbidity, 68% had a low functional ability, and 100 patients (23%) had relatives attending. Attendance of relatives was associated with a lower unplanned 30-day readmission rate (10% vs. 18%, adjusted odds ratio: 0.48 (0.23-1.00) p=0.05). CONCLUSION: Results highlights the importance of involvement of relatives in care planning in the severely frail older patients living alone.

Effects of a new early municipality-based versus a geriatric team-based transitional care intervention on readmission and mortality among frail older patients - a randomised controlled trial.

Purpose Previous studies reported reduced risk of readmission, mortality and shorter length of hospital stay (LOS) among geriatric patients receiving an early (<24h), hospital-based geriatric team intervention after discharge. The objective of this study was to compare a novel, early municipality-based, nurse-led and general practitioner (GP)-supported transitional care intervention (TCI) to an established hospital-based TCI among frail, older, geriatric patients. Material and methods A randomised controlled trial was conducted within a single geriatric department and the adjacent municipality. Inclusion criteria: acutely admitted, frail patients 75+ years old. Eligible patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to the two TCIs. Primary outcome was 30-day unplanned readmission. Secondary outcomes were 90-day all-cause mortality and LOS. Stratified analysis according to type of dwelling was made. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and number needed to treat (NNT) were reported. Results 3,103 patients (median age (IQR): 85 (80-90); 57% female) were included. Readmission rates were 22% in the municipality-based intervention (n=332/1,545), and 18% in the hospital-based intervention (n=276/1,558); OR was 1.27, 95% CI (1.06-1.52), p=0.008 and NNT=27. OR for cohabiting patients was 1.47, 95% CI (1.02-2.08); p=0.035. No significant difference was observed in mortality (22% vs. 21%; OR=1.05, 95% CI (0.89-1.25), p=0.577) or LOS (median (IQR): 6 (2-8) vs. 6 (2-8) days, p=0.1787). Conclusions The new municipality-based, nurse-led and GP-supported intervention was inferior to the hospital-based geriatric team intervention in preventing 30-day readmission among frail, geriatric patients. There was no significant difference between the two interventions in regard to 90-day mortality or LOS.

Clinical presentation and outcomes of COVID-19 in older hospitalised patients assessed by the record-based multidimensional prognostic index, a cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: Older people are the most frequently hospital admitted patients with COVID-19. We aimed to describe the clinical presentation of COVID-19 among frail and nonfrail older hospitalised patients and to evaluate the potential association between frailty and clinical course, decision of treatment level with outcomes change in functional capacity and survival. METHODS: We performed a multi-center, retrospective cross-sectional cohort study examining data on clinical presentation and frailty-related domains for hospitalised people aged 75 + years with a positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) test. Frailty was assessed at admission using record-based MPI (rMPI) and Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). Decision on treatment level about invasive ventilation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), change in CFS-score from admission to discharge, changed need of home care, and in-hospital, 30-day and 90-day mortality were registered. RESULTS: 100 patients (median age 82 years (IQR 78-86), 56% female) with COVID-19 were included. 54 patients were assessed moderately or severely frail (rMPI-score = 2 or 3) and compared to non-frail (rMPI-score = 1). At admission, frail patients presented more frequently with confusion. At discharge, functional decline measured by change in CFS and increased home care was more prevalent among frail than the non-frail. Decisions about no invasive ventilation or CPR were more prevalent among frail older patients with COVID-19 than non-frail. Ninety-day mortality was 70% among frail patients versus 15% in non-frail. CONCLUSION: Frailty seems to be associated with confusion, more frequent decisions about treatment level, larger functional decline at discharge and a higher mortality rate among older patients with COVID-19.

Involving frail older patients in identifying outcome measures for transitional care-a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: During care transitions, the older (75+) patient's agenda can easily be missed. To counteract this, involving patients in shared clinical decision making has proven to be of great value. Likewise, involving patients and other stakeholders as researchers is gaining ground. Patient and public involvement (PPI) in research entails many benefits, for example, by bringing further insight from those with lived experiences of being ill. There are various challenges associated with involving some older patients, for example frailty, cognitive impairment and other chronic illnesses. To the best of our knowledge, there are only a few examples of initiatives involving older patients beyond research participation. The feasibility of involving frail older patients during an ongoing care transition from hospital to primary health care remains unknown. To investigate the feasibility of including older frail patients, their relatives and health care professionals (HCPs) as co-researchers, we established a study with increasingly demanding levels of patient involvement to identify relevant outcome measures for future transitional care research. METHODS: The study was a pragmatic, qualitative feasibility study. The involved individuals were frail older patients, their relatives and HCPs. Patients and their relatives were interviewed, while the interviewer made reflective notes. A thematic analysis was made. Relatives and HCPs discussed the themes to identify relevant outcome measures and potentially co-create new patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for use in future transitional care studies. The feasibility was evaluated according to six involvement steps. The level of involvement was evaluated using the five-levelled Health Canada Public Involvement Continuum (HCPIC). RESULTS: In total, eight patients, five relatives and three HCPs were involved in the study. Patients were involved in discussing care transitions (HCPIC level 3), while some relatives were engaged (HCPIC level 4) in forming PROMs. The partnership level of involvement (HCPIC level 5) was not reached. The thematic analysis and the subsequent theme discussion successfully formed PROMs. The key PROMs were related to care, transparency and the relatives' roles in the transitional care process. CONCLUSIONS: When applying a pragmatic involvement approach, frail older patients can be successfully involved in identifying relevant transitional care outcome measures; however, involving these patients as fellow researchers seems infeasible. To maintain involvement, supportive relatives are essential. Useful experiences for future research involvement of this vulnerable group were reported, arguing that patient participation has the potential to become inherent in future geriatric research.

The purpose of the study was to involve patients in identifying relevant outcome measures for future transitional care research. Involving patients in research is not new. What makes this project special is that it seeks to involve old, frail patients aged 75 plus.The project used open-form interviews that were not constrained in time and were not audio recorded; this was done to obtain confidence from the patients and their relatives. Each patient was interviewed twice: shortly before the patients left the hospital and shortly after discharge. The purpose was to discuss the patient's experiences during the discharge period. The first interview took place in the hospital, whereas the interviewer visited the patients in their residence for the second interview. An expert panel was then formed involving the patients' relatives and the professional health care workers. The expert panel discussed themes based on the data expressed by the patients during the interviews. In addition, an attempt was made to establish long-term cooperation between the patients, their relatives and the researchers. The health condition and vulnerable state of the patients made it difficult to continue their involvement throughout the research process. In fact, only the relatives and professionals were able to take part in the expert panel. Despite these challenges, the outcome of the project was positive. In conclusion, it makes sense to involve frail patients in transitional care research despite the challenges these patients face in their old age. In future research, frail older patients, relatives and other stakeholders can be involved.

A group-based real-time videoconferencing telerehabilitation programme in recently discharged geriatric patients: a feasibility study.

PURPOSE: Exercise at home and improvement in the ability to undertake daily tasks are highly valued by older people after hospitalisation. New telerehabilitation (TR) technologies make it possible to supervise and communicate with exercising participants through videoconferencing equipment. This technology has been shown to be both feasible and effective in Danish chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients in terms of basic mobility, safety, social interactions and patient perception. This study sought to examine whether it was feasible to carry out TR through home exercises in groups. METHODS: Both medical and hip-fracture home-dwelling patients aged 65 years and older admitted to the Emergency Department (ED) and Department of Geriatrics for acute reasons were asked to participate in the study just before their discharge. The inclusion criteria were normal cognitive function, being dependent on a walking aid and computer users before hospitalisation. RESULTS: At discharge, 333 patients were consecutively screened for participation. Of those, 300 patients were excluded. Thirty-three patients met the inclusion criteria. They had a mean age of 82.3 years (± 7.8) and 76% were women. Nine patients agreed to participate, but seven withdrew. The most frequent explanation was exhaustion in the continuation of hospitalisation. CONCLUSION: It was not possible to conduct a videoconference TR study in a geriatric population, as many were excluded and those who were eligible withdrew after inclusion. During the COVID-19 pandemic, TR may be an important tool for isolated older persons to hinder functional decline. Aspects such as recruitment procedures and IT solutions designed for older people must be considered.

Use of single-bed rooms may decrease the incidence of hospital-acquired infections in geriatric patients: A retrospective cohort study in Central Denmark region.

