Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Nephrology (Carlton) ; 29(1): 39-47, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37731224

RESUMEN

AIM: Increased venous thrombosis and arterial embolism rates are observed in the general population during or after COVID-19. Data regarding the kidney transplant population are scarce. In this study, we aim to investigate the thrombotic complications and risk factors associated with thrombotic complications in kidney transplant patients. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included adult kidney transplant recipients diagnosed with COVID-19 between March 2020 and June 2022. The endpoint was the occurrence of thromboembolic events. RESULTS: Four hundred and sixty-nine patients were followed for a median of 10.8 months after COVID-19. Forty patients (8.5%) died. Thromboembolic complications developed in 51 (11.9%) of the surviving patients. Twenty-four patients with thromboembolic events were receiving prophylactic anticoagulation before the event. The patients with mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19 were 292, 129, and 48, respectively. Patients with moderate COVID-19 had a significantly higher percentage of thromboembolic complications than patients with mild COVID-19. Older age, prior heart disease, and moderate COVID-19 were significantly associated with thromboembolic events. The incidence of thromboembolic events after COVID-19 is 10.9 per 100 patient-year. CONCLUSION: Thromboembolic complications were observed at increased rates in kidney transplant recipients after COVID-19. Therefore, prospective and cohort studies for post-COVID-19 complications regarding the treatment modalities are urgently needed.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trasplante de Riñón , Tromboembolia , Trombosis de la Vena , Adulto , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Tromboembolia/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia/epidemiología , Tromboembolia/etiología , Trombosis de la Vena/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Receptores de Trasplantes
2.
J Nephrol ; 36(4): 979-986, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36808609

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Atypical hemolytic syndrome (aHUS) and C3 glomerulopathy (C3G) are complement-mediated rare diseases with excessive activation of the alternative pathway. Data to guide the evaluation of living-donor candidates for aHUS and C3G are very limited. The outcomes of living donors to recipients with aHUS and C3G (Complement disease-living donor group) were compared with a control group to improve our understanding of the clinical course and outcomes of living donation in this context. METHODS: Complement disease-living donor group [n = 28; aHUS(53.6%), C3G(46.4%)] and propensity score-matched control-living donor group (n = 28) were retrospectively identified from 4 centers (2003-2021) and followed for major cardiac events (MACE), de novo hypertension, thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), cancer, death, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and proteinuria after donation. RESULTS: None of the donors for recipients with complement-related kidney diseases experienced MACE or TMA whereas two donors in the control group developed MACE (7.1%) after 8 (IQR, 2.6-12.8) years (p = 0.15). New-onset hypertension was similar between complement disease and control donor groups (21.4% vs 25%, respectively, p = 0.75). There were no differences between study groups regarding last eGFR and proteinuria levels (p = 0.11 and p = 0.70, respectively). One related donor for a recipient with complement-related kidney disease developed gastric cancer and another related donor developed a brain tumor and died in the 4th year after donation (2, 7.1% vs none, p = 0.15). No recipient had donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies at the time of transplantation. Median follow-up period of transplant recipients was 5 years (IQR, 3-7). Eleven (39.3%) recipients [aHUS (n = 3) and C3G (n = 8)] lost their allografts during the follow-up period. Causes of allograft loss were chronic antibody-mediated rejection in 6 recipients and recurrence of C3G in 5. Last serum creatinine and last eGFR of the remaining patients on follow up were 1.03 ± 038 mg/dL and 73.2 ± 19.9 m/min/1.73 m2 for aHUS patients and 1.30 ± 0.23 mg/dL and 56.4 ± 5.5 m/min/1.73 m2 for C3G patients. CONCLUSION: The present study highlights the importance and complexity of living related-donor kidney transplant for patients with complement-related kidney disorders and motivates the need for further research to determine the optimal risk-assessment for living donor candidates to recipients with aHUS and C3G.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Hemolítico Urémico Atípico , Hipertensión , Enfermedades Renales , Microangiopatías Trombóticas , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Vía Alternativa del Complemento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Puntaje de Propensión , Riñón , Enfermedades Renales/complicaciones , Proteínas del Sistema Complemento , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Proteinuria/complicaciones
3.
Ther Apher Dial ; 27(3): 428-434, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36201223

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: We compared the outcomes associated with plasma exchange (PE), double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP), or immunoadsorption (IA) in the treatment of late antibody mediated rejection (AMR). METHODS: Sixty-nine kidney transplantation (KTx) recipients with late AMR were retrospectively categorized according to management with PE (n = 30), DFPP (n = 22) or IA (n = 17). Allograft loss was compared across treatment groups by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression. RESULTS: Study groups were similar regarding age, sex, donor type, kidney function, donor specific antibodies, and post-KTx follow-up time. Five-year graft survival trended higher with IA (70.6%) compared to PE (36.7%) and DFPP (27.3%) (p = 0.06). In multivariate Cox regression, baseline eGFR (HR per ml/min/1.73 m2 [95% CI]; 0.96 [0.94-0.99]), rituximab use (HR [95% CI]; 0.42 [0.21-0.84]), interstitial inflammation (i) (HR [95% CI]; 2.05 [1.13-3.69]), and transplant glomerulopathy (cg) (HR [95% CI]; 1.46 [1.13-1.87]) were associated with graft loss. CONCLUSION: These results motivate the need for continued assessment of rituximab and plasmapheresis in larger studies.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Humanos , Rituximab , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anticuerpos , Plasmaféresis/métodos , Rechazo de Injerto , Supervivencia de Injerto
4.
Am J Nephrol ; 53(8-9): 628-635, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36349757

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Data to guide the evaluation of living-related donor candidates for kidney transplant recipients with Alport syndrome (AS) spectrum are limited. We aimed to examine a cohort of living-related donors to recipients with AS and compare their outcomes with a control group to improve understanding of the clinical course and outcomes of living donation in this context. METHODS: Living donors (LDs) of AS recipients and propensity score-matched control LDs without any family history of AS (control group) were followed for major cardiac events, death, post-donation estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and proteinuria. RESULTS: There were 31 LDs (48.4% male), in whom relationship to AS recipient included mother (45.2%), father (32.3%), sibling (16.1%), grandparent (3.2%), and uncle (3.2%). Long-term outcomes over 10.0 (IQR, 3.0-15.0) years were evaluated in 25 and 25 LDs from study and control groups, respectively. During follow-up, 5 LDs (20.0%) in study group developed major cardiac event (acute coronary ischemia [n = 4] and severe congestive heart failure [n = 1]) after 5.5 (IQR, 4.5-10.3) years, whereas only 2 (8.0%) LDs in control group developed major cardiac events (p = 0.221). New-onset hypertension was higher in study group (56.0%) compared to the control group (16.0%) (p = 0.003). Three donors in study and 2 donors in control group who developed new-onset hypertension died during follow-up (p = 0.297). Major cardiac event rate was significantly higher in donors who developed hypertension after donation (0 vs. 28.0%, p < 0.001). There were no differences between study groups regarding last eGFR and proteinuria levels (p = 0.558 and p = 0.120, respectively). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Although the risk of kidney disease can be minimized by careful donor evaluation, our findings suggest that hypertension risk after the donation is higher than expected in related donors of recipients with AS.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión , Trasplante de Riñón , Nefritis Hereditaria , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Nefritis Hereditaria/epidemiología , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Puntaje de Propensión , Donadores Vivos , Riñón , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Proteinuria/epidemiología , Proteinuria/etiología , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Hipertensión/etiología , Nefrectomía
6.
Clin Kidney J ; 15(5): 999-1006, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35498893

RESUMEN

Background: In this study, we evaluated 3-month clinical outcomes of kidney transplant recipients (KTR) recovering from COVID-19 and compared them with a control group. Method: The primary endpoint was death in the third month. Secondary endpoints were ongoing respiratory symptoms, need for home oxygen therapy, rehospitalization for any reason, lower respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection, biopsy-proven acute rejection, venous/arterial thromboembolic event, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection/disease and BK viruria/viremia at 3 months. Results: A total of 944 KTR from 29 different centers were included in this study (523 patients in the COVID-19 group; 421 patients in the control group). The mean age was 46 ± 12 years (interquartile range 37-55) and 532 (56.4%) of them were male. Total number of deaths was 8 [7 (1.3%) in COVID-19 group, 1 (0.2%) in control group; P = 0.082]. The proportion of patients with ongoing respiratory symptoms [43 (8.2%) versus 4 (1.0%); P < 0.001] was statistically significantly higher in the COVID-19 group compared with the control group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of other secondary endpoints. Conclusion: The prevalence of ongoing respiratory symptoms increased in the first 3 months post-COVID in KTRs who have recovered from COVID-19, but mortality was not significantly different.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...