Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 15 de 15
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Bone Joint Res ; 7(8): 517-523, 2018 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30258571

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Periprosthetic joint infection following joint arthroplasty surgery is one of the most feared complications. The key to successful revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infections, regardless of treatment strategy, is a thorough deep debridement. In an attempt to limit antimicrobial and disinfectant use, there has been increasing interest in the use of acetic acid as an adjunct to debridement in the management of periprosthetic joint infections. However, its effectiveness in the eradication of established biofilms following clinically relevant treatment times has not been established. Using an in vitro biofilm model, this study aimed to establish the minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) of acetic acid following a clinically relevant treatment time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) reference strain and the dissolvable bead assay, biofilms were challenged by 0% to 20% acetic acid (pH 4.7) for ten minutes, 20 minutes, 180 minutes, and 24 hours. RESULTS: The MBEC of acetic acid was found to be: 15%, 11%, 3.2%, and 0.8% following a ten-minute, 20-minute, 180-minute, and 24-hour treatment, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study found that the MBEC of acetic acid following a 10- or 20-minute treatment time exceeded its safety threshold, making these concentrations unsuitable as a topical debridement adjunct. However, a clinically acceptable concentration (5%) was still found to eliminate 96.1% of biofilm-associated MSSA following a 20-minute treatment time.Cite this article: S. T. J. Tsang, P. J. Gwynne, M. P. Gallagher, A. H. R. W. Simpson. The biofilm eradication activity of acetic acid in the management of periprosthetic joint infection. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:517-523. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.78.BJR-2018-0045.R1.

2.
J Med Microbiol ; 67(6): 893-901, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29671723

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Despite WHO recommendations, there is currently no national screening and eradication policy for the detection of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) in the UK prior to elective orthopaedic surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of current standard methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) eradication therapies in the context of S. aureus (both MRSA and MSSA) decolonization in an elective orthopaedic population. METHODOLOGY: A total of 100 patients awaiting joint replacement surgery who were positive for S. aureus on PCR nasal screening underwent the current standard MRSA pre-operative decolonization regimen for 5 days. Prior to commencement of the eradication therapy, swabs of the anterior nares, throat and perineum were taken for culture. Further culture swabs were taken at 48-96 h following treatment, at hospital admission for surgery and at hospital discharge. Following the completion of treatment, patients were asked to provide feedback on their experience using Likert rating scales. The primary outcome of this study was S. aureus clearance 48-96 h following eradication treatment.Results/Key Findings. Clearance of S. aureus 48-96 h following treatment was 94 % anterior nares, 66 % throat and 88 % groin. Mean completion with nasal mupirocin was 98 %. There was no statistically significant recolonization effect between the end of the eradication treatment period and the day of surgery (P>0.05) at a median time of 10 days. CONCLUSION: Current MRSA decolonisation regimens are well tolerated and effective for MSSA decolonization for the anterior nares and groin. The decolonization effect is preserved for at least 10 days following treatment.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Mupirocina/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Anciano , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Portador Sano/tratamiento farmacológico , Portador Sano/microbiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mupirocina/administración & dosificación , Cavidad Nasal/efectos de los fármacos , Cavidad Nasal/microbiología , Nariz/efectos de los fármacos , Nariz/microbiología , Ortopedia/métodos , Faringe/efectos de los fármacos , Faringe/microbiología , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/microbiología , Reino Unido/epidemiología
3.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 73(7): 1830-1840, 2018 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29554250

RESUMEN

Objectives: To evaluate putative anti-staphylococcal biofilm antibiotic combinations used in the management of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Methods: Using the dissolvable bead biofilm assay, the minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) was determined for the most commonly used antimicrobial agents and combination regimens against staphylococcal PJIs. The established fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index was modified to create the fractional biofilm eradication concentration (FBEC) index to evaluate synergism or antagonism between antibiotics. Results: Only gentamicin (MBEC 64 mg/L) and daptomycin (MBEC 64 mg/L) were observed to be effective antistaphylococcal agents at clinically achievable concentrations. Supplementation of gentamicin with daptomycin, vancomycin or ciprofloxacin resulted in a similar or lower MBEC than gentamicin alone (FBEC index 0.25-2). Conversely, when rifampicin, clindamycin or linezolid was added to gentamicin, there was an increase in the MBEC of gentamicin relative to its use as a monotherapy (FBEC index 8-32). Conclusions: This study found that gentamicin and daptomycin were the only effective single-agent antibiotics against established Staphylococcus biofilms. Interestingly the addition of a bacteriostatic antibiotic was found to antagonize the ability of gentamicin to eradicate Staphylococcus biofilms.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Biopelículas/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Daptomicina/farmacología , Antagonismo de Drogas , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Gentamicinas/farmacología , Humanos , Prótesis Articulares/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Staphylococcus/fisiología , Vancomicina/farmacología
4.
Bone Joint Res ; 7(1): 79-84, 2018 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29330346

