RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Tobacco is the main risk factor for developing lung cancer. Yet, while some heavy smokers develop lung cancer at a young age, other heavy smokers never develop it, even at an advanced age, suggesting a remarkable variability in the individual susceptibility to the carcinogenic effects of tobacco. We characterized the germline profile of subjects presenting these extreme phenotypes with Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) and Machine Learning (ML). METHODS: We sequenced germline DNA from heavy smokers who either developed lung adenocarcinoma at an early age (extreme cases) or who did not develop lung cancer at an advanced age (extreme controls), selected from databases including over 6600 subjects. We selected individual coding genetic variants and variant-rich genes showing a significantly different distribution between extreme cases and controls. We validated the results from our discovery cohort, in which we analysed by WES extreme cases and controls presenting similar phenotypes. We developed ML models using both cohorts. FINDINGS: Mean age for extreme cases and controls was 50.7 and 79.1 years respectively, and mean tobacco consumption was 34.6 and 62.3 pack-years. We validated 16 individual variants and 33 variant-rich genes. The gene harbouring the most validated variants was HLA-A in extreme controls (4 variants in the discovery cohort, p = 3.46E-07; and 4 in the validation cohort, p = 1.67E-06). We trained ML models using as input the 16 individual variants in the discovery cohort and tested them on the validation cohort, obtaining an accuracy of 76.5% and an AUC-ROC of 83.6%. Functions of validated genes included candidate oncogenes, tumour-suppressors, DNA repair, HLA-mediated antigen presentation and regulation of proliferation, apoptosis, inflammation and immune response. INTERPRETATION: Individuals presenting extreme phenotypes of high and low risk of developing tobacco-associated lung adenocarcinoma show different germline profiles. Our strategy may allow the identification of high-risk subjects and the development of new therapeutic approaches. FUNDING: See a detailed list of funding bodies in the Acknowledgements section at the end of the manuscript.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma del Pulmón , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Secuenciación del Exoma , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Adenocarcinoma del Pulmón/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Fenotipo , Células Germinativas/patologíaRESUMEN
The standard of care for the first-line management of metastatic urothelial carcinoma has been recently challenged, with the combination of pembrolizumab and enfortumab vedotin (P-EV) strongly arising as a practice-changing option from classical platinum-based chemotherapies. With this paradigm shift on the horizon new questions, including the most suitable second line of treatment for these patients, and the role that the molecular characterization of these tumours will have when selecting these therapies will inevitably arise. Furthermore, after the negative results of the Keynote 361 and IMvigor 130 trials, the combination of nivolumab with platinum-based chemotherapy followed by nivolumab maintenance (Nivo GC-Nivo) has also shown positive results when compared with chemotherapy alone. Translational studies at a molecular, cellular, and functional level will be key to better explain these discordant results. In this Current Perspective, we discuss the potential impact of these results in clinical practice and propose specific guidance for prospective translational research.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Transicionales , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Humanos , Nivolumab/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/secundario , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
OBJETIVO: Varios estudios han valorado el papel de añadir quimioterapia al tratamiento hormonal del cáncer de próstata metastásico hormonosensible (CPMHS). El objetivo de este trabajo es revisar estos estudios y dar recomendaciones sobre la actitud clínica ante dichos pacientes. Métodos Se identificaron los ensayos clínicos publicados que comparan bloqueo hormonal (BH) con BH más docetaxel como tratamiento de primera línea del CPMHS y se analizaron sus resultados de eficacia y toxicidad. RESULTADOS: De los 3 ensayos publicados, dos demostraron un aumento de la supervivencia global (SG) al añadir docetaxel al tratamiento de primera línea del CPMHS (estudios CHAARTED y Stampede) y el tercero no demostró diferencias (estudio GETUG-AFU15). En el estudio CHAARTED la ventaja en SG se limitó a los pacientes con alto volumen tumoral. La toxicidad fue mayor en los pacientes que recibieron docetaxel. CONCLUSIONES: La adición de docetaxel al tratamiento con BH debe contemplarse en los pacientes con CPMHS, especialmente en aquellos que presentan alto volumen tumoral. No obstante, también debe tenerse en cuenta la toxicidad y los recientes resultados de los ensayos realizados con abiraterona en CPMHS
OBJECTIVE: Several studies have assessed the role of adding chemotherapy to hormonal treatment for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (MHSPC). The objective of this manuscript is to review these studies and to provide recommendations for the management of these patients. METHODS: We identified published clinical trials comparing hormone blockade (HB) with HB plus docetaxel as first-line treatment of HSMPC and we analyzed their results in terms of efficacy and toxicity. RESULTS: Of the 3 trials published, two demonstrated increased overall survival by adding docetaxel to the first-line treatment of MHSPC (CHAARTED and Stampede-Docetaxel studies) and the third one did not show such an advantage (GETUG-AFU15). In the CHAARTED study, the survival advantage was limited to patients presenting high tumor volume. Toxicity was increased in patients who received docetaxel. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of docetaxel to treatment with HB should be considered in patients with MHSPC, especially in those with high tumor volume. However, the toxicity and recent results of trials performed with abiraterone in MHSPC should also be taken in consideration