RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer is the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths and has the fifth highest incidence worldwide, especially in eastern Asia, central and Eastern Europe, and South America. Currently, surgery is the only curative treatment for gastric cancer; however, there is an increasing trend toward laparoscopic radical gastrectomy. Early oral feeding (EOF) has been shown to benefit clinical outcomes compared with open gastrectomy under conditions of enhanced recovery after surgery. There are a lack of guidelines and evidence for the safety and feasibility of EOF in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy. Thus, a prospective randomized trial is warranted. METHODS/DESIGN: The EOF after total laparoscopic radical gastrectomy (SOFTLY) study is a single-center, parallel-arm, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial which will enroll 200 patients who are pathologically diagnosed with gastric cancer and undergo laparoscopic radical gastrectomy. The primary endpoint, incidence of anastomotic leakage, is based on 1.9% in the control group in the CLASS-01 study. The patients will be randomized (1:1) into two groups: the EOF group will receive a clear liquid diet on post-operative day 1 (POD1) and the delayed oral feeding (DOF) group will receive a clear liquid diet on post-operative day 4 (POD4). The demographic and pathologic characteristics will be recorded. Total and oral nutritional intake, general data, total serum protein, serum albumin, blood glucose, and temperature will be recorded before surgery and at the time of hospitalization. Adverse events will also be recorded. The occurrence of post-operative fistulas, including anastomotic leakage, will be recorded as the main severe post-operative adverse event and represent the primary endpoint. DISCUSSION: The safety and feasibility of EOF after gastrectomy has not been established. The SOFTLY trial will be the first randomized controlled trial involving total laparoscopic radical gastrectomy, in which the EOF group (POD1) will be compared with the DOF group (POD4). The results of the SOFTLY trial will provide data on the safety and feasibility of EOF after total laparoscopic radical gastrectomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-IOR-15007660 . Registered on 28 December 2015. The study has full ethical and institutional approval.
Asunto(s)
Gastrectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Objectives: The aim of this study is to explore the safety and feasibility of early oral feeding (EOF) on short-term postoperative outcomes. Trial design: A prospective randomized non-inferiority trial. Materials and methods: From August 27, 2015 to March 31, 2017, 100 consecutive patients with gastric cancer in Xijing Hospital were recruited. Patients undergoing total laparoscopic radical gastrectomy (TLRG) received either EOF group or delayed oral feeding (DOF group). The endpoints were anastomotic leakage, the recovery of bowel function, the postoperative complications and costs. The process of randomization used a computer-generated sequence that was kept in a sealed envelope by a nurse that did not participate in the trial. None of the participants, administrators of interventions and those assessing outcomes was blinded. Results: Ultimately, 51 patients were in EOF group and 49 in DOF group, which both are comparable. The postoperative hospital stay in EOF group was significantly lower than DOF group (5.18±1.47 days vs 6.18±2.46 days, P=0.016). Furthermore, there was a trend for a reduction in the time of first flatus (10.3 hrs) and defecation (12.7 hrs) in EOF group compared to DOF group, but it was not statistically significant. Meanwhile, there were no significant differences in postoperative complications between two groups. One patient in the EOF group developed a fistula in the surgical remnant, which was recorded as other leakages; there was no difference between the two groups (P=0.582). Conclusion: EOF does not seem to be more harmful than DOF, and might significantly improve the short-term outcomes for patients receiving TLRG.
RESUMEN
Thioredoxin reductase (TrxR), a major component of the thioredoxin system, makes a critical role in regulating cellular redox signaling and is found to be overexpressed in many human cancer cells. TrxR has become an attractive target for anticancer agents. In this work, three Ru(II) complexes with salicylate as ligand, [Ru(phen)2(SA)] (phenâ¯=â¯1,10-phenanthroline, SAâ¯=â¯salicylate, 1), [Ru(dmb)2(SA)] (dmbâ¯=â¯4,4'-dimethyl-2,2'-bipyridine, 2) and [Ru(bpy)2(SA)] (bpyâ¯=â¯2,2'-bipyridine, 3), were synthesized and characterized. The anticancer effect exerted by them was evaluated. Complex 1 was found to exhibit obvious anticancer activity, in comparison with cisplatin, against cancer cell lines, while displaying low toxicity to the normal cell line BEAS-2B. The mechanism of complex 1 cancer cell growth suppress was investigated in A549 cells. Complex 1 exerted its anticancer through inducing apoptosis and triggering cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase. Complex 1 can selectively inhibit TrxR activity and thus promote the generation and accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which subsequently trigger mitochondrial dysfunction and DNA damage, activate oxidative stress-sensitive mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK), and suppress the protein kinase B (PKB or AKT) signal pathway, resulting in apoptosis in A549 cells.