Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Gastroenterology ; 157(3): 682-691, ago., 30 2019. ilus, tab
Artículo en Inglés | Sec. Est. Saúde SP, SESSP-IDPCPROD, Sec. Est. Saúde SP | ID: biblio-1015771

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are effective at treating acid-related disorders. These drugs are well tolerated in the short term, but long-term treatment was associated with adverse events in observational studies. We aimed to confirm these findings in an adequately powered randomized trial. METHODS: We performed a 3 x 2 partial factorial double-blind trial of 17,598 participants with stable cardiovascular disease and peripheral artery disease randomly assigned to groups given pantoprazole (40 mg daily, n = 8791) or placebo (n = 8807). Participants were also randomly assigned to groups that received rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) with aspirin (100 mg once daily), rivaroxaban (5mg twice daily), or aspirin (100 mg) alone. We collected data on development of pneumonia, Clostridium difficile infection, other enteric infections, fractures, gastric atrophy, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, chronic obstructive lung disease, dementia, cardiovascular disease, cancer, hospitalizations, and all-cause mortality every 6 months. Patients were followed up for a median of 3.01 years, with 53,152 patient-years of follow-up. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the pantoprazole and placebo groups in safety events except for enteric infections (1.4% vs 1.0% in the placebo group; odds ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.75). For all other safety outcomes, proportions were similar between groups except for C difficile infection, which was approximately twice as common in the pantoprazole vs the placebo group, although there were only 13 events, so this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: In a large placebo-controlled randomized trial, we found that pantoprazole is not associated with any adverse event when used for 3 years, with the possible exception of an increased risk of enteric infections. (AU)


Asunto(s)
Bacterias , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Aspirina
2.
Gastroenterology ; 157(2): 403-412, Aug., 2019. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | Sec. Est. Saúde SP, SESSP-IDPCPROD, Sec. Est. Saúde SP | ID: biblio-1022748

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Antiplatelets and anticoagulants are associated with increased upper gastrointestinal bleeding. We evaluated whether proton pump inhibitor therapy could reduce this risk. METHODS: We performed a 3 × 2 partial factorial double-blind trial of 17,598 participants with stable cardiovascular disease and peripheral artery disease. Participants were randomly assigned to groups given pantoprazole 40 mg daily or placebo, as well as rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily with aspirin 100 mg once daily, rivaroxaban 5 mg twice daily, or aspirin 100 mg alone. The primary outcome was time to first upper gastrointestinal event, defined as a composite of overt bleeding, upper gastrointestinal bleeding from a gastroduodenal lesion or of unknown origin, occult bleeding, symptomatic gastroduodenal ulcer or ≥5 erosions, upper gastrointestinal obstruction, or perforation. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in upper gastrointestinal events between the pantoprazole group (102 of 8791 events) and the placebo group (116 of 8807 events) (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-1.15). Pantoprazole significantly reduced bleeding of gastroduodenal lesions (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.94; P = .03); this reduction was greater when we used a post-hoc definition of bleeding gastroduodenal lesion (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.74), although the number needed to treat still was high (n = 982; 95% confidence interval, 609-2528).CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized placebo-controlled trial, we found that routine use of proton pump inhibitors in patients receiving low-dose anticoagulation and/or aspirin for stable cardiovascular disease does not reduce upper gastrointestinal events, but may reduce bleeding from gastroduodenal lesions. ClinicalTrials. (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Método Doble Ciego , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/prevención & control , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación
3.
Gastroenterology ; 157(3): 682-691.e2, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31152740

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are effective at treating acid-related disorders. These drugs are well tolerated in the short term, but long-term treatment was associated with adverse events in observational studies. We aimed to confirm these findings in an adequately powered randomized trial. METHODS: We performed a 3 × 2 partial factorial double-blind trial of 17,598 participants with stable cardiovascular disease and peripheral artery disease randomly assigned to groups given pantoprazole (40 mg daily, n = 8791) or placebo (n = 8807). Participants were also randomly assigned to groups that received rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) with aspirin (100 mg once daily), rivaroxaban (5 mg twice daily), or aspirin (100 mg) alone. We collected data on development of pneumonia, Clostridium difficile infection, other enteric infections, fractures, gastric atrophy, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, chronic obstructive lung disease, dementia, cardiovascular disease, cancer, hospitalizations, and all-cause mortality every 6 months. Patients were followed up for a median of 3.01 years, with 53,152 patient-years of follow-up. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the pantoprazole and placebo groups in safety events except for enteric infections (1.4% vs 1.0% in the placebo group; odds ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.75). For all other safety outcomes, proportions were similar between groups except for C difficile infection, which was approximately twice as common in the pantoprazole vs the placebo group, although there were only 13 events, so this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: In a large placebo-controlled randomized trial, we found that pantoprazole is not associated with any adverse event when used for 3 years, with the possible exception of an increased risk of enteric infections. ClinicalTrials.gov Number: NCT01776424.


