RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the economic burden associated with COVID-19 in Córdoba, Colombia, 2020 and 2021. METHODS: Economic burden study. Direct costs were analyzed from the third-party payer perspective using healthcare administrative databases and interviews from a cohort of confirmed COVID-19 cases from Córdoba. Costing aggregation was performed by the bottom-up method. Indirect costs were estimated using the productivity loss approach. Contrast tests and statistical models were estimated at 5% significance. RESULTS: We studied 1,800 COVID-19 cases. The average economic cost of COVID-19 per episode was estimated at US$ 2,519 (95%CI 1,980;3,047). The direct medical cost component accounted for 92.9% of the total; out-of-pocket and indirect costs accounted for 2% and 5.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 economic cost was mainly due to direct medical costs. This study provided evidence of the economic burden faced by households due to COVID-19, with the most vulnerable households bearing much of the burden on their income.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Costo de Enfermedad , Gastos en Salud , Humanos , Colombia/epidemiología , COVID-19/economía , COVID-19/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Anciano , AdolescenteRESUMEN
Abstract Objective: To estimate the economic burden associated with COVID-19 in Córdoba, Colombia, 2020 and 2021. Methods: Economic burden study. Direct costs were analyzed from the third-party payer perspective using healthcare administrative databases and interviews from a cohort of confirmed COVID-19 cases from Córdoba. Costing aggregation was performed by the bottom-up method. Indirect costs were estimated using the productivity loss approach. Contrast tests and statistical models were estimated at 5% significance. Results: We studied 1,800 COVID-19 cases. The average economic cost of COVID-19 per episode was estimated at US$ 2,519 (95%CI 1,980;3,047). The direct medical cost component accounted for 92.9% of the total; out-of-pocket and indirect costs accounted for 2% and 5.1%, respectively. Conclusion: COVID-19 economic cost was mainly due to direct medical costs. This study provided evidence of the economic burden faced by households due to COVID-19, with the most vulnerable households bearing much of the burden on their income.
Resumen Objetivo: Estimar la carga económica asociada al COVID-19 en Córdoba, Colombia, entre 2020 y 2021. Métodos: Estudio de carga económica. Los costos directos se analizaron desde la perspectiva del tercer pagador usando bases de datos administrativas y entrevistas. La agregación del costeo se realizó por el método de bottom-up. Los costos indirectos se estimaron usando el enfoque de pérdida de productividad. Los test de contraste y modelos estadísticos se estimaron al 5% de significancia. Resultados: Se analizaron 1.800 casos de COVID-19. El costo económico promedio por episodio fue US$ 2.519 (IC95% 1.980;3.047). Los costos directos médicos explicaron el 92,9% del total; el gasto de bolsillo y los costos indirectos un 2% y 5,1%, respectivamente. Conclusión: El costo económico del COVID-19 fue principalmente por el costo directo médico. Este estudio evidenció la carga económica que enfrentan los hogares debido al COVID-19, siendo los más vulnerables quienes asumieron la mayor parte en sus ingresos.
