Home enteral nutrition for patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Home enteral nutrition (HEN) is a relatively new nutritional intervention that provides patients with EN support at home through jejunostomy or nasogastric feeding tubes. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the safety and effect of HEN compared with normal oral diet (NOD) in postoperative patients with esophageal cancer (EC). Methods: EMBASE, Medline, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were used to search articles in English-language journals. The intervention effect was expressed using risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MDs) for continuous outcome measures, with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). The chi-square test and I-square test were used to test heterogeneity among studies. Results: Four studies were eventually included in this meta-analysis. Compared with NOD, HEN has a favorable impact on postoperative body mass index (BMI) (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.09-1.30, P = 0.02), lean body mass (LBM) (WMD = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.04-1.48, P = 0.04), and appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (ASMI) (WMD = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.02-0.58, P = 0.03). Physical function (WMD = 9.26, 95% CI: 8.00-10.53, P < 0.001), role function (WMD = 9.96, 95% CI: 8.11-11.82, P < 0.001), and social function (WMD = 8.51, 95% CI: 3.48-13.54, P = 0.001) of the HEN group were better than those of the NOD group at 3 months, and HEN could reduce the fatigue of patients (WMD = -12.73, 95% CI: -14.8 to -10.66, P < 0.001) and the incidence of postoperative pneumonia (RR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.34-0.81, P = 0.004). There was no significant difference in albumin between HEN and NOD groups (WMD = 0.05, 95% CI: -0.03 to 0.13, P = 0.20). Conclusion: HEN improved nutritional status and quality of life (QOL) in postoperative patients with EC and reduced fatigue and the incidence of postoperative pneumonia. All in all, the results of our meta-analysis support the use of HEN after esophagectomy.

Efficacy of immunonutritional supplement after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, preoperative nutrition has received great attention, especially for patients who received surgical reconstruction of the digestive tract such as esophagectomy. Preoperative nutrition therapy was reported to accelerate the patient's postoperative recovery. In addition, immune suppression, nausea, and vomiting may lead to poor immune and nutritional status of patients with esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), which is not conducive to surgery. Therefore, preoperative nutritional treatment is necessary for patients with esophageal cancer who underwent NAC. METHOD: Patients with esophageal cancer who received NAC at Nanjing Jinling Hospital from January 2018 to September 2020 were retrospectively identified. Patients were divided into enteral immunonutrition (EIN) group (those who received a conventional diet and immunonutrition supplement, Peptisorb, Nutricia, 500 mL/day * 7 via oral intake), and control group (those who only received a conventional diet were divided into). The primary outcomes were immune and nutritional indicators changes, including immunoglobulin M (IgM), immunoglobulin A (IgA), immunoglobulin G (IgG), and albumin (ALB), which were measured at preoperative day (PRD) 7, PRD-1, postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD-7. The secondary outcomes were postoperative complications, adverse reactions, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 124 eligible patients were included in the study, with 21 patients in EIN group. After 1:2 matching, significant difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups was not observed (EIN: n = 21, Control group: n = 42). Compared with the control group, the IgA is significantly increased in the EIN group at POD-7 (p = 0.017). However, we observed that the IgM level in the control group was significantly higher than those in the EIN group at POD-7 (p = 0.007). The incidence of pneumonia and total complications in the EIN group were significantly lower than those in control group (p = 0.024, p = 0.028, respectively). There is no significant difference in ALB and adverse reactions between two groups (p = 0.303, p = 0.108, respectively). CONCLUSION: Immunonutritional supplement after NAC is an effective strategy to improve the postoperative immune status of esophageal cancer patients and could reduce the incidence of infectious complication. More well-designed prospective studies are needed to verify and update our finding.

Predictive value of postoperative C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio in anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Among the many possible postoperative complications, anastomotic leakage (AL) is the most common and serious. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the ability of various inflammatory and nutritional markers to predict postoperative AL in patients after esophagectomy. METHODS: A total of 273 patients were retrospectively evaluated and enrolled into this study. Perioperative, surgery-related, tumor-related and laboratory tests data were extracted and analyzed. The discriminatory ability and optimal cut-off value was evaluated according to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to access the potential risk factors for AL. RESULTS: The overall incidence of AL was 12.5% (34/273). C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CRP/ALB ratio) [AUC 0.943 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.911-0.976, p <  0.001)] and operation time [AUC 0.747 (95% CI = 0.679-0.815, p <  0.001)] had the greatest discrimination on AL prediction. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that CRP/ALB ratio and operation time were two independent risk factors for AL, and CRP/ALB ratio (OR = 102.909, p <  0.001) had an advantage over operation time (OR = 9.363, p = 0.020; Table 3). CONCLUSION: Operation time and postoperative CRP/ALB ratio were two independent predictive indexes for AL. Postoperative CRP/ALB ratio greater than 3.00 indicated a high risk of AL. For patients with abnormal postoperative CRP/ALB ratio, early non-operative treatment or surgical intervention are needed to reduce the serious sequelae of AL.

Controlling nutritional status is a prognostic factor for patients with lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, controlling nutritional status (CONUT) has been used as a prognostic factor in variety of cancers. However, no consensus has been reached on the prognostic value of CONUT in lung cancer. In this study, we aim to investigate the role of CONUT in survival of patients with lung cancer. METHODS: EMBASE, web of science, and Medline were used to search articles in English-language journals. The association between CONUT score and survival of patients with lung cancer was evaluated by using pooled HRs and their 95% CIs. Chi-square test and I-Square was used to test heterogeneity among studies. Analyses were all performed using Stata 13.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX). RESULTS: Eight studies with 1,836 patients were eventually included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that high CONUT score had an unfavorable impact on OS (HR =1.63, 95% CI: 1.30-2.04), DFS (HR =1.75, 95% CI: 1.35-2.26), CSS (HR =1.45, 95% CI: 1.01-2.07) and PFS (HR =1.67, 95% CI: 0.99-2.35), compared with those with low-CONUT. CONCLUSIONS: CONUT can be used as a predictor of prognosis in patients with lung cancer. High-CONUT score was significantly associated with poor OS, DFS, CSS and PFS.