Asunto(s)
Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/administración & dosificación , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/prevención & control , Pantoprazol/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Rivaroxabán/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Aspirina/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Enterocolitis Seudomembranosa/inducido químicamente , Enterocolitis Seudomembranosa/microbiología , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/efectos adversos , Femenino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pantoprazol/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Rivaroxabán/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Gastroenterology ; 157(2): 403-412.e5, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31054846

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Antiplatelets and anticoagulants are associated with increased upper gastrointestinal bleeding. We evaluated whether proton pump inhibitor therapy could reduce this risk. METHODS: We performed a 3 × 2 partial factorial double-blind trial of 17,598 participants with stable cardiovascular disease and peripheral artery disease. Participants were randomly assigned to groups given pantoprazole 40 mg daily or placebo, as well as rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily with aspirin 100 mg once daily, rivaroxaban 5 mg twice daily, or aspirin 100 mg alone. The primary outcome was time to first upper gastrointestinal event, defined as a composite of overt bleeding, upper gastrointestinal bleeding from a gastroduodenal lesion or of unknown origin, occult bleeding, symptomatic gastroduodenal ulcer or ≥5 erosions, upper gastrointestinal obstruction, or perforation. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in upper gastrointestinal events between the pantoprazole group (102 of 8791 events) and the placebo group (116 of 8807 events) (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-1.15). Pantoprazole significantly reduced bleeding of gastroduodenal lesions (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.94; P = .03); this reduction was greater when we used a post-hoc definition of bleeding gastroduodenal lesion (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.74), although the number needed to treat still was high (n = 982; 95% confidence interval, 609-2528). CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized placebo-controlled trial, we found that routine use of proton pump inhibitors in patients receiving low-dose anticoagulation and/or aspirin for stable cardiovascular disease does not reduce upper gastrointestinal events, but may reduce bleeding from gastroduodenal lesions. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01776424.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/prevención & control , Pantoprazol/administración & dosificación , Úlcera Péptica/prevención & control , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Anciano , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Aspirina/efectos adversos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Quimioterapia Combinada/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Femenino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Úlcera Péptica/inducido químicamente , Úlcera Péptica/epidemiología , Rivaroxabán/administración & dosificación , Rivaroxabán/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
N Engl J Med ; 377(14): 1319-1330, 2017 10 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28844192

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We evaluated whether rivaroxaban alone or in combination with aspirin would be more effective than aspirin alone for secondary cardiovascular prevention. METHODS: In this double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 27,395 participants with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease to receive rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin (100 mg once daily), rivaroxaban (5 mg twice daily), or aspirin (100 mg once daily). The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction. The study was stopped for superiority of the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group after a mean follow-up of 23 months. RESULTS: The primary outcome occurred in fewer patients in the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group than in the aspirin-alone group (379 patients [4.1%] vs. 496 patients [5.4%]; hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.86; P<0.001; z=-4.126), but major bleeding events occurred in more patients in the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group (288 patients [3.1%] vs. 170 patients [1.9%]; hazard ratio, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.40 to 2.05; P<0.001). There was no significant difference in intracranial or fatal bleeding between these two groups. There were 313 deaths (3.4%) in the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group as compared with 378 (4.1%) in the aspirin-alone group (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.96; P=0.01; threshold P value for significance, 0.0025). The primary outcome did not occur in significantly fewer patients in the rivaroxaban-alone group than in the aspirin-alone group, but major bleeding events occurred in more patients in the rivaroxaban-alone group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease, those assigned to rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin had better cardiovascular outcomes and more major bleeding events than those assigned to aspirin alone. Rivaroxaban (5 mg twice daily) alone did not result in better cardiovascular outcomes than aspirin alone and resulted in more major bleeding events. (Funded by Bayer; COMPASS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01776424 .).


Asunto(s)
Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Aterosclerosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Rivaroxabán/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Aspirina/efectos adversos , Aterosclerosis/complicaciones , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/efectos adversos , Femenino , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Rivaroxabán/efectos adversos , Prevención Secundaria/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA