RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the euploidy rates among blastocysts created from sibling oocytes injected with sperm and processed using microfluidics or density gradient centrifugation. DESIGN: Sibling oocyte randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Single university-affiliated infertility practice. PATIENTS: A total of 106 patients aged 18-42 years undergoing fresh in vitro fertilization treatment cycles with preimplantation genetic testing between January 2021 and April 2022 contributed 1,442 mature oocytes, which were injected with sperm and processed using microfluidics or density gradient centrifugation. INTERVENTION(S): The sperm sample is divided and processed using a microfluidics device and density gradient centrifugation for injection into sibling oocytes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome was the embryo euploidy rate. Secondary outcomes included fertilization, high-quality blastulation, and ongoing pregnancy rates. RESULT(S): The blastocyst euploidy rate per mature oocyte was not significantly different in the study group compared with the control group (22.9% vs. 20.5%). The blastocyst euploidy rate per biopsied embryo was also similar between the 2 groups (53.0% vs. 45.7%). However, the fertilization rate per mature oocyte injected was found to be significantly higher in the study group compared with the control group (76.0% vs. 69.9%). The high-quality blastulation rate per mature oocyte injected was similar between the 2 groups, as was the total number of embryos frozen. There were no differences in the number of participants with no blastocysts for biopsy or the number of participants with no euploid embryos between the 2 groups. Among the male factor infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss subgroups, there were no differences in euploidy rates, fertilization rates, blastulation rates, or total numbers of blastocysts frozen, although the study was underpowered to detect these differences. Seventy-seven patients underwent frozen embryo transfer; there were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION(S): Microfluidics processing did not improve embryo euploidy rates compared with density gradient centrifugation in this sibling oocyte study, although fertilization rates were significantly higher. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04744025.
Asunto(s)
Blastocisto , Centrifugación por Gradiente de Densidad , Oocitos , Índice de Embarazo , Espermatozoides , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Adulto , Masculino , Centrifugación por Gradiente de Densidad/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Método Doble Ciego , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Inyecciones de Esperma Intracitoplasmáticas/métodos , Microfluídica/métodos , Diagnóstico Preimplantación/métodos , Hermanos , Infertilidad/terapia , Infertilidad/fisiopatología , Infertilidad/diagnóstico , Transferencia de Embrión/métodosRESUMEN
Hyperprolactinemia is common among infertile patients, with up to 15%-20% of women with oligomenorrhea having hyperprolactinemia. Suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis via inhibition of pulsatile gonadotropin releasing hormone because of hyperprolactinemia is a common endocrine etiology of infertility. There are 3 forms of human prolactin (PRL): monomeric PRL, dimeric PRL, and macro-PRL. Also known as big-big PRL, macro-PRL has a molecular weight >150 kDa and normally comprises 5%-10% of circulating PRL. When the predominant form of circulating PRL is macro-PRL, macroprolactinemia is diagnosed. Among patients with hyperprolactinemia, 10%-46% have macroprolactinemia. Patients with macroprolactinemia are at risk of unnecessary pituitary imaging and treatment with dopamine agonists if not correctly diagnosed. Given the high prevalence of macroprolactinemia among patients with elevated PRL levels and the different management of patients with macroprolactinemia vs true monomeric hyperprolactinemia, all patients with persistently elevated PRL levels should be screened for macro-PRL.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of body mass index (BMI) on euploidy rates for in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles with preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) utilizing primarily next-generation sequencing (NGS). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included women aged ≤ 45 years who underwent IVF/PGT between September 2013 and September 2020 at a single university-affiliated fertility center. The primary outcome was euploidy rate. Secondary outcomes included peak serum estradiol (E2), number of oocytes retrieved, oocyte maturation rate, high-quality blastulation rate, clinical loss rate (CLR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate (OPR/LBR). RESULTS: The study included 1335 IVF cycles that were stratified according to BMI (normal, n = 648; overweight, n = 377; obese, n = 310). The obese group was significantly older with significantly lower baseline FSH, peak E2, high-quality blastulation rate, and number of embryos biopsied than the normal group. Overall euploidy rates were not significantly different between BMI groups (normal 36.4% ± 1.3; overweight 37.3% ± 1.8; obese 32.3% ± 1.8; p = 0.11), which persisted after controlling for covariates (p = 0.82) and after stratification of euploidy rate by age group and by number of oocytes retrieved per age group. There were no significant differences in CLR, CPR, and OPR/LBR across BMI groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a lower high quality blastulation rate with obesity, there is not a significant difference in euploidy rates across BMI groups in women undergoing IVF/PGT.
Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico Preimplantación , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Aneuploidia , Sobrepeso , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fertilización In Vitro , Índice de Embarazo , Pruebas Genéticas , Obesidad/epidemiología , Obesidad/genéticaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare pregnancy outcomes between letrozole ovulation induction, natural, and programmed frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles in a population based in the United States. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single university-affiliated infertility practice. PATIENT(S): A total of 3,148 FET cycles consisting of patients aged ≤45 years transferring blastocysts that were created from autologous oocytes between January 2015 and July 2021. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome was the ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) or live birth rate (LBR). The secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy and clinical loss rates (CLRs). RESULT(S): The OPR/LBR was higher among letrozole FETs than among programmed FETs (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.21) but comparable to natural FETs (aRR 1.05, 95% CI 0.96-1.14). The OPR/LBR was comparable between natural and programmed FETs (aRR 1.06, 95% CI 0.99-1.13). The CLR was lower in the natural FET group than in the programmed FET group (aRR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46-0.84). There were no differences in CLRs between letrozole and programmed FETs and between letrozole and natural FETs. Among ovulatory women, the OPR/LBR among letrozole FETs was higher than that among programmed FETs (aRR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05-1.28). The CLR among ovulatory women was significantly lower in both letrozole FETs (aRR 0.44, 95% CI 0.22-0.87) and natural FETs (aRR 0.59, 95% CI 0.43-0.80) than in programmed FETs. Among anovulatory women, the OPR/LBR in the letrozole FET group was similar to that in the programmed FET group (aRR 0.95, 95% CI 0.79-1.13). CONCLUSION(S): Letrozole and natural FET clinical outcomes were improved compared with programmed FET outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Criopreservación , Resultado del Embarazo , Transferencia de Embrión/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Letrozol , Inducción de la Ovulación/efectos adversos , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Infertility has a prevalence of up to 16% worldwide and is on the rise in developed nations, largely due to pursuing childbearing at advanced reproductive ages. Advances in assisted reproductive technology have benefitted socioeconomically advantaged patients disproportionately. High costs of fertility care are largely responsible for this disparity; however, patients in rural areas also face barriers in accessing both gynecology and reproductive endocrinology subspecialty care. Here, focusing on the USA, we discuss fertility care in geographically underserved areas and low-resource settings, and the impact on reproductive outcomes. Increased innovation to improve patient access to fertility care such as assisted reproductive technology is critical for ensuring equity. Remote monitoring is frequently performed by fertility centers, but partnership with local gynecologists has also been demonstrated to be an effective assisted reproductive technology monitoring method. Telehealth is now in mainstream use and the continued application to reduce geographic barriers to infertility patients is imperative. Partnership between local gynecologists and reproductive endocrinology and infertility specialists may improve patient access to fertility care and provide the unique benefits of continuity and ongoing local social support.
