Muscle versus Fascia Free Tissue Transfer for Treatment of Chronic Osteomyelitis in the Comorbid Population.

BACKGROUND: In patients with chronic lower extremity (LE) wounds, chronic osteomyelitis confers additional complexity to achieving adequate treatment. Previous reviews demonstrate increased rates of osteomyelitis recurrence in patients who receive muscle flaps compared with fasciocutaneous flaps for LE limb salvage; however, these studies were not limited to atraumatic populations who receive exclusively free flaps. Thus, this study compared rates of recurrence in chronic osteomyelitis patients undergoing LE reconstruction with fasciocutaneous versus muscle free flaps. METHODS: Patients undergoing free tissue transfer (FTT) between July 2011 and July 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified into fasciocutaneous and muscle free flap groups. Primary outcomes included osteomyelitis recurrence, flap complications, limb salvage, and ambulatory status. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients with pathologic diagnosis of chronic osteomyelitis of the wound bed were identified, of which 58.3% received fasciocutaneous (n = 28) and 41.7% received muscle flaps (n = 20). The most common comorbidities included diabetes mellitus (n = 29, 60.4%), peripheral neuropathy (n = 27, 56.3%) and peripheral vascular disease (n = 24, 50.0%). Methicillin-resistant or methicillin -sensitive Staphylococcus aureus were the most common pathogen in 18.7% (n = 9) of procedures. The majority of patients underwent a median of three debridements followed by negative pressure wound therapy prior to receiving FTT. At a median follow-up of 16.6 months, the limb salvage and ambulatory rates were 79.2 (n = 38) and 83.3% (n = 40), respectively. The overall rate of microsurgical flap success was 93.8% (n = 45). Osteomyelitis recurred in 25% of patients (n = 12) at a median duration of 4.0 months. There were no significant differences in rates of osteomyelitis recurrence, flap complications, limb salvage, ambulation, and mortality. On multivariate analysis, flap composition remained a nonsignificant predictor of osteomyelitis recurrence (odds ratio: 0.975, p = 0.973). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that flap composition may not influence recurrence of osteomyelitis following free flap reconstruction of chronic LE wounds, suggesting that optimal flap selection should be based on wound characteristics and patient goals.

Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease Who Undergo Free Flap Reconstruction for Chronic Lower Extremity Wounds.

BACKGROUND: Free tissue transfer (FTT) is critical for limb salvage of chronic lower extremity (LE) wounds. In patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD), FTT LE reconstruction can be challenging due to limited vessel selection for anastomosis. The study aims to evaluate our surgical and functional outcomes after FTT to LE in patients with PAD. METHODS: A retrospective review identified patients who underwent LE free flap reconstruction between 2011 and 2021. All patients underwent preoperative arteriogram and subsequent FTT. Patients were classified into PAD or non-PAD cohorts, based on the presence of LE arterial stenoses or occlusions identified on arteriogram. Primary outcomes included complications, flap success, need for post-FTT vascular reintervention, limb salvage, and ambulatory status. RESULTS: A total of 253 patients underwent FTT to LE, with 84 patients (33.2%) in the PAD cohort. Patients with PAD had a higher prevalence of diabetes (83.3% vs 39.1%, P < 0.001) and end-stage renal disease (8.3% vs 2.4%, P = 0.028). Osteomyelitis was more common in the PAD group (73.8% vs 55.0%, P = 0.004). Free tissue transfer donor sites and flap composition were similar between cohorts. At a mean follow-up of 21.1 months, limb salvage rates were similar between non-PAD and PAD cohorts (90.5% vs 84.5%, P = 0.158), with no significant differences in ambulatory status or mortality. Higher complication rates occurred in the PAD cohort (38.1% vs 20.7%, P = 0.003), of which partial flap necrosis was more prevalent in the PAD group (6.0% vs 0.6%, P = 0.016). There was no difference in flap success rates between groups (P = 0.430). More postflap angiograms were performed in the PAD group (29.8% vs 7.1%, P < 0.001), with repeat percutaneous endovascular intervention performed in 68.0% of the PAD group versus 33.3% of the non-PAD group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study to demonstrate excellent long-term limb salvage outcomes in patients with PAD who undergo FTT to LE. Percutaneous endovascular intervention and FTT are effective methods to achieve limb salvage in vasculopathic patients with chronic LE wounds.