Utilization of spray-dried raspberry powder as a natural additive to improve oxidative stability, microbial quality and overcome the perception of discoloration in vacuum-packed ground beef during chilled storage.

The present study was conducted to determine the effects of spray-dried raspberry powder (SDRP) (CONTROL, 1.0%, 2.0%, and 3.0%) as a natural antioxidant, antimicrobial, and colorant on physicochemical properties, lipid oxidation, discoloration, and microbial quality of vacuum-packed (VP) ground beef during chilled storage at 2 ± 0.5 °C for 18 days. By incorporating SDRP into VP ground beef pH, lipid oxidation (TBARS), lightness, and hue angle (h°) values decreased (P < .01), while redness (a*) and chroma (C*) values improved (P < .01). SDRP treatments had higher redness, more stable color, and lower pH and TBARS values during storage in a dose-dependent manner (P < .05), demonstrating that SDRP had a preventive effect on lipid oxidation and discoloration. The combination of vacuum packaging with SDRP generally resulted in lower bacterial growth during storage. These results demonstrated that 2% or 3% SDRP treatment has promising potential as an effective strategy to achieve oxidative and microbial stability and overcome discoloration in VP fresh meats.

Apical extrusion of bacteria following the use of reciprocating single-file and rotary multi-file instrumentation systems in oval root canals / Extrusão apical de bactérias após o uso de sistemas alternativos de instrumentação de arquivo único e rotativo de arquivo múltiplo em canais radiculares ovais

Objective: All instrumentation techniques and instruments are associated with apical extrusion during chemomechanical preparation, and this causes postoperative pain and flare-up. However, it is controversial whether reciprocal systems or rotary systems cause more apical extrusion. The objective of this in vitro study was to determine the differences in the amounts of apically extruded bacteria (AEB) associated with nickel-titanium rotary and reciprocating systems when used in oval-shaped root canals. Material and Methods: Seventy human mandibular premolar teeth with oval-shaped canals were randomly assigned to four experimental groups (15 teeth in each group) and one control group (10 teeth). The root canals were contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis and instrumented using two full-sequence rotary instruments (ProTaper Universal [PTU] and ProTaper Next [PTN]) and two reciprocating single-file instruments (Reciproc [R] and WaveOne [WO]). A 0.9% NaCl solution was used as an irrigant, and the bacterial extrusion was quantified as the number of colony-forming units for each sample. The results were statistically analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance and the Mann-Whitney U test, and the statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05. Results: The R system was associated with the highest amount of bacterial extrusion (p < 0.05). The PTU system caused more bacterial extrusion than the PTN and WO systems (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the PTN and WO systems (p > 0.05). Conclusions: All instrumentation techniques caused apical bacterial extrusion. The instrument design and preparation techniques affect the number of extruded bacteria (AU)

Objetivo: Todas as técnicas e instrumentos de instrumentação estão associados à extrusão apical durante o preparo quimomecânico, o que causa dor e surto no pós-operatório. No entanto, é controverso se sistemas recíprocos ou rotativos causam extrusão mais apical. O objetivo deste estudo in vitro foi determinar as diferenças na quantidade de bactérias apicalmente extrudadas (AEB) associadas aos sistemas rotativo e alternativo de níquel-titânio quando usadas em canais radiculares em forma oval. Material e Métodos: Setenta dentes pré-molares inferiores humanos com canais em forma oval foram divididos aleatoriamente em quatro grupos experimentais (15 dentes em cada grupo) e um grupo controle (10 dentes). Os canais radiculares foram contaminados com Enterococcus faecalise instrumentados usando dois instrumentos rotativos de seqüência completa (ProTaper Universal [PTU] e ProTaper Next [PTN]) e dois instrumentos alternativos de arquivo único (Reciproc [R] e WaveOne [WO]). Uma solução de NaCl a 0,9% foi usada como irrigante e a extrusão bacteriana foi quantificada como o número de unidades formadoras de colônias para cada amostra. Os resultados foram analisados estatisticamente usando a análise de variância unidirecional de Kruskal-Wallis e o teste U de Mann-Whitney, e o nível de significância estatística foi estabelecido em p < 0,05. Resultados: O sistema R foi associado à maior quantidade de extrusão bacteriana (p < 0,05). O sistema PTU causou mais extrusão bacteriana que os sistemas PTN e WO (p < 0,05). Não houve diferença significativa entre os sistemas PTN e WO (p > 0,05). Conclusões: Todas as técnicas de instrumentação causaram extrusão bacteriana apical. O desenho do instrumento e as técnica (AU)

Relation between cranial venous return and hand preference by magnetic resonance angiography.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to determine whether there is a relationship between hand preference and the site of cranial venous return. Magnetic resonance angiography was used for the determination of the site of dominance of cranial venous return. METHODS: Forty-seven right-handed and 45 left-handed subjects participated in the study conducted at the Sevgi Hospital in Ankara, Turkey between 1996 and 2000. The site of cranial venous return was determined by calibration of the superior jugular bulbus and named as right (R), left (L) and right-left (R-L). Calibrations of superior jugular bulbus were analyzed by one way variance analyses. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences when analyzing the hand preference and calibration in the subjects with a venous return from the left, than from the right and right-left. The site of venous return (R, L, R-L) and venous calibration were analyzed by student t-test and were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The venous return was from the left in right-handed subjects and from the right in left-handed subjects. Correlation`s of hand preference and age and sex could not be made. For both-sided venous return, ambidexterity could not be determined.