Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Clin Anesth ; 61: 109623, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31672417

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To identify the efficacy and safety of haloperidol prophylaxis in adult patients with a high risk for delirium. DESIGN: A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. INTERVENTION: A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, the ISI Web of Knowledge, the Cochrane Library, and Embase databases from inception through to March 2019.Citation screening, data abstraction and quality assessment were performed in duplicate. Meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis (TSA) were used to assess the primary and secondary outcomes. In addition, we used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) to evaluate the certainty of the body of evidence. MAIN RESULTS: We appraised 8 RCTs involving 3034 patients that that were in compliance with inclusion and exclusion criterion. Pooled analyses indicated patients receiving haloperidol prophylaxis and placebo or normal saline did not significantly differ in incidence of delirium (relative risk [RR] = 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.70 to 1.15), with TSA inconclusive. Notably, compared with the control group, use of haloperidol significantly decreased the duration of delirium (Mean difference [MD] -0.94; 95% CI -1.82 to -0.06 days), with a marked heterogeneity. Additionally, haloperidol prophylaxis does not significantly affect duration of mechanical ventilation, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, length of hospital stay and mortality. In terms of safety profiles, haloperidol was not associated with increased risk for QTc prolongation, extrapyramidal symptoms, or adverse events. GRADE indicated the level of evidence was very low for a benefit from haloperidol prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our meta-analysis suggested the use of prophylactic haloperidol compared with placebo had no beneficial impacts on incidence of delirium, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, length of hospital stay and mortality in adult patients. It appeared to have a positive effect on duration of delirium, while with a significant heterogeneity. These findings do not support the routine usage of haloperidol for delirium prevention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018100511. Registered on 17 July 2018.


Asunto(s)
Delirio , Haloperidol , Adulto , Delirio/epidemiología , Delirio/prevención & control , Haloperidol/efectos adversos , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA