RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: African American (AA) men have the highest incidence and mortality rates of prostate cancer (PCa) among all racial groups in the United States. While race is a social construct, for AA men, this overlaps with west African ancestry. Many of the PCa susceptibility variants exhibit distinct allele frequencies and risk estimates across different races and contribute substantially to the large disparities of PCa incidence among races. We previously reported that a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in 8q24, rs7824364, was strongly associated with west African ancestry and increased risks of PCa in both AA and Puerto Rican men. In this study, we determined whether this SNP can predict biopsy positivity and detection of clinically significant disease (Gleason score [GS] ≥ 7) in a cohort of AA men with suspected PCa. METHODS: SNP rs7824364 was genotyped in 199 AA men with elevated total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (>2.5 ng/mL) or abnormal digital rectal exam (DRE) and the associations of different genotypes with biopsy positivity and clinically significant disease were analyzed. RESULTS: The variant allele carriers were significantly over-represented in the biopsy-positive group compared to the biopsy-negative group (44% vs. 25.7%, p = 0.011). In the multivariate logistic regression analyses, variant allele carriers were at a more than a twofold increased risk of a positive biopsy (odds ratio [OR] = 2.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.06-4.32). Moreover, the variant allele was a predictor (OR = 2.26, 95% CI = 1.06-4.84) of a positive biopsy in the subgroup of patients with PSA < 10 ng/mL and normal DRE. The variant allele carriers were also more prevalent in cases with GS ≥ 7 compared to cases with GS < 7 and benign biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the west African ancestry-specific SNP rs7824364 on 8q24 independently predicted a positive prostate biopsy in AA men who were candidates for prostate biopsy subsequent to PCa screening.
Asunto(s)
Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Negro o Afroamericano/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/genética , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , BiopsiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Duplication of the vas deferens is the identification of a second vas deferens within the spermatic cord; it is a rarely reported congenital anomaly. Duplicate vas deferens should not be confused with double vas deferens that describes ipsilateral renal agenesis with a blind ureter ending in the ejaculatory system. DATA SOURCES: We present a case of duplicated vas deferens, and a PubMed Medline (National Library of Medicine) search was performed using the terms "[duplicated OR double]" and "vas deferens". Nineteen papers for a total of twenty-two cases (including ours) were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Duplication of vas deferens is a rare finding; it is likely under-reported and underrecognized. Failure to recognize this variation can result in injury to the vas deferens or an ineffective vasectomy. Following identification of a suspected duplicated vas deferens, the structure should be tracked from the internal ring down to the epididymis and intra-operative Doppler should be performed. Post-operatively, renal and bladder imaging can be considered though there have been no reported cases of non-testicular genito-urinary anomalies associated with duplicated vas deferens.
Asunto(s)
Anomalías Urogenitales/cirugía , Conducto Deferente/anomalías , Vasectomía/métodos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Orquidopexia/métodos , Conducto Deferente/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Manipulation of infection calculi (struvite and calcium apatite) can cause the sepsis syndrome due to endotoxemia or bacteremia. We sought to determine whether concentrations of endotoxin sufficient to produce the sepsis syndrome could be embedded in renal infection stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fragments of infection and noninfection renal calculi were processed and assayed for endotoxin concentration. Endotoxin concentrations, recorded as endotoxin units per gm. calculus, were converted to ng. (10 endotoxin units = 1 ng.). Urine culture results were available for some patients with infection stones. RESULTS: A total of 34 renal calculi (16 infection and 18 noninfection) were evaluated. The composition of 62.5% of the infection stones was struvite, whereas 50% of the noninfection stones were calcium oxalate monohydrate. Mean endotoxin concentration in infection calculi was 12,223 ng./gm. stone (range 0.6 to 50,000), compared to 340.3 ng./gm. stone (range 0 to 3,490) in noninfection calculi. The endotoxin content difference was significant (p = 0.001). Urine culture results available from 9 patients with infection stones did not correlate with endotoxin concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Large endotoxin concentrations can be found in renal infection calculi. Noninfection stones can contain endotoxin but in much lower amounts. Massive endotoxin release could occur with infection stone manipulation, possibly producing increased serum endotoxin concentrations similar to those seen in gram-negative sepsis. Anti-endotoxin strategies may be beneficial in preventing and treating stone induced endotoxemia and the sepsis syndrome.