Author Correction: Checkpoint blockade immunotherapy reshapes the high-dimensional phenotypic heterogeneity of murine intratumoural neoantigen-specific CD8+ T cells.

The original version of this Article omitted a declaration from the competing interests statement, which should have included the following: 'R.D.S. is a cofounder, stock holder, and scientific advisory board member of Jounce Therapeutics and Neon Therapeutics, and a member of the scientific advisory boards of BioLegend, Constellation, Lytix, and NGM. He also received research funding from Janssen and Agios.'. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.

Checkpoint blockade immunotherapy reshapes the high-dimensional phenotypic heterogeneity of murine intratumoural neoantigen-specific CD8+ T cells.

The analysis of neoantigen-specific CD8+ T cells in tumour-bearing individuals is challenging due to the small pool of tumour antigen-specific T cells. Here we show that mass cytometry with multiplex combinatorial tetramer staining can identify and characterize neoantigen-specific CD8+ T cells in mice bearing T3 methylcholanthrene-induced sarcomas that are susceptible to checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. Among 81 candidate antigens tested, we identify T cells restricted to two known neoantigens simultaneously in tumours, spleens and lymph nodes in tumour-bearing mice. High-dimensional phenotypic profiling reveals that antigen-specific, tumour-infiltrating T cells are highly heterogeneous. We further show that neoantigen-specific T cells display a different phenotypic profile in mice treated with anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-1 immunotherapy, whereas their peripheral counterparts are not affected by the treatments. Our results provide insights into the nature of neoantigen-specific T cells and the effects of checkpoint blockade immunotherapy.Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapies can unleash anti-tumour T-cell responses. Here the authors show, by integrating MHC tetramer multiplexing, mass cytometry and high-dimensional analyses, that neoantigen-specific, tumour-infiltrating T cells are highly heterogeneous and are subjected to ICB modulations.

Incisional hernia recurrence through genomic profiling: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: Although situational risk factors for incisional hernia formation are known, the methods used to determine who would be most susceptible to develop one are unreliable. We hypothesized that patients with recurrent incisional hernias may possess unique gene expression profiles. METHODS: Skin and intact fascia were collected from 15 normal control (NC) patients with no hernia history and 18 patients presenting for recurrent incisional hernia (RH) repair. Microarray analysis was performed using whole genome microarray chips on NC (n = 8) and RH (n = 9). These samples were further investigated using a pathway-specific PCR array containing fibrosis-related genes. RESULTS: Microarray data revealed distinct differences in the gene expression profiles between RH and NC patients. One hundred and sixty-seven genes in the skin and 7 genes in the fascia were differentially expressed, including 8 directly involved in collagen synthesis. In particular, GREMLIN1, or bone morphogenetic protein antagonist 1, was under expressed in skin (fold = 0.49, p < 10(-7), q = 0.0009) and fascia (fold = 0.23, p < 10(-4), q = 0.095) of RH patients compared with NC. The PCR array data supported previous reports of decreased collagen I/III ratios in skin of RH versus NC (mean = 1.51 ± 0.73 vs. mean = 2.26 ± 0.99; one-sided t test, p = 0.058). CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first microarray-based analysis to show distinct gene expression profiles between the skin and fascia of RH and NC patients and the first report of an association between GREMLIN1 and incisional hernia formation. Our results suggest that gene expression profiles may act as surrogate markers that stratify patients into different groups at risk for hernia development prior to their initial surgery.