The meaning of high-risk HPV other than type 16/18 in women with negative cytology: Is it really safe to wait for 1 year?

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a primary risk factor for cervical cancer. HPV 16 and 18 are the two most carcinogenic genotypes and have been reported in the majority of cervical cancer. High-risk HPVs (hrHPVs) other than HPV 16/18 cause approximately a quarter of cervical cancers. We aimed to present the colposcopy-guided biopsy results of non-16/18 hrHPV-infected women with negative cytology. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted on 752 patients between the ages of 30-65 years with non-16/18 hrHPV and negative cytology undergoing colposcopy-guided biopsy at a tertiary gynecological cancer center between January-2016 and January-2019. RESULTS: The mean age of the women was 42.35±9.41 years. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2+ lesion was detected in 49 (6.5%) women with negative cytology. The rate of CIN 2+ lesions in women with abnormal cytology was 12.8%. Patients with abnormal cytology had about 2.1 and 2.4 times increased the odds of CIN 2+ lesion in cervical biopsy and endocervical curettage specimens, respectively. CIN 3+ lesion was detected in 20 (2.7%) women with negative cytology. One (0.1%) of the patients with HPV 39 and negative cytology had invasive cervical cancer. The two most common HPV subtypes were HPV 31 and HPV 51. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of cervical preinvasive lesions still can be detected and cannot be completely eliminated among hrHPV other than 16/18-infected women with negative cytology. Based on the results of this study, referral of non-16/18 hrHPV-infected women with negative cytology to colposcopy is supported as a credible and feasible strategy.

Post-conization follow-up of patients with CIN 2/3 with different amount of distance to negative cone biopsy margin: a retrospective cohort study.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether patients with CIN 2/3 with different amount of distance to negative cone biopsy margin differ in terms of post-conization follow-up results. Cold-knife cone specimens with a negative surgical margin with a diagnosis of CIN-2/3 were selected. The minimum distance between the margin and lesion was categorised as less than 2 mm (Group-1), 2-5 mm (Group-2), or more than 5 mm (Group-3). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in terms of postoperative cone-biopsy results (p = .61). Furthermore, there were no statistically significant differences between groups in terms of cytology at 6 months and 12 months (p = .33 and p = .80, respectively). Results of the present study indicate that the amount of distance of lesion to cone biopsy margin seems to have no effect on follow-up results in patients with negative surgical margin.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? Negative surgical margins on conization are associated with lower rates of lesion recurrence. Only the efficacy of volume and size of cone biopsy specimens have been analysed on lesion recurrence. However, there is no clear definition of the minimum distance of a negative margin during cone biopsy.What do the results of this study add? To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study describing the post-conization follow-up of patients with CIN 2/3 with different amount of distance to negative cone biopsy margin. Patients who underwent surgical treatment with a wider cone biopsy margin and narrower cone biopsy margin demonstrated similar follow-up results.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The present study provides valuable information to guide physicians performing conizations with an appropriate amount of negative surgical margin. Future studies investigating the effect of different amount of distance to negative cone biopsy margin on gynaecologic and obstetrics complications such as stenosis, bleeding, and preterm labour, low birth weight, and perinatal mortality are needed to show the benefits of a narrower distance to negative cone biopsy margin.