Exploring the clinical significance of specific immune-related adverse events in melanoma patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Several studies have demonstrated that patients who experience immune-related adverse events (irAE) as a result of immunotherapy treatment, exhibit significantly improved outcomes compared to patients without toxicity. Data regarding the impact of specific irAE is, however, currently lacking. This is a real-world single-site cohort of 415 advanced melanoma patients who were treated with immunotherapy as first-line between 2014 and 2020, with a median follow-up of 24.5 months. The most frequent irAEs were cutaneous (classified as non-vitiligo, n  = 110, 26.5% and vitiligo, n  = 48, 11.6%), rheumatologic ( n  = 68, 16.4%), gastrointestinal ( n  = 66, 15.9%), endocrine ( n  = 61, 14.7%), and hepatitis ( n  = 50, 12%). Specific irAE that were significantly associated with survival benefit were rheumatologic (hazard ratio 0.34 for PFS, P  < 0.001; hazard ratio 0.38 for OS, P  < 0.001), non-vitiligo cutaneous (hazard ratio 0.58 for PFS, P  < 0.001; hazard ratio 0.54 for OS, P  = 0.001), vitiligo (hazard ratio 0.30 for PFS, P  < 0.001; hazard ratio 0.29 for OS, P  < 0.001), and endocrine (hazard ratio 0.6 for PFS, P  = 0.01; hazard ratio 0.52 for OS, P  < 0.001). Other types if irAEs, such as colitis, hepatitis and others - do not present this correlation. . The occurrence of these specific irAEs may reflect a hyperactivated immune response and thus can serve as meaningful clinical biomarkers.

Real-World Outcomes of Inoperable and Metastatic Cutaneous Head and Neck Melanoma Patients.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe the overall survival (OS) and to identify associated prognostic factors in patients with inoperable and metastatic cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck (H&N) region, undergoing modern systemic treatments. METHODS: This is a retrospective single institutional study. Data on all consecutive H&N melanoma patients treated with systemic oncologic treatments between 2015 and 2022 were collected from electronic medical files. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to describe survival and Cox regression analysis was used to identify patient and tumor factors associated with prognosis. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients were included. Median OS was 45 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 28-65 m). On univariable analysis for OS, the primary disease site, specifically the nape and neck (hazard ratio [HR] 3.3, 95% CI 1.4-7.7, p = 0.007), high Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status ([ECOG-PS], HR 2.5, 95% CI = 1.9-3.3, p < 0.001), high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels (HR 2.8, 95% CI = 1.7-4.6, p < 0.001), and treatment with targeted therapy (TT) as compared with immunotherapy (HR 2.6, 95% CI = 1.06-6.3, p = 0.03) were all associated with shorter OS. High-grade adverse events (AEs) were associated with a longer OS (HR 0.41, 95% CI = 0.25-0.68, p = 0.001). On multivariable analysis for OS, the ECOG-PS, LDH levels, site of disease, and the development of moderate-severe AEs remained significant. CONCLUSIONS: In the era of modern oncologic treatments, the prognosis of inoperable and metastatic cutaneous H&N melanoma aligns with other cutaneous melanomas. Primary tumor site of the nape and neck region emerges as a significant prognostic factor. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 134:2762-2770, 2024.

Neoadjuvant BRAF-targeted therapy for ameloblastoma of the mandible: an organ preservation approach.

BACKGROUND: Ameloblastoma is a rare odontogenic neoplasm frequently located in the mandible. Standard treatment involves radical bone resection and immediate reconstruction, causing functional, aesthetic, and psychological impairments. The BRAF V600E mutation is present in approximately 80% of mandible ameloblastomas, and BRAF inhibitors have demonstrated sustained responses in unresectable cases. METHODS: We identified ameloblastoma patients planned for ablative surgery and screened them for BRAF V600E mutation. Neoadjuvant BRAF inhibitors were offered to facilitate jaw preservation surgery. Retrospective data collection encompassed treatment regimens, tolerability, tumor response, and conversion to mandible preservation surgery. RESULTS: Between 2017 and 2022, a total of 11 patients received dabrafenib (n = 6) or dabrafenib with trametinib (n = 5). The median age was 19 (range = 10-83) years. Median treatment duration was 10 (range = 3-20) months. All (100%) patients achieved a radiological response. Ten (91%) patients successfully converted to mandible preservation surgery with residual tumor enucleation. One patient attained complete radiological response, and surgery was not performed. Among the 10 surgically treated patients, all exhibited a pathological response, with 4 achieving near complete response and 6 partial response. At a median follow-up of 14 (range = 7-37) months after surgery, 1 case of recurrence was observed. Grade 1-2 adverse effects were reported in 8 (73%) patients, with a single case of grade 3 (hepatitis). Dose modification was necessary for 3 patients, and 4 experienced treatment interruptions, while 1 patient permanently discontinued therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant BRAF inhibition may offer a safe and effective strategy for organ preservation in mandible ameloblastoma treatment.