Resumo Objetivo: Estimar a carga econômica associada à covid-19 em Córdoba, Colômbia, entre 2020 e 2021. Métodos: Estudo de avaliação da carga econômica da covid-19. Os custos diretos foram analisados segundo terceiros pagadores, usando-se bases de dados administrativas e entrevistas. A agregação dos custos foi realizada usando-se o método bottom-up. Os custos indiretos foram estimados pela perda de produtividade. Testes de contraste ortogonais e modelos de regressão estatísticos foram estimados com 5% de significância. Resultados: Foram estudadas 1.800 pessoas com covid-19. O custo econômico médio da covid-19 por episódio foi estimado em US$ 2.519 (IC95% 1.980;3.047). O componente de custo médico direto representou 92,9% do total; as despesas diretas e custos indiretos representaram 2,0% e 5,1%, respectivamente. Conclusão: O custo econômico da covid-19 deveu-se principalmente aos custos médicos diretos. Este estudo forneceu avaliações da carga econômica enfrentada pelas famílias devido à covid-19; as mais vulneráveis tiveram grande parte da carga sobre os seus rendimentos.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Three highly effective vaccines are available to prevent human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, and they have been introduced in many countries around the world. This article describes advances and challenges in introducing HPV vaccines in the Expanded Program of Immunization (EPI) of countries in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). METHODS: We reviewed national and regional sources of information to identify LAC countries with and without universal HPV vaccination, along with the year of introduction, type of HPV vaccine, vaccination scheme, age groups targeted, and coverage level reached. Incidence rates of cervical cancer were compared across countries with and without an HPV vaccination program, in order to identify inequities in access to HPV vaccines. RESULTS: So far, 10 LAC countries have supplied data on their vaccination policies and vaccination coverage rates to the Pan America Health Organization. The majority of those 10 started their vaccination programs using quadrivalent vaccine. Only Chile, Ecuador, and Mexico started their programs using a two-dose scheme. However, by the end of 2016, most of the other countries had switched from a three-dose to a two-dose scheme. Different age groups are targeted in the various programs. Some countries vaccinate one-year birth cohorts, while others vaccinate multiple-year birth cohorts. By the end of 2014, coverage with at least two doses ranged from a low of 2% to a high of 86%. With the exception of Venezuela, the LAC countries with the largest populations introduced universal HPV vaccination between 2010 and 2014. Despite the progress that has occurred in some LAC countries, there are still 10 LAC nations with cervical cancer rates above the LAC average (21.2 cases per 100 000) that have not introduced an HPV vaccine in their EPI. CONCLUSIONS: With several key adjustments, HPV vaccination programs across Latin America and the Caribbean could be substantially strengthened. Ongoing monitoring of HPV infection outcomes is needed in order to assess the impact of different vaccination policies.
RESUMEN
Objectives Three highly effective vaccines are available to prevent human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, and they have been introduced in many countries around the world. This article describes advances and challenges in introducing HPV vaccines in the Expanded Program of Immunization (EPI) of countries in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). Methods We reviewed national and regional sources of information to identify LAC countries with and without universal HPV vaccination, along with the year of introduction, type of HPV vaccine, vaccination scheme, age groups targeted, and coverage level reached. Incidence rates of cervical cancer were compared across countries with and without an HPV vaccination program, in order to identify inequities in access to HPV vaccines. Results So far, 10 LAC countries have supplied data on their vaccination policies and vaccination coverage rates to the Pan America Health Organization. The majority of those 10 started their vaccination programs using quadrivalent vaccine. Only Chile, Ecuador, and Mexico started their programs using a two-dose scheme. However, by the end of 2016, most of the other countries had switched from a three-dose to a two-dose scheme. Different age groups are targeted in the various programs. Some countries vaccinate one-year birth cohorts, while others vaccinate multiple-year birth cohorts. By the end of 2014, coverage with at least two doses ranged from a low of 2% to a high of 86%. With the exception of Venezuela, the LAC countries with the largest populations introduced universal HPV vaccination between 2010 and 2014. Despite the progress that has occurred in some LAC countries, there are still 10 LAC nations with cervical cancer rates above the LAC average (21.2 cases per 100 000) that have not introduced an HPV vaccine in their EPI. Conclusions With several key adjustments, HPV vaccination programs across Latin America and the Caribbean could be substantially strengthened. Ongoing monitoring of HPV infection outcomes is needed in order to assess the impact of different vaccination policies.
