Darexaban (YM150), an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor, has no effect on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin.

To investigate the impact of the direct Factor Xa inhibitor darexaban administered in a modified-release formulation (darexaban-MR) on the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of digoxin. In this Phase I, randomized, double-blind, two-period crossover study (8 days for each treatment, 10 days washout), 24 healthy subjects received darexaban-MR 120 mg once/day (qd) + digoxin 0.25 mg qd in one treatment period, and placebo + digoxin 0.25 mg qd in the other treatment period. Blood for PK assessment of digoxin and darexaban was obtained in serial profile on day 8, as well as pre-dose on day 6-7; urinary PK samples were obtained up to 24 h after the last dose on day 8. A lack of interaction was determined if 90 % confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios (GMR) of digoxin C max,ss and AUC0-24h,ss with and without darexaban-MR co-administration were within 0.80-1.25 limits. Pharmacodynamic activity was assessed by international normalized ratio and activated partial thromboplastin time. Twenty-three subjects completed the study. The GMR (90 % CI) for C max,ss and AUC0-24h,ss of digoxin plus darexaban versus digoxin plus placebo was 1.03 (90 % CI: 0.94-1.12) and 1.11 (90 % CI: 1.05-1.17), respectively. The 90 % CI for the GMRs fell within the limits of 0.80-1.25, indicating a lack of drug-drug interaction. Co-administration of digoxin with darexaban-MR was well tolerated, with no unexpected treatment-emergent adverse events or safety concerns. Co-administration of darexaban-MR did not impact the steady-state PK profile of digoxin.

The pharmacokinetics of darexaban (YM150), an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor, are not affected by ketoconazole, a strong inhibitor of CYP3A and P-glycoprotein.

We investigated the effects of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the direct clotting factor Xa inhibitor darexaban (YM150) and its main active metabolite darexaban glucuronide (YM-222714) which almost entirely determines the antithrombotic effect. In this open-label, randomized, two-period crossover study, 26 healthy male volunteers received in one treatment period a single dose of darexaban 60 mg, and in the other treatment period, ketoconazole 400 mg once daily on Days 1-9 with a single dose of darexaban 60 mg on Day 4. Washout between periods was at least 1 week. The geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval) of darexaban glucuronide (darexaban plus ketoconazole versus darexaban) for AUCinf was 1.11 (1.00, 1.23), and for Cmax 1.18 (1.03, 1.35). Darexaban concentrations remained very low (AUClast ∼196-fold lower) in relation to darexaban glucuronide concentrations. In conclusion, the PK of darexaban glucuronide was not affected to a clinically relevant degree by co-administration of the strong CYP3A/P-glycoprotein inhibitor, ketoconazole. The PK of the parent compound darexaban were changed, however, concentrations remained quantitatively insignificant in relation to the main active moiety, darexaban glucuronide.

Clinical pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of darexaban, an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor, in healthy Caucasian and Japanese subjects.

BACKGROUND: Darexaban (YM150) is a potent direct factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor developed for the prophylaxis of venous and arterial thromboembolic disease. This drug is rapidly and extensively metabolized to darexaban glucuronide (YM-222714), which is a pharmacologically active metabolite. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the clinical pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety and tolerability of ascending multiple oral doses of darexaban in healthy non-elderly Caucasian and Japanese subjects. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single and multiple dose-escalating study of healthy Caucasian and Japanese male and female subjects was performed. The tested doses were 20, 60, 120 and 240 mg of darexaban. RESULTS: Plasma concentrations of darexaban glucuronide increased with dose, and Cmax and AUC increased dose-dependently after both single and repeated doses in both Caucasians and Japanese. Cmax was about 17%-19% lower in Caucasians than in Japanese, although AUC appeared to be similar. The time-profiles of prothrombin time reported as the international normalized ratio (PT-INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and FXa activity closely followed the time-concentration profile of darexaban glucuronide, and no clear differences were observed in ethnicity. Overall, 38 of the 82 enrolled subjects reported a total of 57 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Fifty-five TEAEs were of mild intensity and two were of moderate intensity. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that single and multiple doses of darexaban are safe and well tolerated up to 240 mg with predictable PK and PD profiles in both Caucasians and Japanese, and that ethnicity does not affect its PK, PD or tolerability.

The pharmacokinetics of darexaban are not affected to a clinically relevant degree by rifampicin, a strong inducer of P-glycoprotein and CYP3A4.

AIMS: We investigated the effects of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the direct clotting factor Xa inhibitor darexaban (YM150) and its main active metabolite, darexaban glucuronide (YM-222714), which almost entirely determines the antithrombotic effect. METHODS: In this open-label, single-sequence study, 26 healthy men received one dose of darexaban 60 mg on day 1 and oral rifampicin 600 mg once daily on days 4-14. On day 11, a second dose of darexaban 60 mg was given with rifampicin. Blood and urine were collected after study drug administration on days 1-14. The maximal plasma drug concentration (C(max)) and exposure [area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to time of quantifiable measurable concentration; (AUC(last)) or AUC(last) extrapolated to infinity (AUC(∞))] were assessed by analysis of variance of PK. Limits for statistical significance of 90% confidence intervals for AUC and C(max) ratios were predefined as 80-125%. RESULTS: Darexaban glucuronide plasma exposure was not affected by rifampicin; the geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval) of AUC(last) with/without rifampicin was 1.08 (1.00, 1.16). The C(max) of darexaban glucuronide increased by 54% after rifampicin [ratio 1.54 (1.37, 1.73)]. The plasma concentrations of darexaban were very low (<1% of darexaban glucuronide concentrations) with and without rifampicin. Darexaban alone or in combination with rifampicin was generally safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, rifampicin did not affect the PK profiles of darexaban glucuronide and darexaban to a clinically relevant degree, suggesting that the potential for drug-drug interactions between darexaban and CYP3A4 or P-glycoprotein-inducing agents is low.

Absorption, metabolism and excretion of darexaban (YM150), a new direct factor Xa inhibitor in humans.

1. The absorption, metabolism and excretion of darexaban (YM150), a novel oral direct factor Xa inhibitor, were investigated after a single oral administration of [(14)C]darexaban maleate at a dose of 60 mg in healthy male human subjects. 2. [(14)C]Darexaban was rapidly absorbed, with both blood and plasma concentrations peaking at approximately 0.75 h post-dose. Plasma concentrations of darexaban glucuronide (M1), the pharmacological activity of which is equipotent to darexaban in vitro, also peaked at approximately 0.75 h. 3. Similar amounts of dosed radioactivity were excreted via faeces (51.9%) and urine (46.4%) by 168 h post-dose, suggesting that at least approximately half of the administered dose is absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract. 4. M1 was the major drug-related component in plasma and urine, accounting for up to 95.8% of radioactivity in plasma. The N-oxides of M1, a mixture of two diastereomers designated as M2 and M3, were also present in plasma and urine, accounting for up to 13.2% of radioactivity in plasma. In faeces, darexaban was the major drug-related component, and N-demethyl darexaban (M5) was detected as a minor metabolite. 5. These findings suggested that, following oral administration of darexaban in humans, M1 is quickly formed during first-pass metabolism via UDP-glucuronosyltransferases, exerting its pharmacological activity in blood before being excreted into urine and faeces.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling of the EEG effects of opioids: the role of complex biophase distribution kinetics.

The objective of this investigation is to characterize the role of complex biophase distribution kinetics in the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic correlation of a wide range of opioids. Following intravenous infusion of morphine, alfentanil, fentanyl, sufentanil, butorphanol and nalbuphine the time course of the EEG effect was determined in conjunction with blood concentrations. Different biophase distribution models were tested for their ability to describe hysteresis between blood concentration and effect. In addition, membrane transport characteristics of the opioids were investigated in vitro, using MDCK:MDR1 cells and in silico with QSAR analysis. For morphine, hysteresis was best described by an extended-catenary biophase distribution model with different values for k1e and keo of 0.038+/-0.003 and 0.043+/-0.003 min(-1), respectively. For the other opioids hysteresis was best described by a one-compartment biophase distribution model with identical values for k1e and keo. Between the different opioids, the values of k1e ranged from 0.04 to 0.47 min(-1). The correlation between concentration and EEG effect was successfully described by the sigmoidal Emax pharmacodynamic model. Between opioids significant differences in potency (EC50 range 1.2-451 ng/ml) and intrinsic activity (alpha range 18-109 microV) were observed. A statistically significant correlation was observed between the values of the in vivo k1e and the apparent passive permeability as determined in vitro in MDCK:MDR1 monolayers. It can be concluded that unlike other opioids, only morphine displays complex biophase distribution kinetics, which can be explained by its relatively low passive permeability and the interaction with active transporters at the blood-brain barrier.

Toward the prediction of CNS drug-effect profiles in physiological and pathological conditions using microdialysis and mechanism-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling.

Our ultimate goal is to develop mechanism-based pharmacokinetic (PK)-pharmacodynamic (PD) models to characterize and to predict CNS drug responses in both physiologic and pathologic conditions. To this end, it is essential to have information on the biophase pharmacokinetics, because these may significantly differ from plasma pharmacokinetics. It is anticipated that biophase kinetics of CNS drugs are strongly influenced by transport across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). The special role of microdialysis in PK/PD modeling of CNS drugs lies in the fact that it enables the determination of free-drug concentrations as a function of time in plasma and in extracellular fluid of the brain, thereby providing important data to determine BBB transport characteristics of drugs. Also, the concentrations of (potential) extracellular biomarkers of drug effects or disease can be monitored with this technique. Here we describe our studies including microdialysis on the following: (1) the evaluation of the free drug hypothesis; (2) the role of BBB transport on the central effects of opioids; (3) changes in BBB transport and biophase equilibration of anti-epileptic drugs; and (4) the relation among neurodegeneration, BBB transport, and drug effects in Parkinson's disease progression.

High-performance liquid chromatography of nalbuphine, butorphanol and morphine in blood and brain microdialysate samples: application to pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies in rats.

A rapid and sensitive assay for quantification of nalbuphine, butorphanol and morphine in blood (50 microL) and brain microdialysate ( approximately 40 microL) samples was developed. Blood samples were extracted with ethyl acetate. Analysis was performed with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled to an electrochemical detector. The mobile phase was a mixture of 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer, methanol and octane-sulfonic acid with ratio and pH depending on compound and matrix. The limits of quantification in blood samples were 25, 50 and 25 ng/mL for nalbuphine, butorphanol and morphine, respectively and 0.5 ng/mL for morphine in microdialysate samples. Based on sample volume, sensitivity and reproducibility, these assays are particularly suitable for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies in rodents.

Blood-brain barrier transport of synthetic adenosine A1 receptor agonists in vitro: structure transport relationships.

Transport of 11 structurally related adenosine A(1) receptor agonists was determined in an in vitro BBB model of brain-capillary-endothelial-cells and astrocytes. Inhibitor S-(4-nitrobenzyl)-6-thioinosine (NBTI) was used to quantify the contribution of the es nucleoside transporter to the overall transport. The N(6)-substituted adenosine analogues N(6)-cyclobutyladenosine (CBA), N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) and N(6)-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) showed concentration-dependent clearance and their transport could be inhibited by NBTI. The V(max) was 1.5+/-0.2 pmol min(-1) and the Km values were 2.2+/-0.2, 1.8+/-0.3 and 15+/-4 microM for CBA, CPA and CHA, respectively. Further chemical modification such as substitution in the C8-position or modification at the ribose-moiety resulted in loss of affinity for the es nucleoside transporter. Transport by passive diffusion was slow with clearances ranging from 0.21+/-0.01 microl min(-1) for 8-(methylamino)-CPA (MCPA) to 1.8+/-0.18 microl min(-1) for 5'-deoxy-CPA (5'dCPA). Regression analysis showed no relationship between transport clearance by passive diffusion and the GTP-shift, a non-linear relationship between the transport clearance by passive diffusion and the dynamic polar surface area (Cl=0.469e(-0.071DPSA); R2=0.88) and a linear relationship between transport clearance and prediction of BBB transport on basis of the Abraham equation (logCl=1.53logBB-1.56; R2=0.83). It is concluded that the transport of synthetic A(1) adenosine derivatives across the blood-brain barrier is generally quite slow. In addition, transport by the es nucleoside transporter may contribute to the transport of certain structurally distinct analogues.