Asunto(s)
Preservación de la Fertilidad , Infertilidad , Humanos , Infertilidad/terapia , Área sin Atención Médica , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas , Poblaciones VulnerablesRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate embryologic outcomes among paired IVF cycles in which a microfluidics chip was utilized compared to density gradient centrifugation for sperm processing. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 88 paired IVF cycles from patients aged 18-44 years at a university-affiliated IVF center. Fresh cycles from patients undergoing ICSI with sperm processed by a microfluidics chamber (microfluidics cycles) were compared to the same patients' previous ICSI cycles in which sperm was processed via density gradient centrifugation (control cycles). The primary outcome was the high-quality blastulation rate. RESULTS: High-quality blastulation rate per oocyte retrieved was significantly higher in the microfluidics group compared to the control group (21.1% versus 14.5%, p < 0.01) as was the blastulation rate per 2PN (42.7% versus 30.8%, p < 0.01). Fertilization rates were significantly higher in the microfluidics group. The euploidy rate per oocyte retrieved was significantly higher in the microfluidics group compared with the control group (8.5% versus 4.3%, p = 0.04), while the euploidy rate per embryo biopsied was comparable (32.6% versus 21.8%, p = 0.09). In patients with male factor infertility, the high-quality blastulation rate was similar between the control and microfluidics cycles. There was a significantly higher blastulation rate among microfluidics cycles in patients without a diagnosis of male factor infertility (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In this study, several embryologic outcomes, including fertilization rate, high-quality blastulation rate, and euploidy rate, were significantly higher in the microfluidics group compared to the control group. Microfluidics sperm processing may be a way to improve embryologic outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Infertilidad Masculina , Inyecciones de Esperma Intracitoplasmáticas , Centrifugación por Gradiente de Densidad , Femenino , Fertilización In Vitro , Humanos , Masculino , Microfluídica , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Semen , EspermatozoidesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if racial/ethnic differences in pregnancy outcomes persisted in frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles on a national level. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Clinic-based data. PATIENT(S): A total of 189,000 Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology FET cycles from 2014-2016 were screened, of which 12,000 cycles had available fresh cycle linkage information and ultimately, because of missing data, 7,002 FET cycles were included. Cycles were stratified by race (White, Black, Asian, and Hispanic). INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome was live birth rate. Secondary outcomes were implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate, and clinical loss rate (CLR). RESULT(S): Live birth rate was significantly lower in the Black vs. White and Asian, but not Hispanic group. Implantation rate was also significantly lower and CLR higher in the Black group compared with all other groups (all P<.01). Black women had a lower risk of live birth (adjusted risk ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.92) and a higher risk of clinical loss (adjusted risk ratio, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.28-1.99) compared with White women. There was no significant difference between groups in clinical pregnancy rate or multiple pregnancy rate. When the analysis was limited to preimplantation genetic testing FET cycles, there remained a significantly lower implantation rate in the Black group compared with all other groups (all P<.01). CONCLUSION(S): Black race remains an independent predictor of reduced live birth rate in FET cycles, likely because of higher CLR.
Asunto(s)
Población Negra , Criopreservación , Transferencia de Embrión , Fertilización In Vitro , Infertilidad/terapia , Adulto , Asiático , Implantación del Embrión , Transferencia de Embrión/efectos adversos , Femenino , Fertilidad , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Infertilidad/diagnóstico , Infertilidad/etnología , Infertilidad/fisiopatología , Nacimiento Vivo/etnología , Masculino , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo/etnología , Factores Raciales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Blanca , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the utilization of single-embryo transfer (SET) and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in gestational carrier IVF cycles in the USA with donor oocyte and examine the impact on live birth and multiple gestation. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using the Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) clinic database of 4776 donor oocyte-recipient IVF cycles in which a GC was used. The cycles were separated into 4 groups by use of PGT and number of embryos transferred as follows: (1) PGT and single-embryo transfer (PGT-SET); (2) PGT and multiple embryo transfer (PGT-MET); (3) no PGT and SET (NoPGT-SET); (4) no PGT and MET (NoPGT-MET). Primary outcomes were live birth rate (LBR) and multiple pregnancy rate (MPR). RESULTS: More than one blastocyst was transferred in 48.7% (2323/4774) of the cycles. When ≥1 blastocyst was transferred, with or without the use of PGT, the MPR was 45.5% and 42.0%, respectively. In comparison, in the PGT-SET and NoPGT-SET groups, the MPR was 1.4% (8/579) and 3.3% (29/883), respectively. Live birth rates increased with the use of PGT-A and with MET. CONCLUSION: This study shows that SET, with or without PGT, is associated with a significantly reduced MPR in donor oocyte-recipient GC IVF cycles while maintaining high LBR. It also demonstrates that many infertility centers in the USA are not adhering to ASRM embryo transfer guidelines. Our findings highlight an opportunity to increase GC safety, which ultimately may lead to widened access to this increasingly restricted service outside the USA.
