Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 34
Filtrar
1.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 59(3)2023 Mar 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36984542

RESUMEN

Background and Objectives: JAK inhibitors entered current clinical practice as treatment for several immune-related diseases and, recently, for atopic dermatitis. These drugs target the Janus Kinase intracellular cascade, rendering them suitable for treating both Th1 and Th2 immune-mediated responses. Materials and Methods: We report the case of a 36-year-old male patient presenting an overlap of ulcerative colitis, a Th1-related disease, and atopic dermatitis, a Th2-mediated condition. Treatment with upadacitinib was initiated, and laboratory and instrumental follow-ups were carried out for 8 months. Results: The complete and persistent clinical remission of both conditions was observed at a low dose of 15 mg of upadacitinib, even though ulcerative colitis guidelines usually recommend a dosage of 45 mg. No serious adverse responses to therapy were reported. Conclusions: Upadacitinib may be the most suitable management strategy in subjects with coexisting severe conditions mediated by Th1 inflammation, such as ulcerative colitis, and by Th2 cytokines, such as atopic dermatitis.


Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Dermatitis Atópica , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 3 Anillos/uso terapéutico , Inflamación
2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36674095

RESUMEN

Syphilis is characterized by a wide range of variable clinical symptoms; therefore, it is often referred to as "The Great Imitator". Here, we report the case of a 69-year-old hepatitis-C-positive MSM patient, who was admitted to our clinic due to a solitary firm painless erythematous maculopapular lesion with a central crater-like crust on the upper right thigh that occurred two months prior. The dermoscopy showed an erythematous, copper-colored, oval lesion with diffuse monomorphic dotted and glomerular vessels, central crust, and circular scaling (Biett's sign). The histological findings ruled out neoplasia and described a plasma cell infiltrate and endothelial swelling. Finally, the combination of the dermoscopic image, histological findings and the additionally acquired knowledge about the sexual history of the patient at the second visit led to the diagnosis, which was then confirmed with serological tests. Dermoscopy may become a supportive tool to facilitate the recognition of secondary syphilis; however, the reporting of these atypical cases is crucial to highlight the many faces of the disease so that clinicians consider syphilis as part of the differential diagnosis of non-specific lesions.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Cutáneas , Sífilis , Humanos , Anciano , Sífilis/diagnóstico , Sífilis/complicaciones , Dermoscopía/métodos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Eritema , Diagnóstico Diferencial
3.
J Clin Med ; 11(24)2022 Dec 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36556045

RESUMEN

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a rare immune-mediated vasculitis associated with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs). Having systemic and possibly severe involvement, a prompt recognition of its clinical features is crucial to achieve favorable patient outcomes. Although cutaneous manifestations represent key elements, these still remain poorly characterized. We report a case of ANCA-positive EGPA presenting with palpable purpura, livedo reticularis, and pemphigoid-like lesions that was successfully treated with glucocorticoid therapy and rituximab. This report portrays the evolution of cutaneous lesions in ANCA-positive EGPA and demonstrates how dermatologic signs may represent indicators of active disease, allowing for timely diagnosis and for the monitoring of disease activity during treatment.

4.
J Clin Med ; 11(15)2022 Jul 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35956094

RESUMEN

Cutaneous neurosensory symptoms have become increasingly reported findings in COVID-19; however, these virus-related manifestations are largely overlooked, and their pathology is poorly understood. Moreover, alterations of skin sensibility currently recognize no clear histopathology substrate. The purpose of this study was to provide pathology evidence of neurosensory skin system involvement in COVID-19 patients complaining of subjective neurological symptoms affecting the skin. Out of 142 patients, six long COVID-19 cases complaining of cutaneous subjective neurological symptoms assessed on an NTSS-6 questionnaire underwent histopathological and immunohistochemical analyses of skin areas affected by paroxysmal diffuse burning and itching sensations. Two patients also performed electroneurography examination. The histology investigation showed hypertrophic glomus vascular bodies with hypertrophic S100+ perineural sheath cells and adjacent hypertrophy of the nerve branches associated with increased basophil polysaccharide matrix. Electroneurography revealed disturbances of A-delta and C dermal neuronal fibers. The main limitation of this study consisted of a limited number of skin biopsy samples, requiring further investigation. Histopathology findings are consistent with hypertrophy of nerve endings, suggesting a condition such as "dermal hyperneury", a recently reported small nerve hypertrophy condition affecting sensory C fibers. Such a neuropathic basis could explain dysesthesia experienced by the patients, as previously described in postherpetic neuralgia.

5.
J Clin Med ; 11(13)2022 Jun 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35807096

RESUMEN

After coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused a global pandemic, vaccines were rapidly developed to control the spread of the virus. Although they were effective in most of the cases at protecting people from becoming seriously ill and being hospitalized, they showed side effects, too. Among other adverse vaccine reactions, cutaneous eruptions following SARS-CoV-2 have been described in the literature, but they are not well-characterized yet. We described the morphology and timing of the spectrum of cutaneous reactions following most of the COVID-19 vaccines available in Italy, which were observed in outpatients referred to our non-invasive diagnostic clinic. Most of these reactions appeared after the second or third COVID-19 vaccine dose (most of them after mRNA COVID-19 vaccines). Our data support that cutaneous reactions to COVID-19 vaccination are generally self-limited; in addition, history of allergic reaction to a specific food, medicine or vaccine should not discourage vaccination in the general population, although patients with immune dysregulation should be accurately selected and monitored. Further research is necessary to better assess the true prevalence and preventive measures of skin reactions to COVID-19 vaccination.

6.
J Clin Med ; 11(7)2022 Mar 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35407429

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients affected by pre-existing chronic spontaneous/Inducible urticaria (CSU/CIU) still feel unsafe due to the potential risk of an Adverse Event Following Immunization (AEFI) and Cutaneous Adverse Reactions (CARs) of COVID-19 vaccines. The appropriate management in this field remains debated and evidence is still lacking. METHODS: We considered 160 CSU/CIU patients in Omalizumab/antihistamine therapy who received two doses of Comirnaty/Moderna mRNA vaccines; 20 of them also received a booster dose. Urticaria Activity Score-7 (UAS7) was used to assess the severity of the disease. Demographics, medical history, AEFI and CARs outcome after vaccination were collected by administering a web-based questionnaire completed by phone interview. RESULTS: In total, 147 patients did not show urticaria relapse (91.88%). Worsening cutaneous symptoms were experienced by 13 of our patients (8.12%). Exacerbation had a mean duration of 2 days and 11 h and mostly occurred after the first dose (69.23%). Systemic mild side effects were experienced by 9 patients (5.62%). No severe reactions were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Omalizumab can potentially prevent CARs and AEFI; however, major problems were registered during the 2-month stop period scheduled in the treatment. We suggest patients should not undergo vaccination during this period. CSU/CIU exacerbations appear to be transient and can be managed by antihistamines.

10.
Immunotherapy ; 14(4): 183-188, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34933583

RESUMEN

Dupilumab-related head and neck dermatitis is an increasingly reported clinical manifestation occurring in 4-10% of patients on dupilumab that was apparently not reported in clinical trials. Out of 62 adult patients treated with dupilumab for atopic dermatitis in the authors' center, four cases (6%) of head and neck dermatitis were observed, for which a skin biopsy was obtained. Onset occurred between 8 and 24 weeks after initiation of dupilumab, and the reaction resolved after 8-12 weeks. Histopathology and immunohistochemical findings support the authors' hypothesis that facial redness may be a toxic effect induced by dupilumab, although its pathogenesis still requires further investigation.


Plain language summary Dupilumab is an advanced treatment for atopic dermatitis. The new appearance of a peculiar head and neck dermatitis may be observed in as many as 4­10% of subjects receiving this drug, though it was not reported in the course of the clinical trials that led to the approval of dupilumab. Out of 62 adults treated with dupilumab for atopic dermatitis in the authors' Dermatology Clinic, four subjects (6%) were observed to have head and neck dermatitis. The condition appeared between 8 and 24 weeks after initiation of dupilumab and lasted 8­12 weeks. The four subjects gave permission to perform a skin biopsy. Microscopic analysis of their samples suggested that this peculiar facial redness may be a drug-induced reaction associated with dupilumab, although its causes and mechanisms still require understanding.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Atópica/inducido químicamente , Adulto , Cara , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
11.
Clin Dermatol ; 39(6): 1083-1087, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34920828

RESUMEN

Data on the tolerability and response to biologic therapies for type 2 immune disorders in the context of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are currently lacking. Our survey aimed at assessing the adherence of patients to dupilumab therapy and the risk of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. A total of 80 patients with atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab completed a web-based survey. Of the 80 patients, 7 discontinued dupilumab owing to concerns and difficulties related to COVID-19. Our sample was highly susceptible to viral infection owing to the frequency of risk factors including living in high SARS-CoV-2 burden areas, such as in Northern Italy; having comorbidities, such as asthma, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease; and being of advanced age. Older patients in our sample are particularly exposed to the risk of COVID-19-related cytokine storm, triggered by excessive interleukin-4 production and type 2 immune response. One patient contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection without the progression of COVID-19 despite continuing scheduled dupilumab treatment. Because evidence on the appropriate management of biologic therapy in the setting of COVID-19 is lacking, the collection of clinical data from patients in treatment with dupilumab is a valuable addition to current clinical practice. Our survey provides a contribution to the understanding of the tolerability and response to dupilumab during COVID-19 and suggests a feasible and effective approach to patients being treated with biologics even when social distancing is required.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Dermatitis Atópica , Eccema , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2
12.
Dermatol Ther ; 34(6): e15153, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34622531

RESUMEN

An in-depth characterization of the incidence, morphology, and onset of COVID-19-vaccines cutaneous adverse reactions is currently lacking. The existing literature on COVID-19 vaccination-related cutaneous adverse reactions largely focused on messenger RNA vaccines and mainly included type 1 hypersensitivity reactions, such as urticaria and angioedema. Other cutaneous manifestations are still poorly characterized and have been classified as delayed hypersensitivity rash. Our prospective observational study on a sample of 2740 subjects who underwent the COVID-19 vaccination aimed at defining the prevalence of cutaneous adverse reactions and at identifying their timing of onset and their correlation with the administered dose. Vaccine-related cutaneous adverse reactions occurred in 50 subjects. Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire on the type of COVID-19 vaccine received, the time of onset of cutaneous reactions, and the dates of administration. Out of 2740 individuals who received the COVID-19 vaccination, 50 were diagnosed with cutaneous adverse reactions to vaccine, after the first dose in 28 patients, after the second in 20, and after both in two. We reported localized injection site erythema in 12 patients and generalized cutaneous reactions in 38 patients. Our study shows that cutaneous adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccination are not common and most often occur after the first dose, recurring infrequently after the second dose. These reactions are usually easily manageable and, even in severe generalized cases, oral antihistamines and corticosteroids were sufficient for resolution. Therefore, except for immediate hypersensitivity reactions, cutaneous adverse reactions do not represent a contraindication to the completion of the vaccination cycle.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunas de ARNm
14.
Skin Appendage Disord ; 21: 1-5, 2021 Jul 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34373830

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Physicians have largely studied the cutaneous involvement of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but only few reports have focused on telogen effluvium (TE) as a possible sequela of COVID-19. We assessed 14 cases of hair loss occurring after SARS-CoV-2 infection using trichoscopy and trichogram to investigate patterns related to COVID-19. Furthermore, we discussed possible mechanisms involved in COVID-19 TE. CASE PRESENTATION: Fourteen individuals were referred to our post-COVID-19 dermatology office complaining acute hair loss after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clinical evaluation included pull test, trichoscopy, and trichogram. CO-VID-19 TE occurred after a median of 2 months (range 1-3 months) following SARS-CoV-2 infection. The median duration of hair loss was 5 months (range 1-6 months). Trichoscopy showed variable but typical TE patterns. Trichogram showed different telogen/anagen ratio depending on the interval between onset of hair loss and trichological visit. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Our cases showed TE between 1 and 3 months after the onset of SARS-CoV-2 infection, thus earlier than classic TE. Trichoscopic features and trichogram showed no variations from classic TE. Different pathogenetic mechanisms including pro-inflammatory cytokines and direct viral damage on the hair follicle can be hypothesized; further studies on a larger sample are needed to better understand this condition.

15.
An Bras Dermatol ; 96(5): 638-640, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34275694

RESUMEN

Neurofibromatosis type 1 still lacks established treatment options aimed at controlling the progression of neurofibromas as well as effective therapy for the neurogenic itch associated with the disease. We report the case of a 30-year-old Caucasian woman with type 1 neurofibromatosis coexisting with severe refractory atopic dermatitis. Dupilumab, a novel anti-IL-4 receptor alpha monoclonal antibody, the first biologic agent approved for atopic dermatitis, was the drug of choice in this case. We observed remission of atopic dermatitis and a remarkable reduction in the size and swelling of neurofibromas and in the related pruritus, that became evident after one month of treatment. After 18 months of therapy, no new neurofibromas were detected and preexistent lesions showed no increase in size. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that dupilumab, a potent anti-inflammatory drug, may have a positive effect on type 1 neurofibromatosis by stopping the progression of preexisting neurofibromas and the onset of new lesions.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Neurofibromatosis 1 , Adulto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Dermatitis Atópica/complicaciones , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Interleucina-4 , Neurofibromatosis 1/complicaciones , Neurofibromatosis 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Allergy ; 76(6): 1813-1824, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34152613

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Few and small studies have described the management of immunomodulant/immunosuppressive therapies or phototherapy in atopic dermatitis (AD) patients during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: A national registry, named DA-COVID-19 and involving 35 Italian dermatology units, was established in order to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the management of adult AD patients treated with systemic immunomodulant/immunosuppressive medications or phototherapy. Demographic and clinical data were obtained at different timepoints by teledermatology during COVID-19 pandemic, when regular visits were not allowed due to sanitary restrictions. Disease severity was assessed by both physician- and patient-reported assessment scores evaluating itch intensity, sleep disturbances, and AD severity. RESULTS: A total of 1831 patients were included, with 1580/1831 (86.3%) continuing therapy during pandemic. Most patients were treated with dupilumab (86.1%, 1576/1831) that was interrupted in only 9.9% (156/1576) of cases, while systemic immunosuppressive compounds were more frequently withdrawn. Treatment interruption was due to decision of the patient, general practitioner, or dermatologist in 39.9% (114/286), 5.6% (16/286), and 30.1% (86/286) of cases, respectively. Fear of increased susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection (24.8%, 71/286) was one of the main causes of interruption. Sixteen patients (0.9%) resulted positive to SARS-CoV-2 infection; 3 of them (0.2%) were hospitalized but no cases of COVID-related death occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Most AD patients continued systemic treatments during COVID pandemic and lockdown period, without high impact on disease control, particularly dupilumab-treated patients.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Dermatitis Atópica , Adulto , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Dermatitis Atópica/epidemiología , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Pandemias , Sistema de Registros , SARS-CoV-2
17.
Dermatol Ther ; 34(5): e15035, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34152670

RESUMEN

Dupilumab showed significant improvement of adolescent atopic dermatitis (AD) signs and symptoms in clinical trials, with a good safety profile. Herein we report the real-word effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in adolescents with moderate to severe AD from January to October 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. All patients had a diagnosis of AD for a mean [SD] 12.8 [3.1] years. Baseline demographics, AD characteristics (EASI, cDLQI, NRS itch score, NRS sleep loss score) at baseline and week 16, and safety data were collected. Nineteen patients (52.6% men; mean [SD] age, 15.6 [1.4] years [range, 13-17 years]) were included in the analysis. All patients reached EASI-50 and 78.9% EASI-75, especially in those with EASI≥30 and BMI < 25 at baseline, with marked reduction for cDLQI (77.4%), NRS itch score (5.9 point), and NRS sleep loss score (87.5%). One patient contracted asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and 1 developed mild conjuntivitis, without stopping dupilumab. In this real-word experience the effectiveness of dupilumab was excellent and resulted higher than that observed in clinical trials, with a good safety profile during COVID-19 pandemic.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Dermatitis Atópica , Adolescente , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Dermatitis Atópica/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Dermatitis Atópica/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Am J Clin Dermatol ; 22(4): 581-586, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33725337

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in treating elderly patients with atopic dermatitis from baseline to 52 weeks. METHODS: A retrospective observational real-life study was conducted in a group of elderly patients with severe atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab for 52 weeks. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 65 years; diagnosis of atopic dermatitis made by an expert dermatologist; Eczema Area and Severity Index ≥ 24; and a contraindication, side effects, or failure to respond to cyclosporine. The primary outcome was the mean percentage reduction in the Eczema Area and Severity Index score from baseline to week 52. Secondary measures included the mean percentage reduction in the Pruritus and Sleep Numerical Rating Scales and the Dermatology Life Quality Index, and the types and rates of adverse events from baseline to week 52. RESULTS: One hundred and five patients were eligible for the study. Flexural dermatitis was the most frequent clinical phenotype (63.8%). The coexistence of more than one clinical phenotype was found in 70/105 (66.6%) patients. We observed a reduction in all disease severity scores from baseline to week 52 (p < 0.001). Adverse events were recorded in 30/105 (28.6%) patients, with conjunctivitis and injection-site reaction the most frequent. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, dupilumab is an effective and safe treatment for the long-term management of atopic dermatitis in patients aged over 65 years.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Conjuntivitis/epidemiología , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Reacción en el Punto de Inyección/epidemiología , Prurito/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Conjuntivitis/inducido químicamente , Dermatitis Atópica/complicaciones , Dermatitis Atópica/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Atópica/inmunología , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Reacción en el Punto de Inyección/etiología , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Masculino , Prurito/diagnóstico , Prurito/inmunología , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Dermatol Ther ; 34(2): e14841, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33527659

RESUMEN

Chronic spontaneous urticaria might affect elderly patients, causing a serious impairment of their quality of life. The therapeutic management of the elderly patient is challenging; in fact, the first-line recommended therapy for symptom control are antihistamines, that may have interactions or increased risk of side effects in patients with comorbidities and poly-pharmacological regimen. Omalizumab is the first biological drug approved for chronic spontaneous urticaria resistant to antihistamines. Real-life data focusing on patients >65-year-old treated with omalizumab are rare. In our retrospective study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of this biologic therapy in patients over 65-year-old. We performed Urticaria Activity Score-7 (UAS-7) in order to evaluate the efficacy of omalizumab and the time of remission. We collected any adverse event related to the treatment. Moreover, we investigated the presence of comorbidities and their impact on the efficacy of omalizumab. Sixty-threepatients, with a mean age of 72.3 ± 5.6 years, range: 65-89) were enrolled. Of 63 subjects, 23 (36.5%) had an "early complete response" profile, which means the achievement of a UAS7 score of "0" within the first 7 days of therapy. The most frequent comorbidity was hypertension, which affected 26 of 63 (41.3%) patients; no adverse events were reported. No significant correlations were found between treatment effectiveness and comorbidities. Omalizumab is a safe and effective therapy also in elderly patients with multiple comorbidities.


Asunto(s)
Antialérgicos , Urticaria Crónica , Omalizumab/uso terapéutico , Urticaria , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antialérgicos/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Crónica , Humanos , Omalizumab/efectos adversos , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Urticaria/diagnóstico , Urticaria/tratamiento farmacológico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...