RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: IV tenecteplase is an alternative to alteplase before mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with large-vessel occlusion (LVO) ischemic stroke. Little data are available on its use in patients with large ischemic core. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of both thrombolytics in this population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with anterior circulation LVO strokes and diffusion-weighed imaging Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (DWI-ASPECTS) ≤5 treated with tenecteplase or alteplase before MT from the TETRIS (tenecteplase) and ETIS (alteplase) French multicenter registries. Primary outcome was reduced disability at 3 months (ordinal analysis of the modified Rankin scale [mRS]). Safety outcomes were 3-month mortality, parenchymal hematoma (PH), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). We used propensity score overlap weighting to reduce baseline differences between treatment groups. RESULTS: We analyzed 647 patients (tenecteplase: n = 194; alteplase: n = 453; inclusion period 2015-2022). Median (interquartile range) age was 71 (57-81) years, with NIH Stroke Scale score 19 (16-22), DWI-ASPECTS 4 (3-5), and last seen well-to-IV thrombolysis and puncture times 165 minutes (130-226) and 260 minutes (203-349), respectively. After MT, the successful reperfusion rate was 83.1%. After propensity score overlap weighting, all baseline variables were well balanced between both treatment groups. Compared with patients treated with alteplase, patients treated with tenecteplase had better 3-month mRS (common odds ratio [OR] for reduced disability: 1.37, 1.01-1.87, p = 0.046) and lower 3-month mortality (OR 0.52, 0.33-0.81, p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between thrombolytics for PH (OR 0.84, 0.55-1.30, p = 0.44) and sICH incidence (OR 0.70, 0.42-1.18, p = 0.18). DISCUSSION: Our data are encouraging regarding the efficacy and reassuring regarding the safety of tenecteplase compared with that of alteplase in bridging therapy for patients with LVO strokes and a large ischemic core in routine clinical care. These results support its consideration as an alternative to alteplase in bridging therapy for patients with large ischemic cores. TRIALS REGISTRATION INFORMATION: NCT03776877 (ETIS registry) and NCT05534360 (TETRIS registry). CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that patients with anterior circulation LVO stroke and DWI-ASPECTS ≤5 treated with tenecteplase vs alteplase before MT experienced better functional outcomes and lower mortality at 3 months.
Asunto(s)
Fibrinolíticos , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Tenecteplasa , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno , Humanos , Tenecteplasa/uso terapéutico , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/uso terapéutico , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/efectos adversos , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Fibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Resultado del Tratamiento , Hemorragias Intracraneales/inducido químicamente , Trombectomía/métodos , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation (CAA-RI) and biopsy-positive primary angiitis of the CNS (BP-PACNS) have overlapping clinicoradiologic presentations. It is unknown whether clinical and radiologic features can differentiate CAA-RI from BP-PACNS and whether both diseases have different relapse rates. The objectives of this study were to compare clinicoradiologic presentations and relapse rates in patients with CAA-RI vs BP-PACNS. METHODS: Patients with CAA-RI and BP-PACNS were enrolled from 2 retrospective multicenter cohorts. Patients with CAA-RI were biopsy-positive or met probable clinicoradiologic criteria. Patients with BP-PACNS had histopathologic confirmation of CNS angiitis, with no secondary etiology. A neuroradiologist read brain MRIs, blinded to the diagnosis of CAA-RI or BP-PACNS. Clinicoradiologic features were compared using univariable logistic regression models. Relapse rates were compared using a univariable Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model, with death as a competing risk. RESULTS: This study enrolled 104 patients with CAA-RI (mean age 73 years, 48% female sex) and 52 patients with BP-PACNS (mean age 45 years, 48% female sex). Patients with CAA-RI more often had white matter hyperintense lesions meeting the probable CAA-RI criteria (93% vs 51%, p < 0.001), acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (15% vs 2%, p = 0.02), cortical superficial siderosis (27% vs 4%, p < 0.001), ≥1 lobar microbleed (94% vs 26%, p < 0.001), past intracerebral hemorrhage (17% vs 4%, p = 0.04), ≥21 visible centrum semiovale perivascular spaces (34% vs 4%, p < 0.01), and leptomeningeal enhancement (70% vs 27%, p < 0.001). Patients with BP-PACNS more often had headaches (56% vs 31%, p < 0.01), motor deficits (56% vs 36%, p = 0.02), and nonischemic parenchymal gadolinium enhancement (82% vs 16%, p < 0.001). The prevalence of acute ischemic lesions was 18% in CAA-RI and 22% in BP-PACNS (p = 0.57). The features with the highest specificity for CAA-RI were acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (98%), cortical superficial siderosis (96%), past intracerebral hemorrhage (96%), and ≥21 visible centrum semiovale perivascular spaces (96%). The probable CAA-RI criteria had a 71% sensitivity (95% CI 44%-90%) and 91% specificity (95% CI 79%-98%) in differentiating biopsy-positive CAA-RI from BP-PACNS. The rate of relapse in the first 2 years after remission was lower in CAA-RI than in BP-PACNS (hazard ratio 0.46, 95% CI 0.22-0.96, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Clinicoradiologic features differed between patients with CAA-RI and those with BP-PACNS. Specific markers for CAA-RI were hemorrhagic signs of subarachnoid involvement, past intracerebral hemorrhage, ≥21 visible centrum semiovale perivascular spaces, and the probable CAA-RI criteria. A biopsy remains necessary for diagnosis in some cases of CAA-RI. The rate of relapse in the first 2 years after disease remission was lower in CAA-RI than in BP-PACNS.
Asunto(s)
Angiopatía Amiloide Cerebral , Vasculitis del Sistema Nervioso Central , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Angiopatía Amiloide Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Angiopatía Amiloide Cerebral/patología , Angiopatía Amiloide Cerebral/complicaciones , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vasculitis del Sistema Nervioso Central/diagnóstico por imagen , Vasculitis del Sistema Nervioso Central/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Biopsia , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Encéfalo/patología , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , RecurrenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of thrombectomy in patients with acute stroke and a large infarct of unrestricted size has not been well studied. METHODS: We assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients with proximal cerebral vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation and a large infarct (as defined by an Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomographic Score of ≤5; values range from 0 to 10) detected on magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography within 6.5 hours after symptom onset to undergo endovascular thrombectomy and receive medical care (thrombectomy group) or to receive medical care alone (control group). The primary outcome was the score on the modified Rankin scale at 90 days (scores range from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability). The primary safety outcome was death from any cause at 90 days, and an ancillary safety outcome was symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. RESULTS: A total of 333 patients were assigned to either the thrombectomy group (166 patients) or the control group (167 patients); 9 were excluded from the analysis because of consent withdrawal or legal reasons. The trial was stopped early because results of similar trials favored thrombectomy. Approximately 35% of the patients received thrombolysis therapy. The median modified Rankin scale score at 90 days was 4 in the thrombectomy group and 6 in the control group (generalized odds ratio, 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29 to 2.06; P<0.001). Death from any cause at 90 days occurred in 36.1% of the patients in the thrombectomy group and in 55.5% of those in the control group (adjusted relative risk, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.84), and the percentage of patients with symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was 9.6% and 5.7%, respectively (adjusted relative risk, 1.73; 95% CI, 0.78 to 4.68). Eleven procedure-related complications occurred in the thrombectomy group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute stroke and a large infarct of unrestricted size, thrombectomy plus medical care resulted in better functional outcomes and lower mortality than medical care alone but led to a higher incidence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. (Funded by Montpellier University Hospital; LASTE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03811769.).
Asunto(s)
Infarto de la Arteria Cerebral Anterior , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Trombectomía , Terapia Trombolítica , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Hemorragia Cerebral/etiología , Terapia Combinada , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Terapia Trombolítica/efectos adversos , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Infarto Encefálico/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto Encefálico/etiología , Infarto Encefálico/terapia , Enfermedad Aguda , Arterias Cerebrales/diagnóstico por imagen , Arterias Cerebrales/cirugía , Enfermedades Arteriales Cerebrales/complicaciones , Enfermedades Arteriales Cerebrales/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Arteriales Cerebrales/patología , Enfermedades Arteriales Cerebrales/cirugía , Infarto de la Arteria Cerebral Anterior/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto de la Arteria Cerebral Anterior/patología , Infarto de la Arteria Cerebral Anterior/cirugíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Data on prior use of Tenecteplase versus Alteplase in acute stroke management by mechanical thrombectomy are controversial. Our primary objective was to make a comprehensive comparative assessment of clinical and angiographic efficacy and safety outcomes in a large prospective observational study. METHODS: We included stroke patients who were eligible for intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy between 2019 and 2021, from an ongoing registry in twenty comprehensive stroke centers in France. We divided patients into two groups based on the thrombolytic agent used (Alteplase vs Tenecteplase). We then compared their treatment times, and their angiographic (TICI scale), clinical (mRS at three months and sICH) and safety outcomes after controlling for potential confounders using propensity score methods. RESULTS: We evaluated 1131 patients having undergone thrombectomy for the final analysis, 250 received Tenecteplase and 881 Alteplase. Both groups were of the same median age (75 vs 74 respectively), and had the same baseline NIHSS score (16) and ASPECTS (8). There was no significant difference for First Pass Effect (OR 0.93, 95 % CI 0.76-1.14, p = 0.75), time required for reperfusion (OR 0.03, 95 % CI 0.09-0.16, p = 0.49), or for final reperfusion status. Clinically, functional independence at 90 days was similar in both groups (OR 0.82, 95 % CI 0.61-1.10, p = 0.18) with the same risk of sICH (OR 1.36, 95 % CI 0.77-2.41, p = 0.28). However, Tenecteplase patients had shorter imaging-to-groin puncture times (99 vs 142 min, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Tenecteplase showed no better clinical or angiographic impact on thrombectomy compared to Alteplase. Nevertheless, it appeared associated with a shorter thrombolysis-to-groin puncture time.
Asunto(s)
Fibrinolíticos , Sistema de Registros , Tenecteplasa , Trombectomía , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno , Humanos , Tenecteplasa/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Trombectomía/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Angiografía Cerebral , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Francia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/cirugíaRESUMEN
La haute incidence des AVC en Afrique et leur gravite en termes de mortalite est bien documentee. Mais les modalites actuelles de leur prise en charge restent a evaluer. L'objectif de ce travail etait d'analyser les modalites de prise en charge et l'offre de soins pour les AVC; au Mali. Il s'agissait d'une enquete de sante publique aupres des prescripteurs exercant dans des structures impliquees dans la prise en charge AVC dans 7 des 8 regions existantes et du district de Bamako. Un questionnaire a ete adresse a tous les intervenants potentiels recenses de ces territoires; tandis que les plateaux techniques et les personnels ont ete systematiquement recenses. Au cours de ce travail 149 prescripteurs sollicites ont repondu au questionnaire (90). Il s'agissait de 68 medecins generalistes; 12 medecins specialistes; 69 internes. Sur le plan de la logistique; la presque totalite de ce plateau technique et du personnel se trouvent sur une aire geographique qui represente moins de 10du territoire national et n'abrite que 14 de la population. Ces donnees temoignent de l'insuffisance et de l'inegale repartition des ressources allouees a la prise en charge des AVC