Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artif Organs ; 48(6): 683-685, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38385689

RESUMEN

A 64-year-old patient required emergency surgery with high risk of intubation failure, without any possibility to perform neither a direct transtracheal access nor VV-ECMO canulation. The patient was managed thanks to a VA-ECMO despite the absence of cardiac function impairment. This report describes perioperative challenges and management of this unconventional case with favorable outcome.


Asunto(s)
Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Humanos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Bocio/cirugía , Bocio/complicaciones , Intubación Intratraqueal , Masculino , Femenino , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Ann Card Anaesth ; 23(3): 277-282, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32687082

RESUMEN

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the new EuroSCORE (ES) 2 prediction model in high-risk patients with the 2 other oldest additive ES (aES) and logistic ES (lES). Methods: Consecutive adult patients undergoing all cardiac surgery except heart transplantation and left ventricular assist device were included. The 3 risk scores were collected before surgery. We defined 4 high-risk groups of patients, patients ≥80 years, combined cardiac surgery, surgery of the thoracic aorta, and emergency cardiac surgery, and 2 low-risk groups, valve surgery and coronary artery bypass surgery. The predicted value of each score has been assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). Results: The study had included 3301 patients. Thirty-day mortality was 3.9% (95% confidence interval (CI), 3.3 - 4.6%). The AUC of ES2 was 0.81 (0.77 - 0.84), 0.82 (0.78 - 0.85), 0.70 (0.64 - 0.76), 0.79 (0.74 - 0.83), 0.85 (0.83 - 0.87), and 0.88 (0.86 - 0.90) for octogenarians, thoracic aortic surgery, combined surgery, emergency surgery, coronary surgery, and valve surgery, respectively. These ES2 AUC values were higher than those obtained with the aES for octogenarians, and with the lES for octogenarians and valve surgery. The ES2 calibration was better than the aES and lES calibration for the whole population, and low-risk groups. The ES2 calibration was superior to aES and lES in high-risk groups, except for octogenarians and thoracic aortic surgery compared to lES. Conclusion: In high-risk cardiac surgery patients, ES2 only marginally improve the predicted 30-day mortality in comparison to other ES.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/mortalidad , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
Heart Surg Forum ; 22(1): E057-E062, 2019 02 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30802199

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have shown that statin use before coronary surgery decreases the mortality and morbidity. This benefit was not clearly detected in isolated valve surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of preoperative statin therapy on postoperative complications and mortality in a large group of patients undergoing valve surgery. PATIENTS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS: The data of consecutive patients undergoing isolated valve replacement during an 8-year period were retrospectively reviewed from a prospective database. Mortality was compared between the patients who received preoperative statin (statin group [SG]) and those who did not receive statin (control group [CG]) after adjustment on EuroSCORE. Main postoperative complications and mortality were compared between the 2 groups by using a propensity score analysis. RESULTS: During the study period, 1115 patients were prospectively included, 796 in the CG group and 319 in the SG. The SG patients were significantly older, had more cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, and weight) than the CG patients, and benefited from more elective surgery or aortic valve replacement. No difference in mortality was found between the groups: 4.4% in the SG and 4.5% in the CG, P = .95. Multivariate analysis also revealed no effect of statin on mortality, according to the type of surgery (aortic valve surgery alone or any kind of valve surgery) (P = .93), or the elective or urgent nature of the surgery (P = .67). Statin did not predict mortality after stratification with the EuroSCORE or the Parsonnet score. No difference was found between the 2 groups for postoperative complications (24-hour bleeding, atrial fibrillation, renal failure, length of mechanical ventilation, or hospital stay) and mortality after adjustment with a propensity score. DISCUSSION: This study found no difference in mortality or morbidity associated with preoperative statin therapy after isolated valve surgery.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/cirugía , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Puntaje de Propensión , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Morbilidad/tendencias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA