Índice Imunoinflamatório Sistêmico como Determinante de Carga Aterosclerótica e Pacientes de Alto Risco com Síndromes Coronarianas Agudas / Systemic Immune-Inflammatory Index as a Determinant of Atherosclerotic Burden and High-Risk Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes

Resumo Fundamento O índice imunoinflamatório sistêmico (IIS), derivado das contagens de neutrófilos, plaquetas e linfócitos, representa o equilíbrio homeostático entre os estados inflamatório, imune e trombótico. O IIS é superior a índices como a relação neutrófilos-linfócitos no prognóstico de várias malignidades, além de ser um melhor preditor de futuros eventos cardíacos que os fatores de risco tradicionais após a intervenção coronariana. Objetivos Este estudo objetivou avaliar a relação do IIS com a carga aterosclerótica e complicações hospitalares em pacientes com síndrome coronariana aguda. Métodos Desfechos clínicos, como extensão do dano miocárdico, carga aterosclerótica, sangramento, insuficiência renal aguda, duração da internação e mortalidade hospitalar, foram avaliados em uma coorte retrospectiva de 309 pacientes consecutivos com síndrome coronariana aguda. O IIS foi calculado como (plaqueta x neutrófilos)/contagem de linfócitos na admissão. A população estudada foi categorizada em tercis de IIS. Valores de p<0,05 foram considerados estatisticamente significativos. Resultados Os maiores valores de IIS foram encontrados em pacientes com infarto do miocárdio com supradesnivelamento do segmento ST (641,4 com angina pectoris instável, 843,0 com infarto do miocárdio sem supradesnivelamento do segmento ST e 996,0 com infarto do miocárdio com supradesnivelamento do segmento ST; p=0,004). Concentração máxima de troponina (0,94 versus 1,26 versus 3; p<0,001), número de vasos doentes (1 versus 2 versus 2; p<0,001), escore SYNTAX ( The SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery — sinergia entre intervenção coronária percutânea com taxus e cirurgia cardíaca) (9 versus 14 versus 17,5; p<0,001) e duração da internação (2 versus 2 versus 3; p<0,001) também aumentaram de acordo com o tercil de IIS (tercil 1 versus tercil 2 versus tercil 3). O IIS foi um preditor independente de escore SYNTAX (ß: 0,232 [0,001 a 0,003]; p<0,001), extensão do dano miocárdico (ß: 0,152 [0 a 0,001]; p=0,005) e duração da internação (ß: 0,168 [0,0 a 0,001]; p=0,003). Conclusões Este estudo demonstrou que o IIS, um índice hematológico simples, é um marcador melhor de carga aterosclerótica e internação mais longa do que fatores de risco bem conhecidos em pacientes com síndrome coronariana aguda de alto risco.

Abstract Background Systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII), which is derived from neutrophil, platelet and lymphocyte counts, represents the homeostatic balance among inflammatory, immune and thrombotic status. The systemic immune-inflammatory index is superior to indices such as neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in predicting prognosis in various malignancies, while it is shown to predict future cardiac events better than traditional risk factors after coronary intervention. Objectives Herein, we aimed to evaluate the relationship of the systemic immune-inflammatory index with atherosclerotic burden and in-hospital complications in acute coronary syndrome patients. Methods The clinical outcomes, such as extent of myocardial damage, atherosclerotic burden, bleeding, acute kidney injury, duration of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality, were evaluated in a retrospective cohort of 309 consecutive acute coronary syndrome patients. The systemic immune-inflammatory index was calculated as (Platelet X Neutrophil)/Lymphocyte count on admission. Study population was categorized into tertiles with regard to systemic immune-inflammatory index. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The highest systemic immune-inflammatory index values were within ST elevation myocardial infarction patients (641.4 in unstable angina pectoris, 843.0 in non-ST elevation myocardial infarction patients and 996.0 in ST elevation myocardial infarction patients; p=0.004). Maximal troponin concentration (0.94 vs. 1.26 vs. 3; p<0.001), number of diseased vessels (1 vs. 2 vs. 2; p<0.001), the SYNTAX (synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and coronary artery bypass grafting) score (9 vs. 14 vs. 17.5; p<0.001) and duration of hospital stay (2 vs. 2 vs. 3; p<0.001) also increased with increasing SIItertile(tertile1 vs. tertile 2 vs. tertile 3). Systemic immune-inflammatory index was an independent predictor of SYNTAX score (ß: 0.232 [0.001 to 0.003]; p<0.001), extent of myocardial damage (ß: 0.152 [0 to 0.001]; p=0.005) and duration of hospital stay (ß: 0.168 [0.0 to 0.001]; p=0.003). Conclusions This study has demonstrated that the systemic immune-inflammatory index, a simple hematological index, is a marker of atherosclerotic burden and longer hospital stay on well-known risk factors in high risk acute coronary syndrome patients.

Systemic Immune-Inflammatory Index as a Determinant of Atherosclerotic Burden and High-Risk Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes. / Índice Imunoinflamatório Sistêmico como Determinante de Carga Aterosclerótica e Pacientes de Alto Risco com Síndromes Coronarianas Agudas.