RESUMEN Objetivos Existen tres vacunas de gran eficacia para prevenir la infección por el virus del papiloma humano (VPH) que se han introducido en muchos países en todo el mundo. En el presente artículo se describen los progresos alcanzados y las dificultades encontradas con la introducción de las vacunas contra el VPH en el Programa Ampliado de Inmunización de los países de América Latina y el Caribe. Métodos Se examinaron las fuentes de información nacionales y regionales con el fin de definir los países de América Latina y el Caribe que cuentan con la vacunación universal contra el VPH o que carecen de ella, además del año de introducción, el tipo de vacuna utilizada, el calendario de vacunación, los grupos de edad destinatarios y el grado de cobertura alcanzado. Se compararon las tasas de incidencia del cáncer cervicouterino entre los países que poseen un programa de vacunación contra el VPH y los países que no lo tienen, con el propósito de detectar las inequidades en el acceso a estas vacunas. Resultados Hasta el momento, diez países de América Latina y el Caribe han comunicado a la Organización Panamericana de la Salud los datos sobre sus políticas de vacunación y las tasas de cobertura. La mayoría de estos países comenzó sus programas de vacunación utilizando la vacuna tetravalente. Solo Chile, Ecuador y México iniciaron su programa con la aplicación de un esquema de dos dosis. Sin embargo, a fines del 2016 la mayoría de los demás países había pasado de un calendario de tres dosis a una pauta de dos dosis. Los programas se dirigen a diferentes grupos de edad. Algunos países vacunan cohortes de nacimiento de un año y otros vacunan cohortes de nacimiento de varios años. A fines del 2014, la cobertura con al menos dos dosis oscilaba entre un 2% y un 86%. Con la excepción de Venezuela, los países de América Latina y el Caribe con poblaciones más grandes introdujeron la vacunación universal contra el VPH del 2010 al 2014. Pese a los progresos alcanzados en algunos países existen todavía diez naciones en América Latina y el Caribe, cuyas tasas de cáncer cervicouterino son superiores al promedio de la Región (21,2 casos por 100 000 habitantes), que no han integrado la vacuna contra el VPH en su Programa Ampliado de Inmunización. Conclusiones Será necesario adoptar varias modificaciones esenciales con miras a fortalecer de manera sólida los programas de vacunación contra el VPH en América Latina y el Caribe. Es preciso llevar a cabo un seguimiento continuo de los resultados en materia de infección por el VPH que permita evaluar la repercusión de las diferentes políticas de vacunación.
RESUMO Objetivos Existem três vacinas bastante eficazes para prevenir a infecção pelo papilomavírus humano (HPV) que foram introduzidas em diversos países em todo o mundo. Este artigo descreve os avanços e os desafios para introduzir as vacinas contra HPV no Programa Ampliado de Imunização (PAI) dos países na América Latina e Caribe. Métodos Foram pesquisadas fontes de informação nacionais e regionais para identificar os países da América Latina e Caribe com e sem um programa de vacinação universal para HPV, assim como ano de introdução da vacina, tipo de vacina usada, esquema de vacinação, faixas etárias cobertas e nível de cobertura alcançado. Foram comparadas as taxas de incidência do câncer do colo uterino entre os países com e sem programa de vacinação a fim de identificar desigualdades de acesso à vacina contra HPV. Resultados Até o presente, 10 países da América Latina e Caribe forneceram dados sobre suas políticas de vacinação e taxas de cobertura de vacinação à Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde. A maioria iniciou introduzindo no programa de vacinação a vacina quadrivalente. Somente o Chile, Equador e México começaram seus programas com um esquema de duas doses. Porém, ao final de 2016, grande parte dos demais países havia migrado de um esquema de três para duas doses. As faixas etárias cobertas variam nos diversos programas: alguns países vacinam coortes de crianças com um ano de idade, outros vacinam coortes de crianças com idades variadas. Ao final de 2014, a cobertura com a aplicação de pelo menos duas doses da vacina variou de um nível bem baixo de 2% a um nível elevado de 86%. À exceção da Venezuela, os países mais populosos da América Latina e Caribe introduziram a vacinação universal para HPV entre 2010 e 2014. Apesar do progresso verificado, 10 nações onde foram registradas taxas de incidência de câncer do colo uterino acima da média da região (21,2 casos por 100.000 habitantes) ainda não introduziram a vacina contra HPV no próprio PAI. Conclusões Se forem tomadas várias medidas importantes, é possível reforçar consideravelmente os programas de vacinação para HPV na América Latina e Caribe. O monitoramento contínuo dos resultados se faz necessário para avaliar o impacto das políticas de vacinação.
Asunto(s)
Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud/métodos , Programas de Inmunización , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/inmunología , Política de Salud , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Región del Caribe , América LatinaRESUMEN
The majority of abortions in Colombia continue to take place outside the formal health system under a range of conditions, with the majority of women obtaining misoprostol from a thriving black market for the drug and self-administering the medication. We conducted a cost analysis to compare the costs to the health system of three approaches to the provision of abortion care in Colombia: post-abortion care for complications of unsafe abortions, and for legal abortions in a health facility, misoprostol-only medical abortion and vacuum aspiration abortion. Hospital billing records from three institutions, two large maternity hospitals and one specialist reproductive health clinic, were analysed for procedure and complication rates, and costs by diagnosis. The majority of visits (94%) were to the two hospitals for post-abortion care; the other 6% were for legal abortions. Only one minor complication was found among the women having legal abortions, a complication rate of less than 1%. Among the women presenting for post-abortion care, 5% had complications during their treatment, mainly from infection or haemorrhage. Legal abortions were associated not only with far fewer complications for women, but also lower costs for the health system than for post-abortion care. We calculated based on our findings that for every 1,000 women receiving post-abortion care instead of a legal abortion within the health system, 16 women experienced avoidable complications, and the health system spent US $48,000 managing them. Increasing women's access to safe abortion care would not only reduce complications for women, but would also be a cost-saving strategy for the health system.
Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido , Aborto Legal , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Abortivos no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Aborto Inducido/economía , Aborto Inducido/métodos , Aborto Inducido/estadística & datos numéricos , Aborto Legal/economía , Aborto Legal/métodos , Aborto Legal/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Colombia , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Reforma de la Atención de Salud , Maternidades , Humanos , Misoprostol/uso terapéutico , Embarazo , Legrado por Aspiración , Salud de la MujerRESUMEN
Objective: To estimate the economic impact of the introduction of heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV-7) in high risk populations of Colombia. Methods: A full economic evaluation was done regarding potential introduction of PCV-7. A cost-effectiveness study from the perspective of the third payer was done using a Decision Model. The model considered two alternatives: with and without vaccination. As measurement of results the avoided events were taken [cases, hospitalizations, deaths and Life-Years Saved (LYS)]. In addition the net costs and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were evaluated. Results: In a cohort of 70 thousand children of under 2 years old in situation of high risk, can generate 532 deaths that would produce a little more than 21 thousand Years of Life Lost (YLL) with costs between 7.7 and 13.3 million dollars. If we vaccinate this same cohort the deaths can be reduced to 355, and the costs of burden of disease would be between 5.7 and 10 million dollars. It is estimated a reduction of 25% of the costs of burden of disease and of 33% of the deaths. In addition the ICER by YLS would be between 590 and 762 dollars. Conclusion: The introduction of the Heptavalent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine in populations of high risk is highly cost effective in Colombia.
Objetivo: Evaluar económicamente la introducción de la vacuna heptavalente de neumococo en poblaciones de alto riesgo en Colombia. Métodos: Se realizó un análisis de costo-efectividad desde la perspectiva del tercer pagador utilizando un modelo de decisiones que consideró dos alternativas: con y sin programa de vacunación. Como medida de resultados se tomaron los eventos evitados [casos, hospitalizaciones, muertes y años de vida salvados (AVS)]. Además, se valoraron los costos netos y la razón de costo-efectividad incremental (RCEI). Resultados: En una cohorte de 70 mil niños menores de dos años en situación de alto riesgo (bajo peso al nacer), se puede generar 532 muertes que producirían un poco más de 21 mil años de vida perdidos. Los costos de atención estarían entre 7,7 y 13,3 millones de dólares. Si vacunásemos esta misma cohorte con la vacuna conjugada heptavalente las muertes se reducirían a 355 y los costos de la carga estarían entre 5,7 y 10 millones de dólares. Es decir, una reducción cerca de 25% de los costos de la carga y 33% de las muertes. Además el CEI por AVS estaría entre 590 y 762 dólares del año 2006. Conclusiones: La introducción de la vacuna contra neumococo en poblaciones de alto riesgo (bajo peso al nacer) en Colombia es altamente costo-efectiva.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Recién Nacido , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/métodos , Neumonía/diagnóstico , Neumonía/inmunología , Neumonía/prevención & control , VacunaciónRESUMEN
OBJETIVOS: Las vacunas conjugadas contra Haemophilus influenzae tipo b (Hib) son la herramienta más importante para prevenir la mayoría de las enfermedades invasoras producidas por dicho patógeno, pero debido a su costo, aún no se han introducido mundialmente de manera masiva. En el presente estudio se determinó la relación costo-efectividad de una vacuna contra Hib para prevenir la neumonía y la meningitis bacterianas en niños menores de 2 años en Colombia. MÉTODOS: Se estimaron los costos directos e indirectos de la neumonía y la meningitis hospitalaria y siguiendo las recomendaciones de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS), la relación costo-efectividad de los programas de vacunación contra Hib. Se estimaron también las razones de costos por caso evitado de enfermedad invasora por Hib y el costo por año de vida salvado en dos situaciones hipotéticas: con vacunación contra Hib (cobertura vacunal: 90 por ciento) y sin vacunación. RESULTADOS: El costo medio del tratamiento hospitalario de un caso de neumonía fue de 611,5 dólares estadounidenses (US$) (intervalo de confianza del 95 por ciento [IC95 por ciento]: 532,2 - 690,8), el costo medio del tratamiento hospitalario de un caso de meningitis fue de US$ 848,9 (IC95 por ciento: 716,8 - 981,0) y el costo por caso evitado de enfermedad invasora por Hib, de US$ 316,7 (IC95 por ciento: 294,2 - 339,2). La relación costo-efectividad en la hipótesis con vacunación fue de 2,38, frente a 3,81 en la hipótesis sin vacunación. CONCLUSION: La aplicación de un programa adecuado de vacunación contra Hib en Colombia puede prevenir cerca de 25 000 casos de enfermedad invasora por año, lo que representa un ahorro de por lo menos US$ 15 millones anuales. Además, puede evitar cerca de 700 defunciones y salvar anualmente 44 054 años de vida.
OBJECTIVE: Conjugate vaccines are the best public health tools available for preventing most invasive diseases caused by Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), but the high cost of the vaccines has so far kept them from being introduced worldwide. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of introducing Hib conjugate vaccines for the prevention of meningitis and pneumonia among children under 2 years of age in Colombia. METHODS: We estimated the direct and indirect costs of managing in-hospital pneumonia and meningitis cases. In addition, following the recommendations of the World Health Organization, we assessed the cost-effectiveness of Hib vaccination programs. We also estimated the costs for preventing Hib cases, and the cost per year of life saved in two hypothetical situations: (1) with vaccination against Hib (with 90 percent coverage) and (2) without vaccination. RESULTS: The average in-hospital treatment costs were US$ 611.50 (95 percent confidence interval (95 percent CI) = US$ 532.2 to US$ 690.8) per case of pneumonia and US$ 848.9 (95 percent CI = US$ 716.8 to US$ 981.0) per case of meningitis. The average cost per Hib case prevented was US$ 316.7 (95 percent CI = US$ 294.2 to US$ 339.2). In terms of cost-effectiveness, the cost would be US$ 2.38 per year of life saved for vaccination, versus US$ 3.81 per year of life saved without vaccination. CONCLUSION: Having an adequate Hib vaccination program in Colombia could prevent around 25 000 cases of invasive disease per year, representing a cost savings of at least US$ 15 million annually. Furthermore, the program could prevent some 700 deaths per year and save 44 054 years of life per year.