Cardiovascular Risks of Simultaneous Use of Alcohol and Cocaine-A Systematic Review.

Background: The simultaneous use of cocaine and alcohol is highly prevalent and is associated with high numbers of emergency department admissions, primarily due to cardiovascular complications. Aims: To answer the question of whether the co-use of cocaine and alcohol increases the cardiovascular risk compared to the use of cocaine alone. Method: A systematic review of human studies comparing the cardiovascular risk of co-used cocaine and alcohol with the use of cocaine alone. Results: Despite a higher myocardial workload induced by the co-use of cocaine and alcohol and the potentiation of cocaine's cardiovascular effects by alcohol, the findings on the risk and severity of cardiovascular symptoms due to combined use are inconsistent. However, the co-use of cocaine and alcohol clearly leads to higher mortality. Interestingly, the presence of cocaethylene, a unique metabolite generated only via a pharmacokinetic interaction between alcohol and cocaine, carries an 18- to 25-fold increase over the absence of cocaethylene (cocaine-alone users) in the risk of sudden death and is associated with myocardial injury and cardiac arrest, probably due to the inhibition of cardiac ion channels by cocaethylene. Conclusion: Despite the inconsistency in some of the results, it is concluded that the co-use of cocaine and alcohol poses an additional risk of cardiovascular fatalities compared to the use of cocaine alone.

The PIRATE mnemonic: providing a structured approach in the care for intoxicated patients at the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Expertise in toxicology is essential for acute care providers, as intoxicated patients frequently present to Emergency Departments. These patients can be challenging for care providers because they often present with uncertain substance exposure and unknown dose and timing of these exposures. METHODS: The Dutch Society of Emergency Physicians has developed an mnemonic to support treating physicians in a structured approach for the management of (undifferentiated) intoxicated patients. RESULTS: The PIRATE mnemonic was developed, which includes the following aspects and sequence of care for the intoxicated patient: primary survey, investigation & identification, risk assessment, ADME (comprising pharmacokinetic therapeutic targets: absorption, distribution, metabolism, elimination), therapy and evaluation. CONCLUSION: The toxicology section of the Dutch Society of Emergency Physicians developed the PIRATE mnemonic to provide a structured approach in the management of patients presenting with acute intoxications to Emergency Departments. It summarizes the essential steps and priorities required in the care of intoxicated patients. Further, it provides a common strategy for all specialties involved in the care of the acutely intoxicated patient, contributing to developing greater competence in poisoning management.

Digoxin-specific antibodies: a novel dosing strategy.

Digoxin-specific antibodies (digoxin-Fabs) are of value in the treatment of a strongly suspected or a known, potentially life-threatening digoxin toxicity. These antibodies are not registered for use in Europe; therefore Dutch hospital pharmacies are not allowed to keep them in stock. In the Netherlands, digoxin-Fabs are stored in a national calamity stock of emergency medicines at the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. In the case of a medical emergency, digoxin-Fabs are available after contact with the Dutch Poisons Information Centre. Recent studies have shown that the dose of digoxin-Fabs required to effectively treat digoxin toxicity is lower than previously thought. In this article, we present the adjusted digoxin-Fab dosing strategy currently recommended by the Dutch Poisons Information Centre ( www.vergiftigingen.info ). This new dose titration strategy is safe and effective and has a cost-saving side-effect.

[Needle spiking, injecting people with a substance without their knowledge or consent]. / Needle spiking, het drogeren met een injectienaald.

BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands therewereseveralreports on needlespiking: people have found themselvessubjectedtosurreptitiousinjections. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 23-year-old female was seenafterbeingsurroundedby a group of men andfeltwhatshethought was a jab. She was abletoevadethegroup. Several minutes later sheexperienceddizziness, nausea andvomiting. On physical examination, a bleedingpuncturewound was seen on her upper arm withaccompanying erythema. Toxicology on bloodand urine didnot show evidenceforintoxicationotherthan alcohol which was higherthanwouldbesuspectedbythenumber of drinks thevictimreported. CONCLUSION: There is evidencethatpeople are puncturedwithneedles in busy surroundings like thenightlife. Possiblealso drugs are injected. Experiencedsymptomsbyvictims (n=19) wereheterogeneousandnotlikelyattributedtooneandthesamecausal drug. Toxicologydidnotrevealanysubstanceuntilnow.

Recreational drug use among young, hospitalized patients with acute coronary syndrome: A retrospective study.

Background: Cocaine use is a well-established risk factor for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) although other recreational drugs (RD), are increasingly considered as potential cardiac risk factors. Compared to ACS without RD use, worse outcomes have been described for RD-associated ACS. Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the use of RD in a contemporary cohort of young ACS patients. Methods: Between June 2016 and October 2019, ACS patients aged 18-50 years, admitted to OLVG Hospital in Amsterdam, were retrospectively analysed. Medical chart review was performed to obtain patient and clinical characteristics, RD use, cardiac risk factors, outcome and follow up. Results: A total of 229 patients were included in the study. Recreational drug use prior to ACS was present in 24.9% of all patients, with cannabis (16.2%), cocaine (4.8%), or both (2.6%) most commonly observed. RD users were predominantly young men (87.7%) and had a significantly higher tobacco use compared to non-RD users (89.5% vs. 62.8%, P < 0.001), also after adjusting for age and sex. RD use was associated with larger myocardial infarctions with significantly higher CK-MB levels (104 ± 116 U/L vs 62 ± 96, P = 0.040) and poorer left ventricular function measured by echocardiography as compared to non-users (P = 0.007). Conclusion: Recreational drug use was present in almost 25% of all young ACS patients evaluated for drug use and was associated with larger myocardial infarction resulting in poorer left ventricular function as compared to non-users. Additionally, RD-users were younger and were more often tobacco users, compared to non-users.

4-Fluoroamphetamine (4-FA) intoxication results in exaggerated blood pressure effects compared to MDMA and amphetamine: A retrospective analysis.

Objective: 4-Fluoroamphetamine (4-FA) is an amphetamine-type stimulant, with effects comparable to amphetamine and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA). Severe 4-FA-related complications, such as cardiomyopathy, myocardial infarction, and cerebral hemorrhage, have been described. The aim of this study was to explore the cardiovascular symptoms and complications in 4-FA and compare them to MDMA and amphetamine in intoxicated patients who presented to the emergency department (ED). Methods: Between November 2015 and March 2020, all self-reported 4-FA, MDMA, and amphetamine-intoxicated adult patients that presented at the ED of an inner-city hospital in Amsterdam, were retrospectively analyzed for cardiovascular symptoms, vital parameters, cardiovascular complications, interventions, admission rate, and Poisoning Severity Score (PSS). Results: A total of 582 patients were included, of which 31 (5.3%) with 4-FA intoxication (10/31 mono-intoxications, 32.3%), 406 (69.8%) with MDMA (59/406 mono-intoxications, 14.5%), 100 (17.2%) with amphetamine (10/100 mono-intoxications, 10.0%), and 45 (7.7%) with a cross intoxication of these drugs. 4-FA mono-intoxicated patients experienced more headache (n = 8; 80.0%) compared to MDMA (n = 2; 3.3%; P < 0.001) and amphetamine mono-intoxicated patients (n = 0; 0.0%; P < 0.001) and their systolic blood pressure was higher (164 mm Hg ± 31 vs 139 mm Hg ± 19; P = 0.031 vs 135 mm Hg ± 22; P = 0.033, respectively). Severe 4-FA-related cardiovascular complications included Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (n = 1; 3.2%), subarachnoid hemorrhage (n = 1; 3.2%), and hypertensive urgency (n = 2; 6.5%). Conclusions: 4-FA intoxication-related ED symptoms resemble MDMA and amphetamine complications, although patients presented more often with headache and hypertension. Severe 4-FA-related cardiovascular complications occurred in 40% of mono-intoxications.

