RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Isolated pancreatic injury following blunt abdominal trauma is rare, and the absence of definite clinical signs and symptoms may delay diagnosis and management. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a seven-year-old girl with a history of progressive, periumbilical abdominal pain and multiple episodes of non-bilious, non-blood mixed vomiting following a road traffic accident. Computed tomography (CT) imaging revealed an isolated grade three pancreatic injury managed conservatively. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: The patient usually presents with epigastric tenderness with or without a rise in pancreatic enzyme levels. CT grading of injury correlates with and guides the management approach, and CT abdomen with contrast is the preferred investigation for diagnosis. Management depends on the grade of injury, the hemodynamic status of the children, and the co-existence of other injuries. CONCLUSION: Isolated pancreatic injury, although rare, can go undiagnosed due to a lack of suspicion from the treating surgeon and may have dire consequences. Conservative management can be a suitable strategy for children with stable hemodynamic status.
RESUMEN
Objective: To describe the state of literature regarding prevalence, clinical types of tremor in Multiple Sclerosis and associated disability. Background: Tremor has long been recognized as an important symptom of multiple sclerosis. This can be intention and postural tremor that affects the upper limbs. Patients with multiple sclerosis who experience tremor of any severity typically retire early or lose their jobs due to disability. Methods: This systematic review was performed up to September 9, 2022. Article selection was performed by searching the MEDLINE (PubMed) and EMBASE electronic bibliographic databases. The search strategy was not limited by study design but only for articles in the English language. Results: A total of nine full-text articles were included in the analysis. Six studies were cross-sectional studies; one each was a prospective observational study, a case-control study, a community-based cohort. The prevalence of tremor in the multiple sclerosis (MS) population among studies ranged widely, between 12.5% and 68.9%. The presence of severe tremor ranged from 3% to 33%. Younger age was a significant predictor of tremor in two studies. The most common tremor subtype was action tremor. Upper extremities were the most common site involved in the majority of our studies, followed by head and neck. Conclusions: Prevalence of tremor ranged from 12.5% to 68.9% in the MS population with severe tremor being an infrequent complication. Severity of tremor correlated with increasing disability. Upper limb action tremor was the most common with rare occurrences of resting and rubral tremor.
Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple , Humanos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Esclerosis Múltiple/complicaciones , Esclerosis Múltiple/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Temblor/epidemiología , Temblor/etiología , Cabeza , Estudios Observacionales como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Plantar fasciitis (PF) is a common orthopaedic problem, with heel pain worsening the quality of life. Although steroid injection is often used if the conservative treatment fails, Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) injection is gaining popularity due to its safety and long-lasting effect. However, the effect of PRP versus steroid injection in PF has not been studied yet in Nepal. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effect of PRP compared with steroid injection in the treatment of PF. METHODS: This study was a single-center, hospital-based, open-label, parallel-group randomized clinical trial to compare the effect of PRP injection with steroid injection in plantar fasciitis between August 2020 and March 2022. A total of 90 randomly selected participants aged 18 to 60 years suffering from plantar fasciitis with failed conservative treatment were intervened. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scoring system were used to evaluate functional mobility and pain before and after the intervention for three and six months, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed using a Student's two-sample t-test. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The PRP injection showed a better outcome than the steroid injection in six months follow-up. The mean (± SD) VAS score was significantly decreased in the PRP group (1.97 + 1.13) than in the steroid group (2.71 ± 0.94) with the group difference of -0.73 (95% CI: -1.18 to -0.28) at six months. Similarly, there was a significant increase in the AOFAS scores in the PRP group (86.04 ± 7.45) compared to the steroid group (81.23 ± 9.60) at six months of follow-up with a group difference of 4.80 (95% CI: 1.15 to 8.45). There was also a significant reduction of plantar fascia thickness in the PRP group compared to that of the steroid group (3.53 ± 0.81 versus 4.58 ± 1.02) at six months of follow-up with the group difference of -1.04 (95% CI: -1.44 to -0.65). CONCLUSION: The PRP injection showed better outcomes than steroid injection in plantar fasciitis treatment over the course of six months. Further research with a larger population and longer follow-up than six months is needed to generalize the findings and their long-term efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04985396. First registered on 02 August 2021. ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04985396 ).
Asunto(s)
Fascitis Plantar , Plasma Rico en Plaquetas , Humanos , Fascitis Plantar/tratamiento farmacológico , Calidad de Vida , Terapia Conductista , DolorRESUMEN
The clinical diagnosis of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is based on the presence of typical esophageal troublesome symptoms. In clinical practice, heartburn relief following a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) trial or endoscopy can confirm a diagnosis of GERD. In cases of diagnostic uncertainty or before anti-reflux interventions, combined impedance-pH monitoring (MII-pH) provides a comprehensive assessment of both physical and chemical properties of the refluxate, allowing to achieve a conclusive diagnosis of GERD. Recently, the Lyon Consensus proposed the use of mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) and post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index (PSPW-I) as novel MII-pH metrics to support the diagnosis of GERD. The calculation of MNBI and PSPW-I currently needs to be performed manually, but artificial intelligence systems for the automated analysis of MII-pH tracings are being developed. Several studies demonstrated the increased diagnostic yield MNBI and PSPW-I for the categorization of patients with GERD at both on- and off-PPI MII-pH monitoring. Accordingly, we performed a narrative review on the clinical use and diagnostic yield of MNBI and PSPW-I when the diagnosis of GERD is uncertain. Based on currently available evidence, we strongly support the evaluation of PSPW-I and MNBI as part of the standard assessment of MII-pH tracings for the evaluation of GERD, especially in patients with endoscopy-negative heartburn.