OBJECTIVE: Patients accommodated in single-bed rooms may have a reduced risk of hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) compared to those in multi-bed rooms. This study aimed to examine the effect of single-bed accommodation on HAIs in older patients admitted to a geriatric ward. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to geriatric wards in a university hospital in Central Denmark Region linked to a move to a newly built hospital, involving all consecutively admitted patients aged 65 years and over from 15 September to 19 December 2016 and a similar cohort admitted in the same three months in 2017. We compared the incidence of HAIs in patients in single-bed accommodation to those in multi-bed accommodation using retrospective review of electronic patient records, with all infections verified microbiologically or by X-ray with onset between 48 hours after admission to 48 hours after discharge from hospital. RESULTS: In total 446 patients were included. The incidence of HAIs in multi-bed accommodation was 30% compared to 20% in single-bed accommodation. The hazard ratio was 0.62 (95% Confidence Interval 0.43-0.91, p = 0.01) for single-bed accommodation. This finding remained robust after adjustment for age, sex, infection at admission, risk of sepsis, use of catheter, treatment with prednisone or methotrexate, and comorbidity index. CONCLUSION: Accommodation in single-bed rooms appeared to reduce HAIs compared to multi-bed rooms in two geriatric wards. This finding should be considered as hypothesis-generating and be examined further using an experimental design.

Mortality and readmission risk can be predicted by the record-based Multidimensional Prognostic Index: a cohort study of medical inpatients older than 75 years.

PURPOSE: To examine the predictive value of the record-based Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI) on mortality, readmission and length of hospital stay (LOS) among older medical inpatients. METHODS: A cohort of medical inpatients aged ≥ 75 years was rated using the record-based MPI to assess frailty retrospectively. 90-day and 1-year mortality hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated in a sex- and age-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model. 30-day readmission relative risk (RR) estimates were calculated in a binary regression model with mortality as a competing risk. Discrimination was expressed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Median LOS was calculated using the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA. RESULTS: In total, 1190 patients with a median age of 83 years were included. 50% were male. 335 patients (28%) were categorized as non-frail (MPI score 0.0-0.33), 522 (44%) moderately frail (MPI score 0.34-0.66) and 333 (28%) severely frail (MPI score 0.67-1.0). 90-day mortality HR was 7.4 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9-18.6, p < 0.001) for the moderately frail and 18.5 (95% CI 7.5-46.1, p < 0.001) for the severely frail compared with the non-frail. ROC area was 0.76 (95% CI 0.72-0.80). Similarly, 1-year mortality HR was 3.3 (95% CI 2.2-5.0, p < 0.001) for the moderately frail and 7.1 (95% CI 4.7-10.6, p < 0.001) for the severely frail. 30-day readmission RR was 2.1 (95% CI 1.5-2.9, p < 0.001) for the moderately frail and 1.8 (95% CI 1.3-2.6, p = 0.001) for the severely frail. LOS was significantly longer with increasing MPI score (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The record-based MPI assessed at discharge predicts dose-dependent post-discharge mortality and readmission risk and is associated with LOS in older medical inpatients.

Impact of transitional care interventions on hospital readmissions in older medical patients: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: To identify and synthesise available evidence on the impact of transitional care interventions with both predischarge and postdischarge elements on readmission rates in older medical patients. DESIGN: A systematic review. METHOD: Inclusion criteria were: medical patients ≥65 years or mean age in study population of ≥75 years; interventions were transitional care interventions between hospital and home with both predischarge and postdischarge components; outcome was hospital readmissions. Studies were excluded if they: included other patient groups than medical patients, included patients with only one diagnosis or patients with only psychiatric disorders. PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Web of Science were searched from January 2008 to August 2019. Study selection at title level was undertaken by one author; the remaining selection process, data extraction and methodological quality assessment were undertaken by two authors independently. A narrative synthesis was performed, and effect sizes were estimated. RESULT: We identified 1951 records and included 11 studies: five randomised trials, four non-randomised controlled trials and two pre-post cohort studies. The 11 studies represent 15 different interventions and 29 outcome results measuring readmission rates within 7-182 days after discharge. Twenty-two of the 29 outcome results showed a drop in readmission rates in the intervention groups compared with the control groups. The most significant impact was seen when interventions were of high intensity, lasted at least 1 month and targeted patients at risk. The methodological quality of the included studies was generally poor. CONCLUSION: Transitional care interventions reduce readmission rates among older medical patients although the impact varies at different times of outcome assessment. High-quality studies examining the impact of interventions are needed, preferably complimented by a process evaluation to refine and improve future interventions. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019121795.