Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy among patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: the AMY score.

AIMS: Transthyretin 'wild-type' amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTRwt-CM) is a differential diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The clinical work-up for ATTRwt-CM is challenging. Considering a combination of clinical variables specific for ATTRwt-CM might aid in identifying patients at risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty patients (78 ± 6 years, 8% female) were diagnosed with ATTRwt-CM by endomyocardial biopsy. Preserved ejection fraction (LVEF >45%) was present in 41 of the patients. Those were 1:1 propensity score age- and sex-matched to a cohort of patients with HFpEF. ATTRwt-CM patients had less obesity (P = 0.01) and higher septal thickness (IVSd, P < 0.01) as well as more diastolic dysfunction (E/e', P < 0.01). On multivariable regression IVSd > 14 mm, E/e' > 14 and absence of obesity (P > 0.01 for all) were identified as predictors for ATTRwt-CM. A weighted point-based score was derived with IVSd > 14 mm = 1 point; absence of obesity = 2 points; and E/e' > 14 = 3 points. Area under the curve (AUC) for the summation score was 0.91 (0.84-0.97, P < 0.01) and a score of more than 3 points predicted ATTRwt-CM with good sensitivity (78%) and specificity (90%). The score was validated in an external cohort of 142 patients with ATTRwt-CM and 419 HFpEF patients showing sufficient accuracy (AUC 0.91, 0.88-0.94, P < 0.01). A value greater than 3 points demonstrated a high sensitivity (93%) and a negative predictive value of 97%. CONCLUSIONS: A score based on basic clinical and echocardiographic features helps to distinguish ATTRwt-CM from typical HFpEF. This could facilitate the diagnostic work-up for these patients and enable earlier disease screening on a large scale.

Health Status After Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Repair in Patients With Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate changes in quality of life (QoL) after transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVR) for tricuspid regurgitation (TR). BACKGROUND: TTVR provides feasible and durable efficacy in reducing TR, but its clinical benefits on QoL still remain unclear. METHODS: In 115 subjects undergoing TTVR for severe functional TR, QoL was evaluated using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ). All-cause mortality, heart failure (HF) rehospitalization, and a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, HF rehospitalization, and repeat TTVR were recorded as clinical events. RESULTS: Successful device implantation was achieved in 110 patients (96%). Moderate or less TR at discharge was achieved in 95 patients (83%). Mean SF-36 physical component summary (PCS) score improved from 34 ± 9 to 37 ± 9 points (+3 points; 95% CI: 1-5 points; P = 0.001), mean SF-36 mental component summary score improved from 49 ± 9 to 51 ± 10 points (+2 points; 95% CI: 0-4 points; P = 0.017), and mean MLHFQ score decreased from 29 ± 14 to 20 ± 15 points (-8 points; 95% CI: -11 to -5 points; P < 0.001). Baseline PCS, moderate or less TR at discharge, and baseline massive or torrential TR were associated with 1-month change in PCS score (P < 0.05). Change in PCS score after 1 month predicted HF rehospitalization after TTVR (adjusted HR: 0.74 [95% CI: 0.60-0.92] per 5-point increase in PCS score; P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that TTVR provides improvement in QoL in patients with relevant TR. TR reduction to a moderate or less grade was associated with improvement of SF-36 and MLHFQ scores. Further, global QoL was associated with clinical outcomes and might serve as a future outcome surrogate following TTVR.

Structured telephone support programs in chronic heart failure may be affected by a learning curve.

AIMS: The efficacy of a telephone support program in chronic heart failure has been questioned particularly when considering short-term follow-up. This study is aimed to assess the impact of the HeartNetCare telephone support program in chronic heart failure within 18 months of observation and to verify a possible effect of a learning-to-care curve on outcome. METHODS: We retrospectively compared a cohort of 269 chronic heart failure patients included in HeartNetCare program with 200 patients receiving usual care as a control group. All-cause death and hospitalization for heart failure or implantation of left ventricular assist device were the primary composite outcome. Secondary endpoints were the changes in left ventricular ejection fraction and in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class. Outcome data were also analyzed in relation to the time of enrollment from program initiation. RESULTS: At baseline, HeartNetCare group showed lower ejection fraction and higher NYHA class. At the follow-up, 59 HeartNetCare patients (21.9%) and 49 usual care patients (24.5%) reached the primary endpoint (P = 0.51). After 18 months of follow-up, HeartNetCare patients improved ejection fraction and NYHA class compared with the usual care patients (P < 0.001). We also observed that the HeartNetCare patients enrolled after 12 months from the initiation of the program had a more favorable outcome in primary endpoint compared with controls. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the long-term impact of a structured telephone support program might be able to positively influence symptoms and reduce events in chronic heart failure. These appreciable effects where more evident after an initial period essential for completing the learning-to-care curve.

