Vagus nerve stimulation in refractory idiopathic generalised epilepsy: An Irish retrospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE: Refractory idiopathic generalised epilepsy (IGE; also known as genetic generalised epilepsy) is a clinical challenge due to limited available therapeutic options. While vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is approved as an adjunctive treatment for drug-resistant focal epilepsy, there is limited evidence supporting its efficacy for refractory IGE. METHODS: We conducted a single-centre retrospective analysis of adult IGE patients treated with VNS between January 2003 and January 2022. We analysed the efficacy, safety, tolerability, stimulation parameters and potential clinical features of VNS response in this IGE cohort. RESULTS: Twenty-three IGE patients were implanted with VNS between January 2003 and January 2022. Twenty-two patients (95.65%) were female. The median baseline seizure frequency was 30 per month (interquartile range [IQR]= 140), including generalised tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS), absences, myoclonus, and eyelid myoclonia with/without absences. The median number of baseline anti-seizure medications (ASM) was three (IQR= 2). Patients had previously failed a median of six ASM (IQR= 5). At the end of the study period, VNS therapy remained active in 17 patients (73.9%). amongst patients who continued VNS, thirteen (56.5% of the overall cohort) were considered responders (≥50% seizure frequency reduction). Amongst the clinical variables analysed, only psychiatric comorbidity correlated with poorer seizure outcomes, but was non-significant after applying the Bonferroni correction. Although 16 patients reported side-effects, none resulted in the discontinuation of VNS therapy. SIGNIFICANCE: Over half of the patients with refractory IGE experienced a positive response to VNS therapy. VNS represents a viable treatment option for patients with refractory IGE, particularly for females, when other therapeutic options have been exhausted.

LoVE in a time of CoVID: Clinician and patient experience using telemedicine for chronic epilepsy management.

As part of our ongoing interest in patient- and family-centered care in epilepsy, we began, before the onset of the CoVID-19 pandemic, to evaluate the concerns and preferences of those delivering and receiving care via telemedicine. CoVID-19 arrived and acted as an unexpected experiment in nature, catalyzing telemedicine's widespread implementation across many disciplines of medicine. The arrival of CoVID-19 in Ireland gave us the opportunity to record these perceptions pre- and post-CoVID. Data were extracted from the National Epilepsy Electronic Patient Record (EEPR). Power BI Analytics collated data from two epilepsy centers in Dublin. Analysis of data on reasons for using the telephone support line was conducted. A subset of patients and clinicians who attended virtual encounters over both periods were asked for their perception of telemedicine care through a mixed methods survey. Between 23rd December 2019 and 23rd March 2020 (pre-CoVID era), a total of 1180 patients were seen in 1653 clinical encounters. As part of a telemedicine pilot study, 50 of these encounters were scheduled virtual telephone appointments. Twenty eight surveys were completed by clinicians and 18 by patients during that period. From 24th March 2020 to 24th June 2020, 1164 patients were seen in 1693 encounters of which 729 (63%) patients were seen in 748 scheduled virtual encounters. 118 clinician impressions were captured through an online survey and 75 patients or carers completed a telephone survey during the post-CoVID era. There was no backlog of appointments or loss of care continuity forced by the pandemic. Clinicians expressed strong levels of satisfaction, but some doubted the suitability of new patients to the service or candidates for surgery receiving care via telemedicine. Patients reported positive experiences surrounding telephone appointments comparing them favorably to face-to-face encounters. The availability of a shared EEPR demonstrated no loss of care contact for patients with epilepsy. The survey showed that telemedicine is seen as an effective and satisfactory method of delivering chronic outpatient care.

Glioblastoma Multiforme in the over 70's: "To treat or not to treat with radiotherapy?"

BACKGROUND: The incidence of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) is increasing among the older population and is associated with poor prognosis. Management guidelines are lacking in this group. The purpose of this study was to analyze survival data and determine predictors of survival in patients aged ≥70 years treated with radiotherapy (RT) and/or Temozolomide. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all GBM patients treated at our institution between January 2011 and January 2017 was carried out. RESULTS: One-hundred and four patients were eligible. Median age was 73.8 years (70-87). Thirty-three patients received radical RT and 71 palliative RT. Overall median survival (MS) was 6 months. The MS was 10.6 months for radical patients and 4.9 months for palliative patients (P < 0.0005). The MS was 6.9 months in patients aged 70-75 years and 5.2 months in those aged 76-80 years (P = 0.004). The debulked group had a statistically significantly longer survival (8.0 months) than the biopsy only group (4.9 months). Biopsy only (hazard ratio [HR] 2.4), ECOG performance status 3 vs 0 (HR 6.4), and increasing age (HR 1.06) were associated with statistically significant shorter survival after adjustment for the effects of concurrent chemo, delay in starting RT, and RT dose. CONCLUSION: The MS for radical patients was favorable and approaching current literature for the under 70 age group. Radical treatment should be considered for good performance patients aged 70-75 years. Increasing age was associated with shorter MS in patients aged ≥76 years. Debulking and good performance status were associated with improved survival.