Recreational Drug Use During the Amsterdam Dance Event: Impact on Emergency Services.

Background: Recreational drug use is common at large-scale dance events such as the Amsterdam Dance Event (ADE) and severe drug-related complications and deaths occur. Increasing concentrations of cocaine, amphetamine and MDMA have been observed in samples from dance events. Therefore, large dance events are expected to cause an increasing amount of recreational drug related complaints (RDRC) and an increased demand on emergency medical services. Aim: To evaluate the impact of recreational drug related complaints (RDRC) during ADE 2016, compared to regular weeks, and to evaluate the requirement for additional medical personnel. Methods: For this prospective, observational cohort study, patients >12 years old presenting with RDRC at first aid stations (FAS), ambulance service (AA) and ED during ADE, between October 19th and October 24th 2016 were included. From 2 EDs and AA, the RDRC 2 weeks before and after ADE were also collected. Results: An estimated 375.000 people attended ADE. The number of patients with RDRC was 459 at the FAS, 113 at AA and 81 at the ED, and increased significantly during ADE with 225% at AA and with 236% at OLVG ED. Eight patients were admitted. A higher percentage of poly-drug use among ED patients (58%) was found, compared to FAS patients (25%). Also, the proportion of tourists in ED's (51%) was higher compared to FAS (30%). Conclusions: During ADE 2016, the number of intoxicated patients increased significantly. Eight patients were admitted to the hospital, without any deaths. The absolute number of patients stayed within normal range of emergency medical services capacity.

[Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on recreational drug intoxications]. / Invloed van covid-19-pandemie op drugsintoxicaties.

OBJECTIVE: To investigated the impact of the lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic, since March 2020, on the occurrence and characteristics of recreational drug intoxications in the Emergency Department (ED), compared to previous years. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study METHOD: Patients ≥ 18 years old who presented to the ED of OLVG hospital in Amsterdam with recreational drug intoxication(s), with or without alcohol, were divided into the pre-COVID-19-period (January 2017 to February 2020), and the COVID-19-period (March to December 2020). An intoxication was registered by the treating physician, or retrospectively by researchers. Subgroup analysis was performed for foreign tourists, Dutch tourists and Amsterdam residents, as for the four most common drugs used. RESULTS: A total of 3,881 patients (73.6% male, aged 32 (±12) years) were included, of whom 49.0% were tourists. During the COVID-19-period, a 53% decrease of intoxications was observed (1090.1 vs. 514.8 patients/year), with an 83% decrease of tourists (574 vs. 98.4 patients/year), 20% decrease in Dutch residents (516 vs. 416 patients/year) and 4,5% decrease in Amsterdam residents (354 vs.338 patients/year). Among Dutch patients, a significant decrease in cocaine (85.6 vs. 75.6 patients/years), MDMA (25.1 vs. 27.6 patients/year), and THC (108.6 vs. 76.8 patients/year) intoxications were observed. However, the amount of GHB/GBL related intoxications was comparable between groups (100.7 vs. 105.6 patients/year). CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19-period, drug-related intoxications decreased by 53%. Among Dutch residents this decrease was 20%, with a significant decrease in cocaine, MDMA and THC intoxications. However, the amount of GHB/GBL related intoxications was comparable with the pre-COVID-19 period.

Clinical toxicology of exposures to chemicals from clandestine drug laboratories: a literature review.

INTRODUCTION: The synthesis of clandestine drugs is a widespread worldwide phenomenon, with clandestine drug laboratories occurring both in rural and urban areas. There is considerable unfamiliarity among medical professionals about the health risks that are associated with chemicals used in clandestine drug laboratories. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the adverse health effects resulting from exposure to chemicals involved in the production of clandestine drugs. METHODS: The US National Library of Medicine PubMed database and the Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE) were searched from their date of inception to October 26, 2021 using combinations of relevant search terms. This yielded 1,558 unique articles, which were subjected to two eligibility criteria: (i) exposure to clandestine drug laboratory chemicals resulting in adverse health effects; (ii) subjects were human. A total of 22 unique articles were retrieved, consisting of 10 reviews, eight case reports/series and four retrospective studies. Further searches among the references cited in these publications yielded another seven case reports/series and six retrospective studies. RESULTS: Inhalation: Surveillance studies reported respiratory symptoms (including cough, throat irritation, nasal irritation, and dyspnea) in 59% (n = 1,657 of 2,803) of those exposed. The case reports/series described respiratory symptoms in 43% of the cases (n = 36 of 84). Lung edema was reported occasionally (n = 2). Eye exposure: Surveillance studies reported eye irritation and burns in 23% (n = 647 of 2,803) of those exposed. The case reports/series described ocular adverse events in 36% of the cases (n = 30 of 84). More severe ocular effects, such as corneal damage and conjunctival necrosis, were reported after direct eye contact with caustic fluids. Skin exposure: Surveillance studies reported dermal effects, ranging from skin irritation to severe burns, in 6% of those exposed (n = 174 of 2,803). The case reports/series described dermal effects in 30% of the cases (n = 25 of 84). Ingestion: Gastrointestinal burns were observed after ingestion of caustic substances in 5% of the patients reported in the case reports/series (n = 4 of 84). Systemic effects: Surveillance studies reported headache and dizziness in 31% (n = 882 of 2,803) and 7% (n = 187 of 2,803) of those exposed, respectively. The case reports/series described sympathomimetic effects, including mydriasis, hypertension, tachycardia, in 4% of the cases (n = 3 of 84). Fatalities: Surveillance studies reported death in 1% of those exposed (n = 29 of 2803). Ten percent of the people reported in the cases report/series died (n = 8 of 84). Death was reported after inhalation of phosphine (n = 5), hydrogen sulfide (n = 1), methanol (n = 1), and after ingestion of sulfuric acid (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to chemicals involved in the production of clandestine drugs mostly resulted in mild to moderate respiratory, ocular or dermal effects, usually caused by caustic chemicals or solvents. Systemic effects were generally mild, but severe symptoms and eight deaths were reported after exposure to phosphine, hydrogen sulfide, methanol and sulfuric acid.

[Complications of contaminated drugs: how to reduce the number of future victims?] / Complicaties van vervuilde drugs.

Serious complications of drug abuse are frequently seen in acute care. When the clinical signs and symptoms of drug use are discordant with the expected clinical features of the intended substance used, it may involve misleading, contaminated and therefore dangerous illicit drugs. In 2014 and 2015, multiple young patients presented to several Dutch emergency departments in Amsterdam with an opioid toxidrome after supposed use of cocaine. However, it required months and multiple patient presentations, including fatalities, to discover that heroin was sold as cocaine, resulting in serious opioid toxidrome complications. The improvement and formalization of local collaboration and the instatement of an accessible central coordinating party enables early pattern recognition, treatment, sample testing and prevention of future cases of serious drug complications. This was demonstrated in a case of accidental fentanyl intoxication after alleged cocaine use in 2018. Extension of such collaborative networks to create a national coverage is desirable.

Can emergency department clinicians diagnose gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) intoxication based on clinical observations alone?

OBJECTIVES: Gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) is a drug of abuse with central depressing effects, which may cause coma with a GCS score as low as 3. A rapid diagnosis 'GHB intoxication' may prevent unnecessary diagnostic work-up and may lead to guided, less invasive, treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate if ED physicians' clinical evaluation were sufficient for diagnosis in patients with suspected GHB-intoxication. METHODS: Patients presenting at the ED with a GCS<15 and a potential intoxication with drugs of abuse for whom urine toxicology screen was performed were included consecutively. After a first assessment, the ED physician registered the most likely initial diagnosis in the hospital information system. Urine of these patients was tested with a validated gas chromatography analytical method for GHB (confirmation test). The initial diagnoses were compared for agreement with the results of the confirmation test. RESULTS: A total of 506 patients were included, 100 patients tested positive for GHB and 406 patients tested negative for GHB. Sensitivity and specificity of the ED physicians compared with the confirmation test to diagnose GHB intoxications were 63% (95% CI 52 to 73) and 93% (95% CI 90 to 95), respectively. The positive predictive value was 67% (95% CI 60 to 77) and the negative predictive value was 92% (95% CI 88 to 94). CONCLUSION: Physicians underestimate the presence of GHB intoxication and can fail to diagnose GHB intoxication based on clinical observations alone. In the future, a rapid reliable initial analytical GHB test in addition to clinical judgement could be valuable to reduce false negative diagnosis.

The current practice for cocaine-associated chest pain in the Netherlands.

INTRODUCTION: Cocaine is considered a cardiovascular risk factor, yet it is not included in the frequently used risk stratification scores. Moreover, many guidelines provide limited advice on how to diagnose and treat cocaine-associated chest pain (CACP). This study aimed to determine the current practice for CACP patients in emergency departments and coronary care units throughout the Netherlands. METHODS: An anonymous online questionnaire-based survey was conducted among Dutch emergency physicians and cardiologists between July 2015 and February 2016. The questionnaire was based on the American Heart Association CACP treatment algorithm. RESULTS: A total of 214 subjects were enrolled and completed the questionnaire. All responders considered cocaine use a risk factor for developing acute coronary syndrome (ACS), nevertheless 74.4 % of emergency physicians and 81.1 % of cardiologists do not always question chest pain patients about drug use. Of all responders, 73.6 % never perform toxicology screening. Most responders (60 %) observe patients with CACP according to the European Society of Cardiology ACS guideline, and 24.3 % give these patients ß-blockers. CONCLUSION: The current practice for CACP patients in most emergency departments and coronary care units in the Netherlands is not in line with the AHA scientific statement. Emergency physicians and cardiologists should be advised to routinely question all chest pain patients on drug history and be aware that the risk stratifications scores are not validated for CACP. Despite the AHA scientific statement of 2008, many respondents utilize ß-blockers for CACP patients, which is supported by published evidence since the statement appeared.

Prospective Investigation of the Performance of 2 Gamma-Hydroxybutyric Acid Tests: DrugCheck GHB Single Test and Viva-E GHB Immunoassay.

BACKGROUND: Gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) is a recreational drug with central nervous system depressing effects that is often abused. A urine GHB point-of-care test can be of great diagnostic value. The objective of this prospective study was to determine the performance of the new DrugCheck GHB Single Test and the Viva-E GHB immunoassay for urine samples in emergency department patients. METHODS: Patients presented to the emergency department of the OLVG hospital in Amsterdam with a Glasgow Coma Scale score <15 and potential drug of abuse intoxication were included in the study. Between June 2016 and October 2017, 375 patients were included. Using the DrugCheck GHB Single Test (Express Diagnostics Int'l, Blue Earth, MN) and the Viva-E GHB immunoassay (Siemens Healthineers, The Hague, the Netherlands), patients' urine samples were tested for GHB (cutoff for a positive result, 10 or 50 mcg/mL GHB). To ensure quality, the results obtained were compared with those generated using a validated gas chromatography method. The tests were considered reliable if specificity and sensitivity were both >90%. Possible cross-reactivity with ethanol was investigated by analyzing ethanol concentrations in patients' samples. RESULTS: Seventy percentage of the included patients was men, and the median age was 34 years old. The DrugCheck GHB Single Test's specificity and sensitivity were 90.0% and 72.9%, respectively, and using 50 mcg/mL as a cutoff value, its specificity and sensitivity improved to 96.7% and 75.0%, respectively. Serum and urine ethanol levels in the false-positive group were significantly higher compared with those in the true-negative group. The specificity and sensitivity of the Viva-E GHB immunoassay (cutoff value of 50 mcg/mL and excluding samples with ethanol levels ≥2.0 g/L) were 99.4% and 93.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The DrugCheck GHB Single Test's specificity was sufficient, whereas its sensitivity was poor, making it unsuitable for use at point-of-care. Contrarily, using 50 mcg/mL as the cutoff value and excluding samples with ethanol levels ≥2.0 g/L, the Viva-E GHB immunoassay showed acceptable results to detect clinically relevant GHB intoxications.

Safety of withholding intubation in gamma-hydroxybutyrate- and gamma-butyrolactone-intoxicated coma patients in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine if supportive care without endotracheal intubation in the emergency department (ED) was safe in the absence of complications in gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB)/gamma-butyrolactone (GBL) intoxicated patients with a decreased Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of patients presenting to a Dutch tertiary urban ED with a reduced level of consciousness related to alleged GHB/GBL intoxication between April 2011-December 2014. Primary endpoint was major adverse events, defined by: upper airway obstruction not resolved with mayo tube or nasopharyngeal airway, hypoxia not resolved with 15 l of oxygen delivered via non-rebreathing mask, bradypnea not resolved after stimulation, intubation, bradycardia not resolved after intravenous atropine bolus, hypotension for which inotropes were started. RESULTS: Data of 209 patients were retrieved. Major adverse events were reported in five patients (2.4%; 95% CI: 0.8-5.5). Intubation with subsequent ICU admission was required for 1.4% of patients (95% CI: 0.3-4.1). The most frequently seen minor adverse events (N = 209) were: airway obstruction (22%), hypothermia (14.8%), hypoxia (12.9%), bradycardia (8.1%), hypotension (6.7%), bradypnea (5.7%), vomiting (5.3%). There were no deaths. None of the patients had signs of aspiration pneumonia or returned to our ED due to complications. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that conservative airway management for patients with a decreased GCS due to suspected GHB intoxication may be safe. Major adverse events were present in 2.4% of patients, only 1.4% of patients required intubation. All minor adverse events were managed effectively with conservative treatment.

The ANKLE TRIAL (ankle treatment after injuries of the ankle ligaments): what is the benefit of external support devices in the functional treatment of acute ankle sprain? A randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Acute lateral ankle ligament injuries are very common problems in present health care. Still there is no hard evidence about which treatment strategy is superior. Current evidence supports the view that a functional treatment strategy is preferable, but insufficient data are present to prove the benefit of external support devices in these types of treatment. The hypothesis of our study is that external ankle support devices will not result in better outcome in the treatment of acute ankle sprains, compared to a purely functional treatment strategy. Overall objective is to compare the results of three different strategies of functional treatment for acute ankle sprain, especially to determine the advantages of external support devices in addition to functional treatment strategy, based on balance and coordination exercises. METHODS/DESIGN: This study is designed as a randomised controlled multi-centre trial with one-year follow-up. Adult and healthy patients (N = 180) with acute, single sided and first inversion trauma of the lateral ankle ligaments will be included. They will all follow the same schedule of balancing exercises and will be divided into 3 treatment groups, 1. pressure bandage and tape, 2. pressure bandage and brace and 3. no external support. Primary outcome measure is the Karlsson scoring scale; secondary outcomes are FAOS (subscales), number of recurrent ankle injuries, Visual Analogue Scales of pain and satisfaction and adverse events. They will be measured after one week, 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year. DISCUSSION: The ANKLE TRIAL is a randomized controlled trial in which a purely functional treated control group, without any external support is investigated. Results of this study could lead to other opinions about usefulness of external support devices in the treatment of acute ankle sprain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register (NTR): NTR2151.