The Implications of a Dermatopathologist's Report on Melanoma Diagnosis and Treatment.

An accurate and comprehensive histopathology report is essential for cutaneous melanoma management, providing critical information for accurate staging and risk estimation and determining the optimal surgical approach. In many institutions, a review of melanoma biopsy specimens by expert dermatopathologists is considered a necessary step. This study examined these reviews to determine the critical primary histopathology Breslow score in which a histopathology review would be most beneficial. Histopathology reports of patients referred to our institute between January 2011 and September 2019 were compared with our in-house review conducted by an expert dermatopathologist. The review focused on assessing fundamental histologic and clinical prognostic features. A total of 177 specimens underwent histopathology review. Significant changes in the Breslow index were identified in 103 cases (58.2%). Notably, in many of these cases (73.2%), the revised Breslow was higher than the initially reported score. Consequently, the T-stage was modified in 51 lesions (28.8%). Substantial discordance rates were observed in Tis (57%), T1b (59%), T3a (67%) and T4a (50%) classifications. The revised histopathology reports resulted in alterations to the surgical plan in 15.3% of the cases. These findings emphasize the importance of having all routine pathologies of pigmented lesions referred to a dedicated cancer center and reviewed by an experienced dermatopathologist. This recommendation is particularly crucial in instances where the histopathology review can potentially alter the diagnosis and treatment plan, such as in melanoma in situ and thinner melanomas measuring 0.6-2.2 mm in thickness. Our study highlights the significant impact of histopathology reviews in cutaneous melanoma cases. The observed changes in Breslow scores and subsequent modifications in T-stage classification underline the need for thorough evaluation by an expert dermatopathologist, especially in cases of melanoma in situ and thin melanomas. Incorporating such reviews into routine practice within dedicated cancer centers can improve diagnostic accuracy and guide appropriate treatment decisions, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes.

Incidence and Outcome of Neurologic Immune-Related Adverse Events Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Melanoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Neurologic immune-related adverse events (n-irAEs) reportedly occur in up to 8% of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) of all age groups. We investigated the association between age and n-irAEs in patients treated with ICIs and examined the effect of n-irAEs on survival outcomes in a large cohort of patients with melanoma. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with advanced melanoma treated with ICIs at Ella Institute for Immuno-oncology and Melanoma between January 1, 2015, and April 20, 2022. The outcomes of interest were defined as the investigation of age-related frequency and severity of n-irAEs, the need for ICI interruption, the treatment required for n-irAE management, the safety of ICI reintroduction, and n-irAE's effect on survival. RESULTS: ICI was administered to 937 patients. At least one irAE occurred in 73.5% (n = 689) of them. Among the study population, 8% (n = 76) developed a n-irAE, with a median age of 66 years in female and 68 years in male patients at onset. The median follow-up after n-irAE was 1,147 days (IQR: 1,091.5 range: 3,938). Fewer irAEs occurred in patients older than 70 years (median: 3 events, p = 0.04, CI 2.5-4.7) while specifically colitis and pneumonitis were more common in the 18-60 age group (p = 0.03, 95% CI 0.8-0.38, p = 0.009, 95% CI 0.06-0.2). Grade ≥ 3 toxicity was seen in 35.5% of patients across age groups. The median time from ICI administration to n-irAE development was 48 days across age groups. Common n-irAE phenotypes were myositis (44.7%), encephalitis (10.5%), and neuropathy (10.5%). N-irAE required hospitalization in 40% of patients and steroids treatment in 46% with a median of 4 days from n-irAE diagnosis to steroids treatment initiation. Nine patients needed second-line immunosuppressive treatment. Rechallenge did not cause additional n-irAE in 71% of patients. Developing n-irAE (HR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.32-0.77) or any irAE (HR = 0.7195% CI 0.56-0.88) was associated with longer survival. DISCUSSION: N-irAEs are a relatively common complication of ICIs (8% of our cohort). Older age was not associated with its development or severity, in contrast with non-n-irAEs which occurred less frequently in the elderly population. Rechallenge did not result in life-threatening AEs. Development of any irAEs was associated with longer survival; this association was stronger with n-irAEs.

