Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros










Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Gig Sanit ; 94(2): 5-9, 2015.
Artículo en Ruso | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26155633

RESUMEN

In the paper there are presented the basic principles of the organization of activities for the assurance ofthe sanitary- epidemiological welfare in the period ofpreparation and hosting of the XXII Olympic Winter Games and XI Paralympic Winter Games of 2014 in the Resort City of Sochi. There are considered features of the organization ofepidemiological surveillance in the pre-Olympic period, the period of the games and the state of the morbidity rate in the region after the Olympics. There are presented data on certain directions of the work of organs and institutions of the Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Welfare on the disease control of the event.


Asunto(s)
Epidemiología/organización & administración , Colonias de Salud , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Saneamiento/métodos , Estaciones del Año , Deportes , Humanos , Federación de Rusia
2.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 102(3): 201-6, 2002.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12430960

RESUMEN

This paper describes the sequence of events, medical aspects and dose estimations for two radiographers and their driver who were seriously exposed to an iridium-192 industrial radiography source that became detached from its wind-out cable. The men came to medical attention about 1 month later by which time all three were severely leucopenic and one had skin burns on both hands. Doses were estimated by (i) physics calculations combined with their accounts of the event. (ii) the levels of depression of their blood neutrophils, (iii) electron spin resonance on tooth enamel and (iv) blood lymphocyte chromosomal analyses by the conventional dicentric and the fluorescence in situ hybridisation methods. Intercomparison of these methods for estimating doses showed a good level of agreement. In brief, the averaged whole body dose for the most seriously exposed man was about 2.5-3.0 Gy and for the others it was 1.0-2.0 Gy.


Asunto(s)
Rayos gamma/efectos adversos , Leucemia Inducida por Radiación/patología , Leucopenia/sangre , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Liberación de Radiactividad Peligrosa , Recuento Corporal Total/métodos , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Anciano , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ , Radioisótopos de Iridio/efectos adversos , Leucemia Inducida por Radiación/sangre , Leucemia Inducida por Radiación/etiología , Leucopenia/etiología , Leucopenia/patología , Masculino , Dosis de Radiación , Radiometría/métodos , Radiofármacos/efectos adversos
3.
Stem Cells ; 13 Suppl 1: 69-77, 1995 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7488970

RESUMEN

Using the Chernobyl accident as an example, an attempt is made to consider the possibility of using the biological markers of exposure and effects of exposure to ionizing radiation in relation to biology dosimetry, and to predict early and late nonstochastic and stochastic radiation consequences. The biological dosimetry was based on the three markers: chromosome aberrations of peripheral blood lymphocytes, dynamics of blood cell (lymphocytes, neutrophils) counts and electron spin resonance (ESR) of tooth enamel. The first two methods can be applied in a short period of time (days or weeks) after exposure and only after high doses (> 0.5-1 Gy) of acute total body irradiation (TBI). The ESR tooth enamel method possesses dosimetric value at all conditions of uniform gamma TBI (acute, prolonged, chronic and high as well as low level of doses) and at any time after exposure. The low limit of sensitivity of the ESR test is about 0.1 Gy. The use of biological markers of effects of radiation exposure as early diagnostic signs was limited to clinical significant disorders of hemopoietic, immune systems and skin in conditions of acute high-dose irradiation. In cases of acute or prolonged irradiation in low doses, many changes on the cellular as well as organism level were discovered. However, there were not enough data on radiation specificity or dose dependence of these changes. Hence they cannot be considered as the indicators of clinically significant early and late nonstochastic effects. The role of biological markers of stochastic effects in clinical practice is discussed herein.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores , Liberación de Radiactividad Peligrosa , Humanos , Centrales Eléctricas , Pronóstico , Traumatismos por Radiación/sangre , Traumatismos por Radiación/diagnóstico , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Monitoreo de Radiación , Radiobiología , Radiometría , Procesos Estocásticos , Ucrania
4.
N Engl J Med ; 321(4): 205-12, 1989 Jul 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2664512

RESUMEN

On April 26, 1986, an accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power station in the Soviet Union exposed about 200 people to large doses of total-body radiation. Thirteen persons exposed to estimated total-body doses of 5.6 to 13.4 Gy received bone marrow transplants. Two transplant recipients, who received estimated doses of radiation of 5.6 and 8.7 Gy, are alive more than three years after the accident. The others died of various causes, including burns (the cause of death in five), interstitial pneumonitis (three), graft-versus-host disease (two), and acute renal failure and adult respiratory distress syndrome (one). There was hematopoietic (granulocytic) recovery in nine transplant recipients who could be evaluated, six of whom had transient partial engraftment before the recovery of their own marrow. Graft-versus-host disease was diagnosed clinically in four persons and suspected in two others. Although the recovery of endogenous hematopoiesis may occur after exposure to radiation doses of 5.6 to 13.4 Gy, we do not know whether it is more likely after the transient engraftment of transplanted stem cells. Because large doses of radiation affect multiple systems, bone marrow recovery does not necessarily ensure survival. Furthermore, the risk of graft-versus-host disease must be considered when the benefits of this treatment are being weighed.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes , Trasplante de Médula Ósea , Reactores Nucleares , Traumatismos por Radiación/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Quemaduras/complicaciones , Femenino , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Hematopoyesis/efectos de la radiación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Centrales Eléctricas , Dosis de Radiación , Donantes de Tejidos , Ucrania
5.
In. UN. Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources, effects and risks of ionizing radiation. New York, UN, 1988. p.613-47, ilus, tab.
No convencional en En | Desastres | ID: des-3314
6.
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...