A phase I-II evaluation of veliparib (NSC #737664), topotecan, and filgrastim or pegfilgrastim in the treatment of persistent or recurrent carcinoma of the uterine cervix: an NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition by veliparib during cytotoxic topotecan administration with filgrastim or pegfilgrastim neutrophil support in women with persistent or recurrent uterine cervix cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This phase I-II trial examined twice-daily oral veliparib (10 mg) given during once-daily intravenous topotecan (0.6 mg/m²) on days 1 to 5 of each treatment cycle. Cycles were repeated every 21 days until disease progression or until toxicity prohibited further therapy. Toxicity and objective response rate were primary endpoints. RESULTS: Twenty-seven women were enrolled. Frequently reported grade 3 or higher treatment-related toxicities were anemia (59%), thrombocytopenia (44%), leukopenia (22%), and neutropenia (19%). There were 2 partial responses (7% [90% confidence interval, 1%-22%]). Four patients had a disease progression date more than 6 months after the start of veliparib-topotecan therapy. Patients with low immunohistochemical expression (0-1+) of PARP-1 in their primary uterine cervix cancer were more likely to have a longer progression-free interval (hazard ratio, 0.25; P = 0.02) and survival (hazard ratio, 0.12; P = 0.005) after veliparib-topotecan therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical activity of a veliparib-topotecan combination was minimal in women with persistent or recurrent uterine cervix cancer. Women whose uterine cervix cancers express PARP-1 at low levels may benefit preferentially from PARP inhibitors combined with cytotoxic therapies, suggesting further study of PARP expression as an integral triage biomarker.

Phase II evaluation of sorafenib in advanced and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Southwest Oncology Group Study S0420.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of single-agent sorafenib in chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). The primary end point was response probability (ie, confirmed complete and partial response [PR]). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic, persistent, or recurrent SCCHN who received one induction or fewer or received an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen, who had adequate organ function, and who had a performance status

Bortezomib (PS-341) in relapsed or refractory extensive stage small cell lung cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group phase II trial (S0327).

BACKGROUND: In preclinical models, the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (PS-341) inhibits the growth of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) by inhibiting the antiapoptotic Bcl-2 signaling pathway. We conducted a phase II trial of PS-341 in previously treated patients with platinum-sensitive and -refractory extensive stage SCLC to determine response rate, toxicity, and survival. METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed SCLC, measurable disease, Zubrod performance status 0-1, and previous treatment with platinum-based therapy were enrolled. They were stratified by platinum-sensitivity status: sensitive (relapse >90 days after platinum) or refractory (progression during or < or =90 days after platinum). PS-341 was administered at 1.3 mg/m intravenously on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 every 21 days. RESULTS: Of 56 eligible patients, 28 were platinum sensitive and 28 refractory. Twenty-nine patients (52%) had received two or more previous chemotherapy regimens. One platinum-refractory patient had a confirmed partial response. A majority of assessable patients (91%) progressed. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 1 month and 3 months, respectively. Ten patients (18%) discontinued treatment due to adverse events or side effects. CONCLUSION: Although PS-341 induced a response in a patient with platinum-refractory disease, it has limited single-agent activity in this heavily pretreated cohort. As shown in preclinical models, testing of PS-341 in combination with an apoptotic trigger such as chemotherapy, is a rational clinical approach. A trial of topotecan plus PS-341 has been initiated to test this concept.