PET-CT underestimates the true pathological extent of disease at lymphadenectomy for melanoma patients after systemic therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Modern systemic therapy has revolutionized the treatment of melanoma. Currently, patients with clinically involved lymph nodes require lymphadenectomy with associated morbidities. Positron Emission Tomography - Computed Tomography (PET-CT) has demonstrated accuracy in melanoma detection and response to therapy. We aimed to identify whether a PET-CT directed lymphatic resection after systemic therapy is oncologically sound. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of patients who underwent lymphadenectomy after systemic therapy for melanoma with a preoperative PET-CT. Examined demographic, clinical, and perioperative parameters including extent of disease, systemic therapy and response, and PET-CT findings compared to pathological outcomes. We compared patients with "as or less than expected" outcomes on pathology against those with "more than expected" pathological outcomes. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients met inclusion criteria. In 28 (71.8%), pathological outcomes were "as or less than expected" by PET-CT, and in 11 (28.2%) pathological outcome were "more than expected". "More than expected" occurred more frequently with advanced disease at presentation with 75% presenting with regional/metastatic disease versus only 42.9% in the "as or less than expected" group (p = 0.015). Poor response to therapy also trended towards the "more than expected" group with only 27.3% favorable response versus 53.6% favorable response in the "as or less than expected" group, not statistically significant. Extent of disease on imaging failed to predict pathological concordance. CONCLUSION: PET-CT underestimates pathological extent of disease in the lymphatic basin in 30% of patients after systemic therapy. We failed to identify predictors of more extensive disease and warn against limited PET-CT directed lymphatic resections.

Better Late Than Never: The Impact of Steroidal Treatment on the Outcome of Melanoma Patients Treated with Immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Successful treatment with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) requires the balanced activation of the immune system. Over-activation may result in immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which often require steroidal treatment. This study examined the possible impact of steroids on treatment efficacy in melanoma patients concerning initiation timing and dosage. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center analysis of patients with advanced melanoma who underwent first-line ICI therapy during 2014-2020 was conducted. RESULTS: Among the 415 patients, two-hundred patients (48.3%) were exposed to steroids during the first line, most of them due to irAEs (n = 169, 84.5%). Nearly a quarter of them were exposed to steroids within the first four weeks of treatment. Surprisingly, steroidal exposure was associated with better progression-free survival (PFS; HR = 0.74, p = 0.015); however, early exposure (within four weeks of treatment) resulted in a significantly shorter PFS compared to late exposure (adjusted HR 3.2, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Early exposure to corticosteroids during the priming phase of ICI therapy could impede the establishment of an effective immune response. These results suggest that caution should be exercised when considering the use of steroids for the management of early-onset irAEs.

Real world evidence of Lenvatinib + anti PD-1 as an advanced line for metastatic melanoma.

Introduction: Immunotherapy has revolutionized the prognosis of patients with metastatic melanoma. To date, the most active regimen is the combination of ipilimumab + nivolumab (ipi-nivo) achieving a response rate of nearly 60% and a median survival (OS) of 6 years. However, approximately 40% of patients experience primary resistance, while around 50% experience secondary resistance, highlighting the need for an effective second-line treatment option The recently published results on the use of lenvatinib + pembrolizumab in the advanced line setting led to the adoption of this regimen at our institution. Here we present our experience with this regimen, focusing on efficacy and safety. Methods: Electronic medical records of patients treated at a tertiary referral melanoma center, with at least one cycle of anti PD-1 + lenvatinib from 2020 to 2023 were analyzed for baseline demographic characteristics, disease related characteristics and treatment outcomes. Results: Forty-two patients were identified. The Response rate (RR) was 28% and the disease control rate was 38%. Responses were seen across different melanoma subtypes, including 67% in acral melanoma, 20% in uveal melanoma, and 25% in mucosal melanoma. Patients with a more aggressive disease manifested by elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) achieved a RR of 26%, while patients with active central nervous system (CNS) metastases had a RR of 31%, and an intra-cranial RR of 23%. Responses were seen across lines of treatment, with a 25% RR in the second and third lines, and a 36% RR in the fourth and fifth lines. The median progression free survival was 3 months, and the median survival was 11 months. The treatment was not easily tolerated with 31% of the patients experiencing grade 3-4 toxicity, which was manageable through dose interruptions and reductions. Only 7% of patients discontinued the treatment due to toxicity. Conclusion: Lenvatinib in combination with anti-PD1 had demonstrated both relative safety and efficacy in patients with metastatic melanoma of all subtypes in the advanced line setting. We are eagerly anticipating the mature results of the LEAP-004 study hoping that this regimen will receive regulatory approval, paving the way for its widespread adoption in daily practice worldwide.

Radiotherapy may augment response to immunotherapy in metastatic uveal melanoma patients.

Introduction: Uveal melanoma (UM) is a subtype of melanoma arising from the ocular region. Despite various local therapies available, a significant portion of patients develop distant metastases, primarily to the liver. While cutaneous melanoma is very sensitive to immunotherapy, UM is known to be less responsive and patients were excluded from pivotal clinical trials. To date, there is no standard first line therapy for metastatic UM and clinical trial participation is encouraged. While UM is considered a radio-resistant tumor, there is a role for radiotherapy (RT) as palliative treatment and possibly for immune sensitization. This a retrospective analysis aimed at addressing the role of combination checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) with RT as a synergistic treatment in metastatic UM patient. We hypothesized that concurrent RT would improve the clinical response to immunotherapy. Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients with metastatic UM treated with ICI at Ella Lemelbaum Institute between 2015 and 2021. Patients' electronic medical records were analyzed for baseline characteristics, response rate and survival data. Patients were grouped according to receipt of concomitant RT. Study was approved by local IRB and statistical analyses done using Stata V.17. Results: Thirty-nine patients were treated with immunotherapy. Fifty percent were treated with anti-programmed cell death (PD)-1 and 50% with anti-PD1- anti CTLA4 combination therapy. Nine patients were treated concomitantly with immunotherapy and external beam RT or with stereotactic body RT (group A) and 29 patients were treated with immunotherapy alone (group B). Overall response rate was significantly higher in group A (44% versus 10%, p = 0.004). Median progression-free survival was longer for patients in group A (22 months versus 3 m, Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.37, p = 0.036). Median overall survival was also longer for group A (26 months versus 7.5 m, HR = 0.34, p = 0.03). Toxicity was comparable between the groups. Conclusions: RT may improve response to immunotherapy with ICI in metastatic UM patients and may confer an advantage in survival. Further prospective, larger studies are warranted.

Efficacy and toxicity of Ipilimumab-Nivolumab combination therapy in elderly metastatic melanoma patients.

Introduction: Immunotherapy has revolutionized metastatic Melanoma therapy. The most active regimen is combination therapy of Ipilimumab-Nivolumab (Ipi-Nivo) with response rates (RR) of ~60% and median overall survival (OS) of ~6 years. Immune-related adverse events (irAE) are common (~60% develop grade 3-4) and pose a challenge when treating frail patients. We sought to examine whether Ipi-Nivo therapy is feasible in elderly metastatic melanoma patients. Methods: Electronic records of patients treated at the Ella Lemelbaum Institute with Ipi-Nivo between the years 2017-2021 were screened for age. Elderly patients were defined as age 75 and older (group A) and were matched with records of patients age <75 (group B). Records were analyzed for baseline parameters, immunotherapy regimen, RR, toxicity and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Twenty-six relevant patients age >75 (median 77) were identified and were matched to 34 younger patients (median age 57). No statistically significant differences were noted in terms of baseline parameters except for BRAF mutation status (group A 15%, group B 47%, p=0.008). Response rate in group A was 38% and is consistent with previously published data. Median PFS was the same for both groups (A = 5.5 months, B= 7.5 months, p=NS). Treatment was similarly tolerated: 35% of group A patients completed 4 cycles of therapy compared to 28% for group B (p=NS). Grade 2-4 irAE were the same (A=58%, B=66%, p=NS) and there was no difference in the need for hospitalization for G3-4 events between the groups. (A=63%, B=69%, p=NS). Further division into 4 age groups (>80 vs 75-79 in group A and 65-74 vs <65 in group B) found no difference in terms of response rate or G3-4 toxicity. Conclusion: Ipilimumab-Nivolumab combination therapy in elderly metastatic Melanoma patients seems to be well tolerated and efficient in selected elderly patients based on performance status and comorbidities, just as in younger patients. This regimen seems to be a feasible treatment option for this age group.

The increasing role of abdominal metastesectomy for malignant melanoma in the era of modern therapeutics.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic spread of malignant melanoma to the abdomen presents a therapeutic challenge. Targeted and Immune-therapies dramatically improve patients' survival, yet some patients may still benefit from surgical intervention. This study investigates the outcomes of surgical treatment of abdominal metastatic melanoma in the era of modern therapy. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of all patients who underwent surgical resection for abdominal metastatic melanoma between the years 2009-2021 (n = 80). We examined the clinical, operative, perioperative, and oncological outcomes of these patients. RESULTS: The cohort included a therapeutic group (T, n = 43) and palliative group (P, n = 37). The rate of overall post-operative complications was lower in the T group (n = 3, 9.3%) compared to the P group (n = 10, 27.1%) (p = 0.04), but no difference in major complications rate (p = 0.41). The median follow-up was 13.4 months (range, 0.5-107), with an estimated 2- and 5-years survival of 66.5% and 45.3% respectively. The estimated 2- and 5-years survival of the T group was 76.61% and 69.65%, and 49.01% and 28.01% in the P group (p = 0.005). Univariate analysis identified Therapeutic resection (HR 3.2, p = 0.008), isolated lesions (HR 1.47, p = 0.033) and major complication score (HR 1.8, p=<0.001) to be correlated with survival. On multivariate analysis, Therapeutic resection (HR 2.53, p = 0.042) and major complication score (HR 1.62, p = 0.004) remained significant independent factors correlated with survival. In patients who progressed on treatment, and their progression was treated with surgical resection 46.1% where able to be maintained on the same preoperative treatment strategy. CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that abdominal metastesectomy is a safe and oncologically efficacious therapy in selected patients. Especially in the era of modern therapeutics, patients with isolated disease site, limited resectable progression on therapy, or patients with symptomatic metastases should be considered for surgical resection.

The Impact of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP) on the Decision-Making Process in the Treatment of ALK-Rearranged Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (aNSCLC) After Failure of 2nd/3rd-Generation ALK Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs).

Background: The use of CGP in guiding treatment decisions in aNSCLC with acquired resistance to ALK TKIs is questionable. Methods: We prospectively assessed the impact of CGP on the decision-making process in ALK-rearranged aNSCLC patients following progression on 2nd/3rd-generation ALK TKIs. Physician's choice of the most recommended next-line systemic treatment (NLST) was captured before and after receival of CGP results; the percentage of cases in which the NLST recommendation has changed was assessed along with the CGP turnaround time (TAT). Patients were divided into groups: patients in whom the NLST was initiated after (group 1) and before (group 2) receival of the CGP results. Time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS) with NLST were compared between the groups. Results: In 20 eligible patients (median [m]age 63 years [range, 40-89], females 75%, adenocarcinoma 100%, failure of alectinib 90%, FoundationOne Liquid CDx 80%), CGP has altered NLST recommendation in 30% of cases. CGP findings were as follows: ALK mutations 30% (l1171X 10%, G1202R, L1196M, G1269A, G1202R+l1171N+E1210K 5% each), CDKN2A/B mutation/loss 10%, c-met amplification 5%. CGP mTAT was 2.9 weeks [IQR, 2.4-4.4]. mTTD was 11.3 months (95% CI, 2.1-not reached [NR]) and 5.4 months (95% CI, 2.0-NR) in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p-0.34). mOS was 13.2 months (95% CI, 2.9-NR) and 13.0 months (95% CI, 6.0-NR) in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p-0.86). Conclusion: CGP has a significant impact on the decision-making process in ALK-rearranged aNSCLC following progression on 2nd/3rd-generation ALK TKIs.

Artemether-lumefantrine compared to atovaquone-proguanil as a treatment for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in travelers.

Atovaquone-proguanil (AP) and artemether-lumefantrine (AL) are both treatments for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria, but comparative clinical trials are lacking. We performed a retrospective analysis, comparing treatment failure and fever clearance time in non-immune travelers with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria, treated with AP or AL. Sixty-nine patients were included during 2001-2013: 44 in the AP group and 25 in the AL group. Treatment failure was observed in 6 of 44 (13.6%) and 1 of 25 (4.0%) patients in the AP and AL groups, respectively. Six treatment failures were observed in travelers from West Africa. Fever clearance time was 44 ± 23 h in AL group versus 77 ± 28 h in AP group, (P < 0.001). Hospitalization time was significantly shorter in the AL group; 3.8 + 1.3 versus 5.1 + 2.8 days in the AP group (P = 0.04) In conclusion, travelers with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria recover faster on AL than on AP. The AL should probably be the drug of choice for this population.