BACKGROUND: Systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII), which is derived from neutrophil, platelet and lymphocyte counts, represents the homeostatic balance among inflammatory, immune and thrombotic status. The systemic immune-inflammatory index is superior to indices such as neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in predicting prognosis in various malignancies, while it is shown to predict future cardiac events better than traditional risk factors after coronary intervention. OBJECTIVES: Herein, we aimed to evaluate the relationship of the systemic immune-inflammatory index with atherosclerotic burden and in-hospital complications in acute coronary syndrome patients. METHODS: The clinical outcomes, such as extent of myocardial damage, atherosclerotic burden, bleeding, acute kidney injury, duration of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality, were evaluated in a retrospective cohort of 309 consecutive acute coronary syndrome patients. The systemic immune-inflammatory index was calculated as (Platelet X Neutrophil)/Lymphocyte count on admission. Study population was categorized into tertiles with regard to systemic immune-inflammatory index. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The highest systemic immune-inflammatory index values were within ST elevation myocardial infarction patients (641.4 in unstable angina pectoris, 843.0 in non-ST elevation myocardial infarction patients and 996.0 in ST elevation myocardial infarction patients; p=0.004). Maximal troponin concentration (0.94 vs. 1.26 vs. 3; p<0.001), number of diseased vessels (1 vs. 2 vs. 2; p<0.001), the SYNTAX (synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and coronary artery bypass grafting) score (9 vs. 14 vs. 17.5; p<0.001) and duration of hospital stay (2 vs. 2 vs. 3; p<0.001) also increased with increasing SIItertile(tertile1 vs. tertile 2 vs. tertile 3). Systemic immune-inflammatory index was an independent predictor of SYNTAX score (ß: 0.232 [0.001 to 0.003]; p<0.001), extent of myocardial damage (ß: 0.152 [0 to 0.001]; p=0.005) and duration of hospital stay (ß: 0.168 [0.0 to 0.001]; p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated that the systemic immune-inflammatory index, a simple hematological index, is a marker of atherosclerotic burden and longer hospital stay on well-known risk factors in high risk acute coronary syndrome patients.

FUNDAMENTO: O índice imunoinflamatório sistêmico (IIS), derivado das contagens de neutrófilos, plaquetas e linfócitos, representa o equilíbrio homeostático entre os estados inflamatório, imune e trombótico. O IIS é superior a índices como a relação neutrófilos-linfócitos no prognóstico de várias malignidades, além de ser um melhor preditor de futuros eventos cardíacos que os fatores de risco tradicionais após a intervenção coronariana. OBJETIVOS: Este estudo objetivou avaliar a relação do IIS com a carga aterosclerótica e complicações hospitalares em pacientes com síndrome coronariana aguda. MÉTODOS: Desfechos clínicos, como extensão do dano miocárdico, carga aterosclerótica, sangramento, insuficiência renal aguda, duração da internação e mortalidade hospitalar, foram avaliados em uma coorte retrospectiva de 309 pacientes consecutivos com síndrome coronariana aguda. O IIS foi calculado como (plaqueta x neutrófilos)/contagem de linfócitos na admissão. A população estudada foi categorizada em tercis de IIS. Valores de p<0,05 foram considerados estatisticamente significativos. RESULTADOS: Os maiores valores de IIS foram encontrados em pacientes com infarto do miocárdio com supradesnivelamento do segmento ST (641,4 com angina pectoris instável, 843,0 com infarto do miocárdio sem supradesnivelamento do segmento ST e 996,0 com infarto do miocárdio com supradesnivelamento do segmento ST; p=0,004). Concentração máxima de troponina (0,94 versus 1,26 versus 3; p<0,001), número de vasos doentes (1 versus 2 versus 2; p<0,001), escore SYNTAX ( The SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery ­ sinergia entre intervenção coronária percutânea com taxus e cirurgia cardíaca) (9 versus 14 versus 17,5; p<0,001) e duração da internação (2 versus 2 versus 3; p<0,001) também aumentaram de acordo com o tercil de IIS (tercil 1 versus tercil 2 versus tercil 3). O IIS foi um preditor independente de escore SYNTAX (ß: 0,232 [0,001 a 0,003]; p<0,001), extensão do dano miocárdico (ß: 0,152 [0 a 0,001]; p=0,005) e duração da internação (ß: 0,168 [0,0 a 0,001]; p=0,003). CONCLUSÕES: Este estudo demonstrou que o IIS, um índice hematológico simples, é um marcador melhor de carga aterosclerótica e internação mais longa do que fatores de risco bem conhecidos em pacientes com síndrome coronariana aguda de alto risco.

Role of Sodium Levels on Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure: Active Player or a Bystander? / Papel dos Níveis de Sódio na Fibrilação Atrial na Insuficiência Cardíaca: Jogador Ativo ou Bystander?

BACKGROUND: The coexistence of hyponatremia and atrial fibrillation (AF) increases morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure (HF). However, it is not established whether hyponatremia is related to AF or not. OBJECTIVE: Our study aims to seek a potential association of hyponatremia with AF in patients with reduced ejection fraction heart failure (HFrEF). METHODS: This observational cross-sectional single-center study included 280 consecutive outpatients diagnosed with HFrEF with 40% or less. Based on sodium concentrations ≤135 mEq/L or higher, the patients were classified into hyponatremia (n=66) and normonatremia (n=214). A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Mean age was 67.6±10.5 years, 202 of them (72.2%) were male, mean blood sodium level was 138±3.6 mEq/L, and mean ejection fraction was 30±4%. Of those, 195 (69.6%) patients were diagnosed with coronary artery disease. AF was detected in 124 (44.3%) patients. AF rate was higher in patients with hyponatremia compared to those with normonatremia (n=39 [59.1%] vs. n=85 [39.7%), p= 0.020). In the logistic regression analysis, hyponatremia was not related to AF (OR=1.022, 95% CI=0.785-1.330, p=0.871). Advanced age (OR=1.046, 95% CI=1.016-1.177, p=0.003), presence of CAD (OR=2.058, 95% CI=1.122-3.777, p=0.020), resting heart rate (OR=1.041, 95% CI=1.023-1.060, p<0.001), and left atrium diameter (OR=1.049, 95% CI=1.011-1.616, p=0.002) were found to be predictors of AF. CONCLUSION: AF was higher in outpatients with HFrEF and hyponatremia. However, there is no association between sodium levels and AF in patients with HFrEF.

FUNDAMENTO: A coexistência de hiponatremia e fibrilação atrial (FA) aumenta a morbidade e mortalidade em pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca (IC). No entanto, não está estabelecido se a hiponatremia está relacionada à FA ou não. OBJETIVO: O objetivo do nosso estudo foi buscar a possível associação de hiponatremia com FA em pacientes que apresentam IC com fração de ejeção reduzida (ICFrE). MÉTODOS: Este estudo observacional, transversal e unicêntrico incluiu 280 pacientes ambulatoriais consecutivos com diagnóstico de ICFr com 40% ou menos. Com base nas concentrações de sódio ≤135 mEq/L ou superior, os pacientes foram classificados em hiponatremia (n=66) e normonatremia (n=214). Um valor de p<0,05 foi considerado significativo. RESULTADOS: A média de idade foi de 67,6±10,5 anos, 202 (72,2%) eram do sexo masculino, o nível médio de sódio no sangue foi de 138±3,6 mEq/L e a fração de ejeção média foi de 30±4%. Ao todo, 195 (69,6%) pacientes foram diagnosticados com doença arterial coronariana. A FA foi detectada em 124 (44.3%) pacientes. A taxa de FA foi maior em pacientes com hiponatremia em comparação com aqueles com normonatremia (n=39 [59,1%] vs. n=85 [39,7%), p=0,020). Na análise de regressão logística, a hiponatremia não foi relacionada à FA (OR=1.022, IC 95%=0,785­1.330, p=0,871). Idade aumentada (OR=1.046, IC 95%=1.016­1.177, p=0,003), presença de DAC (OR=2.058, IC 95%=1,122­3.777, p=0,020), frequência cardíaca em repouso (OR=1.041, IC 95%=1.023­1.060, p<0,001) e diâmetro do átrio esquerdo (OR=1.049, IC 95%=1.011­1.616, p=0,002) foram considerados preditores de FA. CONCLUSÃO: A FA foi uma taxa mais elevada em pacientes ambulatoriais com ICFr e hiponatremia. No entanto, não há associação entre os níveis de sódio e FA em pacientes com ICFrEF.

Some inflammatory markers and chest computerized tomography in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection.

OBJECTIVE: We retrospectively assessed whether there was a relationship between lung complications and some easily accessible markers to predict the presence of pulmonary consolidation in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: According to the polymerase chain reaction and chest computerized tomography results, the study was categorized into three groups. Group 1 (n=87) included the patients with polymerase chain reaction (+), group 2 (n=55) included the patients with polymerase chain reaction (-) and chest computerized tomography (+), and group 3 (n=77) included the patients with polymerase chain reaction (-) and chest computerized tomography (-), respectively. RESULTS: High-sensitivity C-reactive protein and increased age were associated with higher computerized tomography (CT) scores. CONCLUSION: Increased age and C-reactive protein (CRP) may suggest pulmonary infiltration on chest CT in patients with COVID-19.

Some inflammatory markers and chest computerized tomography in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: We retrospectively assessed whether there was a relationship between lung complications and some easily accessible markers to predict the presence of pulmonary consolidation in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: According to the polymerase chain reaction and chest computerized tomography results, the study was categorized into three groups. Group 1 (n=87) included the patients with polymerase chain reaction (+), group 2 (n=55) included the patients with polymerase chain reaction (-) and chest computerized tomography (+), and group 3 (n=77) included the patients with polymerase chain reaction (-) and chest computerized tomography (-), respectively. RESULTS: High-sensitivity C-reactive protein and increased age were associated with higher computerized tomography (CT) scores. CONCLUSION: Increased age and C-reactive protein (CRP) may suggest pulmonary infiltration on chest CT in patients with COVID-19.