Significance of psychosocial factors in cardiology: update 2018 : Position paper of the German Cardiac Society.

BACKGROUND: Psychosocial factors in cardiovascular diseases are increasingly acknowledged by patients, health care providers and payer organizations. Due to the rapidly increasing body of evidence, the German Cardiac Society has commissioned an update of its 2013 position paper on this topic. The German version was published in 2018 and the current manuscript is an extended translation of the original version. METHODS: This position paper provides a synopsis of the state of knowledge regarding psychosocial factors in the most relevant cardiovascular diseases and gives recommendations with respect to their consideration in clinical practice. RESULTS: Psychosocial factors such as low socioeconomic status, acute and chronic stress, depression, anxiety and low social support are associated with an unfavorable prognosis. Psychosocial problems and mental comorbidities should be assessed routinely to initiate targeted diagnostics and treatment. For all patients, treatment should consider age and gender differences as well as individual patient preferences. Multimodal treatment concepts should comprise education, physical exercise, motivational counseling and relaxation training or stress management. In cases of mental comorbidities, brief psychosocial interventions by primary care providers or cardiologists, regular psychotherapy and/or medications should be offered. While these interventions have positive effects on psychological symptoms, robust evidence for possible effects on cardiac outcomes is still lacking. CONCLUSIONS: For coronary heart disease, chronic heart failure, arterial hypertension, and some arrhythmias, there is robust evidence supporting the relevance of psychosocial factors, pointing to a need for considering them in cardiological care. However, there are still shortcomings in implementing psychosocial treatment, and prognostic effects of psychotherapy and psychotropic drugs remain uncertain. There is a need for enhanced provider education and more treatment trials.

Effect of Escitalopram on All-Cause Mortality and Hospitalization in Patients With Heart Failure and Depression: The MOOD-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Depression is frequent in patients with heart failure and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Long-term efficacy and safety of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in these patients are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether 24 months of treatment with escitalopram improves mortality, morbidity, and mood in patients with chronic systolic heart failure and depression. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Effects of Selective Serotonin Re-Uptake Inhibition on Morbidity, Mortality, and Mood in Depressed Heart Failure Patients (MOOD-HF) study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial conducted at 16 tertiary medical centers in Germany. Between March 2009 and February 2014, patients at outpatient clinics with New York Heart Association class II-IV heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (<45%) were screened for depression using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire. Patients with suspected depression were then invited to undergo a Structured Clinical Interview based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition) to establish the diagnosis. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive escitalopram (10-20 mg) or matching placebo in addition to optimal heart failure therapy. Study duration was 24 months. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The composite primary outcome was time to all-cause death or hospitalization. Prespecified secondary outcomes included safety and depression severity at 12 weeks of treatment (including the titration period), which were determined using the 10-item Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (total possible score, 0 to 60; higher scores indicate more severe depression). RESULTS: A total of 372 patients (mean age, 62 years; 24% female) were randomized and had taken at least 1 dose of study medication when the data and safety monitoring committee recommended the trial be stopped early. During a median participation time of 18.4 months (n = 185) for the escitalopram group and 18.7 months (n = 187) for the placebo group, the primary outcome of death or hospitalization occurred in 116 (63%) patients and 119 (64%) patients, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.76 to 1.27]; P = .92). The mean Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale sum score changed from 20.2 at baseline to 11.2 at 12 weeks in the escitalopram group and from 21.4 to 12.5 in the placebo group (between-group difference, -0.9 [95% CI,-2.6 to 0.7]; P = .26). Safety parameters were comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and depression, 18 months of treatment with escitalopram compared with placebo did not significantly reduce all-cause mortality or hospitalization, and there was no significant improvement in depression. These findings do not support the use of escitalopram in patients with chronic systolic heart failure and depression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: isrctn.com Identifier: ISRCTN33128015.