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Nasal carriers of Staphylococcus (S.) aureus (MRSA and MSSA) have an increased risk for healthcare-associated infections. There are currently limited national screening policies for the detection of S. aureus despite the World Health Organization's recommendations. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of molecular and culture techniques in S. aureus screening, determine the cause of any discrepancy between the diagnostic techniques, and model the potential effect of different diagnostic techniques on S. aureus detection in orthopaedic patients. METHODS: Paired nasal swabs for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay and culture of S. aureus were collected from a study population of 273 orthopaedic outpatients due to undergo joint arthroplasty surgery. RESULTS: The prevalence of MSSA nasal colonization was found to be between 22.4% to 35.6%. The current standard direct culturing methods for detecting S. aureus significantly underestimated the prevalence (p = 0.005), failing to identify its presence in approximately one-third of patients undergoing joint arthroplasty surgery. CONCLUSION: Modelling these results to national surveillance data, it was estimated that approximately 5000 to 8000 S. aureus surgical site infections could be prevented, and approximately $140 million to $950 million (approximately £110 million to £760 million) saved in treatment costs annually in the United States and United Kingdom combined, by using alternative diagnostic methods to direct culture in preoperative S. aureus screening and eradication programmes.Cite this article: S. T. J. Tsang, M. P. McHugh, D. Guerendiain, P. J. Gwynne, J. Boyd, A. H. R. W. Simpson, T. S. Walsh, I. F. Laurenson, K. E. Templeton. Underestimation of Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA and MSSA) carriage associated with standard culturing techniques: One third of carriers missed. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:79-84. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.71.BJR-2017-0175.R1.

5.
J Microbiol Methods ; 142: 46-51, 2017 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28870772

RESUMEN

In vitro biofilm assays are a vital first step in the assessment of therapeutic effectiveness. Current biofilm models have been found to be limited by throughput, reproducibility, and cost. We present a novel in vitro biofilm model, utilising a sodium alginate substratum for surface biofilm colony formation, which can be readily dissolved for accurate evaluation of viable organisms. The dissolving bead biofilm assay was evaluated using a range of clinically relevant strains. The reproducibility and responsiveness of the assay to an antimicrobial challenge was assessed using standardised methods. Cryo-scanning electron microscopy was used to image biofilm colonies. Biofilms were grown for 20h prior to testing. The model provides a reproducible and responsive assay to clinically-relevant antimicrobial challenges, as defined by established guidelines. Moreover cryo-scanning electron microscopy demonstrates that biofilm formation is localised exclusively to the alginate bead surface. Our results suggest that this simple model provides a robust and adaptable assay for the investigation of bacterial biofilms.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Biopelículas/efectos de los fármacos , Biopelículas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana/fisiología , Gentamicinas/farmacología , Alginatos/química , Microscopía por Crioelectrón , Enterococcus faecalis/crecimiento & desarrollo , Enterococcus faecalis/aislamiento & purificación , Escherichia coli/crecimiento & desarrollo , Escherichia coli/aislamiento & purificación , Ácido Glucurónico/química , Ácidos Hexurónicos/química , Humanos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/crecimiento & desarrollo , Klebsiella pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Microscopía Electrónica de Rastreo , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/crecimiento & desarrollo , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación , Staphylococcus aureus/crecimiento & desarrollo , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Streptococcus mutans/crecimiento & desarrollo , Streptococcus mutans/aislamiento & purificación
9.
Nature ; 353(6344): 491, 1991 Oct 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1922351
10.
Nature ; 352(6333): 273, 1991 Jul 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1852196
11.
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...