New antiretroviral drugs.

Despite the availability of 16 antiretroviral drugs approved for the treatment of HIV infection, current combination regimens present challenges. Newer antiretroviral drugs are needed to improve convenience, reduce toxicity and, of particular importance, to provide antiretroviral activity against viral strains resistant to the currently available antiretroviral agents. Candidate drugs with novel properties are in development in the two currently available drug classes: HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitors (nucleoside analogs, non-nucleoside analogs and nucleotide analogs) and HIV protease inhibitors (PI). Investigational nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors (nRTI) include emtricitabine (FTC) and amdoxovir (DAPD), and investigational non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) include DPC 083 and TMC 125. New protease inhibitors under investigation include atazanavir (BMS-232 632), tipranavir, and TMC 114. In addition, newer agents with novel mechanisms of action such as HIV entry inhibitors (that inhibit the three steps of HIV entry: CD4 attachment, chemokine receptor binding and membrane fusion) and HIV integrase inhibitors are under investigation. Investigational entry inhibitors include PRO 542 (a CD4 attachment inhibitor), Schering C (a chemokine receptor inhibitor), enfuvirtide (T-20) and T-1249, inhibitors of membrane fusion. Investigational HIV integrase inhibitors include S-1360. Continued progress in the treatment of HIV disease will result from the development of new antiretroviral drugs.

Indinavir, nevirapine, stavudine, and lamivudine for human immunodeficiency virus-infected, amprenavir-experienced subjects: AIDS Clinical Trials Group protocol 373.

This prospective, multicenter, open-label study was designed to determine the antiretroviral activity and safety of a 4-drug regimen: 1000 mg indinavir every 8 h with 200 mg nevirapine, 40 mg stavudine, and 150 mg lamivudine, each given twice daily in amprenavir-experienced subjects. The primary end points of the study were the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA level and CD4 cell count responses. Fifty-six subjects were enrolled and were changed from amprenavir-containing regimens to the 4-drug regimen. Overall, at week 48, 33 (59%) of 56 subjects had HIV RNA levels <500 copies/mL (intent-to-treat analysis, where missing values equal > or =500 copies/mL) and CD4 cell counts increased by 94 cells/mm(3) from baseline. Subjects who had previously taken amprenavir combination therapy were more likely to experience virologic failure than those who had taken amprenavir monotherapy (odds ratio, 7.7; P=.0012). In this study, most subjects who had taken amprenavir-based regimens and who changed to a 4-drug regimen achieved subsequent durable virologic suppression.

Randomized study of saquinavir with ritonavir or nelfinavir together with delavirdine, adefovir, or both in human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults with virologic failure on indinavir: AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 359.

This study compared antiretroviral activity among 6 "salvage" therapy regimens. The study was a prospective, randomized, 2x3 factorial, multicenter study of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group. The study enrolled 277 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients naive to nonnucleoside analogues who had taken indinavir >6 months. The patients had 2000-200,000 HIV RNA copies/mL. Patients received saquinavir with ritonavir or nelfinavir together with delavirdine and/or adefovir and were followed for safety and antiretroviral response between baseline and week 16. At week 16, 30% (77/254) of patients had

3-year suppression of HIV viremia with indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine.

BACKGROUND: Antiretroviral regimens containing HIV protease inhibitors suppress viremia in HIV-infected patients, but the durability of this effect is not known. OBJECTIVE: To describe the 3-year follow-up of patients randomly assigned to receive indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine in an ongoing clinical trial. DESIGN: Open-label extension of a randomized, double-blind study. SETTING: Four clinical research units. PATIENTS: 33 HIV-infected, zidovudine-experienced patients with serum HIV RNA levels of at least 20,000 copies/mL and CD4 counts ranging from 50 to 400 cells/mm3. INTERVENTION: Indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine. MEASUREMENTS: Safety assessments, HIV RNA levels, CD4 cell counts, and genotypic analyses. RESULTS: After 3 years of follow-up, 21 of 31 contributing patients (68% [95% CI, 49% to 83%]) had serum viral load levels less than 500 copies/mL. Twenty of 31 (65% [CI, 45% to 80%]) had levels less than 50 copies/mL. The median increase in CD4 count from baseline was 230 cells/mm3 (interquartile range, 150 to 316 cells/mm3). Nephrolithiasis occurred in 12 of 33 patients (36%). CONCLUSION: A three-drug regimen of indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine suppressed viremia in two thirds of patients for at least 3 years.

The effects of protease inhibitor therapy on human immunodeficiency virus type 1 levels in semen (AIDS clinical trials group protocol 850).

