Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Acad Med ; 87(4): 403-10, 2012 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22361790

RESUMEN

With changes in the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Common Program Requirements related to transitions in care effective July 1, 2011, sponsoring institutions and training programs must develop a common structure for transitions in care as well as comprehensive curricula to teach and evaluate patient handoffs. In response to these changes, within the Duke University Health System, the resident-led Graduate Medical Education Patient Safety and Quality Council performed a focused review of the handoffs literature and developed a plan for comprehensive handoff education and evaluation for residents and fellows at Duke. The authors present the results of their focused review, concentrating on the three areas of new ACGME expectations--structure, education, and evaluation--and describe how their findings informed the broader initiative to comprehensively address transitions in care managed by residents and fellows. The process of developing both institution-level and program-level initiatives is reviewed, including the development of an interdisciplinary minimal data set for handoff core content, training and education programs, and an evaluation strategy. The authors believe the final plan fully addresses both Duke's internal goals and the revised ACGME Common Program Requirements and may serve as a model for other institutions to comprehensively address transitions in care and to incorporate resident and fellow leadership into a broad, health-system-level quality improvement initiative.


Asunto(s)
Acreditación , Competencia Clínica , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/normas , Internado y Residencia/normas , Transferencia de Pacientes/normas , Facultades de Medicina/normas , Comunicación , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/métodos , North Carolina , Seguridad del Paciente , Transferencia de Pacientes/métodos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Carga de Trabajo
2.
J Urol ; 177(1): 184-7; discussion 187, 2007 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17162036

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We evaluated the significance of stricture length and severity on the outcome of fossa navicularis reconstruction. We also determined the efficacy and usefulness of an extended meatotomy (first stage Johanson) salvage maneuver in refractory cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our 7-year experience with the surgical management of distal urethral strictures involving the fossa navicularis was reviewed. Stricture length, reconstructive method and outcomes were assessed in 40 consecutive cases performed at our institution from 1997 to 2003. Men undergoing flap or graft onlay reconstruction were divided into group 1-short, isolated fossa navicularis strictures (2.5 cm or less) and group 2-long pendulous urethral strictures (greater than 2.5 cm) extending into the fossa navicularis. Men treated with extended meatotomy for complex and/or reoperative distal strictures comprised group 3. RESULTS: Average followup was 52 months (range 28 to 81). The majority of men with short isolated fossa navicularis strictures (group 1 average length 2.2 cm, range 1.5 to 2.5) had successful onlay reconstruction (10 of 11, 91%). Those with longer strictures (group 2 average length 7.4 cm, range 4 to 16) had significantly poorer outcomes with onlay reconstruction (7 of 13, 54%, p <0.05). Failures presented in a delayed manner with recurrent stenosis of the distal segment. Extended meatotomy (group 3) proved to be successful in 14 of 16 men (87%) with complex or reoperative strictures. CONCLUSIONS: Stricture length influences the outcome of distal urethroplasty. Onlay repair via a penile fasciocutaneous flap technique is reliable for short perimeatal strictures, but is less well suited for longer distal strictures. Extended meatotomy appears to be a highly effective salvage maneuver for complicated strictures of the fossa navicularis.


Asunto(s)
Uretra/cirugía , Estrechez Uretral/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos/métodos
3.
J Urol ; 171(1): 445-7, 2004 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14665952

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We determined whether fibrin sealant augmented by an absorbable bolster could salvage kidneys with major, centrally located stab wounds. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A grade 4 renal injury was created in 16 commercial swine via a 1.5 cm sagittal, centrally located, through-and-through right renal laceration. Animals were randomized to 1 of 4 treatment arms, including control groups that received conventional renal capsule suture repair with an absorbable gelatin sponge bolster (3 in group 1) or a microfibrillar collagen sheet (3 in group 2) and experimental groups that received sutureless treatment entailing fibrin sealant instillation into the knife tract augmented by an external gelatin sponge (5 in group 3) or an external microfibrillar collagen sheet (5 in group 4). Arterial occlusion was not performed. Blood loss and time to hemostasis were recorded. Abdominal computerized tomography was performed at 1 week and necropsy was done at 6 weeks. RESULTS: Renal reconstruction with fibrin sealant resulted in significantly lower blood loss (62 vs 155 ml, p <0.05) and time to hemostasis (3.5 vs 6.5 minutes, p <0.05) than in the conventional suture groups. There was no radiographic or gross evidence of significant postoperative bleeding, urinoma formation or abnormal tissue healing in the recovery period. Gelatin sponge and collagen sheet demonstrated similar hemostatic efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: In this porcine renal trauma model fibrin sealant augmented by absorbable gelatin sponge or a microfibrillar collagen sheet effectively promoted hemostasis and renal salvage. Because of its safety, ease of use and efficiency, fibrin sealant appears to be an appropriate adjunct for managing challenging renal injuries.


Asunto(s)
Adhesivo de Tejido de Fibrina , Riñón/lesiones , Adhesivos Tisulares , Heridas Punzantes/terapia , Animales , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Porcinos
4.
J Urol ; 168(3): 1021-3, 2002 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12187213

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We determine if a single 500 mg. oral tablet of levofloxacin represents adequate prophylaxis for patients at low risk who undergo transrectal prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From April 2000 to May 2001 we prospectively evaluated 400 consecutive men who underwent transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate after a single 500 mg. oral dose of levofloxacin. Under an institutional review board approved protocol the drug was issued under a standing order by a clinic nurse 30 to 60 minutes before the procedure. Patients were issued 2 additional daily doses of levofloxacin if they were deemed at increased risk for infectious complications, that is if they had a large prostate more than 75 cc, diabetes mellitus, recent steroid use, severe voiding dysfunction or immune compromise. No patient received a cleansing enema before the procedure. Complications, the number of biopsy cores, prostate size and cancer detection rates were assessed. RESULTS: Only 1 of the 377 patients at low risk in whom biopsy was completed experienced a symptomatic urinary tract infection (0.27%). None of the 23 men at high risk who received additional doses of levofloxacin experienced a complication. Thus, the overall infection rate was 1 of 400 cases (0.25%) in this series. A mean of 7 biopsy cores (range 2 to 16) was obtained per patient and mean prostate volume was 49.75 cc (range 12 to 150). Prostate cancer was present in 93 patients (23%). CONCLUSIONS: A single 500 mg. dose of levofloxacin before transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate is effective and safe in patients at low risk. The administration of prophylaxis by a clinic nurse under a standing order optimizes patient compliance and physician efficiency. In patients at higher risk for infection additional antibiotic administration appears to provide adequate prophylaxis.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Urinarios/administración & dosificación , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Biopsia con Aguja , Levofloxacino , Ofloxacino/administración & dosificación , Próstata/patología , Administración Oral , Biopsia con Aguja/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Infecciones Urinarias/etiología , Infecciones Urinarias/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...