Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 23(3): 187-93, 2000.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10821892

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To perform a retrospective outcomes analysis of central venous catheters with peripheral venous access ports, with comparison to published data. METHODS: One hundred and twelve central venous catheters with peripherally placed access ports were placed under sonographic guidance in 109 patients over a 4-year period. Ports were placed for the administration of chemotherapy, hyperalimentation, long-term antibiotic therapy, gamma-globulin therapy, and frequent blood sampling. A vein in the upper arm was accessed in each case and the catheter was passed to the superior vena cava or right atrium. Povidone iodine skin preparation was used in the first 65 port insertions. A combination of Iodophor solution and povidone iodine solution was used in the last 47 port insertions. Forty patients received low-dose (1 mg) warfarin sodium beginning the day after port insertion. Three patients received higher doses of warfarin sodium for preexistent venous thrombosis. Catheter performance and complications were assessed and compared with published data. RESULTS: Access into the basilic or brachial veins was obtained in all cases. Ports remained functional for a total of 28,936 patient days. The port functioned in 50% of patients until completion of therapy, or the patient's expiration. Ports were removed prior to completion of therapy in 18% of patients. Eleven patients (9.9% of ports placed) suffered an infectious complication (0.38 per thousand catheter-days)-in nine, at the port implantation site, in two along the catheter. In all 11 instances the port was removed. Port pocket infection in the early postoperative period occurred in three patients (4.7%) receiving a Betadine prep vs two patients (4.2%) receiving a standard O.R. prep. This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.9). Venous thrombosis occurred in three patients (6.8%) receiving warfarin sodium and in two patients (3%) not receiving warfarin sodium. This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.6). Aspiration occlusion occurred in 13 patients (11.7%). Intracatheter urokinase was infused in eight of these patients and successfully restored catheter function in all but two instances. These complication rates are comparable to or better than those reported with chest ports. CONCLUSION: Peripheral ports for long-term central venous access placed by interventional radiologists in the interventional radiology suite are as safe and as effective as chest ports.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Catéteres de Permanencia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infecciones Bacterianas/etiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Femenino , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trombosis de la Vena/epidemiología
2.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 168(1): 278, 1997 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8976961
3.
Radiology ; 189(3): 920-1, 1993 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8234727

RESUMEN

Film fog is a common cause of x-ray film artifact. The authors report an unusual source of film fogging in the darkroom--seen in three consecutive radiographs of two different patients--the exposure of film to the low light emission of a fluorescent commercial adhesive bandage worn by the technologist. Heightened awareness of the effects of these bandages will help avoid creation of this film fog artifact.


Asunto(s)
Artefactos , Vendajes , Película para Rayos X , Femenino , Fluorescencia , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA