Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 34: 106-10, 2016 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27116905

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair (PEVAR) continues to evolve. Device profiles continue to decline, further reducing the physiological insult of the procedure. Anesthesia, however, has not evolved with a large proportion of patients continuing to receive general anesthesia for their increasingly less invasive procedures. We report on a novel anesthetic technique providing outstanding anesthesia in patients undergoing PEVAR in an outpatient setting. The total anesthesia used was remarkably cost effective. METHODS: Six patients underwent PEVAR in an outpatient setting. The patients received moderate intravenous (IV) access sedation using versed and fentanyl in combination with bilateral ilioinguinal nerve blocks. Patients received 25 mL bilaterally of 0.5% bupivicaine with epinephrine. All patients were American Society of Anesthesiologists class III. None received central venous access, arterial, or urinary catheters. Standard noninvasive monitoring was used. A board-certified anesthesiologist was present at all times during the procedures. RESULTS: All patients underwent successful repair. Average cost per case for anesthetic supplies averaged around $7.00. The fentanyl dose ranged from 100 to 200 µg with an average dose of 130 µg. Versed dose ranged from 2 to 3 mg with an average dose of 2.4 mg. No patient required conversion to general anesthesia. Postoperative pain relief was excellent. Two patients required pain medication before discharge. Two patients required oral narcotic analgesic the night of discharge. No patients required narcotics after that time. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral ilioinguinal nerve block, when combined with moderate IV sedation allows outstanding anesthesia for patients undergoing PEVAR. This novel combination has not been reported previously. The technique provides safe, effective, care for of a subset of patients not requiring general anesthesia. It offers a greatly reduced cost when compared with general anesthesia. Additional benefits include prolonged pain relief perioperatively as well as potentially decreasing the physiologic and cognitive effects seen with general anesthesia.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Sedación Consciente , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Midazolam/administración & dosificación , Bloqueo Nervioso , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagen , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/economía , Sedación Consciente/efectos adversos , Sedación Consciente/economía , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Costos de los Medicamentos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/economía , Fentanilo/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/efectos adversos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/economía , Masculino , Midazolam/efectos adversos , Midazolam/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Bloqueo Nervioso/efectos adversos , Bloqueo Nervioso/economía , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...