Naringin attenuates acute myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury via miR- 126/GSK-3ß/ß-catenin signaling pathway.

INTRODUCTION: Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury is one of the mechanisms contributing to the high mortality rate of acute myocardial infarction. PURPOSE: This study intended to study the role of naringin in cardiac I/R injury. METHODS: AC16 cells (human cardiomyocyte cell line) were subjected to oxygen-glucose deprivation/recovery (OGD/R) treatment and/or naringin pretreatment. Then, the apoptosis was examined by flow cytometry and Western blotting. The concentration of IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits. How naringin influenced microRNA expression was examined by microarrays and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Dual luciferase reporter assay was employed to evaluate the interaction between miR-126 and GSK-3ß. The GSK-3ß/ß-catenin signaling pathway was examined by Western blotting. Finally, rat myocardial I/R model was created to examine the effects of naringin in vivo. RESULTS: Naringin pretreatment significantly decreased the cytokine release and apoptosis of cardiomyocytes exposed to OGD/R. Bioinformatical analysis revealed that naringin upregulated miR-126 expression considerably. Also, it was found that miR-126 can bind GSK-3ß and downregulate its expression, suggesting that naringin could decrease GSK-3ß activity. Next, we discovered that naringin increased ß-catenin activity in cardiomyocytes treated with OGD/R by inhibiting GSK-3ß expression. Our animal experiments showed that naringin pre-treatment or miR-126 agomir alleviated myocardial I/R. CONCLUSIONS: Naringin preconditioning can reduce myocardial I/R injury via regulating miR-126/GSK-3ß/ß-catenin signaling pathway, and this chemical can be used to treat acute myocardial infarction.

Naringin attenuates acute myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury via miR126/GSK-3ß/ß-catenin signaling pathway

Introduction: Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury is one of the mechanisms contributing to the high mortality rate of acute myocardial infarction. Purpose: This study intended to study the role of naringin in cardiac I/R injury. Methods: AC16 cells (human cardiomyocyte cell line) were subjected to oxygen-glucose deprivation/recovery (OGD/R) treatment and/or naringin pretreatment. Then, the apoptosis was examined by flow cytometry and Western blotting. The concentration of IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits. How naringin influenced microRNA expression was examined by microarrays and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Dual luciferase reporter assay was employed to evaluate the interaction between miR-126 and GSK-3ß. The GSK-3ß/ß-catenin signaling pathway was examined by Western blotting. Finally, rat myocardial I/R model was created to examine the effects of naringin in vivo. Results: Naringin pretreatment significantly decreased the cytokine release and apoptosis of cardiomyocytes exposed to OGD/R. Bioinformatical analysis revealed that naringin upregulated miR-126 expression considerably. Also, it was found that miR-126 can bind GSK-3ß and downregulate its expression, suggesting that naringin could decrease GSK-3ß activity. Next, we discovered that naringin increased ß-catenin activity in cardiomyocytes treated with OGD/R by inhibiting GSK-3ß expression. Our animal experiments showed that naringin pre-treatment or miR-126 agomir alleviated myocardial I/R. Conclusions: Naringin preconditioning can reduce myocardial I/R injury via regulating miR-126/GSK-3ß/ß-catenin signaling pathway, and this chemical can be used to treat acute myocardial infarction.

Irinotecan combined with oxaliplatin and S-1 in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a single-arm, three-centre, prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan combined with oxaliplatin and S-1 in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated patients with cytologically or histologically confirmed metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma underwent a treatment regimen consisting of an intravenous infusion of irinotecan 165 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1, and oral S-1 40 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14, repeating the regimen every 21 days until one of the following occurred: disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or patient death. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), response rate, toxicity, and quality of life. This ongoing study had been registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03726021. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients were enrolled in this study, 18 men and 23 women. The median PFS was 4.33 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.83-5.88] and the median OS was 11.00 months (95% CI: 9.16-12.84). There were no instances of a complete response; the partial response, stable disease, and disease progression rates were 39.02% (16/41), 29.27% (12/41), and 31.71% (13/41), respectively.The most common adverse side effects were mild to moderate nausea, vomiting, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 29.27% (12/41) and 12.20% (5/41) of the patients, respectively. No treatment-related death was observed. CONCLUSION: Irinotecan combined with oxaliplatin and S-1 is a safe and effective treatment for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and any toxicities are mild to moderate and tolerable. A larger study population is needed for further evaluation.

S-1 Maintenance Therapy in Extensive Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer-A Randomized Clinical Study.

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a recalcitrant cancer for its dismal prognosis although extensive research had been done. Four to 6 cycles platinum-based chemotherapy is the mainstay treatment for the extensive-stage disease; but the role of maintenance treatment is not fully understood. This is a phase 2, open-label study. Patients with extensive-stage SCLC reaching an objective response or stable disease (SD) after induction chemotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1) with a minimization procedure. One group received oral S-1 and the other group received placebo as maintenance treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. The primary end point of this study was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary end points were overall survival (OS), response rates, and toxicities. This study was based on earlier work, the preliminary results was reported on 2019 ASCO annual meeting. A total of 89 patients were enrolled, of whom 45 received S-1 maintenance therapy and 44 received placebo. The median PFS and OS were 6.35 months and 10.82 months in the S-1 group, as compared to 5.98 months and 10.09 months in the placebo group. The PFS was 7.2 months and 5.3 months, and OS was 12.9 months and 10.9 months in patients with an objective response compared to in patients with SD after induction chemotherapy, respectively. S-1 maintenance therapy did not prolong PFS or OS in patients with extensive-stage SCLC; tumor regression rate was the prognostic factor of PFS or OS. Further research with novel agents in the maintenance setting is warranted.

[Clinical study of bioglass for repairing alveolar cleft.].

PURPOSE: To analyse the results of using Bioglass to repair alveolar cleft. METHODS: Thirty-nine cases with alveolar cleft were divided into two groups. In group A, autogenous iliac cancellous bone were transplanted into the cleft to repair alveolar defect in 25 cases, while artificial bone-Bioglass was used in group B of 14 cases. The results of two groups were compared with a follow up of 12 months. RESULTS: New bone formation was perfect in grafted area and canines can emerge from the bone grafted areas observed from the X-ray films both in group A and group B. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference between group A and group B in the clinical success rate of alveolar cleft repair. However, there was significant difference between complete alveolar cleft and incomplete alveolar cleft in group A and group B. CONCLUSION: Bioglass can result in new bone formation and eruption of canines from the bone grafted areas. The application of Bioglass in repairing of alveolar cleft provides a new therapy for alveolar cleft patients.