Antiretroviral therapy may lead to decreased shedding of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in genital secretions. Thirty men, 19 receiving amprenavir and 11 receiving amprenavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine, donated blood and semen while undergoing treatment, to evaluate the effects of these medications on HIV-1 shedding in semen. Before therapy, 4 men had HIV-1 RNA levels in seminal plasma >6.0 log10 (1 million) copies/mL, markedly higher than levels in blood plasma. Most men (77%) had HIV-1 RNA levels in seminal plasma below the limit of quantification during therapy. Amprenavir alone suppressed HIV-1 RNA levels to <400 copies/mL in seminal plasma in the majority of patients, the first direct demonstration of the antiretroviral effects of a protease inhibitor in the male genital tract. However, 8 men (27%) had measurable HIV-1 in seminal plasma at their last study visit, 4 with increasing levels. Persistent replication of HIV in the genital tract may have implications for the selection of resistant virus and sexual transmission of HIV-1.

Competing drug-drug interactions among multidrug antiretroviral regimens used in the treatment of HIV- infected subjects: ACTG 884.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the steady state concentrations of saquinavir, ritonavir, nelfinavir, delavirdine, and adefovir in six different three- and four-drug combination regimens. DESIGN: Randomized, partially double-blinded, multicenter study in a population of indinavir-experienced subjects with virologic failure. The first seven subjects enrolled in each of the six treatment arms from 10 participating sites were entered into this pharmacokinetic evaluation. SETTING: Multicenter study of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG). PATIENTS: HIV-infected subjects. INTERVENTIONS: A 12-hour pharmacokinetic study was conducted after 2 weeks of drug administration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Area under the concentration-time curve with statistical comparisons to evaluate the effect of the second protease inhibitor and the effect of the non-protease inhibitors. RESULTS: There was no difference in saquinavir concentrations according to whether the second protease inhibitor was ritonavir or nelfinavir. Saquinavir concentrations in the groups receiving the combination of delavirdine plus adefovir dipivoxil were reduced by approximately 50% compared with those receiving delavirdine. Delavirdine concentrations were reduced by approximately 50%, in the delavirdine plus adefovir dipivoxil arms compared with the delavirdine arms. CONCLUSIONS: Saquinavir concentrations were significantly lower in the arms containing the combination of delavirdine and adefovir dipivoxil compared with the arms containing delavirdine. Delavirdine concentrations were significantly lower when coadministered with adefovir dipivoxil. These drug-drug interactions were not expected, the mechanism(s) is (are) not clear, and additional studies are warranted. This study illustrates the need to understand more fully the pharmacokinetic characteristics of complex combination antiretroviral regimens prior to use in patient management.

Treatment with amprenavir alone or amprenavir with zidovudine and lamivudine in adults with human immunodeficiency virus infection. AIDS Clinical Trials Group 347 Study Team.

Amprenavir is a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitor with a favorable pharmacokinetic profile and good in vitro activity. Ninety-two lamivudine- and protease inhibitor-naive individuals with >/=50 CD4 cells/mm3 and >/=5000 HIV RNA copies/mL were assigned amprenavir (1200 mg) alone or with zidovudine (300 mg) plus lamivudine (150 mg), all given every 12 h. After a median follow-up of 88 days, the findings of a planned interim review resulted in termination of the amprenavir monotherapy arm. Among 85 subjects with confirmed plasma HIV RNA determination, 15 of 42 monotherapy versus 1 of 43 triple-therapy subjects had an HIV RNA increase above baseline or 1 log10 above nadir (P=.0001). For subjects taking triple therapy at 24 weeks, the median decrease in HIV RNA was 2.04 log10 copies/mL, and 17 (63%) of 27 evaluable subjects had <500 HIV RNA copies/mL. Treatment with amprenavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine together reduced the levels of HIV RNA significantly more than did amprenavir monotherapy.

Phase I studies of hypericin, the active compound in St. John's Wort, as an antiretroviral agent in HIV-infected adults. AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocols 150 and 258.

BACKGROUND: Hypericin, the active compound in St. John's Wort, has antiretroviral activity in vitro. Many HIV-infected persons use St. John's wort. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and antiretroviral activity of hypericin in HIV-infected patients. DESIGN: Phase I study. SETTING: Four clinical research units. PATIENTS: 30 HIV-infected patients with CD4 counts less than 350 cells/mm3. INTERVENTION: Intravenous hypericin, 0.25 or 0.5 mg/kg of body weight twice weekly or 0.25 mg/kg three times weekly, or oral hypericin, 0.5 mg/kg daily. MEASUREMENTS: Safety was assessed at weekly visits. Antiretroviral activity was assessed by changes in HIV p24 antigen level, HIV titer, HIV RNA copies, and CD4 cell counts. RESULTS: Of the 30 patients who were enrolled, 16 discontinued treatment early because of toxic effects. Severe cutaneous phototoxicity was observed in 11 of 23 (48% [95% CI, 27% to 69%]) evaluable patients, and dose escalation could not be completed. Virologic markers and CD4 cell count did not significantly change. CONCLUSIONS: Hypericin caused significant phototoxicity and had no antiretroviral activity in the limited number of patients studied.

Salvage therapy.

AIDS: The current guidelines for HIV therapy are two nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) in combination with one or two protease inhibitors (PIs) or a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI). These guidelines are based on clinical trials geared toward reducing viral loads to undetectable levels. In 10 to 20 percent of patients, however, such a reduction in viral load will not be accomplished. Virologic failure rates observed in cohort studies in the United States and Europe have reached rates as high as 60 percent after a year of treatment. Some predictors of treatment failure include higher viral load baselines, lower baseline CD4-cell counts, and failure to initiate treatment with an NNRTI. Clearly, better approaches to salvage therapy are needed. Studies include the evaluation of effectiveness of switching treatments from one PI to another, newer drugs, and multidrug regimens. Two tables, involving current guidelines for and major prospective studies on salvage therapy, are provided. In addition, the use of resistance testing in monitoring salvage therapy is discussed.^ieng

Rethinking nonadherence: historical perspectives on triple-drug therapy for HIV disease.

The advent of triple-drug therapy for HIV disease has raised the concern that disadvantaged patients with multiple social problems may be nonadherent to treatment. Fearing that partial adherence will lead to drug resistance, some clinicians are withholding these powerful new drugs from such patients. The historical record demonstrates that labeling patients as nonadherent may be both stigmatizing and inaccurate. Since 1900, such adjectives as ignorant, vicious, and recalcitrant have been used to describe patients who do not follow medical advice. Less judgmental terms, such as nonadherent and noncompliant, are now used, but these terms still imply that patients should obey physician-imposed regimens. Studies of nonadherence have consistently shown that the problem is widespread among all persons and cannot reliably be predicted on the basis of patient characteristics. This paper argues that physicians should deemphasize the standard approach of predicting and correcting nonadherent behavior in certain patients. Rather, clinicians should encourage all HIV-positive patients to devise individualized treatment plans that can facilitate reliable ingestion of medication. Although the potential development of resistance to triple-drug therapy remains an important public health issue, concern about this possibility must be balanced with respect for patients' rights. Encouraging the active participation of HIV-positive persons in their own treatment will help avoid judgmental and inaccurate assessments of patient behavior and may help patients take medications more successfully.

Simultaneous vs sequential initiation of therapy with indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine for HIV-1 infection: 100-week follow-up.

CONTEXT: Combination antiretroviral therapy can markedly suppress human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) replication but the duration of HIV suppression varies among patients. OBJECTIVE: To compare the antiretroviral effect of a 3-drug regimen started simultaneously or sequentially in patients with HIV infection. DESIGN: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind study, modified after at least 24 weeks of blinded therapy to provide open-label 3-drug therapy with follow-up through 100 weeks. SETTING: Four clinical research units PATIENTS: Ninety-seven patients with HIV infection who had taken zidovudine for at least 6 months with serum HIV RNA level of at least 20000 copies/mL and CD4 cell count of 0.05 to 0.40 x 10(9)/L. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were initially randomized to receive 1 of 3 antiretroviral regimens: indinavir, 800 mg every 8 hours; zidovudine, 200 mg every 8 hours and lamivudine, 150 mg every 12 hours; or all 3 drugs. After at least 24 weeks of blinded therapy, all patients received open-label 3-drug therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Antiretroviral activity was assessed by changes in HIV RNA level and CD4 cell count from baseline. Data through 100 weeks were summarized. RESULTS: Simultaneous initiation of indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine suppressed HIV RNA in 78% (25/32) of contributing patients to less than 500 copies/mL and increased CD4 cell count to a median of 0.209 x 10(9)/L above baseline at 100 weeks. When these 3 drugs were initiated sequentially, only 30% to 45% of contributing patients (10 of 33 in the zidovudine-lamivudine group and 13 of 29 in the indinavir group, respectively) had a sustained reduction in HIV RNA to less than 500 copies/mL, and median CD4 cell count increased to 0.101 to 0.163 x 10(9)/L above baseline at 100 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: A 3-drug combination of indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine started simultaneously has durable antiretroviral activity for at least 2 years. Sequential initiation of the same 3 drugs is much less effective.

Too little of a good thing.

AIDS: A case study is presented on the therapeutic dilemmas surrounding the introduction of antiretroviral therapy. Such dilemmas can include a patient's willingness to understand and adhere to a prescribed regimen or how to deal with side effects that may occur as a result of a regimen. This case involves a 38-year-old, HIV-positive male who, in response to numbness in his left foot, reduced his dosage of d4T by half, without consulting his physician. Now that the numbness has disappeared, the patient opposes returning to the original dosage of d4T. Opinions on this case are provided by two medical professionals, along with their suggestions for accommodating the patient.^ieng

Treatment with indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine in adults with human immunodeficiency virus infection and prior antiretroviral therapy.

BACKGROUND: The new protease inhibitors are potent inhibitors of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and in combination with other antiretroviral drugs they may be able to cause profound and sustained suppression of HIV replication. METHODS: In this double-blind study, 97 HIV-infected patients who had received zidovudine treatment for at least 6 months and had 50 to 400 CD4 cells per cubic millimeter and at least 20,000 copies of HIV RNA per milliliter were randomly assigned to one of three treatments for up to 52 weeks: 800 mg of indinavir every eight hours; 200 mg of zidovudine every eight hours combined with 150 mg of lamivudine twice daily; or all three drugs. The patients were followed to monitor the occurrence of adverse events and changes in viral load and CD4 cell counts. RESULTS: The decrease in HIV RNA over the first 24 weeks was greater in the three-drug group than in the other groups (P<0.001 for each comparison). RNA levels decreased to less than 500 copies per milliliter at week 24 in 28 of 31 patients in the three-drug group (90 percent), 12 of 28 patients in the indinavir group (43 percent), and none of 30 patients in the zidovudine-lamivudine group. The increase in CD4 cell counts over the first 24 weeks was greater in the two groups receiving indinavir than in the zidovudine-lamivudine group (P< or =0.01 for each comparison). The changes in the viral load and the CD4 cell count persisted for up to 52 weeks. All the regimens were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: In most HIV-infected patients with prior antiretroviral therapy, the combination of indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine reduces levels of HIV RNA to less than 500 copies per milliliter for as long as one year.

Current antiretroviral therapy: an overview.

Advances in the understanding of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pathogenesis, clinical assessment with viral load testing and the availability of potent combination antiretroviral therapy regimens have led to significant changes in options for HIV-infected patients. From the first approved antiretroviral agent, zidovudine (AZT), through two-drug nucleoside analogue regimens, to the current three-drug combination regimens with protease inhibitors, both the benefits of therapy and the complexities of therapy continue to increase. With the clinical benefits come associated lifestyle constraints and, thus, the impact and assessment of potent antiretroviral therapy on patient quality of life (QoL) becomes increasingly complicated.

Pursuing a diagnosis in a Caribbean man.

AIDS: A case study of an HIV-infected Caribbean male with extrapulmonary tuberculosis details his diagnosis, treatment regimens, and follow-up. His presenting symptoms included epigastric pain and fever. Endoscopy and gastric biopsy showed gastritis and helicobacter infection, which were treated symptomatically, and TMP-SMX was given for possible salmonellosis. Serologic tests for common opportunistic infections were negative. After all other expected conditions were ruled out, concurrent symptoms were diagnosed as extrapulmonary tuberculosis, and multi-drug treatment was successfully conducted. The problem of interactions between protease inhibitors and anti-tuberculosis drugs in treating HIV and tuberculosis concurrently is discussed. Three options are addressed: (1) discontinue (or delay starting) the protease inhibitor until at least 6 months of a standard rifampin-containing tuberculosis regimen is completed; (2) discontinue (or delay starting) the protease inhibitor until 2 months of a standard rifampin-containing regimen are completed; and (3) use of rifabutin rather than rifampin.^ieng

FUO in a 56-year-old woman.

AIDS: A 56-year-old, obese woman who had been sexually inactive for 10 years presented at the hospital with high fevers, decreased appetite, nausea, vomiting, and weight loss. Following many diagnostic tests that revealed little, it was found that her estranged husband was being treated for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP). The woman was tested for HIV and found to be positive. This is an example of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) indication that 10 percent of reported AIDS cases occur in people over age 50, that diagnosis is often delayed in older age groups, and that anyone suffering from fever of an unknown origin should be tested for HIV. In such situations it is suggested that general practice include seeking behavioral information and offering HIV testing and counseling.^ieng

Abdominal pain in a man with HIV, TB, and KS.

AIDS: A case history is presented of a 29-year-old male diagnosed with tuberculosis, HIV, and Kaposi's sarcoma. Upon admission to the hospital for weight loss and diarrhea accompanied by acute pain in the abdomen, a battery of tests, including a CT scan, laboratory tests, and physical examination were performed. Results of the CT scan showed intestinal dilatation and nodular masses in the small bowel. Surgical evaluation and pathology determined intussusception secondary to Kaposi's sarcoma nodules.^ieng