Asunto(s)
Nacimiento Vivo/epidemiología , Embarazo Múltiple/genética , Diagnóstico Preimplantación , Transferencia de un Solo Embrión , Adulto , Tasa de Natalidad , Blastocisto/metabolismo , Femenino , Fertilización In Vitro , Humanos , Donación de Oocito , Oocitos/crecimiento & desarrollo , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Embarazo Múltiple/fisiología , Madres SustitutasRESUMEN
STUDY QUESTION: Does trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) increase the risk of obstetric or perinatal complications in frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles? SUMMARY ANSWER: Trophectoderm biopsy may increase the risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) in pregnancies following FET cycles. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Trophectoderm biopsy has replaced blastomere biopsy as the standard of care to procure cells for PGT analysis. Recently, there has been concern that trophectoderm biopsy may adversely impact obstetric and perinatal outcomes. Previous studies examining this question are limited by use of inappropriate control groups, small sample size or reporting on data that no longer reflects current IVF practice. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single university-affiliated fertility center. A total of 756 patients who underwent FET with transfer of previously vitrified blastocysts that had either trophectoderm biopsy or were unbiopsied and resulted in a singleton live birth between 2013 and 2019 were included. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Obstetric and perinatal outcomes for patients aged 20-44 years who underwent FET with transfer of previously vitrified blastocysts that were either biopsied (n = 241) or unbiopsied (n = 515) were analyzed. Primary outcome was odds of placentation disorders including HDP and rate of fetal growth restriction (FGR). Binary logistic regression was performed to control for potential covariates. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The biopsy group was significantly older, had fewer anovulatory patients, was more often nulliparous and had fewer embryos transferred compared to the unbiopsied group. After controlling for potential covariates, the probability of developing HDP was significantly higher in the biopsy group compared with unbiopsied group (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.943, 95% CI 1.072-3.521; P = 0.029).There was no significant difference between groups in the probability of placenta previa or placenta accreta. There was also no significant difference in the rate of FGR (aOR 1.397; 95% CI, 0.815-2.395; P = 0.224) or the proportion of low (aOR 0.603; 95% CI, 0.336-1.084; P = 0.091) or very low (aOR 2.948; 95% CI, 0.613-14.177; P = 0.177) birthweight infants comparing biopsied to unbiopsied groups. LIMITATIONS, REASON FOR CAUTION: This was a retrospective study performed at a single fertility center, which may limit the generalizability of our findings. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Trophectoderm biopsy may increase the risk of HDP in FET cycles, however, a prospective multicenter randomized trial should be performed to confirm these findings. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No specific funding was obtained for this study. The authors declare no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NA.
Asunto(s)
Blastocisto , Transferencia de Embrión , Adulto , Biopsia , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
RESEARCH QUESTION: Do maternal and perinatal outcomes differ between natural and programmed frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles? DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study at a university-affiliated fertility centre including 775 patients who underwent programmed or natural FET cycles resulting in a singleton live birth using blastocysts vitrified between 2013 and 2018. RESULTS: A total of 384 natural and 391 programmed FET singleton pregnancies were analysed. Programmed FET resulted in higher overall maternal complications (32.2% [126/391] versus 18.8% [72/384]; P < 0.01), including higher probability of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) (15.3% [60/391] versus 6.3% [24/384]; P < 0.01), preterm premature rupture of membranes (2.6% [10/391] versus 0.3% [1/384]; P = 0.02) and caesarean delivery (53.2% [206/387] versus 42.8% [163/381]; P = 0.03) compared with natural FET. After controlling for potential confounders, including age, body mass index, parity, smoking status, history of diabetes or chronic hypertension, infertility diagnosis, number of embryos transferred and use of preimplantation genetic testing, the adjusted odds ratio for HDP was 2.39 (95% CI 1.37 to 4.17) and for overall maternal complications was 2.21 (95% CI 1.51 to 3.22) comparing programmed with natural FET groups. The groups did not significantly differ for any perinatal outcomes analysed, including birth weight (3357.9 ± 671.6 g versus 3318.4 ± 616.2 g; P = 0.40) or rate of birth defects (1.5% [6/391] versus 2.1% [8/384]; P = 0.57), respectively. CONCLUSION: Vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer in a programmed cycle resulted in a twofold higher probability of HDP compared with transfer in a natural cycle. Natural FET cycle should, therefore, be recommended as first line for all eligible patients undergoing FET to reduce the risk of HDP.
Asunto(s)
Transferencia de Embrión/métodos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/etiología , Adulto , Criopreservación , Transferencia de Embrión/efectos adversos , Femenino , Fertilización In Vitro , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Nacimiento Vivo , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , VitrificaciónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess whether GnRH agonist trigger impacts the implantation potential of euploid embryos. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study done at an academic IVF center evaluating frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles in which single-euploid blastocysts were transferred between 2014 and 2019. All embryos were generated in an IVF cycle which used GnRHa or hCG trigger and then were transferred in a programmed or natural FET cycle. Only the first FET cycle was included for each patient. Primary outcome was ongoing pregnancy rate or live birth rate (OPR/LBR). Secondary outcomes were implantation rate (IR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), clinical loss rate (CLR), and multiple pregnancy rate (MPR). Logistic regression was performed to control for confounding variables. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-three FET cycles were included for analysis (GnRHa = 145; hCG = 118). The GnRHa group was significantly younger (35.2 vs. 37.5 years) and had higher AMH values (4.50 ng/ml vs. 2.03 ng/ml) than the hCG group, respectively (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in OPR/LBR (64.1% (93/145) vs. 65.3% (77/118); p = 0.90) between the GnRHa and hCG groups, respectively. There was also no significant difference in IR, CPR, CLR, or MPR between groups. After controlling for confounding variables, the adjusted odds ratio for OPR/LBR was 0.941 (95% CI, 0.534-1.658); p = 0.83) comparing GnRHa to hCG. Pregnancy outcomes did not significantly differ when groups were stratified by age (< 35 vs. > 35 years old). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm that euploid embryos created after hCG or GnRHa trigger have the same potential for pregnancy.
Asunto(s)
Blastocisto/efectos de los fármacos , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/administración & dosificación , Oogénesis/efectos de los fármacos , Diagnóstico Preimplantación , Adulto , Tasa de Natalidad , Blastocisto/metabolismo , Implantación del Embrión/efectos de los fármacos , Transferencia de Embrión/métodos , Femenino , Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Humanos , Técnicas de Maduración In Vitro de los Oocitos/métodos , Péptidos y Proteínas de Señalización Intercelular/administración & dosificación , Inducción de la Ovulación/métodos , Embarazo , Resultado del EmbarazoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes for preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) using various testing platforms. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Large academic IVF center. PATIENTS: Fifty-one balanced translocation carriers undergoing IVF with PGT-SR who completed a total of 91 cycles, including 31 fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), 24 microarray comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), and 36 next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing cycles. INTERVENTIONS: PGT-SR. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome of live-birth rate and secondary outcomes including implantation rate, clinical loss rate, and percentages of normal or balanced, unbalanced, and aneuploid embryos detected. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in LBR, though there was a tendency toward a higher LBR for NGS testing (14 of 19, 73.7%) compared with FISH (8 of 18, 44.4%) and aCGH (10 of 20, 50.0%). The implantation rate was statistically significantly higher for NGS (16 of 20, 80.0%) compared with FISH (11 of 25, 44.0%) and aCGH (16 of 30, 53.3%). There was no statistically significant difference in clinical pregnancy losses. There was a lower percentage of normal or balanced embryos with FISH (12.5%) compared with aCGH (23.7%) and with NGS (20.7%). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of PGT-SR outcomes for translocation carriers directly comparing PGT-SR using FISH, aCGH, and NGS. Our findings suggest an improvement in pregnancy outcomes parallel to the advancement in technology and are reassuring for continued use of NGS for this population.
RESUMEN
RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the optimal timing for transfer in natural cycle vitrified-warmed embryo transfers (NC-VET)? DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study uses data from a large university-affiliated IVF clinic. The study included 341 NC-VET cycles with autologous oocytes and non-preimplantation genetic testing, vitrified embryos from January 2013 to September 2017. Each cycle was classified by timing of embryo transfer in relation to LH surge ≥20 IU/l. Group 1: LH ≥20 IU/l one day and blastocyst was transferred 6 days later; Group 2: LH ≥20 IU/l two consecutive days and blastocyst was transferred 6 days after the initial surge; Group 3: LH ≥20 IU/l two consecutive days and blastocyst was transferred 7 days after the initial surge. The primary outcome was ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR). The secondary objective was to compare OPR in relation to serum oestradiol dynamics and progesterone concentration (according to threshold 1.0 ng/ml) 6 days prior to embryo transfer. RESULTS: OPR were similar for all three groups (66.8%, 65.0%, 62.9% for Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively). When stratified according to oestradiol and progesterone, no significant differences were noted in OPR. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the timing of blastocyst transfer in a natural cycle after LH surge is flexible within 24 h. Outcomes are equally good with day of embryo transfer 6 or 7 days after LH surge date. Oestradiol dynamics and progesterone concentration 6 days prior to NC-VET did not have a significant impact on OPR.
Asunto(s)
Transferencia de Embrión/métodos , Vitrificación , Adulto , Blastocisto , Criopreservación/métodos , Implantación del Embrión , Estradiol/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Oocitos/citología , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Progesterona/metabolismo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Temperatura , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate differences in euploidy rates between IVF cycles triggered with either GnRH agonist (GnRHa) or hCG. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: University-affiliated fertility center. PATIENT(S): A total of 366 patients performing 539 IVF cycles utilizing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). INTERVENTION(S): Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or hCG trigger of oocyte maturation during IVF cycles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Rate of euploid embryos. RESULT(S): Patients in the GnRHa trigger arm were younger, with a lower body mass index and higher antimüllerian hormone level, and they had a higher number of oocytes retrieved and embryos biopsied. Euploid rate per embryo biopsied was higher after GnRHa trigger than after hCG trigger (37.8% ± 2.1% vs. 30.3% ± 1.8%), but multivariate regression analysis controlling for potential confounding factors did not show any differences between the two groups. Moreover, the euploid rate per oocyte retrieved was not significantly different overall (GnRHa vs. hCG: 33.9% ± 2.2% vs. 28.0% ± 1.9%). The anticipated decline in the rate of euploid embryos per oocyte retrieved went from 15.8% ± 1.2% for age <35 years to 4.3% ± 0.9% for patients aged ≥41 years. There were no significant differences between the two groups after stratifying by age and controlling for PGT-A testing modality. CONCLUSION(S): Both GnRHa and hCG trigger result in comparable euploid rates. Trigger with GnRHa should therefore be considered a valid option for trigger modality in freeze-all PGT-A cycles, in view of its demonstrated effectiveness and known safety enhancement.
Asunto(s)
Gonadotropina Coriónica/uso terapéutico , Fármacos para la Fertilidad Femenina/uso terapéutico , Pruebas Genéticas/estadística & datos numéricos , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/uso terapéutico , Inducción de la Ovulación/métodos , Ploidias , Diagnóstico Preimplantación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Aneuploidia , Femenino , Fertilización In Vitro/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Infertilidad Femenina/epidemiología , Infertilidad Femenina/genética , Infertilidad Femenina/terapia , Ciclo Menstrual/efectos de los fármacos , Oogénesis/efectos de los fármacos , Oogénesis/genética , Inducción de la Ovulación/efectos adversos , Inducción de la Ovulación/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to describe impaired oocyte fertilization from phospholipase C-zeta (PLC-ζ) deficiency in normal-appearing sperm that was successfully treated using calcium (Ca(2+)) ionophore with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) of oocytes matured in vitro. METHODS: An infertile couple undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) experienced failed oocyte fertilization following ICSI with normal-appearing sperm. A semen sample collected from the patient was used to assess the expression of sperm PLC- ζ protein by Western blot analysis and immunofluorescence and PLC-ζ bioactivity by an in vitro model of Ca(2+) release. A second IVF cycle was performed using Ca(2+) ionophore with ICSI to enhance Ca(2+)-induced oocyte activation of oocytes matured in vitro. RESULTS: Sperm PLC-ζ protein deficiency was demonstrated by Western blot analysis and immunofluorescence and confirmed by reduced PLC-ζ bioactivity using an in vitro model of Ca(2+) release. Nevertheless, with this sperm and supplementation of Ca(2+) ionophore following ICSI, fertilization of four of six oocytes matured in vitro was obtained. In addition, four embryos underwent cleavage and two of them reached the blastocyst stage. Transfer of these blastocysts into the uterus led to a single pregnancy and live birth. CONCLUSIONS: Deficiency of PLC-ζ in normal-appearing human sperm is associated with impaired Ca(2+)-dependent oocyte activation during ICSI. Under this condition, use of Ca(2+) ionophore following ICSI of oocytes matured in vitro improves embryo developmental competence, possibly through the activation of Ca(2+)-dependent mechanisms governing fertilization and preimplantation embryogenesis.
Asunto(s)
Fertilización/fisiología , Infertilidad/etiología , Oocitos/citología , Inducción de la Ovulación , Fosfoinositido Fosfolipasa C/deficiencia , Inyecciones de Esperma Intracitoplasmáticas/métodos , Espermatozoides/fisiología , Adulto , Western Blotting , Transferencia de Embrión , Femenino , Técnica del Anticuerpo Fluorescente , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Infertilidad/enzimología , Masculino , Oocitos/fisiología , Embarazo , Insuficiencia del TratamientoRESUMEN
Implantation and live birth rates resulting from IVF cycles using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and (GnRH) antagonist IVF protocols were compared among good-prognosis patients using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance System 2009-2010 data (n = 203,302 fresh, autologous cycles). Bivariable and multivariable analyses were conducted between cycles to compare outcomes. Cycles were restricted as follows: age younger than 35 years, maximum FSH less than 10 mIU/mL, first assisted reproduction technology cycle and FSH dose less than 3601 IU. A subgroup analysis including only elective single embryo transfer was also carried out. Among good-prognosis patients, the GnRH-agonist protocol was associated with a lower risk of cancellation before retrieval (4.3 versus 5.2%; P < 0.05) or transfer (5.5 versus 6.8%; P < 0.05), and a higher live birth rate per transfer (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.13, confidence interval [CI] 1.03 to 1.25) than the GnRH-antagonist group. Among the elective single embryo transfer group, the GnRH-agonist protocol was associated with a higher implantation rate (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.36, CI 1.08 to 1.73) and a higher live birth rate (adjusted OR 1.33, CI 1.07 to 1.66) compared with the GnRH-antagonist protocol. The GnRH-antagonist group had lower rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Among good-prognosis patients, agonist protocols decreased cancellation risk and increased odds of implantation and live birth. Antagonist protocols may confer decreased risk of hyperstimulation.
Asunto(s)
Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Inducción de la Ovulación/métodos , Adulto , Implantación del Embrión , Transferencia de Embrión , Femenino , Antagonistas de Hormonas/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Pronóstico , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study was conducted to determine if expression of the testis-specific phospholipase C Zeta1 (PLCZ1) correlated with low success or fertilization failure after ICSI in patients with normal parameters after standard semen analysis (SA). METHODS: Couples <43 years with one or two failed or low fertilization ICSI cycles. Standard Semen Analysis (SA) was performed to determine sperm parameters in male partners, whereas females were evaluated for antral follicle counts (AFC), day 3 FSH levels and peak Estradiol (E2) levels. The presence of PLCZ1 in sperm was ascertained using Western blotting and Immunofluorescence (IF) analysis. The ability of sperm to initiate changes in the intracellular concentrations of free calcium ([Ca(2+)]i), which is characteristic of mammalian sperm, was performed after injection of human sperm into mouse eggs loaded with the Ca(2+) sensitive dye fura-2 AM. RESULTS: Male partners of couples with failed or low success ICSI fertilization but with normal SA parameters showed low expression levels of PLCZ1 as determined by western blotting and reduced fluorescent signal during IF studies. In addition, fewer of these males' sperm showed PLCZ1 expression and were able to initiate robust [Ca(2+)]i oscillations upon injection into eggs. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that in patients with normal SA parameters but with repeated low fertilization or outright failed fertilization results after ICSI, abnormal PLCZ1 function should be considered as the underlying mechanism responsible for the failure of fertilization.