Asunto(s)
Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Pirosis , Inteligencia Artificial , Impedancia Eléctrica , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Monitorización del pH Esofágico , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Pirosis/diagnóstico , Humanos , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Inhibidores de la Bomba de ProtonesRESUMEN
Hypercontractile esophagus (HE) is a heterogeneous major motility disorder diagnosed when ≥20% hypercontractile peristaltic sequences (distal contractile integral >8,000 mm Hg*s*cm) are present within the context of normal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation (integrated relaxation pressure < upper limit of normal) on esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM). HE can manifest with dysphagia and chest pain, with unclear mechanisms of symptom generation. The pathophysiology of HE may entail an excessive cholinergic drive with temporal asynchrony of circular and longitudinal muscle contractions; provocative testing during HRM has also demonstrated abnormal inhibition. Hypercontractility can be limited to the esophageal body or can include the LES; rarely, the process is limited to the LES. Hypercontractility can sometimes be associated with esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow obstruction and increased muscle thickness. Provocative tests during HRM can increase detection of HE, reproduce symptoms, and predict delayed esophageal emptying. Regarding therapy, an empiric trial of a proton pump inhibitor, should be first considered, given the overlap with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Calcium channel blockers, nitrates, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors have been used to reduce contraction vigor but with suboptimal symptomatic response. Endoscopic treatment with botulinum toxin injection or pneumatic dilation is associated with variable response. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy may be superior to laparoscopic Heller myotomy in relieving dysphagia, but available data are scant. The presence of EGJ outflow obstruction in HE discriminates a subset of patients who may benefit from endoscopic treatment targeting the EGJ.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de la Motilidad Esofágica/fisiopatología , Contracción Muscular/fisiología , Peristaltismo/fisiología , Inhibidores de la Liberación de Acetilcolina/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Bario , Toxinas Botulínicas/uso terapéutico , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/uso terapéutico , Dolor en el Pecho/fisiopatología , Trastornos de Deglución/fisiopatología , Dilatación , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo , Trastornos de la Motilidad Esofágica/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Motilidad Esofágica/terapia , Unión Esofagogástrica/fisiopatología , Unión Esofagogástrica/cirugía , Miotomía de Heller , Humanos , Laparoscopía , Manometría , Miotomía , Nitratos/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa/uso terapéutico , Presión , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , RadiografíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The incidence of Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) continues to rise, and risk stratification of patients with BE is needed. Impaired esophageal motility is associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease; however, whether esophageal dysmotility is a risk factor for dysplasia progression in BE is incompletely understood. This study aimed to characterize esophageal motility patterns in patients with BE and identify physiologic factors associated with dysplasia progression in BE. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study assessed data from adult patients with histologically confirmed BE who underwent high-resolution esophageal manometry from 1/2014 to 1/2018 at four tertiary care centers. Longitudinal data were collected when available among patients with non-dysplastic BE (NDBE) and separated as: no dysplastic progression or positive dysplastic progression. Multivariable logistic regression assessed for independent predictors of dysplasia progression. RESULTS: Among 193 patients, histology at index endoscopy identified 152 (79%) NDBE, 23 (12%) low-grade dysplasia, 14 (7%) high-grade dysplasia, and 4 (2%) EAC. Ninety-eight (51%) had abnormal esophageal motor function on manometry. Longitudinal data were available for 84 of 152 patients with initial NDBE. Twelve (14%) exhibited dysplastic progression to low-grade (6) or high-grade (6) dysplasia. Mean esophageal distal contractile integral was lower for patients that progressed [455 mmHg s cm (SD 515)] compared with patients who did not progress [987 mmHg s cm (SD 953); aOR 1.21 (95% CI 1.01, 1.44)]. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study of 193 BE patients, the majority exhibited abnormal esophageal motor function. Reduced esophageal contractility was independently associated with dysplastic progression in BE. Characterizing esophageal physiology in BE may help to risk stratify patients.
Asunto(s)
Esófago de Barrett , Trastornos de la Motilidad Esofágica , Esófago , Hiperplasia/patología , Esófago de Barrett/diagnóstico , Esófago de Barrett/epidemiología , Esófago de Barrett/fisiopatología , Estudios de Cohortes , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Trastornos de la Motilidad Esofágica/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Motilidad Esofágica/epidemiología , Trastornos de la Motilidad Esofágica/patología , Esófago/diagnóstico por imagen , Esófago/patología , Esófago/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Manometría/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Lesiones Precancerosas/epidemiología , Lesiones Precancerosas/patología , Lesiones Precancerosas/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Emiratos Árabes Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
GOALS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of tilt-down (TD) versus left lateral (LL) positioning in speed and ease of colonoscope insertion in women with risk factors for difficult colonoscopy. BACKGROUND: Risk factors for difficult colonoscopy in women include pelvic surgery, diverticulosis, and thin body habitus. STUDY: Female patients with body mass index (BMI) under 25, diverticulosis and history of pelvic surgery were randomized to TD or LL positioning. Five colonoscopists performed all studies at a single center. Time to splenic flexure and cecum, type and amount of medication administered, Boston Bowel Prep Score (BBPS), adverse events, and findings were recorded. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to evaluate the primary endpoint. RESULTS: A total of 150 women were enrolled (81 TD, 69 LL). The mean age was 60.1 (SD 10.5) and the mean BMI was 23.9 (SD 3.5). In total 98 (65.3%) women had prior pelvic surgery, 94 (62.7%) had BMI <25 and 60 (40.0%) had diverticulosis. There was no statistically significant difference in time to the splenic flexure overall but insertion to the splenic flexure was significantly faster in the TD position as compared with the LL position in patients with diverticulosis (124 s for TD, 160 s for LL, P=0.022). In a linear regression analysis, lower BMI, diverticulosis and lower BBPS were significantly associated with a longer insertion time to the splenic flexure. There were no adverse events. CONCLUSION: TD positioning represents a straightforward maneuver to facilitate advancement through the sigmoid colon and may be beneficial in women with diverticular disease.
Asunto(s)
Colonoscopios , Colonoscopía , Boston , Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Posicionamiento del PacienteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess expert gastroenterologists' opinion on treatment for distinct gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) profiles characterized by proton pump inhibitor (PPI) unresponsive symptoms. METHODS: Fourteen esophagologists applied the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method to hypothetical scenarios with previously demonstrated GERD (positive pH-metry or endoscopy) and persistent symptoms despite double-dose PPI therapy undergoing pH-impedance monitoring on therapy. A priori thresholds included: esophageal acid exposure (EAE) time >6.0%; symptom-reflux association: symptom index >50% and symptom association probability >95%; >80 reflux events; large hiatal hernia: >3 cm. Primary outcomes were appropriateness of four invasive procedures (laparoscopic fundoplication, magnetic sphincter augmentation, transoral incisionless fundoplication, radiofrequency energy delivery) and preference for pharmacologic/behavioral therapy. RESULTS: Laparoscopic fundoplication was deemed appropriate for elevated EAE, and moderately appropriate for positive symptom-reflux association for regurgitation and a large hiatal hernia with normal EAE. Magnetic sphincter augmentation was deemed moderately appropriate for elevated EAE without a large hiatal hernia. Transoral incisionless fundoplication and radiofrequency energy delivery were not judged appropriate in any scenario. Preference for non-invasive options was as follows: H2RA for elevated EAE, transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation inhibitors for elevated reflux episodes, and neuromodulation/behavioral therapy for positive symptom-reflux association. CONCLUSION: For treatment of PPI unresponsive symptoms in proven GERD, expert esophagologists recommend invasive therapy only in the presence of abnormal reflux burden, with or without hiatal hernia, or regurgitation with positive symptom-reflux association and a large hiatus hernia. Non-invasive pharmacologic or behavioral therapies are preferred for all other scenarios.
Asunto(s)
Reflujo Gastroesofágico/tratamiento farmacológico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Terapia Conductista , California , Árboles de Decisión , Esquema de Medicación , Esofagoscopía , Femenino , Fundoplicación , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIM: The most effective schedule of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) administration and the optimal timing of endoscopy in acute peptic ulcer bleeding remain uncertain. The aim of this study was to determine the most efficient PPI regimen and optimal timing of endoscopy. METHODS: Consecutive patients with suspected bleeding peptic ulcers were enrolled and randomized to receive either a standard regimen or a high-dose intensive intravenous regimen. Only patients with bleeding peptic ulcers diagnosed at initial endoscopy continued the study. High-risk patients received endoscopic hemostasis. The primary outcome measure of recurrent bleeding was compared between the two dosage regimens and between early and late endoscopy. Secondary outcome measures compared included need for endoscopic treatment, blood transfusion, hospital stay, surgery and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 875 patients completed the study. Recurrent bleeding occurred in 11.0% in the standard regimen group, statistically higher than that in the intensive regimen group (6.4%, P=0.02). Mean units of blood transfused and duration of hospital stay were also higher in the standard regimen group (P<0.001 for each compared to intensive regimen group). However, no significant differences were noted between the two groups in the need for endoscopic hemostasis, need for surgery, and mortality. Recurrence of bleeding was similar between the early and late endoscopy groups. Units of blood transfused and length of hospital stay were both significantly reduced with early endoscopy. CONCLUSION: High-dose PPI infusion is more efficacious in reducing rebleeding rate, blood transfusion requirements and hospital stay. Early endoscopy is safe and more effective than late endoscopy.