Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Tipo de estudio
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
World J Clin Cases ; 9(14): 3252-3264, 2021 May 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34002134

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested that atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with rheumatic diseases (RD) may be due to inflammation. AIM: To determine the highest association of AF among hospitalized RD patients and to determine morbidity and mortality associated with AF in hospitalized patients with RD. METHODS: The National inpatient sample database from October 2015 to December 2017 was analyzed to identify hospitalized patients with RD with and without AF. A subgroup analysis was performed comparing outcomes of AF among different RD. RESULTS: The prevalence of AF was 23.9% among all patients with RD (n = 3949203). Among the RD subgroup, the prevalence of AF was highest in polymyalgia rheumatica (33.2%), gout (30.2%), and pseudogout (27.1%). After adjusting for comorbidities, the odds of having AF were increased with gout (1.25), vasculitis (1.19), polymyalgia rheumatica (1.15), dermatopolymyositis (1.14), psoriatic arthropathy (1.12), lupus (1.09), rheumatoid arthritis (1.05) and pseudogout (1.04). In contrast, enteropathic arthropathy (0.44), scleroderma (0.96), ankylosing spondylitis (0.96), and Sjorgen's syndrome (0.94) had a decreased association of AF. The mortality, length of stay, and hospitalization costs were higher in patients with RD having AF vs without AF. Among the RD subgroup, the highest mortality was found with scleroderma (4.8%), followed by vasculitis (4%) and dermatopolymyositis (3.5%). CONCLUSION: A highest association of AF was found with gout followed by vasculitis, and polymyalgia rheumatica when compared to other RD. Mortality was two-fold higher in patients with RD with AF.

2.
Expert Rev Respir Med ; 15(2): 171-173, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32901576
3.
Ther Adv Respir Dis ; 14: 1753466620926853, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32436445

RESUMEN

COVID-19 has grown into a global pandemic that has strained healthcare throughout the world. There is a sense of urgency in finding a cure for this deadly virus. In this study, we reviewed the empiric options used in common practice for COVID-19, based on the literature available online, with an emphasis on human experiences with these treatments on severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus (SARS-COV-1) and other viruses. Convalescent blood products are the most promising potential treatment for use in COVID-19. The use of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), remdesivir, and tocilizumab are some of the other promising potential therapies; however, they are yet to be tested in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The use of lopinavir-ritonavir did not prove beneficial in a large RCT. The use of corticosteroids should be avoided in COVID-19 pneumonia unless used for other indications, based on the suggestion of harm in patients with SARS-COV-1 and Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) infection. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , COVID-19 , Humanos , Pandemias , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA